Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Iowa by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa *** 41.3 (40.4, 42.2) N/A 1,665 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.0, -1.7)
United States *** 38.5 (38.4, 38.6) N/A 149,208 falling falling trend -5.0 (-5.4, -4.5)
Polk County *** 43.3 (40.6, 46.1) 41 (24, 63) 205 falling falling trend -7.9 (-12.3, -3.4)
Linn County *** 42.0 (38.5, 45.8) 49 (23, 72) 110 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -1.5)
Scott County *** 42.7 (38.8, 47.0) 44 (20, 71) 90 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.9, -1.4)
Black Hawk County *** 43.1 (38.7, 48.0) 43 (16, 73) 71 falling falling trend -5.2 (-8.2, -2.1)
Pottawattamie County *** 49.6 (44.0, 55.6) 16 (4, 55) 61 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Woodbury County *** 49.1 (43.5, 55.3) 20 (5, 57) 58 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Dubuque County *** 38.5 (33.8, 43.8) 66 (27, 85) 49 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Johnson County *** 28.4 (24.3, 32.9) 93 (70, 95) 37 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.6, -2.0)
Clinton County *** 43.3 (36.6, 51.0) 42 (9, 82) 31 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Des Moines County *** 49.6 (41.8, 58.6) 17 (2, 67) 30 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Dallas County *** 36.0 (30.1, 42.7) 75 (27, 92) 27 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.1)
Cerro Gordo County *** 38.9 (32.5, 46.5) 61 (19, 89) 27 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
Wapello County *** 55.6 (46.5, 66.3) 8 (1, 59) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Marshall County *** 47.1 (39.2, 56.3) 29 (3, 75) 26 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Story County *** 29.8 (24.8, 35.6) 90 (57, 95) 26 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Lee County *** 47.6 (39.5, 57.2) 27 (4, 77) 25 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Warren County *** 37.7 (30.9, 45.6) 70 (18, 91) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Jasper County *** 39.9 (32.6, 48.4) 56 (14, 89) 22 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.6)
Muscatine County *** 40.1 (32.7, 48.7) 55 (12, 89) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Webster County *** 41.0 (33.4, 50.1) 52 (10, 88) 21 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Benton County *** 46.9 (37.4, 58.3) 31 (3, 87) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Marion County *** 37.8 (29.8, 47.3) 69 (15, 93) 16 falling falling trend -24.1 (-32.9, -14.2)
Boone County *** 44.2 (34.7, 55.7) 39 (4, 89) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Plymouth County *** 42.3 (33.1, 53.6) 47 (4, 91) 15 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Mahaska County *** 47.5 (37.1, 60.1) 28 (2, 87) 15 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 1.9)
Hardin County *** 49.5 (38.5, 63.2) 18 (1, 82) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5)
Carroll County *** 46.4 (35.9, 59.4) 34 (2, 86) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Fayette County *** 41.4 (31.8, 53.4) 51 (6, 92) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
Page County *** 50.9 (39.0, 66.0) 12 (1, 82) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Bremer County *** 37.0 (28.3, 47.7) 72 (13, 95) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.8)
Cedar County *** 46.9 (35.9, 60.8) 30 (2, 86) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Dickinson County *** 39.9 (30.5, 52.0) 57 (8, 93) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Buchanan County *** 45.6 (34.9, 58.7) 36 (2, 89) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Poweshiek County *** 46.2 (35.1, 60.2) 35 (1, 88) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Tama County *** 48.0 (36.6, 62.5) 24 (1, 88) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2)
Appanoose County *** 56.5 (42.6, 74.3) 7 (1, 73) 12 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 3.0)
Henry County *** 40.6 (30.6, 53.2) 54 (5, 93) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Jones County *** 35.9 (26.9, 47.3) 76 (15, 95) 11 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Floyd County *** 41.7 (31.3, 55.0) 50 (5, 92) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Jackson County *** 37.8 (28.2, 49.9) 68 (10, 94) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.5, 0.0)
Washington County *** 35.0 (26.1, 46.2) 80 (17, 95) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.6)
Harrison County *** 50.0 (37.3, 66.4) 15 (1, 86) 11 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Allamakee County *** 45.5 (33.5, 61.1) 37 (1, 91) 10
*
*
Monona County *** 61.3 (45.5, 82.7) 2 (1, 75) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.7)
Butler County *** 44.4 (32.5, 59.8) 38 (2, 92) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Hamilton County *** 42.2 (31.3, 56.5) 48 (4, 93) 10 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Union County *** 52.1 (38.3, 70.0) 10 (1, 87) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Cherokee County *** 49.2 (35.4, 67.5) 19 (1, 91) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 2.8)
