Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Kansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kansas No 155.6 (153.8, 157.5) N/A 5,548 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.0)
United States No 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) N/A 599,666 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Sheridan County Yes 115.6 (76.4, 174.8) 105 (16, 105) 6 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.3)
Norton County Yes 120.6 (88.7, 161.9) 104 (29, 105) 10 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Gove County No 122.9 (80.3, 185.2) 103 (12, 105) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Haskell County No 126.1 (82.6, 184.9) 102 (8, 105) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.1)
Jackson County No 126.5 (104.8, 152.0) 101 (44, 105) 24 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Cheyenne County No 127.6 (80.2, 196.6) 100 (6, 105) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.2)
Johnson County No 129.0 (125.2, 133.0) 99 (82, 102) 865 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Kearny County No 129.3 (86.3, 187.1) 98 (7, 105) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Miami County No 129.6 (114.9, 145.8) 97 (63, 104) 58 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Stanton County No 132.0 (78.4, 212.4) 96 (3, 105) 4
*
*
Douglas County No 133.6 (124.0, 143.8) 95 (67, 102) 149 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Mitchell County No 135.4 (103.0, 176.2) 94 (17, 105) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Sherman County No 137.4 (103.8, 179.7) 93 (11, 105) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Hodgeman County No 138.1 (87.7, 216.9) 92 (3, 105) 5 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Seward County No 138.5 (115.4, 164.6) 91 (28, 105) 26 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Clay County No 138.5 (110.7, 172.3) 90 (19, 105) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Riley County No 139.3 (125.4, 154.3) 89 (49, 102) 78 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Gray County No 140.0 (102.5, 187.2) 88 (8, 105) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Ellis County No 141.4 (123.4, 161.3) 87 (36, 103) 48 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Pottawatomie County No 141.5 (121.7, 163.7) 86 (31, 103) 38 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Thomas County No 142.7 (111.5, 180.6) 85 (15, 105) 15 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Stafford County No 142.7 (103.1, 194.9) 84 (6, 105) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Washington County No 143.7 (111.2, 185.0) 83 (13, 105) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Rooks County No 144.7 (109.6, 189.6) 82 (9, 105) 12 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.0)
Wabaunsee County No 145.1 (113.3, 184.4) 81 (12, 105) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Graham County No 145.9 (101.7, 210.7) 80 (4, 105) 8 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.4)
Barton County No 147.2 (129.9, 166.3) 79 (28, 100) 57 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Ford County No 148.6 (129.6, 169.6) 78 (25, 100) 46 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Stevens County No 148.6 (108.8, 198.8) 77 (5, 105) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.1)
Meade County No 148.9 (108.2, 202.0) 76 (4, 105) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Cloud County No 149.4 (120.8, 183.6) 75 (10, 104) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Coffey County No 149.7 (119.8, 185.7) 74 (12, 104) 19 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Finney County No 149.9 (131.1, 170.6) 73 (25, 100) 48 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Ness County No 150.4 (101.6, 218.6) 72 (3, 105) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Jewell County No 151.5 (110.1, 210.7) 71 (4, 105) 9 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Reno County No 151.9 (140.5, 164.1) 70 (35, 91) 140 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Barber County No 153.7 (115.1, 203.6) 69 (5, 105) 12 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.2)
Logan County No 153.9 (101.1, 226.7) 68 (2, 105) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Clark County No 153.9 (96.2, 238.3) 67 (2, 105) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.6)
Phillips County No 154.6 (118.2, 200.5) 66 (6, 105) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
McPherson County No 154.6 (138.1, 172.7) 65 (24, 95) 71 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4)
Harvey County No 154.7 (139.1, 171.7) 64 (25, 93) 78 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Jefferson County No 156.3 (135.1, 180.2) 63 (18, 100) 41 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Scott County No 156.9 (118.2, 206.0) 62 (5, 105) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Lincoln County No 157.0 (111.1, 220.4) 61 (3, 105) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Dickinson County No 158.5 (138.3, 181.2) 60 (16, 98) 47 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Allen County No 159.0 (134.1, 187.7) 59 (12, 101) 31 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Wallace County No 159.1 (86.5, 272.1) 58 (2, 105) 3
*
*
Osborne County No 159.1 (117.5, 214.7) 57 (3, 105) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Sedgwick County No 159.2 (154.5, 163.9) 56 (41, 74) 929 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Pratt County No 159.5 (131.1, 193.1) 55 (7, 102) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Pawnee County No 159.6 (126.4, 200.6) 54 (5, 104) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Chautauqua County No 160.2 (115.2, 220.8) 53 (3, 105) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.3)
