Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

Pancreas, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana N/A *** 12.2 (11.9, 12.5) N/A 1,029 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.6, 3.1)
United States N/A *** 11.2 (11.1, 11.2) N/A 46,760 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.2, 0.3)
Dubois County Rural *** 6.5 (4.0, 10.2) 75 (50, 75) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.3)
Jefferson County Rural *** 8.1 (4.7, 13.2) 74 (15, 75) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
LaGrange County Rural *** 8.2 (4.9, 13.0) 73 (15, 75) 4
*
*
Wells County Urban *** 8.5 (5.0, 13.9) 72 (8, 75) 4
*
*
Jasper County Urban *** 8.5 (5.1, 13.6) 71 (12, 75) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.2)
Washington County Urban *** 9.2 (5.3, 15.1) 70 (5, 75) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 3.2)
Whitley County Urban *** 9.6 (6.2, 14.6) 69 (7, 75) 5
*
*
Johnson County Urban *** 9.8 (7.9, 12.0) 68 (26, 74) 19 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.2)
Elkhart County Urban *** 10.3 (8.6, 12.3) 67 (25, 73) 25 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
Delaware County Urban *** 10.4 (8.2, 13.1) 66 (16, 74) 15 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.5)
Porter County Urban *** 10.5 (8.6, 12.6) 65 (22, 73) 24 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Steuben County Rural *** 10.6 (7.1, 15.7) 64 (5, 75) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 2.0)
Tippecanoe County Urban *** 10.9 (8.7, 13.4) 63 (15, 73) 18 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.9)
Montgomery County Rural *** 10.9 (7.3, 15.9) 62 (4, 75) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.9)
Daviess County Rural *** 10.9 (6.8, 16.7) 61 (3, 75) 4
*
*
Randolph County Rural *** 11.1 (6.6, 17.7) 60 (2, 75) 4
*
*
Adams County Rural *** 11.5 (7.4, 17.1) 59 (2, 75) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.6)
Allen County Urban *** 11.5 (10.1, 13.0) 58 (20, 67) 52 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.0)
Carroll County Urban *** 11.5 (6.5, 19.2) 57 (1, 75) 3
*
*
Spencer County Rural *** 11.5 (6.4, 19.6) 56 (1, 75) 3
*
*
Howard County Urban *** 11.5 (9.0, 14.7) 55 (7, 73) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.5)
Jennings County Rural *** 11.6 (7.0, 18.2) 54 (1, 75) 4
*
*
Hancock County Urban *** 11.7 (8.9, 15.1) 53 (5, 74) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 2.0)
Clark County Urban *** 11.7 (9.4, 14.5) 52 (9, 72) 18 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 2.3)
Hendricks County Urban *** 11.8 (9.7, 14.2) 51 (11, 71) 23 stable stable trend 1.5 (-14.8, 16.3)
Gibson County Rural *** 11.8 (7.7, 17.5) 50 (2, 75) 5
*
*
Lake County Urban *** 11.9 (10.8, 13.2) 49 (20, 63) 78 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Madison County Urban *** 12.0 (9.8, 14.6) 48 (10, 70) 22 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.4)
Fulton County Rural *** 12.1 (7.2, 19.7) 47 (1, 75) 4
*
*
Marshall County Rural *** 12.2 (8.6, 16.8) 46 (3, 74) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 2.2)
Cass County Rural *** 12.2 (8.3, 17.5) 45 (2, 74) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.5)
Floyd County Urban *** 12.2 (9.4, 15.8) 44 (4, 72) 13 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 2.1)
Noble County Rural *** 12.3 (8.5, 17.2) 43 (2, 74) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.1)
Scott County Rural *** 12.3 (7.5, 19.3) 42 (1, 75) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.7)
Putnam County Rural *** 12.4 (8.2, 18.1) 41 (1, 75) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 3.1)
LaPorte County Urban *** 12.4 (10.0, 15.3) 40 (6, 70) 19 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Hamilton County Urban *** 12.4 (10.8, 14.2) 39 (12, 64) 45 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 2.0)
