Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Illinois by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Illinois N/A No 154.7 (153.6, 155.7) N/A 18,121 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -1.3)
United States 6 N/A No 151.3 (151.1, 151.5) N/A 463,400 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Pulaski County Rural No 236.9 (182.2, 306.4) 2 (1, 84) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.1)
Scott County Rural No 198.0 (153.0, 254.1) 9 (1, 102) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.0)
Alexander County Urban No 238.7 (186.4, 305.7) 1 (1, 82) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.8)
Moultrie County Rural No 179.2 (153.3, 208.7) 31 (2, 97) 36 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.6)
Clark County Rural No 183.9 (158.8, 212.3) 22 (2, 93) 41 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Ford County Urban No 197.4 (169.7, 228.9) 10 (1, 84) 38 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Iroquois County Rural No 196.7 (177.6, 217.8) 12 (1, 57) 84 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Pike County Rural No 197.2 (171.7, 226.0) 11 (1, 79) 46 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Hardin County Rural No 194.3 (148.4, 254.6) 15 (1, 102) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.7)
Marion County Rural No 206.1 (188.7, 225.0) 5 (1, 38) 109 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
Mercer County Urban No 179.1 (155.6, 205.8) 32 (3, 97) 44 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Vermilion County Rural No 202.4 (189.4, 216.1) 7 (1, 32) 195 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Clay County Rural No 181.1 (154.2, 211.8) 27 (2, 99) 35 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Fulton County Rural No 210.9 (192.7, 230.6) 3 (1, 32) 105 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Hamilton County Rural No 172.4 (141.0, 210.0) 43 (2, 102) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Logan County Rural No 186.5 (167.3, 207.5) 19 (3, 80) 73 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Whiteside County Rural No 171.2 (158.3, 185.1) 52 (15, 86) 139 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Crawford County Rural No 181.5 (159.1, 206.6) 25 (3, 91) 49 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.2, -0.2)
Greene County Rural No 191.6 (163.5, 224.0) 16 (1, 90) 35 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Morgan County Rural No 181.7 (164.4, 200.7) 24 (4, 82) 86 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Randolph County Rural No 175.7 (158.0, 195.2) 36 (6, 88) 77 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Cumberland County Rural No 147.8 (120.8, 179.8) 90 (13, 102) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
DeKalb County Urban No 170.6 (158.8, 183.1) 54 (17, 84) 162 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Douglas County Rural No 176.1 (153.1, 201.9) 35 (3, 94) 45 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Edwards County Rural No 184.8 (146.6, 231.4) 21 (1, 102) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Knox County Rural No 174.4 (160.4, 189.5) 40 (11, 85) 127 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
La Salle County Rural No 188.9 (178.9, 199.5) 17 (6, 47) 282 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.4)
Macoupin County Urban No 174.9 (160.6, 190.3) 38 (10, 83) 118 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Mason County Rural No 202.7 (175.4, 233.8) 6 (1, 73) 43 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Schuyler County Rural No 143.0 (111.9, 182.1) 94 (9, 102) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Stephenson County Rural No 163.4 (149.2, 178.9) 70 (20, 96) 112 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
White County Rural No 163.3 (139.7, 190.4) 71 (8, 102) 38 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Woodford County Urban No 153.3 (138.3, 169.7) 86 (34, 101) 81 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Brown County Rural No 157.9 (118.5, 208.1) 78 (2, 102) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Gallatin County Rural No 210.1 (164.8, 266.1) 4 (1, 98) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Jackson County Rural No 171.4 (155.5, 188.6) 51 (12, 90) 92 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Jefferson County Rural No 181.5 (164.9, 199.5) 26 (5, 81) 92 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Jersey County Urban No 186.2 (164.8, 209.9) 20 (2, 85) 58 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Lawrence County Rural No 196.6 (169.3, 227.6) 13 (1, 81) 39 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Livingston County Rural No 175.2 (158.7, 193.3) 37 (8, 86) 88 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
McHenry County Urban No 157.2 (151.1, 163.5) 80 (53, 90) 525 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 1.0)
Richland County Rural No 172.4 (148.7, 199.4) 42 (5, 98) 41 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Saline County Rural No 183.6 (163.6, 205.7) 23 (3, 84) 64 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Stark County Urban No 171.5 (133.8, 218.6) 49 (1, 102) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.1)
Warren County Rural No 195.3 (169.0, 225.2) 14 (1, 85) 44 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Wayne County Rural No 162.4 (140.4, 187.4) 73 (10, 102) 42 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Bureau County Rural No 165.6 (149.9, 182.8) 63 (17, 95) 87 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Christian County Rural No 180.1 (163.3, 198.4) 29 (4, 83) 89 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
De Witt County Rural No 188.1 (162.9, 216.6) 18 (1, 89) 42 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Franklin County Rural No 198.7 (182.0, 216.8) 8 (1, 48) 109 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Madison County Urban No 170.9 (164.5, 177.5) 53 (29, 73) 563 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.7)