Clayton County *** 32.6 (23.9, 44.1) 83 (25, 96) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.0)
Humboldt County *** 57.8 (42.0, 78.8) 5 (1, 81) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.2)
Buena Vista County *** 35.9 (25.6, 48.9) 77 (8, 96) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Cass County *** 38.6 (27.6, 53.4) 63 (6, 95) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Clay County *** 35.6 (25.6, 48.8) 78 (12, 95) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
Crawford County *** 36.9 (26.6, 50.3) 73 (10, 95) 9 stable stable trend -22.7 (-54.8, 32.3)
Delaware County *** 32.6 (23.5, 44.6) 84 (24, 96) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.6)
Jefferson County *** 33.9 (23.8, 47.2) 82 (13, 96) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.6)
Montgomery County *** 48.8 (34.8, 67.6) 22 (1, 91) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.2)
O'Brien County *** 38.5 (27.4, 53.4) 65 (5, 95) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.1)
Kossuth County *** 30.7 (21.8, 42.9) 88 (26, 96) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Mills County *** 40.9 (29.1, 56.4) 53 (3, 95) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Sac County *** 48.6 (34.4, 67.9) 23 (1, 92) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 3.0)
Sioux County *** 18.9 (13.4, 26.1) 96 (85, 96) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Guthrie County *** 46.8 (33.1, 65.3) 32 (1, 93) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.4)
Louisa County *** 50.6 (36.0, 69.8) 13 (1, 89) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.4)
Palo Alto County *** 52.0 (36.7, 72.7) 11 (1, 90) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.8)
Wright County *** 36.9 (25.9, 51.7) 74 (7, 96) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
Shelby County *** 39.2 (27.6, 55.3) 59 (5, 95) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.1)
Clarke County *** 57.6 (40.6, 80.3) 6 (1, 86) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.9, 3.2)
Keokuk County *** 47.8 (33.5, 67.2) 25 (1, 92) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.8)
Howard County *** 50.3 (35.1, 71.0) 14 (1, 93) 7 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 3.5)
Iowa County *** 32.6 (22.7, 45.6) 85 (17, 96) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.5)
Van Buren County *** 64.7 (44.9, 91.7) 1 (1, 81) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.3, 4.0)
Winneshiek County *** 22.2 (15.3, 31.8) 95 (69, 96) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.6)
Madison County *** 31.2 (21.3, 44.5) 87 (20, 96) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Mitchell County *** 37.2 (25.4, 53.8) 71 (5, 96) 7 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.1)
Monroe County *** 54.9 (37.6, 78.6) 9 (1, 92) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Adair County *** 58.3 (38.3, 86.1) 4 (1, 91) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.7, 2.9)
Greene County *** 42.5 (28.7, 62.0) 45 (2, 95) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.8, 3.1)
Emmet County *** 43.6 (28.5, 64.5) 40 (1, 95) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.8)
Lucas County *** 42.3 (28.4, 62.1) 46 (2, 95) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.7, 0.7)
Chickasaw County *** 34.2 (22.3, 50.7) 81 (5, 96) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.9)
Grundy County *** 28.5 (19.0, 42.0) 92 (23, 96) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 1.9)
Lyon County *** 38.6 (25.6, 56.2) 64 (4, 96) 6
*
*
Calhoun County *** 35.3 (23.2, 52.6) 79 (5, 96) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.1)
Hancock County *** 29.2 (19.2, 43.9) 91 (20, 96) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.7)
Decatur County *** 47.8 (30.8, 71.8) 26 (1, 95) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.1)
Ida County *** 46.6 (30.2, 70.5) 33 (1, 95) 5
*
*
Ringgold County *** 59.6 (38.1, 91.7) 3 (1, 94) 5 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.8, 3.4)
Winnebago County *** 31.7 (20.4, 48.1) 86 (12, 96) 5 stable stable trend -14.6 (-27.2, 0.3)
Fremont County *** 38.3 (24.4, 59.5) 67 (2, 96) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.4)
Franklin County *** 27.9 (17.4, 43.6) 94 (20, 96) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.4)
Worth County *** 38.8 (24.2, 60.5) 62 (2, 96) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 1.0)
Wayne County *** 39.6 (23.8, 63.8) 58 (1, 96) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.1)
Pocahontas County *** 30.5 (18.2, 50.5) 89 (8, 96) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.1)
Taylor County *** 39.1 (21.2, 66.6) 60 (1, 96) 3 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 2.9)
Adams County *** 49.0 (27.8, 84.6) 21 (1, 96) 3
*
*
Audubon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/08/2021 12:54 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top