Death Rates Table
County
|
Met Healthy People Objective of ***? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa | *** | 40.0 (39.1, 40.8) | N/A | 1,636 |
falling 
|
-5.0 (-7.2, -2.8) |
| United States | *** | 36.7 (36.6, 36.8) | N/A | 146,023 |
falling
|
-4.9 (-5.2, -4.5) |
| Van Buren County | *** | 68.7 (48.2, 96.3) | 1 (1, 68) | 8 |
stable 
|
2.0 (0.0, 3.9) |
| Clarke County | *** | 59.5 (42.3, 82.2) | 2 (1, 81) | 8 |
stable
|
1.4 (-0.4, 3.3) |
| Palo Alto County | *** | 57.1 (41.3, 78.3) | 3 (1, 81) | 9 |
stable
|
0.5 (-1.2, 2.1) |
| Ringgold County | *** | 56.0 (35.5, 87.1) | 4 (1, 95) | 5 |
stable
|
1.0 (-1.2, 3.2) |
| Monona County | *** | 55.0 (39.9, 75.6) | 5 (1, 83) | 9 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.6, 1.5) |
| Appanoose County | *** | 54.8 (41.1, 72.4) | 6 (1, 81) | 11 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.6, 2.7) |
| Adams County | *** | 53.3 (30.8, 90.5) | 7 (1, 98) | 3 |
|
|
| Wapello County | *** | 52.7 (43.8, 63.1) | 8 (1, 60) | 25 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.6, 0.5) |
| Ida County | *** | 52.1 (34.7, 76.9) | 9 (1, 95) | 6 |
|
|
| Hardin County | *** | 50.8 (39.8, 64.7) | 10 (1, 79) | 15 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.6, 1.2) |
| Mahaska County | *** | 50.8 (39.9, 64.0) | 11 (1, 78) | 16 |
stable
|
0.6 (-0.6, 1.8) |
| Des Moines County | *** | 50.7 (42.8, 59.8) | 12 (2, 60) | 31 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.2, 0.7) |
| Greene County | *** | 50.3 (35.0, 71.2) | 13 (1, 89) | 7 |
stable
|
0.9 (-0.9, 2.8) |
| Boone County | *** | 50.2 (40.0, 62.3) | 14 (1, 72) | 18 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.5, 0.9) |
| Adair County | *** | 49.8 (31.7, 75.8) | 15 (1, 96) | 6 |
stable
|
0.7 (-1.1, 2.5) |
| Harrison County | *** | 49.6 (36.9, 65.9) | 16 (1, 88) | 11 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.4, -0.2) |
| Pottawattamie County | *** | 49.2 (43.7, 55.2) | 17 (4, 49) | 60 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.6, -0.3) |
| Emmet County | *** | 48.8 (32.8, 70.8) | 18 (1, 95) | 7 |
stable
|
0.3 (-1.1, 1.7) |
| Allamakee County | *** | 48.6 (35.9, 65.0) | 19 (1, 89) | 11 |
|
|
| Wayne County | *** | 48.4 (29.3, 76.4) | 20 (1, 97) | 4 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-2.6, 1.4) |
| Sac County | *** | 48.0 (33.9, 67.2) | 21 (1, 90) | 8 |
stable
|
0.8 (-1.1, 2.6) |
| Cherokee County | *** | 47.7 (34.3, 65.6) | 22 (1, 91) | 10 |
stable
|
0.6 (-1.3, 2.5) |
| Woodbury County | *** | 47.3 (41.9, 53.3) | 23 (5, 58) | 56 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.5, -0.2) |
| Humboldt County | *** | 46.7 (32.8, 65.9) | 24 (1, 95) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-2.4, 0.9) |
| Montgomery County | *** | 46.3 (32.7, 64.8) | 25 (1, 94) | 8 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-2.4, 0.0) |
| Louisa County | *** | 46.2 (32.3, 64.6) | 26 (1, 93) | 7 |
stable
|
0.6 (-0.9, 2.1) |
| Keokuk County | *** | 45.7 (31.8, 64.6) | 27 (1, 94) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-2.0, 1.4) |
| Monroe County | *** | 45.4 (29.8, 67.6) | 28 (1, 97) | 5 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.3, 1.7) |
| Fremont County | *** | 45.3 (30.1, 67.5) | 29 (1, 97) | 6 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.2, 0.6) |
| Black Hawk County | *** | 45.2 (40.7, 50.2) | 30 (10, 61) | 75 |
falling
|
-3.8 (-6.5, -1.0) |
| Benton County | *** | 44.3 (35.1, 55.5) | 31 (4, 88) | 16 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.5, 0.2) |
| Tama County | *** | 44.3 (33.4, 58.2) | 32 (2, 91) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.5, 1.0) |
| Howard County | *** | 44.0 (30.0, 63.5) | 33 (1, 96) | 7 |
stable
|
1.4 (-0.4, 3.2) |
| Cedar County | *** | 44.0 (33.3, 57.5) | 34 (2, 91) | 12 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.5, 1.3) |
