Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Georgia by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Georgia N/A No 128.7 (127.5, 130.0) N/A 8,472 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.7)
United States N/A No 126.4 (126.2, 126.6) N/A 285,526 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Baker County Rural No 186.6 (115.5, 295.2) 1 (1, 155) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.9)
Chattooga County Rural No 184.5 (156.8, 216.3) 2 (1, 78) 33 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4)
Chattahoochee County Urban No 183.3 (107.5, 288.1) 3 (1, 155) 4
*
*
Crawford County Urban No 179.8 (140.6, 227.9) 4 (1, 139) 16 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 2.2)
Madison County Urban No 173.8 (149.1, 201.9) 5 (1, 85) 37 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.9)
Wilkes County Rural No 173.0 (131.1, 225.8) 6 (1, 146) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Wayne County Rural No 171.8 (146.1, 201.1) 7 (1, 103) 33 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.6)
Calhoun County Rural No 171.4 (107.4, 262.6) 8 (1, 155) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.0)
Polk County Rural No 171.3 (149.6, 195.4) 9 (1, 82) 47 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Pike County Urban No 170.4 (139.4, 206.7) 10 (1, 123) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 1.0)
Toombs County Rural No 170.2 (144.1, 199.9) 11 (1, 98) 32 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Atkinson County Rural No 169.5 (121.0, 232.0) 12 (1, 153) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.6)
Montgomery County Rural No 168.4 (121.4, 228.6) 13 (1, 153) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Stewart County Urban No 168.3 (107.5, 262.2) 14 (1, 155) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 2.0)
Wilcox County Rural No 164.2 (116.6, 226.8) 15 (1, 153) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Terrell County Urban No 163.2 (123.4, 213.8) 16 (1, 149) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.5)
Charlton County Rural No 162.4 (122.3, 212.9) 17 (1, 150) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.5)
Evans County Rural No 161.0 (120.8, 211.0) 18 (1, 151) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Appling County Rural No 160.1 (129.8, 196.1) 19 (1, 142) 20 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.1)
Telfair County Rural No 160.0 (121.1, 209.3) 20 (1, 150) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Ben Hill County Rural No 159.6 (129.6, 195.2) 21 (1, 142) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Franklin County Rural No 159.4 (133.8, 189.1) 22 (2, 132) 29 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Butts County Urban No 158.2 (131.6, 189.1) 23 (1, 136) 26 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.1)
Clinch County Rural No 157.5 (108.0, 223.0) 24 (1, 155) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.6)
Murray County Urban No 157.4 (136.2, 181.2) 25 (3, 119) 41 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Spalding County Urban No 157.2 (141.4, 174.5) 26 (4, 98) 77 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Upson County Rural No 156.6 (133.4, 183.2) 27 (2, 128) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Floyd County Urban No 156.6 (143.3, 170.9) 28 (7, 85) 107 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Sumter County Rural No 156.1 (132.0, 183.5) 29 (3, 132) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Peach County Urban No 156.0 (131.1, 184.6) 30 (2, 133) 30 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.1)
Stephens County Rural No 155.5 (132.3, 182.3) 31 (2, 130) 35 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Jefferson County Rural No 155.1 (124.6, 191.9) 32 (1, 144) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Liberty County Urban No 154.9 (134.2, 177.9) 33 (3, 122) 43 stable stable trend 6.7 (-0.8, 16.1)
Tift County Rural No 154.9 (134.4, 177.9) 34 (4, 117) 43 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Barrow County Urban No 154.8 (139.0, 172.0) 35 (5, 104) 72 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 1.0)
Bartow County Urban No 154.1 (140.8, 168.4) 36 (9, 94) 102 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Emanuel County Rural No 154.1 (126.6, 186.1) 37 (2, 143) 23 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.5)
