Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan *** 162.7 (161.6, 163.7) N/A 20,843 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
United States *** 152.4 (152.3, 152.6) N/A 598,381 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Alcona County *** 178.7 (153.8, 208.7) 18 (1, 78) 44 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Alger County *** 181.6 (151.8, 217.0) 12 (1, 81) 29 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Allegan County *** 165.1 (155.6, 175.1) 53 (15, 70) 236 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Alpena County *** 178.4 (161.6, 196.8) 21 (2, 69) 88 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Antrim County *** 152.1 (135.3, 171.0) 69 (20, 83) 66 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Arenac County *** 172.0 (149.3, 197.9) 36 (1, 79) 46 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Baraga County *** 184.4 (152.2, 222.5) 10 (1, 81) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Barry County *** 156.0 (143.8, 169.0) 67 (22, 80) 129 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Bay County *** 174.6 (165.0, 184.6) 27 (7, 60) 266 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
Benzie County *** 138.8 (119.6, 160.7) 79 (31, 83) 43 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Berrien County *** 166.3 (158.7, 174.3) 50 (19, 66) 376 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Branch County *** 178.4 (163.0, 195.0) 20 (3, 67) 103 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Calhoun County *** 179.4 (170.5, 188.7) 17 (5, 51) 318 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
Cass County *** 173.0 (159.7, 187.3) 30 (5, 69) 133 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.8)
Charlevoix County *** 157.0 (139.8, 176.1) 65 (10, 82) 68 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Cheboygan County *** 165.7 (149.1, 184.2) 52 (6, 79) 79 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Chippewa County *** 172.2 (156.1, 189.6) 34 (4, 73) 86 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Clare County *** 215.1 (196.5, 235.4) 1 (1, 13) 107 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Clinton County *** 141.1 (130.6, 152.3) 77 (59, 83) 138 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Crawford County *** 176.3 (152.7, 203.5) 24 (2, 78) 44 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Delta County *** 174.1 (159.2, 190.3) 28 (4, 69) 109 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Dickinson County *** 151.0 (134.4, 169.5) 70 (19, 83) 65 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Eaton County *** 160.0 (150.8, 169.7) 60 (25, 74) 236 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Emmet County *** 163.7 (148.3, 180.5) 54 (7, 78) 88 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Genesee County *** 173.4 (168.3, 178.6) 29 (14, 53) 931 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Gladwin County *** 180.0 (161.8, 200.1) 14 (2, 68) 82 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Gogebic County *** 156.3 (135.5, 180.3) 66 (8, 83) 44 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Grand Traverse County *** 137.5 (128.5, 147.0) 80 (65, 83) 184 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Gratiot County *** 172.6 (156.8, 189.7) 32 (4, 72) 91 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Hillsdale County *** 177.8 (163.1, 193.5) 22 (3, 63) 116 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Houghton County *** 169.4 (152.5, 187.7) 47 (5, 75) 78 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Huron County *** 166.2 (150.9, 183.0) 51 (7, 77) 94 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Ingham County *** 157.6 (151.1, 164.3) 63 (41, 73) 464 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Ionia County *** 170.9 (157.4, 185.3) 43 (6, 70) 124 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Iosco County *** 170.2 (153.7, 188.7) 45 (4, 74) 87 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Iron County *** 162.3 (137.7, 191.4) 57 (3, 83) 39 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Isabella County *** 157.4 (143.9, 171.9) 64 (15, 80) 103 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Jackson County *** 184.3 (176.0, 192.9) 11 (4, 39) 390 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Kalamazoo County *** 150.6 (144.3, 157.1) 71 (53, 78) 444 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Kalkaska County *** 194.1 (169.3, 221.9) 5 (1, 67) 48 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Kent County *** 148.0 (143.9, 152.2) 72 (62, 78) 1,020 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.1)
