Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Georgia by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Georgia No 129.5 (128.2, 130.7) N/A 8,211 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
United States No 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) N/A 283,896 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Fulton County No 124.1 (120.0, 128.3) 113 (85, 129) 709 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.0)
Gwinnett County Yes 121.4 (116.6, 126.3) 122 (92, 135) 519 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.9)
Cobb County No 125.1 (120.2, 130.2) 109 (79, 128) 514 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
DeKalb County Yes 114.8 (110.2, 119.5) 134 (109, 142) 497 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.5)
Chatham County Yes 122.0 (114.9, 129.5) 121 (79, 140) 230 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Muscogee County No 155.1 (145.1, 165.7) 33 (11, 75) 186 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.1)
Richmond County No 146.6 (137.1, 156.7) 56 (19, 93) 183 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Cherokee County Yes 121.0 (112.9, 129.4) 123 (77, 141) 178 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Clayton County No 134.2 (124.9, 144.0) 87 (38, 121) 176 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Henry County No 142.5 (132.8, 152.7) 61 (25, 103) 172 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Hall County No 123.3 (114.6, 132.5) 117 (70, 138) 154 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Bibb County No 129.9 (120.1, 140.3) 95 (46, 134) 137 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Forsyth County Yes 107.2 (99.0, 116.0) 140 (110, 152) 128 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Houston County No 131.5 (120.9, 142.7) 91 (42, 131) 117 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Floyd County No 156.8 (143.5, 171.1) 30 (7, 85) 107 stable stable trend 2.5 (0.0, 5.1)
Coweta County No 123.3 (112.9, 134.5) 116 (61, 143) 107 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Paulding County No 129.6 (118.5, 141.4) 96 (43, 136) 107 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Douglas County No 141.3 (129.2, 154.2) 65 (22, 120) 106 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Columbia County Yes 119.0 (108.9, 129.8) 128 (72, 144) 106 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.5)
Newton County No 150.4 (137.0, 164.8) 46 (9, 102) 96 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Glynn County No 140.3 (127.5, 154.3) 69 (21, 127) 95 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Carroll County No 137.8 (125.6, 151.0) 78 (23, 129) 95 falling falling trend -11.0 (-19.0, -2.2)
Fayette County Yes 109.1 (99.0, 120.0) 139 (98, 152) 91 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Bartow County No 141.6 (128.5, 155.6) 64 (19, 124) 90 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Walton County No 140.3 (127.1, 154.5) 70 (21, 121) 85 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Dougherty County No 133.8 (120.8, 147.9) 89 (29, 136) 82 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Whitfield County No 124.7 (112.5, 137.9) 110 (51, 145) 78 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Clarke County No 123.3 (110.9, 136.8) 115 (54, 145) 75 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Lowndes County Yes 116.9 (105.2, 129.7) 131 (70, 150) 74 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.2)
Rockdale County No 131.3 (118.0, 145.9) 92 (31, 139) 74 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Walker County No 140.8 (126.2, 156.7) 67 (16, 127) 73 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Spalding County No 151.4 (135.7, 168.5) 42 (7, 106) 72 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Barrow County No 150.1 (134.3, 167.2) 49 (8, 108) 68 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
Catoosa County No 130.6 (116.5, 146.0) 94 (33, 140) 65 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Troup County No 138.0 (123.0, 154.5) 77 (20, 133) 64 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Jackson County No 139.2 (123.5, 156.4) 74 (19, 134) 59 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Gordon County No 148.8 (131.5, 167.9) 53 (8, 120) 55 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Bulloch County No 134.7 (118.4, 152.7) 84 (18, 141) 51 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Thomas County No 149.6 (131.0, 170.4) 51 (6, 127) 49 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Polk County No 171.8 (150.3, 195.6) 9 (1, 76) 48 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Effingham County No 138.5 (120.5, 158.5) 75 (14, 139) 45 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Laurens County No 124.1 (107.5, 142.8) 111 (31, 148) 43 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Habersham County No 128.3 (111.3, 147.5) 99 (26, 147) 42 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Tift County No 154.7 (133.8, 178.1) 34 (4, 122) 41 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Colquitt County No 140.9 (121.8, 162.2) 66 (10, 138) 41 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Murray County No 157.2 (135.8, 181.2) 28 (2, 118) 40 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Camden County No 134.9 (116.1, 156.0) 83 (15, 145) 39 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Baldwin County No 140.7 (121.0, 163.0) 68 (8, 142) 39 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Ware County No 146.4 (125.7, 169.8) 57 (6, 131) 38 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3)