Marion County Urban *** 12.5 (11.5, 13.5) 38 (18, 55) 125 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.6)
Starke County Rural *** 12.5 (7.7, 19.6) 37 (1, 75) 4
*
*
Wabash County Rural *** 12.6 (8.6, 18.2) 36 (2, 74) 7
*
*
Bartholomew County Urban *** 12.6 (9.7, 16.2) 35 (3, 71) 13 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.6)
Vanderburgh County Urban *** 12.6 (10.6, 14.9) 34 (8, 66) 30 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.6)
Vigo County Urban *** 12.6 (10.0, 15.7) 33 (4, 70) 17 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.7, 3.3)
Posey County Urban *** 12.6 (7.9, 19.5) 32 (1, 75) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 3.2)
Harrison County Urban *** 12.7 (8.7, 18.1) 31 (1, 74) 7
*
*
White County Rural *** 12.8 (8.2, 19.4) 30 (1, 75) 5
*
*
Knox County Rural *** 12.8 (8.6, 18.5) 29 (1, 74) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.2)
Decatur County Rural *** 12.8 (8.0, 19.6) 28 (1, 75) 5
*
*
Dearborn County Urban *** 12.8 (9.3, 17.4) 27 (2, 73) 9 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 2.2)
Jackson County Rural *** 12.8 (9.1, 17.7) 26 (2, 73) 8 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 2.2)
Morgan County Urban *** 12.9 (9.8, 16.8) 25 (2, 71) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.9)
Orange County Rural *** 13.1 (7.7, 21.1) 24 (1, 75) 4
*
*
Miami County Rural *** 13.2 (9.0, 18.9) 23 (1, 74) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 3.1)
Wayne County Rural *** 13.3 (10.2, 17.1) 22 (2, 71) 13 rising rising trend 8.9 (0.2, 26.9)
Monroe County Urban *** 13.3 (10.8, 16.4) 21 (3, 66) 19 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.5)
Warrick County Urban *** 13.6 (10.3, 17.6) 20 (2, 69) 12 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 3.0)
Kosciusko County Rural *** 13.6 (10.6, 17.4) 19 (2, 69) 14 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.5, 3.2)
Clinton County Rural *** 13.8 (9.2, 20.1) 18 (1, 74) 6
*
*
Huntington County Rural *** 13.9 (9.7, 19.6) 17 (1, 73) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 3.1)
Grant County Rural *** 14.3 (10.9, 18.4) 16 (1, 68) 13 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 2.0)
Fountain County Rural *** 14.3 (8.4, 23.4) 15 (1, 75) 4
*
*
DeKalb County Rural *** 14.4 (10.3, 19.8) 14 (1, 71) 8
*
*
Franklin County Urban *** 14.7 (9.3, 22.4) 13 (1, 74) 5
*
*
Boone County Urban *** 14.7 (11.1, 19.1) 12 (1, 67) 12 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.7)
Shelby County Urban *** 14.8 (10.7, 20.1) 11 (1, 70) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.3, 4.0)
Newton County Urban *** 15.0 (8.7, 25.1) 10 (1, 75) 3
*
*
Lawrence County Rural *** 15.0 (11.1, 20.1) 9 (1, 68) 10
*
*
Clay County Urban *** 15.0 (10.0, 22.0) 8 (1, 74) 6 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.2, 4.8)
St. Joseph County Urban *** 15.0 (13.2, 17.1) 7 (3, 41) 50 rising rising trend 5.5 (0.8, 12.3)
Fayette County Rural *** 15.1 (9.5, 23.0) 6 (1, 74) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 2.1)
Henry County Rural *** 15.3 (11.4, 20.2) 5 (1, 68) 10 stable stable trend 1.4 (0.0, 3.2)
Greene County Rural *** 16.6 (11.8, 23.1) 4 (1, 70) 8 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.5, 4.7)
Ripley County Rural *** 17.0 (11.7, 24.0) 3 (1, 69) 7
*
*
Tipton County Urban *** 17.8 (11.1, 27.9) 2 (1, 74) 4
*
*
Pulaski County Rural *** 19.2 (11.2, 31.5) 1 (1, 73) 4
*
*
Benton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blackford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owen County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rush County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Switzerland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vermillion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top