Death Rates Table
County
|
Met Healthy People Objective of ***? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana | *** | 205.5 (203.3, 207.6) | N/A | 7,165 |
falling 
|
-1.6 (-1.7, -1.5) |
| United States | *** | 181.4 (181.1, 181.7) | N/A | 314,987 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-2.6, -2.0) |
| Marion County | *** | 213.1 (206.5, 219.8) | 44 (24, 62) | 859 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-1.8, -1.4) |
| Lake County | *** | 205.3 (197.4, 213.5) | 58 (31, 75) | 539 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.0, -1.5) |
| Allen County | *** | 206.0 (196.5, 215.9) | 56 (30, 76) | 371 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.7, -1.2) |
| St. Joseph County | *** | 200.3 (189.7, 211.3) | 64 (33, 83) | 282 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.7, -1.3) |
| Vanderburgh County | *** | 215.6 (202.5, 229.2) | 40 (15, 72) | 216 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-1.9, -1.3) |
| Hamilton County | *** | 151.8 (142.1, 162.0) | 92 (87, 92) | 198 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.1, -1.4) |
| Elkhart County | *** | 189.2 (177.1, 201.8) | 82 (48, 90) | 191 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.6, -0.9) |
| Porter County | *** | 194.6 (181.5, 208.5) | 74 (36, 87) | 177 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.8, -1.1) |
| Madison County | *** | 209.5 (195.0, 224.9) | 51 (17, 80) | 161 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.5, -1.0) |
| Johnson County | *** | 202.5 (187.7, 218.1) | 60 (23, 85) | 147 |
stable 
|
1.6 (-2.1, 5.5) |
| Hendricks County | *** | 191.5 (177.2, 206.7) | 79 (35, 89) | 142 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.1, -1.4) |
| LaPorte County | *** | 213.7 (197.5, 230.9) | 43 (14, 76) | 137 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.5, -0.9) |
| Delaware County | *** | 211.8 (195.8, 228.8) | 46 (13, 79) | 134 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.7, -0.8) |
| Tippecanoe County | *** | 177.3 (163.7, 191.7) | 86 (60, 91) | 132 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-2.6, -1.7) |
| Vigo County | *** | 236.8 (218.4, 256.3) | 15 (3, 53) | 130 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.5, -0.6) |
| Clark County | *** | 219.4 (202.0, 237.9) | 32 (9, 74) | 128 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.8, -1.1) |
| Howard County | *** | 221.3 (203.0, 240.9) | 27 (6, 72) | 112 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.9, -0.8) |
| Monroe County | *** | 171.7 (157.1, 187.3) | 89 (66, 92) | 106 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.1, -1.3) |
| Grant County | *** | 240.2 (219.0, 263.1) | 11 (2, 54) | 99 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.2, -0.3) |
| Wayne County | *** | 211.8 (191.9, 233.4) | 45 (10, 83) | 86 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.6, -0.5) |
| Floyd County | *** | 208.3 (188.2, 229.9) | 54 (12, 86) | 85 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.0, -1.3) |
| Morgan County | *** | 209.5 (188.9, 231.7) | 52 (10, 85) | 84 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.9, -0.8) |
| Kosciusko County | *** | 184.6 (166.6, 204.0) | 85 (39, 91) | 82 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.8, -0.7) |
| Hancock County | *** | 196.0 (176.9, 216.8) | 70 (21, 90) | 81 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.3, -0.5) |
| Bartholomew County | *** | 177.0 (159.6, 195.8) | 88 (53, 92) | 78 |
falling
|
-5.3 (-9.1, -1.5) |
| Henry County | *** | 217.8 (194.4, 243.3) | 35 (5, 82) | 66 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.4, -0.4) |
| Lawrence County | *** | 214.0 (190.6, 239.7) | 42 (6, 86) | 64 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.6, -0.5) |
| Warrick County | *** | 177.3 (157.7, 198.7) | 87 (47, 92) | 63 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.5, -1.3) |
| Dearborn County | *** | 204.0 (181.1, 229.1) | 59 (11, 89) | 63 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.3, -1.1) |