Gordon County Rural No 153.9 (136.5, 173.0) 38 (4, 111) 58 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Treutlen County Rural No 153.6 (104.5, 219.7) 39 (1, 155) 7
*
*
Pierce County Rural No 153.1 (123.5, 188.1) 40 (1, 145) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Macon County Rural No 152.6 (114.9, 200.3) 41 (1, 153) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Haralson County Urban No 151.5 (128.0, 178.3) 42 (3, 137) 30 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Mitchell County Rural No 151.4 (125.3, 182.1) 43 (2, 143) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Hancock County Rural No 150.6 (107.3, 209.3) 44 (1, 155) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Bryan County Urban No 149.3 (126.5, 175.0) 45 (3, 135) 32 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.2)
Seminole County Rural No 149.3 (111.2, 198.4) 46 (1, 153) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Thomas County Rural No 149.1 (130.7, 169.6) 47 (6, 127) 50 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Ware County Rural No 148.8 (128.1, 172.2) 48 (5, 137) 39 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Washington County Rural No 148.3 (121.1, 180.6) 49 (2, 146) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Dade County Urban No 148.3 (119.1, 183.6) 50 (2, 149) 19 falling falling trend -3.4 (-15.2, -0.5)
McIntosh County Urban No 148.2 (113.3, 192.8) 51 (1, 153) 15 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Hart County Rural No 148.0 (125.4, 174.3) 52 (4, 139) 33 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Brantley County Urban No 147.8 (117.2, 184.4) 53 (1, 150) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.8)
Meriwether County Urban No 146.6 (121.5, 176.1) 54 (4, 144) 26 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Walton County Urban No 146.1 (133.1, 160.0) 55 (15, 111) 96 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Richmond County Urban No 145.6 (136.2, 155.5) 56 (23, 99) 188 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Dawson County Urban No 145.5 (121.6, 173.3) 57 (4, 144) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.8)
Fannin County Rural No 145.2 (122.5, 171.9) 58 (4, 143) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.5)
Berrien County Rural No 144.8 (116.6, 178.5) 59 (3, 149) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Muscogee County Urban No 144.7 (135.3, 154.5) 60 (23, 99) 186 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Jeff Davis County Rural No 144.6 (111.5, 185.1) 61 (1, 152) 13 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Johnson County Rural No 144.4 (103.3, 198.8) 62 (1, 155) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.5)
Morgan County Urban No 144.4 (118.6, 174.8) 63 (4, 148) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Tattnall County Rural No 144.2 (116.9, 176.4) 64 (3, 148) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Rabun County Rural No 142.6 (115.3, 175.9) 65 (3, 149) 23 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.1)
Elbert County Rural No 142.5 (116.9, 172.8) 66 (3, 148) 24 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Randolph County Rural No 142.4 (97.6, 203.5) 67 (1, 155) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.0)
Quitman County Rural No 142.2 (81.5, 253.2) 68 (1, 155) 4
*
*
Dougherty County Urban No 141.1 (127.6, 155.7) 69 (21, 131) 85 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Decatur County Rural No 140.7 (118.1, 166.6) 70 (5, 147) 29 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Lee County Urban No 139.8 (115.9, 167.3) 71 (5, 148) 25 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.6)
Heard County Urban No 139.5 (104.8, 183.3) 72 (2, 154) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 1.1)
Oglethorpe County Urban No 139.4 (110.1, 175.2) 73 (2, 153) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.4)
Douglas County Urban No 139.2 (127.3, 151.8) 74 (27, 125) 107 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Newton County Urban No 138.1 (125.5, 151.6) 75 (24, 130) 91 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Henry County Urban No 138.0 (128.7, 147.7) 76 (31, 116) 177 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Cook County Rural No 137.5 (108.7, 172.1) 77 (4, 153) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Walker County Urban No 137.3 (122.9, 153.1) 78 (19, 138) 71 falling falling trend -2.2 (-8.6, -0.9)