Fannin County No 148.2 (125.2, 175.1) 54 (4, 139) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Liberty County No 144.0 (123.3, 167.1) 60 (8, 136) 37 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Pickens County No 135.9 (115.8, 159.1) 81 (12, 146) 35 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Gilmer County No 134.3 (113.6, 158.3) 86 (10, 147) 35 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Upson County No 157.8 (134.4, 184.6) 26 (2, 121) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Sumter County No 163.4 (139.0, 191.3) 16 (1, 114) 34 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Bryan County No 171.4 (145.5, 200.6) 10 (1, 96) 32 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Stephens County No 163.7 (138.7, 192.4) 15 (1, 119) 32 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Coffee County No 124.1 (105.2, 145.6) 112 (29, 152) 32 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Madison County No 155.4 (131.7, 182.6) 32 (2, 127) 32 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Union County Yes 104.1 (87.9, 124.3) 145 (82, 155) 31 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Haralson County No 152.2 (128.8, 179.0) 37 (3, 136) 31 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Chattooga County No 170.3 (143.4, 201.3) 11 (1, 101) 30 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Toombs County No 160.0 (134.9, 188.8) 22 (2, 118) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Harris County No 125.3 (105.5, 148.1) 108 (23, 152) 30 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
White County No 126.5 (105.8, 150.6) 103 (21, 150) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Wayne County No 156.1 (131.6, 184.1) 31 (2, 128) 30 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Peach County No 157.5 (132.4, 186.3) 27 (2, 126) 29 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Hart County No 131.3 (110.1, 156.2) 93 (13, 148) 29 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Decatur County No 150.2 (126.0, 178.0) 48 (3, 137) 29 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Lumpkin County No 126.9 (105.9, 151.2) 102 (23, 151) 28 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Butts County No 170.0 (141.9, 202.5) 12 (1, 103) 27 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.0)
Franklin County No 149.9 (125.2, 178.7) 50 (3, 137) 27 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Monroe County Yes 120.1 (99.2, 144.7) 125 (30, 154) 25 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Oconee County Yes 102.5 (84.8, 122.9) 147 (73, 155) 24 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Mitchell County No 150.5 (124.2, 181.4) 45 (2, 142) 24 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.7)
Lee County No 151.6 (125.0, 182.2) 40 (3, 140) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Meriwether County No 138.4 (113.8, 167.6) 76 (6, 148) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
McDuffie County No 151.5 (124.5, 183.1) 41 (1, 142) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Jones County Yes 112.6 (92.8, 136.0) 135 (43, 155) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Dawson County No 125.9 (102.7, 153.3) 107 (16, 153) 23 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Crisp County No 126.3 (103.3, 153.5) 105 (16, 153) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Putnam County Yes 119.2 (97.2, 145.7) 127 (28, 154) 23 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Emanuel County No 148.9 (121.4, 181.0) 52 (2, 144) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Morgan County No 153.5 (125.3, 186.9) 35 (2, 141) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Rabun County No 135.2 (109.6, 166.7) 82 (6, 150) 22 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Grady County Yes 122.4 (100.0, 148.8) 120 (19, 154) 22 falling falling trend -6.1 (-11.3, -0.7)
Washington County No 136.7 (111.4, 167.0) 80 (5, 150) 21 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.2)
Elbert County No 126.2 (102.1, 155.2) 106 (14, 154) 21 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Jefferson County No 166.9 (135.6, 204.3) 13 (1, 131) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Worth County No 127.6 (103.4, 156.5) 100 (10, 154) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Brantley County No 158.6 (128.1, 194.7) 25 (1, 142) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Appling County No 151.7 (122.5, 186.5) 39 (2, 145) 20 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8)
Berrien County No 142.2 (114.8, 174.8) 62 (4, 149) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Pike County No 156.9 (126.9, 192.5) 29 (1, 137) 19 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Greene County Yes 116.9 (92.5, 147.2) 130 (19, 155) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Pierce County No 146.0 (117.6, 179.8) 58 (2, 147) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Tattnall County No 127.2 (102.2, 157.0) 101 (9, 154) 19 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Dodge County Yes 120.8 (96.7, 149.9) 124 (15, 154) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Dade County No 140.1 (112.0, 174.4) 72 (3, 152) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Burke County Yes 116.0 (92.3, 144.4) 132 (22, 155) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Ben Hill County No 140.2 (110.8, 175.5) 71 (4, 151) 17 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.7)
