Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana *** 205.5 (203.3, 207.6) N/A 7,165 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.5)
United States *** 181.4 (181.1, 181.7) N/A 314,987 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
Hamilton County *** 151.8 (142.1, 162.0) 92 (87, 92) 198 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
Warren County *** 166.0 (121.3, 223.8) 91 (9, 92) 9 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.3)
Dubois County *** 170.7 (147.7, 196.3) 90 (45, 92) 42 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Monroe County *** 171.7 (157.1, 187.3) 89 (66, 92) 106 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Bartholomew County *** 177.0 (159.6, 195.8) 88 (53, 92) 78 falling falling trend -5.3 (-9.1, -1.5)
Warrick County *** 177.3 (157.7, 198.7) 87 (47, 92) 63 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
Tippecanoe County *** 177.3 (163.7, 191.7) 86 (60, 91) 132 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.7)
Kosciusko County *** 184.6 (166.6, 204.0) 85 (39, 91) 82 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Marshall County *** 188.4 (165.7, 213.6) 84 (25, 91) 52 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Spencer County *** 188.6 (156.8, 225.5) 83 (11, 92) 26 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Elkhart County *** 189.2 (177.1, 201.8) 82 (48, 90) 191 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Steuben County *** 190.6 (165.6, 218.7) 81 (17, 92) 45 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Tipton County *** 191.0 (153.1, 236.1) 80 (5, 92) 19 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Hendricks County *** 191.5 (177.2, 206.7) 79 (35, 89) 142 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Carroll County *** 191.5 (158.0, 230.5) 78 (7, 92) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Boone County *** 192.0 (169.4, 216.7) 77 (21, 91) 57 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.2, -2.2)
Gibson County *** 193.0 (165.9, 223.3) 76 (14, 92) 38 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Rush County *** 193.4 (156.4, 237.0) 75 (3, 92) 20 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
Porter County *** 194.6 (181.5, 208.5) 74 (36, 87) 177 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Brown County *** 195.0 (159.0, 238.2) 73 (4, 92) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Parke County *** 195.2 (159.7, 237.2) 72 (4, 92) 22 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Benton County *** 195.3 (144.3, 259.4) 71 (1, 92) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Hancock County *** 196.0 (176.9, 216.8) 70 (21, 90) 81 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Montgomery County *** 196.1 (171.1, 223.9) 69 (13, 91) 46 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Whitley County *** 198.2 (170.3, 229.4) 68 (10, 92) 39 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Jasper County *** 199.0 (170.9, 230.4) 67 (9, 92) 38 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Daviess County *** 199.0 (169.9, 231.8) 66 (9, 91) 35 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
LaGrange County *** 199.8 (171.0, 231.9) 65 (10, 92) 37 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
St. Joseph County *** 200.3 (189.7, 211.3) 64 (33, 83) 282 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Newton County *** 200.6 (161.3, 247.4) 63 (3, 92) 19 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Perry County *** 201.7 (167.1, 241.8) 62 (4, 92) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Franklin County *** 202.0 (169.1, 239.9) 61 (4, 92) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Johnson County *** 202.5 (187.7, 218.1) 60 (23, 85) 147 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.1, 5.5)
Dearborn County *** 204.0 (181.1, 229.1) 59 (11, 89) 63 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Lake County *** 205.3 (197.4, 213.5) 58 (31, 75) 539 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.5)
Ripley County *** 205.9 (176.0, 239.7) 57 (5, 91) 35 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Allen County *** 206.0 (196.5, 215.9) 56 (30, 76) 371 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Randolph County *** 208.1 (177.9, 242.5) 55 (4, 91) 35 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Floyd County *** 208.3 (188.2, 229.9) 54 (12, 86) 85 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.3)
Ohio County *** 209.2 (152.3, 284.1) 53 (1, 92) 9 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Morgan County *** 209.5 (188.9, 231.7) 52 (10, 85) 84 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Madison County *** 209.5 (195.0, 224.9) 51 (17, 80) 161 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Putnam County *** 210.6 (183.8, 240.3) 50 (7, 89) 46 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