Whitfield County Urban No 137.3 (124.5, 151.2) 79 (26, 131) 86 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Jenkins County Rural No 136.6 (97.1, 188.8) 80 (1, 155) 8 falling falling trend -20.2 (-37.1, -0.7)
Pickens County Urban No 136.3 (116.9, 158.7) 81 (12, 146) 37 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Lanier County Urban No 136.0 (96.4, 187.0) 82 (1, 155) 8
*
*
Habersham County Rural No 135.5 (118.2, 154.9) 83 (20, 145) 46 falling falling trend -0.9 (-2.0, -0.1)
Taylor County Rural No 135.4 (97.1, 186.6) 84 (1, 155) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
Clayton County Urban No 135.4 (126.3, 144.8) 85 (42, 124) 189 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Carroll County Urban No 134.8 (122.7, 147.7) 86 (34, 134) 94 falling falling trend -4.1 (-11.3, -0.7)
Brooks County Urban No 134.5 (106.9, 168.2) 87 (5, 152) 18 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Camden County Rural No 134.3 (116.1, 154.7) 88 (17, 146) 41 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.2)
Rockdale County Urban No 133.9 (120.8, 148.1) 89 (30, 139) 81 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Colquitt County Rural No 133.9 (115.4, 154.6) 90 (17, 147) 39 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Early County Rural No 133.2 (100.0, 175.2) 91 (2, 155) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Banks County Rural No 133.1 (105.1, 167.0) 92 (5, 154) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.2)
Gilmer County Rural No 132.5 (111.9, 156.3) 93 (11, 149) 36 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.1)
Baldwin County Rural No 131.7 (112.4, 153.5) 94 (18, 147) 36 falling falling trend -5.2 (-17.1, -0.3)
White County Rural No 131.4 (110.2, 156.3) 95 (16, 151) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.5)
Effingham County Urban No 131.1 (114.0, 150.1) 96 (22, 147) 44 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Long County Urban No 130.3 (94.3, 175.0) 97 (2, 155) 10 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.6, 0.3)
McDuffie County Urban No 130.1 (105.5, 159.2) 98 (10, 153) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Glynn County Urban No 129.9 (117.8, 143.0) 99 (41, 142) 94 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Coweta County Urban No 129.7 (119.1, 141.0) 100 (49, 140) 115 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.2)
Crisp County Rural No 129.3 (104.8, 158.6) 101 (9, 153) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Bacon County Rural No 129.1 (94.8, 172.7) 102 (2, 155) 10 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.4)
Troup County Rural No 128.8 (114.4, 144.7) 103 (37, 146) 61 falling falling trend -2.1 (-6.0, -1.2)
Pulaski County Rural No 128.6 (96.2, 170.4) 104 (3, 155) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Screven County Rural No 128.6 (99.9, 164.3) 105 (5, 154) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Coffee County Rural No 128.0 (108.8, 149.7) 106 (24, 151) 33 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Worth County Urban No 127.8 (103.7, 156.6) 107 (14, 153) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Bibb County Urban No 127.2 (117.6, 137.3) 108 (58, 140) 138 falling falling trend -2.6 (-9.2, -0.8)
Lincoln County Urban No 126.5 (89.3, 177.1) 109 (2, 155) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Bulloch County Rural No 126.4 (111.0, 143.3) 110 (32, 149) 50 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Jackson County Rural No 126.1 (111.8, 141.9) 111 (45, 148) 58 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.2)
Hall County Urban No 126.1 (117.4, 135.3) 112 (63, 139) 162 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Jasper County Urban No 125.0 (96.6, 160.2) 113 (8, 155) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Putnam County Rural No 124.8 (102.2, 151.8) 114 (16, 153) 24 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.0, 0.0)
Union County Rural No 124.8 (106.4, 147.1) 115 (27, 151) 38 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.6)
Paulding County Urban No 124.6 (114.0, 136.0) 116 (58, 144) 106 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.7)
Houston County Urban No 124.4 (114.5, 134.9) 117 (65, 144) 119 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Lumpkin County Urban No 124.0 (103.4, 148.0) 118 (21, 153) 28 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.5)
