Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Illinois by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois No 155.3 (154.4, 156.2) N/A 24,068 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.6)
United States No 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) N/A 599,666 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Mason County No 224.5 (196.7, 255.9) 1 (1, 30) 50 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Gallatin County No 218.4 (172.1, 275.1) 2 (1, 90) 17 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Pulaski County No 215.5 (172.2, 268.2) 3 (1, 90) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Hardin County No 210.1 (162.6, 270.7) 4 (1, 98) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Marion County No 207.9 (190.7, 226.4) 5 (1, 31) 115 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Ford County No 207.8 (179.3, 240.2) 6 (1, 67) 41 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Alexander County No 207.3 (168.1, 254.6) 7 (1, 86) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Saline County No 205.2 (184.0, 228.3) 8 (1, 46) 72 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Scott County No 203.0 (158.3, 258.1) 9 (1, 100) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Brown County No 200.1 (157.4, 251.7) 10 (1, 99) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.7)
Fulton County No 196.9 (179.9, 215.3) 11 (1, 54) 104 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Iroquois County No 194.6 (176.0, 215.0) 12 (2, 57) 86 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
Lawrence County No 194.4 (168.6, 223.5) 13 (1, 77) 42 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Vermilion County No 194.0 (182.3, 206.5) 14 (3, 40) 213 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Logan County No 193.6 (174.4, 214.6) 15 (1, 61) 77 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Pike County No 191.4 (167.2, 218.7) 16 (1, 81) 48 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
La Salle County No 188.1 (178.4, 198.2) 17 (6, 42) 298 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Mercer County No 186.3 (162.8, 212.9) 18 (2, 85) 47 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Marshall County No 185.1 (158.2, 216.1) 19 (2, 92) 36 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.1)
Christian County No 184.5 (167.6, 202.8) 20 (4, 74) 92 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Cass County No 182.8 (153.9, 216.0) 21 (1, 95) 30 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Kankakee County No 182.4 (172.4, 193.0) 22 (9, 56) 256 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
De Witt County No 181.7 (157.4, 209.1) 23 (2, 91) 42 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Macoupin County No 181.0 (166.6, 196.3) 24 (7, 72) 125 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Clay County No 180.6 (154.2, 210.7) 25 (2, 94) 36 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
White County No 179.8 (155.1, 207.9) 26 (2, 93) 41 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Lee County No 179.1 (162.8, 196.9) 27 (6, 79) 92 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Morgan County No 179.1 (162.3, 197.3) 28 (6, 78) 90 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Livingston County No 178.8 (162.5, 196.6) 29 (6, 79) 93 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Franklin County No 178.4 (163.2, 194.9) 30 (7, 76) 105 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Grundy County No 177.7 (162.2, 194.4) 31 (7, 79) 100 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Montgomery County No 177.4 (159.8, 196.8) 32 (5, 85) 78 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Union County No 176.7 (154.3, 202.0) 33 (4, 94) 47 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Hamilton County No 175.3 (144.1, 212.3) 34 (1, 102) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Jefferson County No 174.9 (159.1, 191.8) 35 (9, 87) 94 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Crawford County No 174.4 (153.0, 198.4) 36 (4, 92) 49 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Knox County No 174.3 (161.0, 188.6) 37 (11, 77) 135 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Macon County No 173.7 (164.3, 183.6) 38 (16, 71) 271 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Moultrie County No 173.0 (147.7, 201.7) 39 (4, 97) 35 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Williamson County No 172.3 (160.5, 184.8) 40 (14, 76) 164 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Ogle County No 170.8 (157.4, 185.1) 41 (13, 86) 125 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Greene County No 170.3 (144.8, 199.6) 42 (3, 101) 33 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Warren County No 170.1 (146.9, 196.4) 43 (5, 99) 41 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Peoria County No 170.1 (162.5, 178.0) 44 (22, 73) 393 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Douglas County No 170.1 (147.9, 194.9) 45 (5, 100) 45 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Winnebago County No 169.7 (163.8, 175.9) 46 (27, 68) 638 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.6)
Randolph County No 169.6 (153.1, 187.7) 47 (11, 93) 80 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Massac County No 169.0 (144.9, 196.6) 48 (4, 99) 37 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Bureau County No 168.9 (153.3, 185.8) 49 (13, 90) 92 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Madison County No 168.8 (162.7, 175.1) 50 (27, 69) 602 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.8)
