Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Illinois by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois N/A No 131.9 (130.8, 133.0) N/A 11,552 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.5)
United States N/A No 126.4 (126.2, 126.6) N/A 285,526 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Alexander County Urban No 198.2 (142.2, 273.8) 1 (1, 98) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.2)
Bond County Urban No 146.1 (115.6, 183.2) 47 (2, 101) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Boone County Urban No 124.9 (108.8, 142.9) 83 (34, 101) 44 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Calhoun County Urban No 133.7 (84.8, 207.4) 73 (1, 102) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.2)
Champaign County Urban Yes 115.5 (106.6, 125.1) 97 (69, 102) 131 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.5)
Clinton County Urban Yes 119.3 (100.6, 140.8) 92 (30, 102) 31 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Cook County Urban No 127.9 (126.2, 129.6) 81 (66, 87) 4,444 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.3, -1.8)
DeKalb County Urban No 150.9 (136.6, 166.3) 35 (7, 77) 85 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.1)
DuPage County Urban Yes 114.9 (111.1, 118.8) 98 (83, 101) 743 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
Ford County Urban No 141.3 (111.8, 177.8) 62 (3, 102) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Grundy County Urban No 161.2 (141.9, 182.5) 15 (2, 73) 52 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Henry County Urban No 146.0 (129.1, 164.9) 48 (10, 89) 58 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Jersey County Urban No 177.4 (148.9, 210.5) 5 (1, 74) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Kane County Urban Yes 120.6 (115.2, 126.3) 89 (70, 98) 380 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
Kankakee County Urban No 152.8 (140.1, 166.3) 29 (9, 71) 113 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Kendall County Urban Yes 119.7 (107.6, 132.8) 90 (52, 101) 74 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.5)
Lake County Urban Yes 122.1 (117.5, 126.9) 88 (72, 97) 548 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.7)
Macon County Urban No 142.8 (131.3, 155.2) 58 (19, 83) 123 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Macoupin County Urban No 124.6 (108.5, 142.9) 84 (33, 101) 47 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Madison County Urban No 144.5 (136.9, 152.4) 53 (24, 72) 289 falling falling trend -1.0 (-4.3, -0.7)
Marshall County Urban Yes 119.5 (90.4, 157.1) 91 (6, 102) 13 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Massac County Urban No 153.1 (121.5, 191.5) 28 (1, 101) 18 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
McHenry County Urban No 135.0 (127.7, 142.6) 70 (42, 86) 269 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.1, 3.6)
McLean County Urban Yes 122.7 (113.0, 133.0) 87 (56, 100) 123 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Menard County Urban No 146.8 (113.0, 188.8) 44 (1, 102) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 1.0)
Mercer County Urban No 158.5 (128.2, 195.2) 19 (1, 97) 20 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.4)
Monroe County Urban No 124.2 (105.1, 146.3) 85 (24, 102) 32 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Peoria County Urban No 144.7 (135.2, 154.7) 51 (21, 77) 186 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Piatt County Urban Yes 117.2 (92.0, 148.4) 94 (16, 102) 16 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Rock Island County Urban No 134.6 (124.9, 145.0) 71 (33, 90) 154 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Sangamon County Urban No 138.9 (130.3, 147.9) 64 (30, 82) 212 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
St. Clair County Urban No 148.9 (140.8, 157.3) 39 (18, 66) 268 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Stark County Urban No 149.7 (99.5, 220.0) 37 (1, 102) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.3)
Tazewell County Urban No 137.6 (127.3, 148.5) 66 (29, 87) 142 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Will County Urban No 130.4 (125.5, 135.5) 78 (56, 87) 536 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -1.3)
Winnebago County Urban No 143.3 (135.9, 151.0) 57 (26, 74) 299 falling falling trend -2.8 (-6.5, -1.1)
Woodford County Urban No 130.5 (111.5, 152.1) 77 (20, 100) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Adams County Rural No 154.0 (138.3, 171.1) 26 (6, 79) 79 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Brown County Rural No 140.1 (90.8, 211.5) 63 (1, 102) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.7)
Bureau County Rural No 143.7 (124.0, 166.2) 56 (6, 98) 42 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Carroll County Rural No 159.6 (128.4, 197.6) 17 (1, 98) 21 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Cass County Rural No 147.0 (112.5, 189.5) 43 (1, 102) 13 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
Christian County Rural No 163.2 (141.0, 188.5) 13 (1, 78) 43 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Clark County Rural No 178.0 (144.5, 218.0) 4 (1, 82) 21 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 1.9)
Clay County Rural No 165.6 (131.0, 207.8) 12 (1, 96) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
Coles County Rural No 137.9 (120.3, 157.7) 65 (13, 98) 49 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Crawford County Rural No 153.5 (126.3, 185.9) 27 (1, 97) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-11.3, 1.6)
Cumberland County Rural Yes 106.6 (77.2, 145.6) 102 (21, 102) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.6)
De Witt County Rural No 173.6 (141.7, 211.7) 9 (1, 88) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Douglas County Rural No 160.6 (130.8, 195.6) 16 (1, 96) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.5)