Catoosa County Urban No 124.0 (110.5, 138.8) 119 (44, 148) 64 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Fulton County Urban No 123.0 (118.9, 127.1) 120 (91, 134) 723 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.8)
Clarke County Urban Yes 122.3 (110.2, 135.3) 121 (58, 148) 78 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Monroe County Urban Yes 122.2 (101.5, 146.5) 122 (28, 154) 26 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.7)
Harris County Urban Yes 122.1 (102.8, 144.5) 123 (35, 153) 30 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Cobb County Urban Yes 121.4 (116.7, 126.3) 124 (92, 138) 525 falling falling trend -1.3 (-4.8, -0.4)
Marion County Urban Yes 121.2 (84.3, 171.8) 125 (2, 155) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 2.4)
Lowndes County Urban Yes 121.1 (109.2, 133.9) 126 (60, 149) 78 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Grady County Rural Yes 120.8 (99.3, 146.1) 127 (22, 154) 23 falling falling trend -3.7 (-17.1, -0.7)
Miller County Rural Yes 120.5 (81.7, 175.7) 128 (2, 155) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.5)
Cherokee County Urban Yes 119.5 (111.9, 127.4) 129 (85, 146) 195 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Lamar County Rural Yes 119.3 (92.8, 151.5) 130 (12, 155) 15 falling falling trend -5.4 (-19.3, -1.5)
Gwinnett County Urban Yes 118.9 (114.3, 123.7) 131 (101, 142) 539 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Burke County Urban Yes 118.9 (95.8, 146.2) 132 (21, 155) 20 falling falling trend -3.5 (-15.6, -1.1)
Twiggs County Urban Yes 118.2 (81.4, 168.8) 133 (3, 155) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Candler County Rural Yes 118.2 (86.4, 159.2) 134 (9, 155) 10 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Laurens County Rural Yes 117.4 (102.0, 134.7) 135 (56, 153) 44 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Dodge County Rural Yes 117.4 (93.9, 145.9) 136 (22, 155) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Chatham County Urban Yes 117.3 (110.5, 124.4) 137 (96, 146) 232 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.6)
Talbot County Urban Yes 116.5 (77.9, 173.9) 138 (3, 155) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2)
DeKalb County Urban Yes 115.7 (111.2, 120.3) 139 (109, 145) 521 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -1.2)
Columbia County Urban Yes 115.3 (105.8, 125.6) 140 (88, 150) 111 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.5)
Greene County Rural Yes 115.1 (92.5, 143.1) 141 (32, 155) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.6)
Turner County Rural Yes 113.4 (77.0, 162.0) 142 (4, 155) 7 falling falling trend -43.8 (-63.3, -9.4)
Warren County Rural Yes 112.4 (73.1, 170.7) 143 (3, 155) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.1, 1.4)
Dooly County Rural Yes 111.0 (77.7, 155.6) 144 (9, 155) 9 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Irwin County Rural Yes 109.6 (75.6, 155.1) 145 (9, 155) 7 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Clay County Rural Yes 109.0 (60.7, 195.8) 146 (1, 155) 3 falling falling trend -5.3 (-23.8, -2.1)
Fayette County Urban Yes 107.8 (98.2, 118.2) 147 (108, 153) 98 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.7)
Schley County Rural Yes 107.7 (62.9, 176.1) 148 (1, 155) 4 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.3)
Jones County Urban Yes 105.6 (86.2, 128.5) 149 (61, 155) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Wilkinson County Rural Yes 104.7 (72.6, 148.3) 150 (19, 155) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Wheeler County Rural Yes 104.2 (65.0, 163.3) 151 (6, 155) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.2)
Forsyth County Urban Yes 103.6 (95.9, 111.7) 152 (127, 154) 138 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.6)
Bleckley County Rural Yes 100.9 (74.2, 135.6) 153 (38, 155) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Oconee County Urban Yes 93.8 (77.7, 112.6) 154 (107, 155) 24 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -0.9)
Towns County Rural Yes 91.6 (69.8, 122.0) 155 (90, 155) 15 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.0, 0.1)
Echols County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glascock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taliaferro County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/07/2024 10:52 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top