Keweenaw County *** 118.5 (74.8, 191.7) 83 (2, 83) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.1)
Lake County *** 186.3 (159.9, 216.9) 8 (1, 74) 43 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
Lapeer County *** 172.1 (161.4, 183.5) 35 (7, 65) 202 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Leelanau County *** 123.8 (107.8, 142.1) 82 (66, 83) 54 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Lenawee County *** 171.6 (161.6, 182.2) 39 (9, 64) 230 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Livingston County *** 146.3 (139.4, 153.6) 73 (59, 81) 352 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
Luce County *** 180.4 (143.8, 224.9) 13 (1, 82) 18 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Mackinac County *** 179.8 (153.7, 210.3) 16 (1, 78) 37 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Macomb County *** 169.6 (166.2, 173.1) 46 (25, 54) 1,919 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.8)
Manistee County *** 185.4 (167.3, 205.4) 9 (2, 64) 82 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Marquette County *** 154.2 (142.7, 166.5) 68 (30, 81) 142 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Mason County *** 159.3 (143.0, 177.2) 61 (10, 81) 76 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Mecosta County *** 179.9 (163.8, 197.2) 15 (2, 66) 100 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Menominee County *** 162.5 (145.1, 182.0) 55 (7, 80) 68 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Midland County *** 144.6 (134.7, 155.1) 74 (54, 82) 166 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.2, 6.4)
Missaukee County *** 142.9 (121.1, 168.1) 76 (16, 83) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Monroe County *** 172.9 (164.7, 181.5) 31 (10, 61) 347 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
Montcalm County *** 167.1 (154.7, 180.2) 49 (9, 71) 141 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Montmorency County *** 204.9 (173.2, 242.4) 3 (1, 67) 38 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Muskegon County *** 178.5 (170.5, 186.7) 19 (6, 50) 394 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.5)
Newaygo County *** 171.6 (157.6, 186.7) 38 (5, 69) 117 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Oakland County *** 143.1 (140.4, 145.8) 75 (68, 80) 2,287 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.3)
Oceana County *** 171.7 (153.4, 191.9) 37 (3, 73) 68 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Ogemaw County *** 194.2 (173.9, 216.7) 4 (1, 59) 74 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Ontonagon County *** 162.4 (133.2, 201.5) 56 (2, 83) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Osceola County *** 177.1 (157.5, 198.8) 23 (2, 72) 63 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Oscoda County *** 171.3 (140.6, 208.2) 41 (1, 83) 26 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Otsego County *** 161.4 (142.8, 182.0) 58 (6, 81) 58 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Ottawa County *** 135.4 (129.7, 141.3) 81 (73, 83) 436 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
Presque Isle County *** 159.3 (136.3, 186.2) 62 (4, 83) 43 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Roscommon County *** 210.5 (190.4, 232.8) 2 (1, 20) 104 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Saginaw County *** 160.5 (153.7, 167.6) 59 (33, 71) 435 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Sanilac County *** 188.2 (172.8, 204.8) 7 (1, 52) 118 stable stable trend -3.2 (-16.4, 12.2)
Schoolcraft County *** 190.2 (159.3, 227.1) 6 (1, 76) 29 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.4)
Shiawassee County *** 167.6 (155.8, 180.1) 48 (9, 71) 157 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
St. Clair County *** 170.6 (162.8, 178.7) 44 (13, 63) 380 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
St. Joseph County *** 174.8 (161.8, 188.5) 25 (5, 65) 141 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Tuscola County *** 171.0 (158.0, 184.9) 42 (6, 69) 135 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Van Buren County *** 172.2 (160.5, 184.6) 33 (7, 66) 170 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Washtenaw County *** 139.8 (134.4, 145.4) 78 (68, 82) 527 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Wayne County *** 174.7 (172.1, 177.3) 26 (17, 43) 3,662 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Wexford County *** 171.4 (154.7, 189.7) 40 (4, 74) 81 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.5, -1.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/09/2021 12:14 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top