Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Michigan No 160.6 (159.6, 161.6) N/A 20,928 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
United States No 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) N/A 599,666 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Midland County No 148.1 (138.2, 158.6) 69 (45, 82) 174 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.1, 5.4)
Cass County No 175.9 (162.5, 190.1) 26 (5, 64) 138 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.7)
Lake County No 203.8 (176.3, 235.6) 4 (1, 55) 47 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.3)
Roscommon County No 206.1 (186.3, 228.1) 3 (1, 29) 103 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Schoolcraft County No 186.3 (156.2, 222.6) 9 (1, 77) 29 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Kalkaska County No 198.3 (173.5, 226.1) 5 (1, 58) 50 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Baraga County No 176.8 (145.5, 214.2) 24 (1, 82) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Chippewa County No 177.5 (161.2, 195.2) 22 (3, 65) 90 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Gratiot County No 181.0 (164.9, 198.3) 15 (3, 64) 97 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Branch County No 177.2 (161.9, 193.6) 23 (4, 65) 104 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Clare County No 210.8 (192.5, 230.6) 1 (1, 17) 107 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Emmet County No 163.1 (147.8, 179.8) 51 (9, 78) 89 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Hillsdale County No 184.3 (169.5, 200.2) 10 (2, 54) 122 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Mecosta County No 177.7 (161.8, 194.8) 20 (4, 65) 101 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Menominee County No 160.9 (143.5, 180.5) 55 (9, 81) 67 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Missaukee County No 149.8 (127.6, 175.2) 67 (9, 83) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Ontonagon County No 171.1 (141.0, 211.2) 32 (1, 82) 25 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Oscoda County No 195.8 (163.3, 234.5) 6 (1, 71) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Crawford County No 169.8 (147.0, 196.2) 37 (2, 81) 44 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Gladwin County No 194.8 (176.0, 215.4) 7 (1, 48) 89 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Montmorency County No 208.6 (175.4, 247.8) 2 (1, 59) 38 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Alcona County No 179.6 (154.3, 210.0) 18 (1, 79) 45 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Bay County No 174.0 (164.5, 184.0) 29 (9, 57) 268 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Eaton County No 157.3 (148.3, 166.8) 60 (31, 75) 237 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Huron County No 157.2 (142.6, 173.2) 61 (17, 81) 91 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Isabella County No 160.5 (146.9, 175.0) 58 (15, 77) 108 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Lenawee County No 167.6 (157.8, 177.9) 44 (13, 67) 228 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Muskegon County No 176.2 (168.3, 184.3) 25 (9, 52) 397 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.5)
Osceola County No 180.3 (160.5, 202.2) 16 (1, 68) 64 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Otsego County No 160.8 (142.4, 181.1) 56 (7, 81) 59 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Tuscola County No 169.3 (156.5, 183.0) 40 (8, 70) 137 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Alpena County No 181.6 (164.7, 200.3) 13 (2, 61) 90 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Calhoun County No 179.7 (170.9, 189.0) 17 (6, 47) 323 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
Delta County No 170.6 (155.8, 186.6) 35 (6, 71) 108 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Houghton County No 174.8 (157.7, 193.5) 27 (3, 70) 81 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Jackson County No 181.2 (173.0, 189.6) 14 (6, 40) 387 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Lapeer County No 168.6 (158.1, 179.7) 41 (12, 67) 204 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Marquette County No 146.9 (135.7, 158.9) 73 (43, 82) 137 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Mason County No 164.5 (148.2, 182.6) 48 (7, 77) 80 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Oceana County No 162.5 (144.9, 181.9) 53 (8, 80) 66 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Van Buren County No 171.1 (159.5, 183.3) 33 (9, 66) 173 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Allegan County No 160.6 (151.3, 170.3) 57 (23, 72) 237 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Cheboygan County No 165.2 (148.4, 183.9) 46 (7, 78) 79 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Ingham County No 155.6 (149.2, 162.3) 63 (42, 74) 468 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
Macomb County No 167.3 (163.9, 170.7) 45 (27, 54) 1,923 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.9)
Montcalm County No 171.1 (158.7, 184.3) 31 (8, 67) 147 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Newaygo County No 169.8 (155.8, 184.9) 38 (8, 71) 117 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Ottawa County No 135.5 (129.9, 141.3) 81 (71, 83) 449 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Shiawassee County No 168.4 (156.7, 180.8) 42 (8, 68) 160 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Barry County No 152.4 (140.5, 165.2) 65 (30, 81) 127 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Dickinson County No 146.9 (130.5, 165.2) 72 (19, 83) 63 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Ionia County No 164.7 (151.6, 178.6) 47 (10, 74) 123 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Manistee County No 183.2 (165.3, 203.0) 12 (2, 63) 83 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Monroe County No 169.7 (161.6, 178.1) 39 (13, 59) 347 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Presque Isle County No 156.6 (134.0, 183.2) 62 (6, 83) 42 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
St. Clair County No 170.9 (163.1, 178.9) 34 (12, 58) 385 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
St. Joseph County No 168.1 (155.5, 181.6) 43 (9, 70) 137 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Arenac County No 163.6 (141.3, 189.1) 50 (5, 82) 44 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Berrien County No 161.6 (154.1, 169.4) 54 (27, 68) 370 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Charlevoix County No 149.2 (132.5, 167.9) 68 (18, 83) 65 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Iosco County No 174.4 (157.1, 193.7) 28 (4, 73) 87 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Iron County No 177.6 (150.7, 209.1) 21 (1, 80) 41 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Kalamazoo County No 150.6 (144.4, 157.0) 66 (50, 77) 456 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Kent County No 147.7 (143.6, 151.9) 71 (59, 77) 1,043 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.0)
Benzie County No 138.1 (119.2, 159.8) 80 (35, 83) 44 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Gogebic County No 153.7 (132.9, 177.8) 64 (9, 83) 43 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Ogemaw County No 193.5 (173.5, 215.7) 8 (1, 55) 75 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Saginaw County No 159.1 (152.3, 166.1) 59 (33, 71) 437 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Clinton County No 142.3 (131.8, 153.4) 76 (53, 83) 143 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Grand Traverse County No 138.3 (129.4, 147.8) 79 (61, 83) 189 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Washtenaw County No 139.9 (134.5, 145.3) 77 (67, 82) 540 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Luce County No 179.3 (142.8, 223.9) 19 (1, 83) 18 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
Antrim County No 145.4 (128.8, 164.1) 74 (28, 83) 63 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Livingston County No 148.0 (141.1, 155.2) 70 (54, 80) 367 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
Genesee County No 172.0 (167.0, 177.1) 30 (17, 50) 938 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Leelanau County Yes 120.0 (104.7, 137.6) 83 (69, 83) 55 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Mackinac County No 163.0 (137.8, 192.7) 52 (3, 83) 34 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Oakland County No 139.2 (136.6, 141.8) 78 (70, 82) 2,269 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
Keweenaw County No 125.8 (80.6, 200.5) 82 (1, 83) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.7)
Wayne County No 170.5 (168.0, 173.1) 36 (23, 48) 3,611 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.8)
Wexford County No 164.5 (148.2, 182.2) 49 (8, 77) 79 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.3, -1.8)
Sanilac County No 183.5 (168.4, 199.9) 11 (2, 58) 117 stable stable trend -6.7 (-14.9, 2.2)
Alger County No 144.1 (118.2, 175.6) 75 (9, 83) 24 stable stable trend -15.9 (-40.8, 19.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/01/2022 9:39 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top