Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Death Rate Report for Illinois by County

Breast, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
sort alphabetically by name descending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Illinois N/A No 20.2 (19.8, 20.7) N/A 1,719 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.7)
United States N/A No 19.3 (19.2, 19.4) N/A 42,308 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
Adams County Rural No 26.6 (20.1, 34.8) 4 (1, 47) 13 rising rising trend 4.8 (0.3, 18.9)
Boone County Urban No 18.1 (12.1, 26.2) 44 (5, 59) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.9)
Bureau County Rural No 17.7 (10.4, 28.4) 47 (3, 59) 4 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.6)
Carroll County Rural No 25.5 (14.4, 44.1) 8 (1, 59) 3 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.3)
Champaign County Urban No 16.7 (13.4, 20.7) 50 (19, 59) 19 falling falling trend -2.7 (-10.7, -1.8)
Christian County Rural No 25.8 (17.0, 38.1) 5 (1, 57) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 0.8)
Clinton County Urban Yes 13.6 (8.1, 22.2) 59 (13, 59) 4 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.4)
Coles County Rural No 15.7 (10.4, 23.2) 53 (9, 59) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.2)
Cook County Urban No 21.0 (20.3, 21.7) 25 (16, 36) 713 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.2, 1.1)
Crawford County Rural No 21.5 (12.6, 36.0) 24 (1, 59) 4
*
*
DeKalb County Urban No 22.8 (17.4, 29.5) 18 (2, 54) 13 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.3)
Douglas County Rural No 33.2 (19.8, 52.5) 2 (1, 57) 4
*
*
DuPage County Urban No 19.2 (17.6, 20.9) 38 (20, 49) 121 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.2, 3.2)
Edgar County Rural No 22.4 (12.6, 38.6) 20 (1, 59) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.0)
Effingham County Rural Yes 13.9 (8.0, 23.0) 58 (10, 59) 4 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.1, -0.1)
Franklin County Rural No 25.5 (17.4, 36.5) 7 (1, 56) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Fulton County Rural No 25.3 (17.2, 36.7) 9 (1, 56) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.3)
Greene County Rural No 39.1 (21.7, 66.1) 1 (1, 55) 3
*
*
Grundy County Urban No 29.6 (21.6, 39.6) 3 (1, 47) 9
*
*
Henry County Urban No 24.2 (17.5, 33.1) 12 (1, 55) 9 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.4, -0.2)
Iroquois County Rural No 15.9 (9.2, 26.6) 52 (4, 59) 4 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.6, -0.3)
Jackson County Rural No 21.6 (14.9, 30.5) 23 (2, 59) 7 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.1, -0.1)
Jefferson County Rural No 17.6 (10.6, 27.8) 48 (3, 59) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.4)
Jersey County Urban No 25.3 (14.7, 41.3) 10 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Jo Daviess County Rural No 20.8 (12.1, 35.0) 27 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Kane County Urban No 18.0 (16.0, 20.3) 45 (23, 55) 56 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.3, -2.0)
Kankakee County Urban No 23.8 (18.8, 29.7) 14 (2, 49) 17 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.1, 0.9)
Kendall County Urban Yes 14.7 (10.7, 19.6) 57 (22, 59) 9 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.4, -1.9)
Knox County Rural No 16.0 (11.1, 22.8) 51 (12, 59) 7 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.2)
La Salle County Rural No 20.9 (16.7, 26.0) 26 (6, 54) 18 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Lake County Urban No 19.3 (17.4, 21.3) 36 (18, 50) 85 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.7)
Lee County Rural Yes 15.0 (8.6, 24.9) 56 (6, 59) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.3, 0.4)
Livingston County Rural No 20.0 (13.4, 29.4) 30 (2, 59) 6 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.4, -1.7)
Macon County Urban No 20.1 (15.7, 25.5) 28 (6, 56) 16 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.2)
Macoupin County Urban No 17.5 (11.7, 25.7) 49 (6, 59) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.0)
Madison County Urban No 19.0 (16.2, 22.1) 40 (15, 55) 37 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Marion County Rural No 19.0 (12.5, 28.2) 39 (3, 59) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
McDonough County Rural No 18.5 (10.3, 31.4) 42 (2, 59) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.3)
McHenry County Urban No 22.3 (19.4, 25.6) 21 (6, 44) 45 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.1)
McLean County Urban No 19.7 (15.9, 24.1) 34 (9, 55) 20 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.1)
Monroe County Urban No 20.0 (12.9, 30.3) 29 (2, 59) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.8)
Montgomery County Rural Yes 15.3 (8.8, 25.8) 54 (6, 59) 4 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.2, -1.3)
Morgan County Rural No 22.7 (14.7, 34.1) 19 (1, 59) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.4)
Ogle County Rural No 23.3 (16.4, 32.3) 17 (1, 57) 8 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.2, 14.1)
Peoria County Urban No 23.5 (19.6, 28.0) 16 (3, 45) 28 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.7)
Randolph County Rural No 25.1 (16.1, 38.1) 11 (1, 58) 6
*
*
Rock Island County Urban No 17.9 (14.3, 22.2) 46 (11, 58) 19 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Saline County Rural No 23.6 (15.3, 36.2) 15 (1, 59) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.5)
Sangamon County Urban No 18.3 (15.2, 21.9) 43 (15, 56) 27 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.3)
St. Clair County Urban No 22.1 (19.0, 25.6) 22 (6, 45) 39 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.6)
Stephenson County Rural No 23.9 (17.1, 33.1) 13 (1, 55) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.8)
Tazewell County Urban No 19.2 (15.3, 23.9) 37 (8, 56) 19 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.7)
Vermilion County Rural No 19.8 (14.6, 26.5) 32 (5, 58) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
Wayne County Rural No 25.7 (14.1, 44.2) 6 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Whiteside County Rural No 19.9 (14.3, 27.3) 31 (4, 59) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Will County Urban No 19.5 (17.6, 21.6) 35 (16, 50) 80 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.4)
Williamson County Rural No 18.8 (13.5, 25.6) 41 (6, 59) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.6)
Winnebago County Urban No 19.8 (17.0, 22.8) 33 (12, 52) 40 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Woodford County Urban Yes 15.2 (9.4, 23.8) 55 (8, 59) 5
*
*
Alexander County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bond County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
De Witt County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ford County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Massac County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moultrie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Piatt County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stark County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabash County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/07/2024 4:17 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top