| Union County | *** | 44.0 (30.7, 61.6) | 35 (1, 96) | 8 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.7, 1.2) |
| Page County | *** | 43.7 (33.0, 57.5) | 36 (2, 90) | 12 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.6, 0.8) |
| Mills County | *** | 43.6 (31.5, 59.4) | 37 (1, 93) | 9 |
stable
|
-1.4 (-2.6, 0.0) |
| Marshall County | *** | 43.2 (35.7, 51.9) | 38 (6, 82) | 24 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.7, -0.9) |
| Scott County | *** | 43.0 (39.1, 47.2) | 39 (17, 67) | 92 |
falling
|
-3.1 (-4.7, -1.5) |
| Lee County | *** | 42.8 (35.2, 51.8) | 40 (7, 83) | 23 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.6, -0.5) |
| Cass County | *** | 42.8 (31.2, 58.2) | 41 (2, 93) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-2.3, 0.6) |
| Dickinson County | *** | 42.2 (32.6, 54.7) | 42 (4, 90) | 14 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.5, 0.3) |
| Webster County | *** | 42.2 (34.4, 51.4) | 43 (7, 84) | 22 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.4, -0.7) |
| Carroll County | *** | 42.1 (32.0, 54.7) | 44 (4, 90) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-2.2, 0.9) |
| Fayette County | *** | 41.7 (32.1, 53.8) | 45 (5, 92) | 13 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.0, 0.0) |
| Butler County | *** | 41.6 (30.2, 56.6) | 46 (2, 94) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.5, 1.0) |
| Taylor County | *** | 41.5 (23.0, 69.7) | 47 (1, 98) | 4 |
stable
|
0.7 (-1.2, 2.6) |
| Clinton County | *** | 41.4 (35.0, 48.8) | 48 (11, 82) | 30 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.2, -0.8) |
| Lyon County | *** | 41.4 (27.9, 59.5) | 49 (2, 97) | 6 |
|
|
| Poweshiek County | *** | 41.3 (31.0, 54.6) | 50 (3, 93) | 12 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.5, 1.3) |
| Polk County | *** | 40.9 (38.4, 43.6) | 51 (28, 66) | 199 |
falling
|
-7.1 (-10.4, -3.7) |
| O'Brien County | *** | 40.9 (29.2, 56.2) | 52 (3, 96) | 9 |
stable
|
0.3 (-1.2, 1.9) |
| Decatur County | *** | 40.6 (25.0, 63.4) | 53 (1, 98) | 4 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-2.3, 1.8) |
| Guthrie County | *** | 40.4 (28.0, 57.4) | 54 (2, 96) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-2.1, 1.0) |
| Henry County | *** | 40.3 (30.3, 52.8) | 55 (5, 95) | 11 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.4, -0.1) |
| Linn County | *** | 39.9 (36.5, 43.5) | 56 (28, 74) | 107 |
falling
|
-2.6 (-3.5, -1.7) |
| Calhoun County | *** | 39.7 (26.7, 58.0) | 57 (2, 97) | 6 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.1, 0.2) |
| Hamilton County | *** | 39.4 (28.8, 53.2) | 58 (6, 96) | 10 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.9, -0.4) |
| Buchanan County | *** | 39.3 (29.5, 51.6) | 59 (6, 94) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.7, 0.5) |
| Muscatine County | *** | 38.4 (31.3, 46.9) | 60 (12, 90) | 21 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.1, -0.2) |
| Chickasaw County | *** | 38.3 (26.1, 55.1) | 61 (3, 98) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-2.1, 1.0) |
| Jackson County | *** | 38.3 (28.8, 50.4) | 62 (7, 95) | 11 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.5, -0.2) |
| Floyd County | *** | 38.2 (28.0, 51.6) | 63 (5, 96) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.8, 0.2) |
| Shelby County | *** | 37.8 (26.4, 53.5) | 64 (6, 97) | 8 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.6, 1.7) |
| Washington County | *** | 37.2 (28.1, 48.7) | 65 (9, 95) | 12 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.0, 1.4) |
| Warren County | *** | 37.2 (30.5, 45.0) | 66 (20, 92) | 22 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.1, 0.1) |
| Cerro Gordo County | *** | 36.9 (30.7, 44.1) | 67 (22, 91) | 26 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-3.0, -1.7) |