| Shelby County | *** | 238.1 (211.6, 267.1) | 13 (1, 66) | 62 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.6, 0.0) |
| Jackson County | *** | 236.1 (208.9, 265.9) | 16 (1, 72) | 57 |
falling
|
-7.2 (-11.1, -3.1) |
| Boone County | *** | 192.0 (169.4, 216.7) | 77 (21, 91) | 57 |
falling
|
-4.2 (-6.2, -2.2) |
| Noble County | *** | 216.4 (190.3, 245.0) | 37 (5, 86) | 55 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.5, -0.2) |
| DeKalb County | *** | 219.2 (192.4, 248.8) | 33 (4, 84) | 52 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.2, 0.2) |
| Marshall County | *** | 188.4 (165.7, 213.6) | 84 (25, 91) | 52 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.2, -0.9) |
| Harrison County | *** | 210.7 (184.6, 239.6) | 48 (6, 89) | 50 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.9, -0.3) |
| Greene County | *** | 234.7 (205.8, 266.8) | 17 (2, 73) | 50 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.3, 0.2) |
| Cass County | *** | 216.0 (189.3, 245.7) | 39 (5, 86) | 49 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.9, -0.8) |
| Wabash County | *** | 237.9 (208.2, 270.9) | 14 (1, 72) | 48 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.3, 0.1) |
| Miami County | *** | 216.6 (189.1, 247.2) | 36 (4, 87) | 47 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.5, -0.4) |
| Huntington County | *** | 225.8 (197.0, 257.7) | 21 (2, 84) | 47 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.2, 0.1) |
| Knox County | *** | 220.8 (192.7, 251.9) | 28 (3, 85) | 47 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.9, -0.8) |
| Putnam County | *** | 210.6 (183.8, 240.3) | 50 (7, 89) | 46 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.9, -0.6) |
| Montgomery County | *** | 196.1 (171.1, 223.9) | 69 (13, 91) | 46 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.2, -1.0) |
| Steuben County | *** | 190.6 (165.6, 218.7) | 81 (17, 92) | 45 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.3, -0.7) |
| Jefferson County | *** | 240.2 (208.2, 276.0) | 10 (1, 76) | 44 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.5, 0.2) |
| Dubois County | *** | 170.7 (147.7, 196.3) | 90 (45, 92) | 42 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.3, -0.9) |
| Adams County | *** | 223.9 (193.6, 257.7) | 23 (2, 85) | 41 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-0.9, 0.6) |
| Clinton County | *** | 218.4 (188.6, 251.8) | 34 (3, 87) | 40 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.3, 0.3) |
| Clay County | *** | 251.2 (216.6, 290.0) | 6 (1, 66) | 40 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.3, -0.9) |
| Jennings County | *** | 248.0 (212.9, 287.3) | 8 (1, 73) | 39 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.9, -0.1) |
| Whitley County | *** | 198.2 (170.3, 229.4) | 68 (10, 92) | 39 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.8, -0.3) |
| Jasper County | *** | 199.0 (170.9, 230.4) | 67 (9, 92) | 38 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.9, -0.5) |
| Washington County | *** | 233.0 (200.0, 270.1) | 18 (1, 83) | 38 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.0, -0.6) |
| Gibson County | *** | 193.0 (165.9, 223.3) | 76 (14, 92) | 38 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.4, -0.8) |
| Wells County | *** | 221.5 (190.3, 256.7) | 26 (2, 88) | 38 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.6, 0.0) |
| LaGrange County | *** | 199.8 (171.0, 231.9) | 65 (10, 92) | 37 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.8, -0.4) |
| Scott County | *** | 264.8 (226.0, 308.5) | 2 (1, 61) | 36 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.4, -0.3) |
| Ripley County | *** | 205.9 (176.0, 239.7) | 57 (5, 91) | 35 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.4, 0.0) |
| Daviess County | *** | 199.0 (169.9, 231.8) | 66 (9, 91) | 35 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.1, -0.7) |
| Fayette County | *** | 225.6 (192.8, 262.9) | 22 (2, 87) | 35 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.8, -0.5) |
