Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Illinois by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Illinois *** 39.2 (38.7, 39.6) N/A 6,019 falling falling trend -4.8 (-5.7, -4.0)
United States *** 36.7 (36.6, 36.8) N/A 146,023 falling falling trend -4.9 (-5.2, -4.5)
Iroquois County *** 55.3 (45.9, 66.4) 21 (3, 79) 25 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.2)
Pulaski County *** 74.1 (50.0, 107.7) 2 (1, 91) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Mason County *** 61.1 (47.4, 78.2) 9 (1, 83) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Menard County *** 53.5 (39.1, 72.3) 27 (1, 98) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9)
Crawford County *** 55.3 (43.5, 69.7) 20 (2, 88) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Hamilton County *** 50.9 (35.0, 72.9) 38 (1, 101) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 1.9)
Logan County *** 55.2 (45.4, 66.8) 22 (2, 80) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Pike County *** 57.6 (44.7, 73.5) 15 (1, 86) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Richland County *** 52.1 (39.6, 67.9) 32 (2, 95) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Clay County *** 59.5 (45.1, 77.8) 12 (1, 86) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
De Witt County *** 66.4 (52.1, 83.9) 5 (1, 63) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
Union County *** 53.1 (41.0, 68.1) 28 (1, 94) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.2)
Greene County *** 52.1 (38.4, 69.8) 33 (1, 99) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Cass County *** 62.6 (46.2, 83.3) 8 (1, 88) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Clark County *** 44.0 (32.5, 58.7) 66 (5, 101) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Edwards County *** 43.4 (27.1, 67.8) 71 (2, 101) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.7)
Jersey County *** 46.9 (36.9, 59.2) 54 (6, 98) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Putnam County *** 51.1 (33.1, 78.1) 36 (1, 101) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 1.9)
Schuyler County *** 63.7 (44.3, 90.5) 6 (1, 93) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Henry County *** 46.0 (39.3, 53.7) 57 (16, 90) 35 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
White County *** 57.7 (44.4, 74.6) 14 (1, 87) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Hardin County *** 50.7 (30.2, 85.3) 40 (1, 101) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.8)
Lee County *** 44.8 (36.9, 54.1) 60 (14, 97) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Livingston County *** 55.0 (46.0, 65.4) 23 (3, 78) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Macoupin County *** 52.2 (44.9, 60.6) 31 (6, 76) 37 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Marion County *** 60.2 (51.2, 70.4) 11 (1, 59) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Mercer County *** 57.8 (45.1, 73.6) 13 (1, 84) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Alexander County *** 68.2 (46.7, 97.9) 3 (1, 94) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 0.9)
Ford County *** 48.5 (35.4, 65.5) 50 (2, 101) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
La Salle County *** 55.5 (50.3, 61.1) 19 (6, 55) 88 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Morgan County *** 53.9 (45.1, 64.2) 26 (3, 79) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Randolph County *** 49.9 (41.0, 60.3) 43 (5, 89) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Jackson County *** 44.7 (37.6, 52.9) 61 (16, 93) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Jefferson County *** 49.0 (40.8, 58.6) 49 (7, 89) 26 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Lawrence County *** 63.3 (49.0, 81.0) 7 (1, 78) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Moultrie County *** 49.4 (36.5, 65.9) 48 (2, 100) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Vermilion County *** 60.5 (54.1, 67.5) 10 (2, 40) 67 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Warren County *** 46.4 (35.1, 60.7) 56 (4, 100) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Christian County *** 52.3 (43.6, 62.5) 30 (4, 84) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
DeKalb County *** 42.0 (36.4, 48.2) 74 (34, 94) 42 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Marshall County *** 49.8 (36.9, 66.9) 45 (2, 99) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Shelby County *** 48.2 (38.3, 60.3) 51 (5, 95) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Wayne County *** 45.6 (34.8, 59.3) 59 (7, 100) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Woodford County *** 41.0 (33.4, 49.9) 76 (25, 100) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Boone County *** 38.5 (31.9, 46.2) 85 (40, 101) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Bureau County *** 46.8 (38.8, 56.3) 55 (11, 93) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Massac County *** 54.0 (41.4, 70.1) 25 (1, 92) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.6)
