Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Illinois by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois N/A No 34.4 (34.0, 34.9) N/A 5,544 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.0, -4.1)
United States N/A No 32.4 (32.3, 32.5) N/A 136,831 falling falling trend -4.3 (-4.4, -4.1)
Alexander County Urban No 80.5 (55.9, 115.0) 1 (1, 56) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.1)
Edwards County Rural No 66.4 (44.7, 96.5) 2 (1, 88) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 2.0)
Mason County Rural No 64.3 (49.8, 82.6) 3 (1, 64) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.0)
Pulaski County Rural No 64.3 (42.5, 96.0) 4 (1, 95) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Vermilion County Rural No 61.8 (55.3, 69.0) 5 (1, 26) 68 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Fulton County Rural No 59.6 (50.4, 70.2) 6 (1, 48) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Pike County Rural No 59.4 (46.2, 75.9) 7 (1, 72) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Clay County Rural No 59.3 (44.9, 77.5) 8 (1, 78) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Ford County Urban No 58.4 (44.2, 76.4) 9 (1, 79) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.5)
Montgomery County Rural No 57.1 (47.3, 68.7) 10 (1, 60) 25 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.6, -0.5)
Marion County Rural No 56.8 (48.2, 66.7) 11 (1, 53) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Lawrence County Rural No 56.4 (42.6, 73.6) 12 (1, 82) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.4)
Gallatin County Rural No 55.5 (34.7, 87.0) 13 (1, 98) 5 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.3)
Logan County Rural No 55.2 (45.4, 66.8) 14 (1, 67) 23 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Greene County Rural No 54.4 (40.4, 72.6) 15 (1, 87) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.9)
Christian County Rural No 53.7 (44.9, 63.9) 16 (2, 67) 27 falling falling trend -3.4 (-15.6, -1.3)
Jefferson County Rural No 53.3 (44.8, 63.2) 17 (2, 68) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Hamilton County Rural No 52.1 (35.9, 74.5) 18 (1, 96) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.5)
Fayette County Rural No 51.4 (40.5, 64.7) 19 (1, 84) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Warren County Rural No 50.9 (38.9, 65.8) 20 (2, 86) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Grundy County Urban No 50.8 (43.0, 59.8) 21 (4, 72) 31 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Jersey County Urban No 50.7 (40.2, 63.6) 22 (2, 81) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
La Salle County Rural No 50.6 (45.7, 55.9) 23 (9, 55) 83 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Macoupin County Urban No 50.4 (43.0, 58.8) 24 (5, 70) 35 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Mercer County Urban No 50.1 (38.4, 64.9) 25 (2, 88) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
De Witt County Rural No 50.0 (37.6, 65.7) 26 (2, 92) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Schuyler County Rural No 49.4 (33.2, 73.1) 27 (1, 97) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
Iroquois County Rural No 49.4 (40.4, 60.1) 28 (4, 82) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Union County Rural No 49.2 (38.3, 63.0) 29 (2, 88) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Hardin County Rural No 49.1 (28.2, 85.3) 30 (1, 98) 3 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.6)
Cass County Rural No 49.1 (35.0, 67.3) 31 (1, 97) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
Putnam County Rural No 48.8 (31.2, 75.6) 32 (1, 98) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.6)
Saline County Rural No 48.5 (39.0, 60.1) 33 (4, 85) 18 falling falling trend -3.2 (-7.6, -2.0)
Morgan County Rural No 48.4 (40.0, 58.4) 34 (5, 81) 24 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.5, 0.1)
Knox County Rural No 48.3 (41.7, 55.9) 35 (8, 72) 39 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Madison County Urban No 48.2 (45.0, 51.5) 36 (17, 54) 176 falling falling trend -2.3 (-7.5, -1.2)
Massac County Urban No 47.6 (35.5, 63.1) 37 (2, 94) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Macon County Urban No 47.6 (42.8, 52.8) 38 (13, 68) 76 falling falling trend -2.9 (-6.1, -1.5)
Wayne County Rural No 47.3 (36.2, 61.3) 39 (3, 93) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Williamson County Rural No 47.1 (41.1, 53.8) 40 (10, 74) 46 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Jackson County Rural No 47.1 (39.7, 55.6) 41 (9, 80) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Shelby County Rural No 47.0 (37.2, 59.1) 42 (4, 89) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
Randolph County Rural No 47.0 (38.5, 57.1) 43 (5, 84) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Richland County Rural No 46.8 (35.1, 61.8) 44 (2, 95) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Kankakee County Urban No 46.8 (41.8, 52.3) 45 (14, 69) 66 falling falling trend -6.6 (-14.4, -1.4)
Franklin County Rural No 45.8 (38.3, 54.6) 46 (8, 84) 27 falling falling trend -9.0 (-20.7, -3.7)
Douglas County Rural No 45.7 (34.8, 59.3) 47 (4, 93) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Clark County Rural No 45.7 (34.0, 60.8) 48 (3, 95) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Crawford County Rural No 45.2 (34.6, 58.6) 49 (4, 94) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Peoria County Urban No 44.4 (40.7, 48.4) 50 (25, 71) 108 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.8, -2.1)
