Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

Hispanic (any race), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan Yes 120.2 (114.2, 126.5) N/A 331 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.2)
United States 6 Yes 108.2 (107.8, 108.7) N/A 41,779 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Allegan County Yes 120.6 (71.6, 186.2) 15 (1, 22) 5
*
*
Bay County No 127.8 (78.8, 193.5) 12 (1, 22) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 3.6)
Berrien County Yes 106.4 (64.9, 161.5) 18 (2, 22) 5
*
*
Calhoun County No 139.8 (88.0, 208.0) 9 (1, 22) 5
*
*
Eaton County Yes 81.9 (45.3, 134.2) 21 (7, 22) 3
*
*
Genesee County No 155.7 (119.2, 198.9) 5 (1, 17) 14 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 3.0)
Ingham County Yes 103.0 (79.0, 131.4) 19 (7, 22) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.4)
Jackson County No 171.6 (113.5, 246.5) 1 (1, 20) 6
*
*
Kalamazoo County No 127.3 (86.7, 178.5) 13 (1, 22) 7 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.8, -1.2)
Kent County Yes 102.0 (84.5, 121.7) 20 (10, 22) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Lenawee County No 142.0 (101.0, 193.2) 8 (1, 21) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.3)
Livingston County No 162.7 (96.2, 252.9) 2 (1, 21) 4
*
*
Macomb County Yes 122.4 (96.9, 152.0) 14 (4, 20) 17 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.1)
Monroe County No 152.6 (94.6, 230.5) 6 (1, 21) 5
*
*
Muskegon County No 157.0 (109.5, 216.3) 4 (1, 20) 8
*
*
Oakland County Yes 117.2 (98.4, 138.2) 16 (6, 20) 31 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.8, -0.4)
Ottawa County Yes 110.4 (84.0, 141.5) 17 (5, 22) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 2.5)
Saginaw County No 145.1 (117.5, 177.0) 7 (1, 17) 20 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
St. Clair County No 157.2 (96.9, 237.5) 3 (1, 21) 5
*
*
Van Buren County No 129.0 (76.7, 199.2) 11 (1, 22) 5
*
*
Washtenaw County Yes 76.3 (48.2, 112.9) 22 (13, 22) 6
*
*
Wayne County No 131.5 (117.9, 146.0) 10 (4, 16) 77 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.2, -0.1)
Alcona County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alger County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alpena County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Antrim County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arenac County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Barry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benzie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Branch County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlevoix County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheboygan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clare County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickinson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Emmet County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gladwin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grand Traverse County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gratiot County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hillsdale County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houghton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huron County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ionia County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iosco County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Isabella County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kalkaska County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lapeer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leelanau County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Manistee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marquette County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mecosta County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Midland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montcalm County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newaygo County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oceana County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ogemaw County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otsego County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roscommon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sanilac County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shiawassee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Joseph County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tuscola County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wexford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/24/2024 6:19 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
NHIA (NAACCR Hispanic Identification Algorithm) was used for Hispanic Ethnicity (see Technical Notes section of the USCS).
Statistics for minorities may be affected by inconsistent race identification between the cancer case reports (sources for numerator of rate) and data from the Census Bureau (source for denominator of rate); and from undercounts of some population groups in the census.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top