Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Colorado by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado Yes 24.2 (23.6, 24.8) N/A 1,489 falling falling trend -4.4 (-4.8, -4.0)
United States No 35.0 (34.9, 35.0) N/A 142,497 falling falling trend -4.8 (-5.1, -4.6)
Prowers County No 48.3 (33.8, 67.4) 1 (1, 14) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Logan County No 32.8 (24.2, 43.8) 2 (1, 26) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Morgan County No 31.9 (24.2, 41.4) 3 (1, 26) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Montrose County No 31.5 (25.8, 38.4) 4 (1, 21) 23 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Fremont County No 31.2 (25.8, 37.7) 5 (1, 22) 24 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Moffat County No 31.2 (20.1, 46.6) 6 (1, 31) 5
*
*
Las Animas County No 31.1 (22.1, 43.6) 7 (1, 29) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Montezuma County No 30.4 (23.2, 39.6) 8 (1, 27) 13 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.3)
Adams County 8 No 30.3 (27.9, 32.8) 9 (2, 15) 127 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.4, -2.7)
Delta County No 29.4 (23.3, 37.0) 10 (1, 25) 17 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.2)
Pueblo County No 29.0 (25.9, 32.3) 11 (3, 20) 69 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Mesa County No 28.1 (25.0, 31.5) 12 (3, 21) 61 falling falling trend -5.5 (-7.8, -3.2)
Weld County 8 No 26.4 (23.8, 29.3) 13 (6, 24) 78 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.3, -2.5)
El Paso County No 26.1 (24.4, 27.9) 14 (8, 22) 184 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.5, -2.4)
Otero County No 25.8 (18.3, 36.0) 15 (2, 31) 8 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.8)
Arapahoe County Yes 25.0 (23.2, 26.8) 16 (11, 24) 162 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.3, -2.6)
Elbert County Yes 24.9 (16.8, 35.6) 17 (2, 32) 7 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.8)
Denver County Yes 24.3 (22.6, 26.1) 18 (12, 25) 159 falling falling trend -6.0 (-7.7, -4.2)
Teller County Yes 23.6 (16.2, 33.5) 19 (2, 32) 8 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.2)
Alamosa County Yes 23.5 (14.2, 36.7) 20 (2, 34) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.4)
Jefferson County 8 Yes 23.4 (21.8, 25.1) 21 (14, 26) 168 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.1, -2.8)
Garfield County Yes 23.2 (17.8, 29.7) 22 (4, 32) 13 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.6)
Broomfield County 8 Yes 23.1 (18.3, 28.7) 23 (6, 31) 17 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.3, 0.4)
Huerfano County Yes 22.7 (12.0, 42.9) 24 (1, 34) 3 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Rio Grande County Yes 21.8 (13.0, 35.5) 25 (2, 34) 4
*
*
Chaffee County Yes 21.4 (15.0, 30.6) 26 (5, 33) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.8)
Larimer County Yes 20.5 (18.6, 22.6) 27 (19, 31) 85 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.1, -3.0)
Douglas County Yes 19.3 (17.1, 21.7) 28 (21, 32) 59 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.1, -3.1)
Boulder County 8 Yes 18.9 (16.9, 21.1) 29 (22, 32) 67 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.1, -3.0)
La Plata County Yes 17.6 (13.3, 22.9) 30 (18, 33) 12 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.1)
Archuleta County Yes 15.7 (8.6, 27.3) 31 (10, 34) 3
*
*
Park County Yes 13.8 (7.8, 23.4) 32 (17, 34) 4 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.4, -0.8)
Routt County Yes 12.9 (7.4, 21.0) 33 (20, 34) 4 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.6, -3.0)
Eagle County Yes 9.7 (5.6, 15.3) 34 (29, 34) 4 falling falling trend -5.2 (-7.9, -2.5)
Baca County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bent County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheyenne County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clear Creek County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conejos County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Costilla County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crowley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Custer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dolores County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilpin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grand County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gunnison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kit Carson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ouray County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pitkin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rio Blanco County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Saguache County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Miguel County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sedgwick County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Summit County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yuma County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/27/2022 12:11 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top