Tazewell County Urban No 43.3 (39.2, 47.8) 51 (26, 76) 84 falling falling trend -5.2 (-11.5, -2.3)
Coles County Rural No 43.3 (36.2, 51.5) 52 (13, 88) 27 falling falling trend -2.5 (-9.7, -1.0)
Wabash County Rural No 43.1 (30.2, 60.5) 53 (3, 98) 8 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Perry County Rural No 42.8 (32.8, 55.3) 54 (8, 96) 13 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
St. Clair County Urban No 42.6 (39.4, 45.9) 55 (33, 75) 140 falling falling trend -2.4 (-5.5, -1.8)
Livingston County Rural No 42.4 (34.6, 51.5) 56 (12, 90) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
McDonough County Rural No 42.2 (33.0, 53.5) 57 (9, 95) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Ogle County Rural No 42.1 (35.7, 49.4) 58 (18, 88) 32 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Moultrie County Rural No 41.8 (30.3, 57.0) 59 (5, 98) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
Menard County Urban No 41.5 (29.2, 58.0) 60 (4, 98) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.3)
Henry County Urban No 41.4 (35.2, 48.6) 61 (21, 89) 33 falling falling trend -3.0 (-17.7, -0.3)
Hancock County Rural No 40.9 (31.1, 53.4) 62 (9, 97) 13 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Whiteside County Rural No 40.9 (35.1, 47.4) 63 (24, 88) 37 falling falling trend -2.6 (-6.4, -1.2)
White County Rural No 40.7 (30.2, 54.7) 64 (7, 98) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.6)
Adams County Rural No 40.4 (35.1, 46.5) 65 (28, 88) 42 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Marshall County Urban No 40.1 (28.5, 56.0) 66 (6, 98) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Lee County Rural No 39.9 (32.7, 48.6) 67 (20, 94) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Stark County Urban No 39.9 (23.4, 66.1) 68 (2, 98) 4 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.6, -0.1)
Winnebago County Urban No 39.6 (36.9, 42.6) 69 (46, 82) 155 falling falling trend -4.4 (-8.2, -1.6)
Bureau County Rural No 38.9 (31.9, 47.4) 70 (23, 95) 22 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Rock Island County Urban No 38.9 (35.2, 43.0) 71 (43, 86) 83 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.8, -2.5)
Bond County Urban No 38.8 (28.3, 52.5) 72 (10, 98) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.0)
Johnson County Rural No 38.7 (27.2, 54.2) 73 (6, 98) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
DeKalb County Urban No 37.8 (32.6, 43.6) 74 (37, 92) 39 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Edgar County Rural No 37.8 (28.5, 49.9) 75 (17, 98) 11 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Effingham County Rural No 37.7 (30.2, 46.6) 76 (24, 97) 18 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Woodford County Urban No 37.6 (30.5, 46.1) 77 (25, 97) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Sangamon County Urban No 37.3 (34.1, 40.8) 78 (52, 88) 103 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.8, -3.0)
Stephenson County Rural No 36.2 (30.3, 43.2) 79 (37, 96) 28 falling falling trend -4.7 (-15.5, -1.6)
McLean County Urban No 36.0 (32.2, 40.2) 80 (52, 91) 68 falling falling trend -2.9 (-6.0, -2.0)
Will County Urban No 35.7 (33.8, 37.7) 81 (65, 89) 267 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.8, -3.1)
Henderson County Rural No 35.6 (22.3, 57.2) 82 (7, 98) 4 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Clinton County Urban No 35.3 (28.3, 43.8) 83 (34, 97) 18 falling falling trend -2.2 (-8.4, -1.4)
Piatt County Urban No 34.8 (24.8, 47.9) 84 (17, 98) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.4)
Carroll County Rural No 34.3 (24.6, 47.3) 85 (21, 98) 9 falling falling trend -3.0 (-11.2, -1.8)
McHenry County Urban No 33.8 (31.2, 36.6) 86 (68, 93) 127 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.6, -3.5)
Washington County Rural No 33.1 (23.2, 46.5) 87 (26, 98) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.8)
Boone County Urban No 32.9 (27.0, 39.7) 88 (52, 98) 23 falling falling trend -5.5 (-14.3, -2.2)
Kendall County Urban No 32.7 (27.9, 38.0) 89 (57, 97) 35 falling falling trend -2.6 (-9.4, -1.4)
Monroe County Urban No 32.3 (25.4, 40.7) 90 (46, 98) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Cumberland County Rural No 31.6 (20.2, 47.9) 91 (14, 98) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 0.5)
Jo Daviess County Rural No 30.0 (23.4, 38.8) 92 (51, 98) 14 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Cook County Urban No 29.4 (28.8, 30.0) 93 (85, 96) 1,819 falling falling trend -5.5 (-6.7, -4.4)
Champaign County Urban No 28.8 (25.6, 32.3) 94 (80, 98) 61 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.7, -2.6)
Kane County Urban No 28.7 (26.8, 30.7) 95 (84, 97) 168 falling falling trend -5.0 (-8.7, -3.4)
Lake County Urban No 28.3 (26.7, 30.0) 96 (86, 97) 234 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.5, -2.8)
Jasper County Rural No 25.6 (15.6, 41.3) 97 (43, 98) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.2, 0.5)
DuPage County Urban Yes 24.4 (23.2, 25.8) 98 (93, 98) 286 falling falling trend -4.7 (-5.8, -3.9)
Brown County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/08/2024 10:03 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top