St. Clair County No 168.7 (162.3, 175.3) 51 (28, 71) 547 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
Stark County No 168.2 (130.9, 214.7) 52 (1, 102) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
DeKalb County No 167.5 (156.4, 179.3) 53 (20, 82) 174 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Whiteside County No 167.5 (155.3, 180.6) 54 (18, 87) 147 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Jersey County No 166.9 (147.1, 188.9) 55 (8, 97) 54 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Clark County No 165.6 (142.5, 191.8) 56 (8, 101) 39 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Edgar County No 164.9 (144.0, 188.6) 57 (8, 99) 47 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Fayette County No 164.1 (144.1, 186.4) 58 (9, 100) 51 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Perry County No 162.5 (141.9, 185.6) 59 (10, 100) 47 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Rock Island County No 162.1 (154.2, 170.4) 60 (34, 85) 333 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Stephenson County No 161.7 (148.4, 176.0) 61 (19, 94) 119 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
McDonough County No 161.4 (143.2, 181.5) 62 (14, 98) 62 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Sangamon County No 160.6 (153.7, 167.8) 63 (40, 84) 426 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Tazewell County No 160.6 (152.4, 169.1) 64 (36, 86) 304 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
Bond County No 160.4 (137.8, 186.1) 65 (9, 102) 38 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Woodford County No 160.1 (144.7, 176.8) 66 (18, 97) 84 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Richland County No 159.9 (137.4, 185.6) 67 (9, 101) 39 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Johnson County No 159.4 (134.8, 187.9) 68 (7, 102) 31 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Carroll County No 158.2 (135.7, 184.1) 69 (11, 102) 40 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Piatt County No 157.9 (135.5, 183.3) 70 (10, 102) 38 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Will County No 157.6 (153.4, 161.9) 71 (54, 83) 1,122 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Wayne County No 157.4 (136.0, 181.8) 72 (11, 102) 41 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Wabash County No 157.3 (131.7, 187.1) 73 (9, 102) 29 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Pope County No 156.8 (117.2, 210.3) 74 (1, 102) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.4)
Adams County No 156.2 (145.0, 168.1) 75 (34, 95) 157 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Menard County No 155.5 (129.7, 185.5) 76 (8, 102) 28 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Cumberland County No 155.1 (127.7, 187.3) 77 (7, 102) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
McHenry County No 154.9 (149.0, 161.0) 78 (54, 90) 541 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.8)
Schuyler County No 154.6 (123.6, 192.7) 79 (5, 102) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Henry County No 154.3 (141.7, 167.8) 80 (33, 97) 116 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Jackson County No 152.9 (139.4, 167.4) 81 (34, 99) 101 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Cook County No 152.1 (150.7, 153.6) 82 (68, 87) 9,085 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.5, -1.8)
Edwards County No 151.9 (118.9, 192.6) 83 (5, 102) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
McLean County No 149.0 (140.9, 157.4) 84 (58, 97) 263 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Coles County No 148.9 (135.7, 163.2) 85 (40, 101) 98 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Kendall County No 147.3 (136.7, 158.5) 86 (49, 100) 152 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Henderson County No 147.0 (115.7, 185.9) 87 (8, 102) 18 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Calhoun County No 146.5 (112.9, 190.1) 88 (5, 102) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Lake County No 145.5 (141.7, 149.5) 89 (75, 96) 1,141 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Jo Daviess County No 145.2 (128.6, 164.0) 90 (36, 102) 61 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Clinton County No 144.8 (129.7, 161.3) 91 (41, 102) 71 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Effingham County No 143.5 (128.2, 160.4) 92 (42, 102) 66 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Boone County No 143.0 (130.0, 156.9) 93 (54, 102) 92 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Putnam County No 142.9 (110.5, 184.0) 94 (9, 102) 14 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Shelby County No 142.4 (125.2, 161.7) 95 (39, 102) 52 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Hancock County No 140.2 (121.3, 161.8) 96 (37, 102) 43 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Washington County No 138.9 (116.9, 164.4) 97 (32, 102) 30 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Kane County No 137.4 (133.0, 141.9) 98 (85, 101) 780 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
Champaign County No 133.3 (126.2, 140.7) 99 (86, 102) 278 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.8)
DuPage County No 132.6 (129.5, 135.7) 100 (91, 102) 1,478 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.8, -1.5)
Jasper County No 131.4 (106.4, 161.5) 101 (34, 102) 20 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Monroe County No 125.5 (111.3, 141.2) 102 (79, 102) 60 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 4:59 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top