Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

Hispanic (any race), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate ascending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Michigan N/A Yes 117.2 (111.5, 123.1) N/A 356 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.7, -0.9)
United States 6 N/A Yes 106.8 (106.4, 107.3) N/A 44,330 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.1)
Calhoun County Urban No 173.4 (113.8, 249.6) 1 (1, 19) 7
*
*
Genesee County Urban No 172.0 (134.4, 216.0) 2 (1, 12) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-6.9, 1.8)
Monroe County Urban No 150.2 (93.7, 225.4) 3 (1, 21) 5
*
*
St. Clair County Urban No 143.9 (91.3, 213.6) 4 (1, 21) 5
*
*
Bay County Urban No 137.7 (87.1, 204.4) 5 (1, 22) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 3.4)
Muskegon County Urban No 137.7 (96.7, 188.8) 6 (1, 21) 8
*
*
Lenawee County Rural No 136.6 (97.9, 184.6) 7 (1, 21) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.3, 0.2)
Ingham County Urban No 135.5 (107.5, 167.9) 8 (1, 19) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 1.0)
Saginaw County Urban No 133.9 (107.6, 164.4) 9 (2, 19) 19 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.3)
Livingston County Urban No 129.4 (73.6, 206.4) 10 (1, 22) 4
*
*
Kalamazoo County Urban No 127.2 (87.9, 176.4) 11 (1, 21) 8 falling falling trend -3.1 (-10.9, -1.0)
Wayne County Urban No 126.2 (113.5, 139.8) 12 (5, 17) 81 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Allegan County Rural Yes 120.0 (74.7, 179.6) 13 (1, 22) 6
*
*
Eaton County Urban Yes 119.3 (73.8, 180.1) 14 (1, 22) 5
*
*
Macomb County Urban Yes 113.7 (90.0, 141.3) 15 (4, 21) 17 falling falling trend -2.7 (-12.1, -0.2)
Ottawa County Urban Yes 113.2 (87.9, 142.7) 16 (4, 21) 17 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 3.0)
Van Buren County Rural Yes 112.5 (66.5, 174.6) 17 (1, 22) 5
*
*
Kent County Urban Yes 106.4 (89.5, 125.3) 18 (8, 21) 35 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 1.6)
Jackson County Urban Yes 101.6 (62.2, 155.5) 19 (3, 22) 4
*
*
Oakland County Urban Yes 98.2 (81.9, 116.5) 20 (11, 22) 29 falling falling trend -3.1 (-8.3, -1.2)
Washtenaw County Urban Yes 89.1 (60.7, 124.8) 21 (8, 22) 7
*
*
Berrien County Urban Yes 65.7 (36.4, 107.0) 22 (13, 22) 3
*
*
Alcona County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alger County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alpena County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Antrim County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arenac County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Barry County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benzie County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Branch County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlevoix County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheboygan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clare County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickinson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Emmet County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gladwin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grand Traverse County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gratiot County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hillsdale County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houghton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ionia County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iosco County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Isabella County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kalkaska County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lapeer County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leelanau County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Manistee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marquette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mecosta County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Midland County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montcalm County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newaygo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oceana County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ogemaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otsego County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roscommon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sanilac County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shiawassee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Joseph County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tuscola County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wexford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/04/2024 11:42 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
NHIA (NAACCR Hispanic Identification Algorithm) was used for Hispanic Ethnicity (see Technical Notes section of the USCS).
Statistics for minorities may be affected by inconsistent race identification between the cancer case reports (sources for numerator of rate) and data from the Census Bureau (source for denominator of rate); and from undercounts of some population groups in the census.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top