Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Illinois by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois No 158.6 (157.6, 159.7) N/A 18,449 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
United States 6 No 154.4 (154.1, 154.6) N/A 464,265 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Cook County No 150.9 (149.0, 152.9) 84 (73, 92) 5,026 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.6)
DuPage County No 141.2 (137.6, 144.8) 97 (85, 100) 1,271 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Lake County No 151.3 (146.9, 155.8) 83 (67, 94) 948 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Will County No 166.3 (161.4, 171.3) 58 (38, 76) 921 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Kane County No 143.3 (138.2, 148.5) 96 (80, 100) 635 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Madison County No 170.1 (163.7, 176.7) 51 (28, 72) 560 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
Winnebago County No 174.5 (167.8, 181.4) 39 (22, 65) 555 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.4)
McHenry County No 159.6 (153.3, 166.1) 73 (48, 87) 511 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.7)
Sangamon County No 159.5 (152.2, 167.1) 74 (43, 88) 382 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
St. Clair County No 161.2 (153.9, 168.9) 69 (40, 87) 380 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Peoria County No 169.6 (161.2, 178.3) 52 (24, 77) 329 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Tazewell County No 162.5 (154.2, 171.2) 66 (36, 86) 301 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Rock Island County No 166.1 (157.4, 175.2) 59 (28, 83) 294 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
La Salle County No 192.3 (182.2, 203.0) 18 (5, 40) 288 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.4)
McLean County No 150.0 (141.4, 158.9) 87 (59, 99) 243 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Macon County No 173.8 (163.6, 184.5) 41 (18, 76) 238 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Champaign County No 131.3 (123.7, 139.4) 101 (90, 102) 232 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.7)
Kankakee County No 180.6 (169.7, 192.2) 28 (11, 66) 215 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Vermilion County No 194.4 (181.8, 207.7) 16 (4, 44) 191 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
DeKalb County No 169.0 (157.3, 181.3) 53 (18, 85) 162 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Williamson County No 175.7 (163.5, 188.7) 36 (12, 77) 160 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Adams County No 158.4 (146.9, 170.7) 76 (34, 95) 153 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Whiteside County No 170.8 (157.9, 184.7) 49 (16, 86) 138 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Kendall County No 150.6 (138.9, 162.9) 85 (49, 100) 129 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Knox County No 175.6 (161.5, 190.7) 37 (11, 83) 127 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Macoupin County No 181.8 (167.3, 197.3) 26 (8, 73) 124 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Ogle County No 173.5 (159.6, 188.5) 43 (13, 85) 120 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Henry County No 157.4 (144.4, 171.4) 77 (31, 98) 114 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Stephenson County No 164.7 (150.7, 180.1) 61 (18, 94) 112 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Marion County No 209.9 (192.1, 229.0) 6 (1, 34) 110 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.4)
Franklin County No 181.1 (165.5, 197.9) 27 (7, 77) 104 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Fulton County No 201.5 (183.9, 220.6) 10 (2, 45) 103 stable stable trend 6.9 (-1.9, 16.5)
Coles County No 150.3 (136.7, 164.9) 86 (41, 101) 96 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Grundy County No 179.5 (163.4, 196.7) 32 (8, 81) 95 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Christian County No 187.0 (169.8, 205.7) 21 (4, 73) 91 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Livingston County No 179.7 (162.8, 198.0) 30 (6, 81) 90 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Bureau County No 173.3 (157.1, 191.1) 45 (10, 89) 90 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Jackson County No 155.4 (140.8, 171.3) 79 (28, 100) 89 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Jefferson County No 173.3 (157.2, 190.8) 46 (9, 89) 89 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Lee County No 181.8 (164.8, 200.4) 25 (5, 78) 89 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Boone County No 149.2 (135.1, 164.5) 88 (42, 102) 86 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Morgan County No 179.5 (162.2, 198.5) 31 (5, 84) 86 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Iroquois County No 199.9 (180.4, 221.2) 11 (2, 54) 85 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
Woodford County No 162.3 (146.7, 179.3) 68 (20, 98) 84 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Montgomery County No 178.2 (160.2, 198.0) 33 (6, 88) 76 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Logan County No 197.7 (177.7, 219.6) 13 (1, 61) 76 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Randolph County No 168.6 (151.5, 187.4) 54 (12, 94) 75 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Saline County No 207.8 (186.0, 231.8) 7 (1, 46) 70 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Clinton County No 147.6 (132.0, 164.7) 90 (39, 102) 69 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Effingham County No 144.2 (128.7, 161.3) 94 (47, 102) 66 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