Rawlins County No 160.6 (114.7, 225.8) 52 (3, 105) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 1.8)
Woodson County No 161.4 (114.2, 225.7) 51 (2, 105) 9 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Marshall County No 162.2 (134.6, 194.6) 50 (7, 101) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Lyon County No 162.3 (144.4, 182.0) 49 (14, 90) 62 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Smith County No 162.4 (118.3, 221.4) 48 (3, 105) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Rice County No 162.8 (133.0, 197.9) 47 (6, 102) 22 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.6, 0.2)
Marion County No 163.6 (138.5, 192.8) 46 (9, 98) 34 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Butler County No 163.9 (151.3, 177.3) 45 (23, 80) 132 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.2)
Shawnee County No 165.3 (157.9, 172.9) 44 (27, 69) 401 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
Kiowa County No 165.8 (112.1, 240.5) 43 (2, 105) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.7)
Saline County No 165.9 (152.8, 179.9) 42 (20, 80) 124 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Leavenworth County No 166.2 (154.4, 178.7) 41 (22, 77) 153 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
Montgomery County No 166.6 (150.0, 184.6) 40 (14, 83) 79 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.4, -1.3)
Ottawa County No 167.1 (129.3, 213.9) 39 (3, 103) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Osage County No 167.4 (144.2, 193.9) 38 (9, 94) 39 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Morris County No 168.2 (130.5, 215.1) 37 (3, 103) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Sumner County No 168.8 (149.2, 190.6) 36 (11, 85) 57 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Linn County No 169.9 (141.5, 203.4) 35 (6, 100) 27 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Labette County No 171.8 (150.4, 195.6) 34 (9, 88) 50 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Atchison County No 171.8 (147.1, 199.7) 33 (7, 92) 36 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Morton County No 175.1 (122.4, 246.8) 32 (2, 105) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.2)
Nemaha County No 175.1 (145.2, 209.9) 31 (4, 95) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Bourbon County No 178.2 (152.4, 207.6) 30 (5, 88) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Comanche County No 179.3 (120.3, 267.3) 29 (2, 105) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.2)
Wyandotte County No 179.6 (170.4, 189.3) 28 (13, 51) 297 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.2)
Hamilton County No 179.7 (115.1, 268.2) 27 (2, 105) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Neosho County No 179.8 (155.5, 207.1) 26 (5, 80) 42 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Cowley County No 183.4 (166.1, 202.2) 25 (6, 66) 87 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Brown County No 184.5 (154.2, 220.0) 24 (3, 88) 27 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3)
Geary County No 185.2 (160.3, 212.6) 23 (4, 77) 41 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Trego County No 185.7 (138.2, 250.4) 22 (2, 102) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Wilson County No 187.6 (155.3, 225.5) 21 (3, 87) 25 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Chase County No 188.7 (129.9, 268.4) 20 (2, 105) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Franklin County No 189.2 (168.4, 212.0) 19 (4, 66) 63 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Ellsworth County No 189.8 (151.7, 236.0) 18 (2, 94) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.3)
Wichita County No 190.2 (122.8, 284.4) 17 (2, 105) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.0)
Cherokee County No 191.8 (169.3, 216.8) 16 (3, 67) 55 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Republic County No 192.2 (146.9, 249.2) 15 (2, 98) 16 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Russell County No 196.0 (158.1, 241.4) 14 (2, 89) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Grant County No 198.7 (155.7, 250.0) 13 (2, 94) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Decatur County No 200.1 (143.3, 276.4) 12 (2, 103) 11 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 2.1)
Rush County No 200.9 (149.3, 269.1) 11 (2, 100) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Anderson County No 201.2 (166.3, 242.3) 10 (2, 77) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Greenwood County No 202.4 (162.9, 250.4) 9 (2, 87) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Crawford County No 205.1 (186.5, 225.0) 8 (2, 36) 94 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Doniphan County No 205.4 (168.9, 248.4) 7 (2, 77) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Harper County No 208.1 (166.9, 258.1) 6 (2, 79) 19 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Elk County No 216.2 (156.7, 297.0) 5 (1, 99) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Lane County No 220.8 (147.6, 327.1) 4 (1, 103) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.3)
Greeley County No 220.9 (127.3, 362.9) 3 (1, 105) 4
*
*
Edwards County No 235.2 (169.3, 320.9) 2 (1, 93) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.7)
Kingman County No 353.6 (301.6, 412.9) 1 (1, 3) 38 rising rising trend 17.7 (4.3, 32.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/01/2022 3:56 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top