Marshall County Urban No 154.7 (129.9, 183.7) 84 (12, 102) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Massac County Urban No 178.0 (151.8, 208.3) 33 (2, 100) 36 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
McDonough County Rural No 155.4 (136.4, 176.6) 82 (19, 102) 54 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Menard County Urban No 167.8 (141.1, 198.7) 61 (3, 102) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Ogle County Rural No 170.0 (156.1, 185.0) 55 (15, 88) 118 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Perry County Rural No 172.2 (150.1, 197.0) 45 (5, 98) 48 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Pope County Rural No 155.0 (113.5, 214.1) 83 (1, 102) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Shelby County Rural No 167.9 (149.0, 188.9) 60 (10, 98) 61 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Bond County Urban No 169.8 (145.2, 197.8) 56 (5, 100) 37 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Calhoun County Urban No 173.7 (133.6, 225.1) 41 (1, 102) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Coles County Rural No 164.2 (149.7, 179.9) 68 (18, 96) 100 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Edgar County Rural No 171.4 (149.7, 196.0) 50 (6, 97) 48 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Effingham County Rural No 157.9 (141.8, 175.6) 79 (24, 100) 73 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Henry County Urban No 161.0 (147.8, 175.2) 75 (26, 95) 117 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Jasper County Rural No 162.0 (133.4, 196.0) 74 (5, 102) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Johnson County Rural No 165.0 (138.9, 195.4) 65 (5, 102) 30 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Peoria County Urban No 167.9 (159.6, 176.6) 59 (28, 82) 330 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Rock Island County Urban No 164.8 (156.1, 173.8) 66 (31, 87) 295 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.8)
Washington County Rural No 145.6 (122.3, 172.6) 92 (23, 102) 30 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Boone County Urban No 154.4 (140.2, 169.9) 85 (32, 101) 91 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Carroll County Rural No 176.4 (152.9, 203.2) 34 (3, 96) 45 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Cass County Rural No 180.1 (149.6, 215.8) 30 (1, 100) 27 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Fayette County Rural No 165.0 (144.5, 188.0) 64 (10, 99) 49 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Grundy County Urban No 174.7 (159.3, 191.3) 39 (10, 87) 98 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Kankakee County Urban No 171.6 (160.9, 182.9) 48 (19, 81) 202 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Lee County Rural No 164.6 (148.6, 182.3) 67 (16, 97) 81 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Montgomery County Rural No 180.8 (162.6, 200.8) 28 (4, 85) 77 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Tazewell County Urban No 162.7 (154.4, 171.4) 72 (35, 88) 301 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
Union County Rural No 172.2 (149.8, 197.6) 44 (5, 97) 46 falling falling trend -1.0 (-6.8, -0.3)
Henderson County Rural No 149.2 (118.0, 188.4) 87 (6, 102) 18 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
McLean County Urban No 148.8 (140.5, 157.6) 88 (65, 99) 247 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
Wabash County Rural No 172.1 (143.8, 205.2) 46 (3, 102) 29 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Clinton County Urban No 143.4 (128.1, 160.1) 93 (49, 102) 68 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Jo Daviess County Rural No 142.0 (125.2, 161.1) 98 (43, 102) 60 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Kendall County Urban No 145.7 (134.6, 157.5) 91 (62, 102) 133 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Adams County Rural No 171.9 (159.8, 184.8) 47 (15, 83) 161 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Piatt County Urban No 148.4 (127.1, 172.7) 89 (20, 102) 37 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
St. Clair County Urban No 158.3 (150.9, 165.9) 77 (47, 90) 366 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Kane County Urban No 142.1 (137.0, 147.2) 97 (82, 100) 635 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
Putnam County Rural No 168.8 (131.6, 215.9) 58 (1, 102) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.8, -0.1)
Macon County Urban No 169.8 (159.6, 180.5) 57 (22, 82) 228 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.7, -1.0)
Hancock County Rural No 133.3 (115.0, 154.4) 101 (58, 102) 41 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Monroe County Urban No 137.8 (122.9, 154.3) 99 (63, 102) 66 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Will County Urban No 160.7 (155.9, 165.5) 76 (50, 85) 916 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -1.2)
Champaign County Urban No 130.8 (123.1, 139.0) 102 (90, 102) 227 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.5)
Lake County Urban No 142.3 (138.1, 146.6) 96 (83, 100) 918 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -1.5)
DuPage County Urban No 135.5 (132.1, 139.0) 100 (91, 102) 1,248 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -1.6)
Cook County Urban No 142.7 (140.8, 144.5) 95 (85, 99) 4,788 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.9)
Winnebago County Urban No 166.7 (160.2, 173.4) 62 (33, 80) 537 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.3, -1.1)
Sangamon County Urban No 156.6 (149.4, 164.0) 81 (51, 91) 380 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.7, -1.5)
Williamson County Rural No 163.6 (151.9, 176.1) 69 (25, 93) 150 falling falling trend -3.4 (-7.6, -1.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/10/2024 3:20 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top