Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

Esophagus, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate ascending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Michigan N/A *** 4.6 (4.4, 4.8) N/A 634 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.6, -0.1)
United States N/A *** 3.7 (3.7, 3.8) N/A 15,762 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.8)
Kalkaska County Urban *** 11.5 (6.4, 19.7) 1 (1, 31) 3
*
*
Houghton County Rural *** 9.8 (6.2, 14.9) 2 (1, 28) 5
*
*
Newaygo County Rural *** 8.5 (5.6, 12.6) 3 (1, 32) 6
*
*
Monroe County Urban *** 8.5 (6.8, 10.5) 4 (1, 16) 18 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.5, 3.2)
Alpena County Rural *** 8.5 (5.3, 13.4) 5 (1, 36) 5
*
*
Hillsdale County Rural *** 7.8 (5.1, 11.7) 6 (1, 39) 6
*
*
Montcalm County Urban *** 7.6 (5.2, 10.7) 7 (1, 35) 7
*
*
Calhoun County Urban *** 7.2 (5.6, 9.3) 8 (1, 25) 14 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 3.0)
Chippewa County Rural *** 7.1 (4.3, 11.3) 9 (1, 44) 4
*
*
St. Clair County Urban *** 6.9 (5.5, 8.7) 10 (2, 25) 17 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.9)
Menominee County Rural *** 6.9 (3.9, 12.3) 11 (1, 45) 3
*
*
Branch County Rural *** 6.9 (4.1, 10.9) 12 (1, 45) 4
*
*
Lapeer County Urban *** 6.7 (4.8, 9.2) 13 (2, 36) 8
*
*
Ionia County Urban *** 6.4 (4.1, 9.6) 14 (1, 44) 5
*
*
Wexford County Rural *** 6.1 (3.4, 10.4) 15 (1, 45) 3
*
*
Muskegon County Urban *** 5.9 (4.6, 7.6) 16 (5, 36) 14 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.7)
Tuscola County Rural *** 5.8 (3.5, 9.3) 17 (2, 45) 4
*
*
Shiawassee County Rural *** 5.7 (3.8, 8.4) 18 (3, 44) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.5)
Bay County Urban *** 5.6 (4.1, 7.5) 19 (5, 42) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.3)
Sanilac County Rural *** 5.3 (3.1, 9.0) 20 (2, 45) 3 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.4, 4.2)
Delta County Rural *** 5.3 (3.0, 9.2) 21 (2, 45) 3
*
*
Allegan County Rural *** 5.2 (3.7, 7.1) 22 (6, 44) 8
*
*
Eaton County Urban *** 4.9 (3.4, 6.9) 23 (8, 44) 8
*
*
Grand Traverse County Urban *** 4.7 (3.2, 6.8) 24 (7, 45) 7
*
*
Midland County Urban *** 4.7 (3.2, 6.9) 25 (8, 45) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.8)
Livingston County Urban *** 4.6 (3.5, 6.0) 26 (12, 44) 13
*
*
Ingham County Urban *** 4.6 (3.6, 5.8) 27 (13, 44) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 2.3)
Marquette County Rural *** 4.5 (2.8, 7.1) 28 (6, 45) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.6)
Jackson County Urban *** 4.5 (3.3, 6.0) 29 (12, 45) 11 falling falling trend -5.2 (-20.3, -0.1)
Barry County Urban *** 4.5 (2.7, 7.1) 30 (7, 45) 4
*
*
Macomb County Urban *** 4.5 (3.9, 5.0) 31 (19, 40) 54 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 1.0)
Lenawee County Rural *** 4.4 (3.0, 6.4) 32 (9, 45) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 3.1)
Berrien County Urban *** 4.4 (3.2, 5.9) 33 (13, 45) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.3)
St. Joseph County Rural *** 4.2 (2.5, 6.9) 34 (7, 45) 4
*
*
Genesee County Urban *** 4.0 (3.3, 4.9) 35 (20, 44) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.6)
Wayne County Urban *** 4.0 (3.6, 4.4) 36 (25, 42) 88 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Ottawa County Urban *** 3.9 (3.1, 5.0) 37 (19, 45) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.4)
Oakland County Urban *** 3.9 (3.5, 4.3) 38 (25, 43) 68 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Saginaw County Urban *** 3.9 (2.9, 5.1) 39 (18, 45) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.5)
Clinton County Urban *** 3.8 (2.3, 6.1) 40 (11, 45) 4
*
*
Cass County Urban *** 3.8 (2.2, 6.4) 41 (10, 45) 3 stable stable trend -44.7 (-70.8, 2.2)
Kent County Urban *** 3.7 (3.1, 4.4) 42 (24, 45) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.9)
Van Buren County Rural *** 3.4 (2.0, 5.5) 43 (15, 45) 4
*
*
Kalamazoo County Urban *** 3.3 (2.4, 4.4) 44 (25, 45) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.3)
Washtenaw County Urban *** 2.9 (2.2, 3.8) 45 (32, 45) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.4)
Alcona County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alger County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Antrim County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arenac County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benzie County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlevoix County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheboygan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clare County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickinson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Emmet County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gladwin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gratiot County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iosco County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Isabella County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leelanau County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Manistee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mecosta County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oceana County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ogemaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otsego County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roscommon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/08/2025 7:23 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top