Edgar County Rural No 142.8 (115.0, 176.5) 59 (3, 101) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Edwards County Rural Yes 108.1 (70.4, 162.5) 101 (7, 102) 6 falling falling trend -13.6 (-31.5, -0.8)
Effingham County Rural No 128.6 (109.0, 151.0) 80 (18, 102) 33 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Fayette County Rural No 135.1 (110.2, 164.9) 69 (7, 102) 22 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Franklin County Rural No 159.0 (138.4, 182.2) 18 (2, 79) 47 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Fulton County Rural No 174.8 (152.3, 200.4) 7 (1, 60) 47 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Gallatin County Rural No 197.6 (139.2, 276.6) 2 (1, 99) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.9)
Greene County Rural No 175.5 (138.5, 220.9) 6 (1, 90) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Hamilton County Rural No 135.2 (97.6, 185.2) 68 (1, 102) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.0)
Hancock County Rural Yes 119.1 (96.5, 147.0) 93 (21, 102) 21 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Hardin County Rural No 144.5 (93.2, 225.2) 52 (1, 102) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Henderson County Rural No 145.2 (101.6, 205.8) 50 (1, 102) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Iroquois County Rural No 169.7 (146.2, 196.5) 11 (1, 74) 41 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Jackson County Rural No 144.5 (125.9, 165.1) 54 (8, 95) 48 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Jasper County Rural Yes 108.9 (77.9, 150.7) 100 (13, 102) 8 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.2)
Jefferson County Rural No 142.7 (122.8, 165.2) 60 (7, 98) 40 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Jo Daviess County Rural No 123.6 (101.9, 150.1) 86 (18, 102) 27 stable stable trend 14.1 (-1.9, 26.3)
Johnson County Rural No 130.0 (98.4, 170.8) 79 (4, 102) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.4)
Knox County Rural No 155.1 (137.4, 174.8) 24 (4, 77) 64 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
La Salle County Rural No 154.8 (142.9, 167.6) 25 (8, 66) 133 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Lawrence County Rural No 149.9 (117.6, 189.6) 36 (1, 101) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.6)
Lee County Rural No 146.4 (125.6, 170.1) 46 (6, 95) 39 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Livingston County Rural No 157.9 (137.0, 181.5) 20 (3, 83) 45 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Logan County Rural No 155.4 (132.1, 182.2) 23 (2, 89) 35 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Marion County Rural No 180.9 (159.1, 205.3) 3 (1, 45) 54 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Mason County Rural No 156.5 (124.5, 196.0) 22 (1, 99) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
McDonough County Rural No 132.2 (109.0, 159.3) 75 (11, 101) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Montgomery County Rural No 145.4 (123.1, 171.2) 49 (5, 97) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Morgan County Rural No 148.2 (127.6, 171.7) 41 (5, 96) 41 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Moultrie County Rural No 132.2 (102.4, 169.0) 74 (5, 102) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Ogle County Rural No 152.2 (134.9, 171.3) 33 (5, 85) 61 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Perry County Rural No 148.6 (121.7, 180.7) 40 (2, 99) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Pike County Rural No 143.8 (115.0, 179.1) 55 (2, 101) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.9)
Pope County Rural Yes 116.9 (65.3, 206.8) 96 (1, 102) 4
*
*
Pulaski County Rural No 172.4 (119.3, 245.5) 10 (1, 102) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.0)
Putnam County Rural No 152.4 (105.3, 218.4) 31 (1, 102) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 1.0)
Randolph County Rural No 151.5 (129.4, 176.8) 34 (3, 94) 38 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Richland County Rural No 146.4 (117.0, 182.0) 45 (2, 101) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Saline County Rural No 157.0 (133.0, 184.9) 21 (2, 92) 32 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Schuyler County Rural Yes 113.8 (77.4, 166.2) 99 (6, 102) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Scott County Rural No 161.6 (108.6, 236.0) 14 (1, 102) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.1)
Shelby County Rural Yes 116.9 (96.3, 141.9) 95 (32, 102) 23 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Stephenson County Rural No 137.2 (119.8, 156.8) 67 (13, 98) 54 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Union County Rural No 147.2 (118.9, 181.3) 42 (2, 100) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.2)
Vermilion County Rural No 174.7 (159.2, 191.4) 8 (1, 40) 101 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.3)
Wabash County Rural No 142.6 (108.1, 186.2) 61 (1, 102) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Warren County Rural No 152.5 (122.6, 188.4) 30 (2, 100) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Washington County Rural No 127.1 (97.7, 163.8) 82 (7, 102) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Wayne County Rural No 149.5 (120.6, 184.4) 38 (2, 99) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.0)
White County Rural No 134.2 (105.0, 170.5) 72 (5, 102) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Whiteside County Rural No 152.3 (136.3, 170.0) 32 (6, 83) 71 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.6)
Williamson County Rural No 131.3 (117.4, 146.5) 76 (28, 99) 69 falling falling trend -3.6 (-8.9, -1.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/10/2024 10:33 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top