Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

Pancreas, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana *** 12.0 (11.6, 12.3) N/A 979 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.3, 0.5)
United States *** 11.1 (11.0, 11.1) N/A 44,868 stable stable trend 0.1 (0.0, 0.2)
Marion County *** 12.6 (11.6, 13.7) 23 (11, 49) 124 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.5)
Lake County *** 11.8 (10.6, 13.1) 37 (15, 58) 74 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Allen County *** 12.3 (10.9, 13.9) 25 (10, 57) 54 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 0.9)
St. Joseph County *** 13.6 (11.9, 15.6) 14 (4, 49) 45 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.3)
Hamilton County *** 11.6 (9.9, 13.4) 41 (13, 64) 37 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.8)
Vanderburgh County *** 13.1 (11.1, 15.4) 19 (4, 60) 31 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.5)
Porter County *** 11.5 (9.5, 13.8) 42 (10, 67) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.4)
Elkhart County *** 10.2 (8.5, 12.3) 62 (21, 71) 24 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
LaPorte County *** 14.9 (12.2, 18.1) 8 (1, 51) 22 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 2.0)
Tippecanoe County *** 12.3 (10.0, 14.9) 26 (5, 66) 21 stable stable trend -7.9 (-22.6, 9.6)
Hendricks County *** 11.5 (9.3, 13.9) 44 (9, 68) 21 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Madison County *** 11.9 (9.7, 14.5) 33 (7, 67) 21 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Johnson County *** 11.1 (9.0, 13.5) 48 (11, 69) 19 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Vigo County *** 12.9 (10.2, 16.0) 22 (3, 65) 17 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.6, 3.1)
Delaware County *** 10.6 (8.4, 13.4) 54 (12, 72) 16 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Howard County *** 13.2 (10.4, 16.7) 17 (2, 64) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.0)
Monroe County *** 10.6 (8.3, 13.3) 55 (12, 72) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Clark County *** 10.7 (8.4, 13.5) 53 (11, 71) 15 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.5, 2.5)
Kosciusko County *** 14.7 (11.5, 18.6) 10 (1, 60) 14 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.6, 3.2)
Hancock County *** 13.5 (10.3, 17.3) 16 (2, 66) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.7)
Floyd County *** 11.8 (8.9, 15.3) 38 (5, 70) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Bartholomew County *** 10.9 (8.2, 14.3) 52 (7, 71) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.1)
Grant County *** 12.2 (9.1, 16.0) 28 (3, 70) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Morgan County *** 11.8 (8.8, 15.7) 35 (3, 70) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.3)
Wayne County *** 11.0 (8.2, 14.7) 49 (6, 72) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Henry County *** 14.9 (11.0, 19.8) 9 (1, 66) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.8)
Dearborn County *** 14.1 (10.3, 19.1) 12 (1, 69) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.9)
Shelby County *** 15.8 (11.5, 21.2) 5 (1, 62) 9 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.1, 3.6)
Warrick County *** 10.9 (8.0, 14.8) 51 (5, 73) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.2)
Lawrence County *** 12.9 (9.3, 17.7) 21 (1, 71) 9
*
*
Boone County *** 12.2 (8.8, 16.7) 27 (2, 71) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.9)
Cass County *** 16.1 (11.3, 22.3) 4 (1, 67) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.4, 2.9)
DeKalb County *** 15.0 (10.6, 20.6) 6 (1, 68) 8
*
*
Huntington County *** 16.5 (11.7, 22.9) 3 (1, 63) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.8, 3.0)
Noble County *** 11.7 (8.0, 16.6) 39 (2, 73) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Jackson County *** 12.0 (8.3, 17.0) 31 (2, 73) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.9)
Knox County *** 13.5 (9.2, 19.2) 15 (1, 71) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.9)
Marshall County *** 10.5 (7.2, 14.9) 57 (5, 73) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.7)
Montgomery County *** 11.8 (8.1, 16.9) 36 (2, 72) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.1)
Harrison County *** 11.9 (8.0, 17.2) 34 (2, 73) 6
*
*
Clinton County *** 14.9 (10.0, 21.6) 7 (1, 71) 6
*
*
Greene County *** 12.1 (8.0, 17.9) 29 (1, 73) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.5, 3.4)
Ripley County *** 14.5 (9.6, 21.2) 11 (1, 71) 6
*
*
Whitley County *** 11.0 (7.2, 16.4) 50 (3, 73) 5
*
*
Gibson County *** 10.4 (6.7, 15.7) 59 (3, 73) 5
*
*
Dubois County *** 7.9 (5.0, 12.0) 72 (20, 73) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.5)
Steuben County *** 9.1 (5.8, 14.0) 68 (8, 73) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.6)
Franklin County *** 14.1 (8.8, 21.7) 13 (1, 73) 5
*
*
Jasper County *** 10.3 (6.4, 15.9) 60 (3, 73) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.1)
Jennings County *** 13.1 (8.2, 20.1) 18 (1, 73) 5
*
*
Miami County *** 9.8 (6.1, 15.0) 63 (5, 73) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.5)
Putnam County *** 9.6 (6.0, 14.7) 65 (5, 73) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.4)
Wabash County *** 9.5 (5.9, 14.9) 66 (5, 73) 5
*
*
Clay County *** 11.6 (7.2, 18.0) 40 (1, 73) 4 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.5, 3.5)
Daviess County *** 11.5 (7.2, 17.5) 43 (2, 73) 4
*
*
Tipton County *** 19.7 (12.0, 31.1) 1 (1, 70) 4
*
*
Adams County *** 9.7 (5.9, 15.0) 64 (4, 73) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.7)
Decatur County *** 11.2 (6.8, 17.6) 47 (2, 73) 4
*
*
Scott County *** 12.1 (7.3, 19.2) 30 (1, 73) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 3.0)
White County *** 10.5 (6.3, 16.8) 56 (2, 73) 4
*
*
LaGrange County *** 8.6 (5.1, 13.6) 69 (6, 73) 4
*
*
Posey County *** 11.2 (6.6, 17.9) 46 (1, 73) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.3)
Starke County *** 12.5 (7.4, 20.1) 24 (1, 73) 4
*
*
Fayette County *** 10.4 (6.1, 17.1) 58 (2, 73) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.2)
Fulton County *** 11.9 (7.0, 19.4) 32 (1, 73) 4
*
*
Pulaski County *** 17.7 (10.5, 29.2) 2 (1, 71) 4
*
*
Fountain County *** 13.0 (7.5, 21.6) 20 (1, 73) 3
*
*
Randolph County *** 8.6 (5.0, 14.3) 70 (8, 73) 3
*
*
Washington County *** 9.5 (5.5, 15.6) 67 (4, 73) 3 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 3.0)
Wells County *** 8.0 (4.6, 13.3) 71 (10, 73) 3
*
*
Carroll County *** 10.3 (5.8, 17.4) 61 (2, 73) 3
*
*
Jefferson County *** 7.7 (4.3, 12.8) 73 (11, 73) 3 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Orange County *** 11.3 (6.4, 19.1) 45 (1, 73) 3
*
*
Benton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blackford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jay County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parke County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rush County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Spencer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Switzerland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vermillion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/30/2024 3:20 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top