| Posey County | *** | 223.4 (190.3, 260.9) | 24 (2, 87) | 35 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.9, -0.4) |
| Randolph County | *** | 208.1 (177.9, 242.5) | 55 (4, 91) | 35 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.2, 0.6) |
| White County | *** | 210.6 (179.7, 245.8) | 49 (4, 90) | 35 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.0, -0.5) |
| Starke County | *** | 220.4 (187.8, 257.6) | 30 (2, 88) | 34 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.8, -0.2) |
| Fountain County | *** | 295.8 (251.3, 346.5) | 1 (1, 37) | 32 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.7, 0.1) |
| Orange County | *** | 247.3 (209.5, 290.4) | 9 (1, 80) | 32 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.9, -0.2) |
| Decatur County | *** | 210.8 (178.3, 247.7) | 47 (4, 91) | 31 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.4, -0.2) |
| Owen County | *** | 220.3 (185.0, 260.8) | 31 (2, 89) | 31 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.4, 0.5) |
| Sullivan County | *** | 248.9 (209.8, 293.3) | 7 (1, 78) | 30 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.2, 0.3) |
| Franklin County | *** | 202.0 (169.1, 239.9) | 61 (4, 92) | 29 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.7, 0.3) |
| Fulton County | *** | 214.5 (179.0, 255.5) | 41 (2, 91) | 27 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.3, -0.6) |
| Vermillion County | *** | 264.8 (219.9, 316.7) | 3 (1, 67) | 26 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.7, 0.2) |
| Jay County | *** | 221.9 (184.5, 264.8) | 25 (1, 91) | 26 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.6, 0.3) |
| Spencer County | *** | 188.6 (156.8, 225.5) | 83 (11, 92) | 26 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.6, -1.1) |
| Perry County | *** | 201.7 (167.1, 241.8) | 62 (4, 92) | 25 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.6, 0.1) |
| Carroll County | *** | 191.5 (158.0, 230.5) | 78 (7, 92) | 24 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.6, 0.2) |
| Brown County | *** | 195.0 (159.0, 238.2) | 73 (4, 92) | 23 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.9, 0.3) |
| Parke County | *** | 195.2 (159.7, 237.2) | 72 (4, 92) | 22 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.1, -0.2) |
| Pulaski County | *** | 251.2 (204.7, 306.0) | 5 (1, 86) | 21 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.4, 0.8) |
| Blackford County | *** | 261.0 (212.5, 318.3) | 4 (1, 83) | 21 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.8, -0.1) |
| Rush County | *** | 193.4 (156.4, 237.0) | 75 (3, 92) | 20 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.3, -0.8) |
| Newton County | *** | 200.6 (161.3, 247.4) | 63 (3, 92) | 19 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.8, -0.8) |
| Tipton County | *** | 191.0 (153.1, 236.1) | 80 (5, 92) | 19 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.3, -0.6) |
| Pike County | *** | 220.7 (175.6, 274.6) | 29 (1, 92) | 18 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.3, -0.2) |
| Crawford County | *** | 230.1 (179.4, 291.5) | 20 (1, 91) | 16 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.2, 1.3) |
| Switzerland County | *** | 239.8 (187.8, 302.5) | 12 (1, 91) | 16 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-3.1, -0.2) |
| Martin County | *** | 231.1 (182.0, 290.6) | 19 (1, 91) | 16 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.8, -0.4) |
| Benton County | *** | 195.3 (144.3, 259.4) | 71 (1, 92) | 10 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.3, 0.1) |
| Union County | *** | 216.0 (157.6, 290.6) | 38 (1, 92) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.8, 0.6) |
| Ohio County | *** | 209.2 (152.3, 284.1) | 53 (1, 92) | 9 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-3.0, 0.0) |
| Warren County | *** | 166.0 (121.3, 223.8) | 91 (9, 92) | 9 |
falling
|
-3.1 (-4.8, -1.3) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/16/2022 4:17 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/16/2022 4:17 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.