| Jasper County | *** | 36.8 (30.0, 45.0) | 68 (18, 93) | 20 |
falling
|
-6.2 (-9.7, -2.6) |
| Pocahontas County | *** | 36.5 (22.9, 57.7) | 69 (3, 98) | 5 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-2.9, 0.6) |
| Bremer County | *** | 35.9 (27.4, 46.4) | 70 (13, 96) | 13 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.7, 0.5) |
| Marion County | *** | 35.6 (28.1, 44.7) | 71 (16, 95) | 16 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-2.0, 0.1) |
| Worth County | *** | 35.5 (21.6, 56.7) | 72 (3, 98) | 4 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-3.7, 0.6) |
| Plymouth County | *** | 35.2 (26.9, 45.6) | 73 (15, 96) | 13 |
stable
|
0.4 (-0.9, 1.8) |
| Buena Vista County | *** | 34.9 (24.8, 47.7) | 74 (10, 98) | 8 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.7, 1.0) |
| Dubuque County | *** | 34.5 (30.0, 39.5) | 75 (39, 90) | 45 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.4, -1.2) |
| Dallas County | *** | 34.5 (28.9, 40.8) | 76 (32, 93) | 28 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.8, -1.2) |
| Osceola County | *** | 34.2 (20.1, 57.0) | 77 (3, 98) | 4 |
|
|
| Lucas County | *** | 34.0 (21.9, 52.0) | 78 (7, 98) | 5 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-3.6, 0.5) |
| Jones County | *** | 33.8 (25.1, 45.0) | 79 (18, 97) | 11 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.9, -0.4) |
| Hancock County | *** | 33.7 (22.8, 49.2) | 80 (7, 98) | 6 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.8, 0.6) |
| Clayton County | *** | 32.1 (23.4, 43.7) | 81 (21, 98) | 9 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-2.5, 0.1) |
| Mitchell County | *** | 31.7 (20.9, 47.4) | 82 (11, 98) | 6 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-3.5, -0.3) |
| Crawford County | *** | 31.4 (21.9, 44.0) | 83 (14, 98) | 7 |
stable
|
-15.1 (-28.2, 0.3) |
| Clay County | *** | 31.4 (22.2, 43.6) | 84 (18, 98) | 8 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-2.8, 0.4) |
| Madison County | *** | 30.3 (20.8, 43.3) | 85 (19, 98) | 7 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-3.1, -0.2) |
| Iowa County | *** | 29.8 (20.5, 42.3) | 86 (23, 98) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-2.0, 1.4) |
| Story County | *** | 29.4 (24.4, 35.0) | 87 (57, 97) | 26 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.1, -0.2) |
| Winnebago County | *** | 28.9 (18.7, 44.0) | 88 (14, 98) | 5 |
falling
|
-9.6 (-17.6, -0.9) |
| Wright County | *** | 28.6 (19.5, 41.6) | 89 (28, 98) | 7 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-2.8, 0.4) |
| Grundy County | *** | 28.3 (18.9, 41.8) | 90 (24, 98) | 6 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-2.2, 1.7) |
| Jefferson County | *** | 28.3 (19.3, 40.6) | 91 (28, 98) | 7 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.5, 0.3) |
| Delaware County | *** | 28.2 (19.9, 39.5) | 92 (32, 98) | 8 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-3.2, -0.8) |
| Johnson County | *** | 27.8 (23.8, 32.2) | 93 (69, 97) | 37 |
falling
|
-4.4 (-6.4, -2.3) |
| Davis County | *** | 26.7 (15.5, 44.0) | 94 (21, 98) | 3 |
|
|
| Franklin County | *** | 25.2 (15.2, 40.3) | 95 (31, 98) | 4 |
stable
|
-46.8 (-80.5, 45.6) |
| Kossuth County | *** | 24.7 (16.8, 36.1) | 96 (49, 98) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.8, 1.2) |
| Winneshiek County | *** | 23.1 (16.1, 32.7) | 97 (62, 98) | 7 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-3.4, -0.7) |
| Sioux County | *** | 18.8 (13.3, 26.0) | 98 (83, 98) | 8 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.9, 0.7) |
| Audubon County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/23/2021 11:08 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/23/2021 11:08 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.