White County *** 210.6 (179.7, 245.8) 49 (4, 90) 35 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Harrison County *** 210.7 (184.6, 239.6) 48 (6, 89) 50 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Decatur County *** 210.8 (178.3, 247.7) 47 (4, 91) 31 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Delaware County *** 211.8 (195.8, 228.8) 46 (13, 79) 134 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Wayne County *** 211.8 (191.9, 233.4) 45 (10, 83) 86 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Marion County *** 213.1 (206.5, 219.8) 44 (24, 62) 859 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
LaPorte County *** 213.7 (197.5, 230.9) 43 (14, 76) 137 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Lawrence County *** 214.0 (190.6, 239.7) 42 (6, 86) 64 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Fulton County *** 214.5 (179.0, 255.5) 41 (2, 91) 27 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Vanderburgh County *** 215.6 (202.5, 229.2) 40 (15, 72) 216 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Cass County *** 216.0 (189.3, 245.7) 39 (5, 86) 49 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Union County *** 216.0 (157.6, 290.6) 38 (1, 92) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Noble County *** 216.4 (190.3, 245.0) 37 (5, 86) 55 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Miami County *** 216.6 (189.1, 247.2) 36 (4, 87) 47 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Henry County *** 217.8 (194.4, 243.3) 35 (5, 82) 66 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Clinton County *** 218.4 (188.6, 251.8) 34 (3, 87) 40 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
DeKalb County *** 219.2 (192.4, 248.8) 33 (4, 84) 52 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Clark County *** 219.4 (202.0, 237.9) 32 (9, 74) 128 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Owen County *** 220.3 (185.0, 260.8) 31 (2, 89) 31 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Starke County *** 220.4 (187.8, 257.6) 30 (2, 88) 34 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Pike County *** 220.7 (175.6, 274.6) 29 (1, 92) 18 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Knox County *** 220.8 (192.7, 251.9) 28 (3, 85) 47 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Howard County *** 221.3 (203.0, 240.9) 27 (6, 72) 112 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Wells County *** 221.5 (190.3, 256.7) 26 (2, 88) 38 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Jay County *** 221.9 (184.5, 264.8) 25 (1, 91) 26 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Posey County *** 223.4 (190.3, 260.9) 24 (2, 87) 35 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Adams County *** 223.9 (193.6, 257.7) 23 (2, 85) 41 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Fayette County *** 225.6 (192.8, 262.9) 22 (2, 87) 35 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Huntington County *** 225.8 (197.0, 257.7) 21 (2, 84) 47 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Crawford County *** 230.1 (179.4, 291.5) 20 (1, 91) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Martin County *** 231.1 (182.0, 290.6) 19 (1, 91) 16 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Washington County *** 233.0 (200.0, 270.1) 18 (1, 83) 38 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Greene County *** 234.7 (205.8, 266.8) 17 (2, 73) 50 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Jackson County *** 236.1 (208.9, 265.9) 16 (1, 72) 57 falling falling trend -7.2 (-11.1, -3.1)
Vigo County *** 236.8 (218.4, 256.3) 15 (3, 53) 130 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Wabash County *** 237.9 (208.2, 270.9) 14 (1, 72) 48 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Shelby County *** 238.1 (211.6, 267.1) 13 (1, 66) 62 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Switzerland County *** 239.8 (187.8, 302.5) 12 (1, 91) 16 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Grant County *** 240.2 (219.0, 263.1) 11 (2, 54) 99 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Jefferson County *** 240.2 (208.2, 276.0) 10 (1, 76) 44 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Orange County *** 247.3 (209.5, 290.4) 9 (1, 80) 32 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Jennings County *** 248.0 (212.9, 287.3) 8 (1, 73) 39 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Sullivan County *** 248.9 (209.8, 293.3) 7 (1, 78) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Clay County *** 251.2 (216.6, 290.0) 6 (1, 66) 40 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Pulaski County *** 251.2 (204.7, 306.0) 5 (1, 86) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Blackford County *** 261.0 (212.5, 318.3) 4 (1, 83) 21 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Vermillion County *** 264.8 (219.9, 316.7) 3 (1, 67) 26 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Scott County *** 264.8 (226.0, 308.5) 2 (1, 61) 36 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
Fountain County *** 295.8 (251.3, 346.5) 1 (1, 37) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/06/2021 1:45 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top