Cook County No 144.8 (115.2, 180.2) 59 (2, 151) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Brooks County No 134.4 (105.9, 169.3) 85 (4, 152) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Screven County No 146.8 (116.4, 184.1) 55 (2, 148) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.3)
Jasper County No 159.6 (125.5, 201.0) 23 (1, 143) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Oglethorpe County No 131.5 (103.5, 165.9) 90 (6, 153) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Towns County Yes 102.1 (79.3, 134.0) 148 (43, 155) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Lamar County No 122.8 (95.8, 155.5) 119 (11, 155) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Crawford County No 176.2 (136.1, 225.4) 4 (1, 135) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.7)
Telfair County No 123.8 (95.5, 159.7) 114 (9, 155) 14 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.3)
Macon County No 152.9 (117.8, 196.7) 36 (1, 147) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Seminole County No 188.5 (144.4, 244.3) 1 (1, 131) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Wilkes County No 160.2 (121.6, 209.2) 21 (1, 150) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
McIntosh County Yes 103.0 (78.1, 135.3) 146 (28, 155) 14 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.5)
Banks County Yes 101.9 (78.0, 131.5) 150 (45, 155) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Charlton County No 163.1 (123.9, 212.0) 18 (1, 147) 13 stable stable trend 4.2 (-1.8, 10.7)
Bleckley County No 126.4 (94.7, 166.3) 104 (5, 155) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Terrell County No 163.3 (121.2, 217.0) 17 (1, 151) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Evans County No 150.2 (112.6, 197.4) 47 (1, 152) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Heard County No 137.5 (102.6, 181.4) 79 (2, 154) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Jeff Davis County Yes 115.5 (86.1, 152.3) 133 (14, 155) 11 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.0)
Jenkins County No 172.1 (127.7, 229.0) 7 (1, 146) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 1.9)
Dooly County Yes 101.0 (73.6, 137.1) 151 (33, 155) 10 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.4)
Marion County No 150.9 (110.6, 203.3) 43 (1, 153) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.7)
Hancock County No 139.6 (98.8, 195.4) 73 (1, 155) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Turner County No 164.5 (118.5, 223.8) 14 (1, 152) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 2.7)
Early County Yes 111.7 (80.8, 152.1) 136 (13, 155) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Pulaski County Yes 93.5 (67.9, 127.6) 155 (55, 155) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -0.9)
Wilcox County No 174.3 (124.8, 239.0) 6 (1, 151) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Randolph County No 134.1 (93.6, 189.1) 88 (2, 155) 9 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Treutlen County No 182.8 (131.1, 250.3) 3 (1, 144) 9
*
*
Candler County Yes 105.5 (76.3, 143.9) 143 (25, 155) 9 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.7)
Long County Yes 104.4 (74.0, 142.5) 144 (20, 155) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.4)
Bacon County Yes 111.3 (79.4, 152.8) 138 (15, 155) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Taylor County Yes 119.7 (84.7, 166.9) 126 (5, 155) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Clinch County No 171.9 (120.5, 239.2) 8 (1, 152) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Johnson County Yes 118.1 (81.1, 167.8) 129 (4, 155) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.0)
Twiggs County Yes 111.3 (76.9, 158.8) 137 (7, 155) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Montgomery County No 123.2 (85.3, 173.5) 118 (4, 155) 7 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.2)
Atkinson County No 158.8 (110.0, 222.3) 24 (1, 155) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.5)
Lincoln County Yes 100.1 (68.4, 144.8) 152 (18, 155) 7 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
Wilkinson County Yes 102.1 (70.5, 145.0) 149 (19, 155) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Calhoun County No 186.6 (126.7, 268.5) 2 (1, 152) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.1)
Lanier County Yes 107.0 (73.2, 151.7) 141 (9, 155) 7
*
*
Miller County No 129.0 (88.2, 186.6) 97 (1, 155) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.8)
Warren County No 129.0 (88.0, 188.1) 98 (1, 155) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.3)
Talbot County Yes 98.9 (67.3, 147.0) 153 (21, 155) 6 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Irwin County Yes 95.5 (63.7, 139.2) 154 (24, 155) 6 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
Stewart County No 161.9 (104.7, 245.3) 19 (1, 155) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Clay County No 151.9 (94.3, 244.2) 38 (1, 155) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.7)
Wheeler County Yes 106.8 (66.7, 166.1) 142 (5, 155) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.2)
Baker County No 161.2 (99.1, 257.8) 20 (1, 155) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.3, 2.6)
Quitman County No 174.8 (105.1, 293.1) 5 (1, 155) 4
*
*
Glascock County No 150.6 (85.6, 252.4) 44 (1, 155) 3
*
*
Chattahoochee County No 141.8 (79.8, 229.8) 63 (1, 155) 3
*
*
Echols County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taliaferro County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/19/2024 9:49 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top