McDonough County No 163.8 (145.1, 184.5) 63 (12, 99) 61 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Jo Daviess County No 145.7 (128.9, 164.7) 92 (39, 102) 60 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Monroe County No 127.1 (112.6, 143.0) 102 (78, 102) 60 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2)
Jersey County No 170.3 (150.1, 192.8) 50 (7, 97) 54 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Shelby County No 144.3 (126.9, 163.9) 93 (45, 102) 52 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Fayette County No 167.7 (147.1, 190.8) 56 (11, 98) 51 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Mason County No 228.0 (199.6, 260.0) 2 (1, 32) 50 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Crawford County No 177.1 (155.2, 201.8) 34 (4, 96) 49 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Pike County No 195.0 (170.3, 222.9) 15 (1, 75) 48 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Mercer County No 189.2 (165.3, 216.3) 19 (1, 85) 47 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Edgar County No 165.4 (144.2, 189.4) 60 (9, 99) 47 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Union County No 180.0 (157.0, 206.2) 29 (4, 91) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Perry County No 167.9 (146.1, 192.4) 55 (7, 100) 46 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Douglas County No 174.7 (151.5, 200.7) 38 (5, 98) 44 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Hancock County No 140.6 (121.5, 162.5) 98 (39, 102) 43 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
De Witt County No 184.4 (159.6, 212.5) 22 (2, 91) 42 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Wayne County No 160.3 (138.4, 185.1) 71 (11, 102) 41 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Ford County No 211.4 (182.2, 244.5) 5 (1, 54) 41 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
White County No 182.9 (157.8, 211.7) 23 (2, 91) 41 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Lawrence County No 195.4 (168.8, 225.7) 14 (1, 82) 40 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Carroll County No 162.9 (139.5, 190.0) 64 (9, 102) 40 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Warren County No 174.4 (149.9, 202.3) 40 (4, 99) 40 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Clark County No 166.5 (143.2, 193.0) 57 (6, 100) 39 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Richland County No 162.4 (139.4, 188.6) 67 (9, 101) 39 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Piatt County No 160.1 (137.3, 185.9) 72 (12, 102) 38 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Bond County No 162.7 (139.0, 189.8) 65 (8, 102) 37 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Marshall County No 188.2 (160.7, 220.0) 20 (1, 92) 36 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Clay County No 181.9 (155.1, 212.5) 24 (2, 96) 35 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Moultrie County No 173.7 (148.1, 202.9) 42 (4, 99) 35 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Massac County No 172.3 (146.7, 201.8) 47 (4, 100) 35 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Greene County No 173.4 (147.4, 203.3) 44 (4, 100) 33 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Johnson County No 160.7 (135.2, 190.6) 70 (8, 102) 30 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Washington County No 140.1 (117.8, 166.0) 99 (34, 102) 30 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Cass County No 192.8 (161.2, 229.6) 17 (1, 93) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Wabash County No 158.5 (132.5, 189.0) 75 (8, 102) 28 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Menard County No 155.4 (129.4, 185.7) 80 (10, 102) 27 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Cumberland County No 157.3 (129.5, 190.0) 78 (7, 102) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.3)
Hamilton County No 176.3 (144.6, 214.0) 35 (2, 102) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
Jasper County No 133.5 (108.1, 164.1) 100 (32, 102) 20 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Henderson County No 148.5 (116.5, 188.4) 89 (6, 102) 17 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Schuyler County No 153.5 (122.0, 192.5) 81 (7, 102) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Gallatin County No 222.8 (175.3, 280.9) 3 (1, 96) 17 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Edwards County No 152.3 (118.9, 193.5) 82 (7, 102) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Hardin County No 215.3 (166.3, 278.1) 4 (1, 97) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Scott County No 205.8 (160.4, 261.8) 8 (1, 100) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Stark County No 171.5 (133.4, 219.2) 48 (1, 102) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Alexander County No 199.2 (154.1, 257.3) 12 (1, 100) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Brown County No 202.8 (158.5, 257.3) 9 (1, 101) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Putnam County No 147.3 (113.8, 190.4) 91 (7, 102) 14 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.8, -0.1)
Pulaski County No 238.8 (182.9, 309.2) 1 (1, 90) 14 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.1)
Calhoun County No 143.3 (110.0, 186.9) 95 (9, 102) 13 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Pope County No 164.4 (122.1, 222.4) 62 (1, 102) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/16/2024 7:13 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top