Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Iowa by County

Colon & Rectum, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 8.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa No 13.6 (13.1, 14.2) N/A 564 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.4, -2.1)
United States No 13.1 (13.1, 13.2) N/A 52,152 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.8)
Appanoose County No 20.1 (12.6, 31.6) 10 (1, 58) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.8)
Benton County No 13.5 (8.4, 20.9) 37 (5, 60) 5
*
*
Black Hawk County No 11.6 (9.3, 14.3) 51 (24, 59) 19 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.1, -1.9)
Boone County No 15.9 (10.5, 23.4) 25 (3, 59) 6 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.7)
Bremer County No 11.9 (7.4, 18.6) 48 (10, 60) 4 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.4, -1.5)
Buchanan County No 11.9 (6.9, 19.5) 49 (8, 60) 3 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.1)
Buena Vista County No 19.3 (12.0, 29.4) 12 (1, 58) 5 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.8)
Butler County No 13.5 (8.0, 22.5) 38 (5, 60) 4 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.2)
Calhoun County No 24.2 (14.4, 39.6) 3 (1, 56) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.3)
Carroll County No 15.6 (10.0, 23.7) 26 (3, 60) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.2)
Cass County No 21.7 (13.3, 34.3) 6 (1, 56) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.2)
Cedar County No 12.0 (6.8, 20.2) 47 (6, 60) 3
*
*
Cerro Gordo County No 10.5 (7.1, 15.2) 58 (19, 60) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.0)
Cherokee County No 15.2 (8.2, 27.1) 29 (2, 60) 3 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.7)
Clay County No 16.8 (10.0, 27.0) 19 (2, 60) 4 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.3)
Clayton County No 18.7 (12.1, 28.2) 14 (1, 57) 6 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.1)
Clinton County No 13.0 (9.4, 17.7) 41 (12, 59) 9 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.8, -1.7)
Dallas County No 9.9 (7.1, 13.4) 59 (27, 60) 8 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.2, -2.4)
Delaware County No 16.7 (10.5, 26.0) 20 (2, 59) 5 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.5)
Des Moines County No 12.6 (8.7, 17.8) 43 (11, 60) 7 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.0, -2.4)
Dickinson County No 15.5 (9.7, 24.5) 27 (3, 60) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.2)
Dubuque County No 10.6 (8.1, 13.6) 57 (27, 60) 13 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.7, -2.8)
Emmet County No 28.9 (17.5, 46.2) 2 (1, 47) 4 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.4, 3.6)
Fayette County No 14.3 (8.9, 22.3) 32 (4, 60) 5 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.3)
Grundy County No 21.2 (12.4, 34.6) 8 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Hamilton County No 14.1 (7.8, 24.2) 34 (3, 60) 3
*
*
Hardin County No 11.3 (6.2, 19.7) 53 (8, 60) 3 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.0, -2.0)
Harrison County No 16.0 (9.4, 26.3) 24 (2, 60) 4
*
*
Howard County No 21.3 (12.3, 35.9) 7 (1, 59) 3 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.9, 1.1)
Jackson County No 16.5 (10.3, 25.5) 21 (2, 59) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.4)
Jasper County No 12.1 (8.4, 17.1) 46 (13, 60) 7 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.5)
Johnson County No 11.3 (8.8, 14.2) 54 (24, 60) 15 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.1)
Jones County No 18.5 (12.4, 27.0) 15 (2, 57) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.2)
Keokuk County No 23.8 (13.7, 39.4) 4 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Lee County No 16.3 (11.7, 22.4) 22 (4, 57) 9 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -1.5)
Linn County No 13.0 (11.1, 15.2) 40 (20, 55) 35 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.7, -2.6)
Madison County No 17.4 (10.3, 28.1) 16 (1, 60) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Mahaska County No 14.4 (8.9, 22.3) 31 (4, 60) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Marion County No 18.9 (13.5, 26.0) 13 (2, 53) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Marshall County No 12.7 (8.7, 18.0) 42 (11, 60) 7 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.0, -2.0)
Montgomery County No 20.8 (11.9, 35.0) 9 (1, 60) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.3)
Muscatine County No 16.9 (12.3, 22.7) 18 (4, 55) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Page County No 11.0 (6.2, 19.2) 56 (11, 60) 3
*
*
Plymouth County No 12.5 (7.6, 19.7) 44 (8, 60) 4
*
*
Polk County No 13.9 (12.5, 15.5) 35 (19, 47) 69 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Pottawattamie County No 14.2 (11.3, 17.6) 33 (12, 56) 18 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Poweshiek County No 16.2 (10.3, 25.1) 23 (2, 59) 5 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.4)
Sac County No 23.4 (13.1, 39.7) 5 (1, 57) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.1)
Scott County No 13.2 (11.0, 15.6) 39 (19, 55) 28 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.8, -2.2)
Sioux County Yes 7.1 (4.1, 11.7) 60 (40, 60) 3 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.4, -2.5)
Story County No 11.4 (8.5, 15.0) 52 (20, 60) 11 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -1.6)
Tama County No 14.6 (8.8, 23.5) 30 (4, 60) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.3)
Union County No 19.4 (10.8, 32.7) 11 (1, 60) 3 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.7)
Van Buren County No 29.0 (16.3, 49.4) 1 (1, 57) 3
*
*
Wapello County No 12.4 (8.4, 17.9) 45 (11, 60) 6 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.3)
Warren County No 11.7 (8.1, 16.4) 50 (15, 60) 7 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.2, -1.3)
Washington County No 15.3 (9.7, 23.3) 28 (3, 60) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.6)
Webster County No 17.0 (11.9, 23.6) 17 (3, 57) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Winneshiek County No 11.1 (6.7, 18.2) 55 (11, 60) 4
*
*
Woodbury County No 13.7 (10.9, 17.1) 36 (14, 57) 17 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Adair County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Adams County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Allamakee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Audubon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chickasaw County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fremont County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Guthrie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humboldt County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ida County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iowa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kossuth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Louisa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lucas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lyon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monona County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
O'Brien County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Palo Alto County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pocahontas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ringgold County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winnebago County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wright County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 5:14 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top