Williamson County *** 47.6 (41.5, 54.5) 53 (15, 84) 45 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Fayette County *** 52.4 (41.4, 65.8) 29 (3, 91) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Grundy County *** 51.7 (43.5, 61.1) 34 (5, 83) 29 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Johnson County *** 49.9 (36.3, 67.7) 42 (2, 100) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Knox County *** 50.9 (43.9, 58.9) 37 (8, 78) 39 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Madison County *** 50.5 (47.2, 54.0) 41 (19, 61) 178 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
McDonough County *** 44.3 (35.3, 55.1) 64 (12, 99) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Washington County *** 36.8 (26.2, 51.0) 90 (15, 101) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Edgar County *** 41.8 (31.8, 54.7) 75 (10, 101) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Kankakee County *** 56.5 (50.9, 62.5) 17 (5, 51) 78 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Fulton County *** 49.7 (41.5, 59.3) 46 (6, 88) 27 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Saline County *** 54.9 (44.5, 67.3) 24 (2, 84) 20 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Douglas County *** 44.2 (33.5, 57.6) 65 (6, 101) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Henderson County *** 43.6 (28.8, 65.9) 69 (3, 101) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.1)
Ogle County *** 43.6 (37.0, 51.1) 70 (23, 94) 32 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Wabash County *** 43.8 (30.7, 61.3) 68 (4, 101) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Effingham County *** 33.7 (26.5, 42.4) 95 (51, 101) 15 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Kendall County *** 36.4 (31.0, 42.4) 92 (54, 101) 35 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Montgomery County *** 55.8 (46.0, 67.4) 18 (1, 79) 24 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Perry County *** 43.9 (33.7, 56.6) 67 (10, 101) 13 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Stark County *** 40.7 (23.6, 67.7) 77 (2, 101) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 0.9)
Gallatin County *** 75.3 (50.4, 110.4) 1 (1, 90) 6 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.2)
Jo Daviess County *** 36.6 (28.8, 46.6) 91 (40, 101) 16 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Piatt County *** 37.6 (27.2, 51.3) 87 (18, 101) 9 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Hancock County *** 38.1 (29.0, 49.9) 86 (24, 101) 12 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Jasper County *** 30.9 (19.4, 47.7) 100 (27, 101) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.7)
St. Clair County *** 48.1 (44.7, 51.7) 52 (25, 70) 154 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Adams County *** 39.1 (33.8, 45.2) 83 (45, 99) 40 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Bond County *** 39.3 (28.7, 53.1) 82 (15, 101) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.2)
Cumberland County *** 38.9 (26.5, 56.2) 84 (9, 101) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.2)
Clinton County *** 39.6 (32.1, 48.5) 81 (28, 101) 20 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.8)
Carroll County *** 39.7 (29.2, 53.8) 80 (15, 101) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.7)
Monroe County *** 32.7 (25.7, 41.2) 97 (59, 101) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Whiteside County *** 45.8 (39.6, 52.9) 58 (20, 89) 40 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.4)
McLean County *** 40.6 (36.4, 45.2) 79 (47, 93) 71 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.3, -1.3)
Lake County *** 33.6 (31.8, 35.6) 96 (83, 99) 257 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.9, -2.4)
Macon County *** 51.4 (46.4, 56.8) 35 (11, 69) 81 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.2, -1.2)
Peoria County *** 49.6 (45.6, 53.9) 47 (18, 67) 116 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.5, -1.1)
Champaign County *** 30.9 (27.5, 34.5) 99 (83, 101) 65 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.5, -2.5)
Rock Island County *** 43.1 (39.1, 47.4) 72 (40, 88) 89 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.5, -1.4)
DuPage County *** 29.9 (28.4, 31.4) 101 (93, 101) 325 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.6, -3.0)
Coles County *** 44.4 (37.3, 52.7) 62 (18, 94) 28 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.6, -1.5)
Stephenson County *** 35.6 (29.8, 42.5) 93 (56, 101) 27 stable stable trend -4.8 (-9.9, 0.5)
Winnebago County *** 44.4 (41.4, 47.6) 63 (40, 81) 168 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.3, -2.2)
Kane County *** 31.9 (29.8, 34.2) 98 (86, 101) 176 falling falling trend -5.0 (-7.7, -2.1)
Cook County *** 35.0 (34.3, 35.7) 94 (82, 96) 2,062 falling falling trend -5.5 (-7.2, -3.7)
McHenry County *** 36.9 (34.0, 40.0) 89 (67, 97) 127 falling falling trend -5.6 (-7.1, -4.0)
Will County *** 40.6 (38.5, 42.9) 78 (61, 88) 283 falling falling trend -6.7 (-11.4, -1.7)
Tazewell County *** 49.8 (45.3, 54.7) 44 (17, 71) 93 stable stable trend -7.1 (-13.8, 0.0)
Sangamon County *** 42.6 (39.1, 46.4) 73 (45, 86) 111 falling falling trend -8.5 (-14.2, -2.5)
Franklin County *** 57.4 (49.1, 67.1) 16 (2, 65) 34 stable stable trend -15.6 (-28.7, 0.0)
Brown County *** 66.5 (42.5, 99.9) 4 (1, 100) 5
*
*
Pope County *** 37.0 (21.1, 68.1) 88 (4, 101) 3
*
*
Scott County *** 50.7 (30.4, 81.8) 39 (1, 101) 4
*
*
Calhoun County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2021 10:36 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top