Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

Esophagus, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate†
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate ascending 		CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Michigan *** 4.7 (4.6, 4.9) N/A 620 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.1, 0.3)
United States *** 3.9 (3.8, 3.9) N/A 15,474 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
Iosco County *** 8.6 (5.0, 14.5) 1 (1, 41) 4
*
*
Monroe County *** 8.2 (6.5, 10.3) 2 (1, 16) 17 stable stable trend 22.2 (-5.4, 57.8)
Newaygo County *** 7.7 (4.9, 11.6) 3 (1, 39) 5
*
*
Sanilac County *** 7.2 (4.5, 11.1) 4 (1, 41) 5 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.3, 4.8)
Houghton County *** 7.1 (4.1, 11.7) 5 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Isabella County *** 6.9 (4.3, 10.5) 6 (1, 42) 4
*
*
Lapeer County *** 6.7 (4.8, 9.3) 7 (1, 36) 8
*
*
Delta County *** 6.7 (4.1, 10.7) 8 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Roscommon County *** 6.5 (3.9, 11.7) 9 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Hillsdale County *** 6.4 (4.0, 9.9) 10 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Eaton County *** 6.3 (4.6, 8.5) 11 (1, 37) 9
*
*
Calhoun County *** 6.2 (4.7, 8.1) 12 (1, 35) 12 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.5)
Montcalm County *** 6.2 (4.0, 9.2) 13 (1, 42) 5
*
*
Branch County *** 6.1 (3.6, 9.9) 14 (1, 43) 4
*
*
St. Clair County *** 5.9 (4.6, 7.6) 15 (3, 36) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.1)
Cass County *** 5.7 (3.6, 8.8) 16 (1, 43) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.7, 4.4)
Mecosta County *** 5.5 (3.0, 9.3) 17 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Ingham County *** 5.4 (4.3, 6.7) 18 (5, 37) 17 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.1)
Midland County *** 5.3 (3.6, 7.7) 19 (2, 43) 6 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.2, 3.4)
Ionia County *** 5.2 (3.1, 8.2) 20 (2, 43) 4
*
*
Shiawassee County *** 5.2 (3.3, 7.8) 21 (2, 43) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 2.5)
Livingston County *** 5.0 (3.8, 6.5) 22 (7, 42) 12
*
*
Jackson County *** 4.9 (3.7, 6.5) 23 (6, 42) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.3)
Wayne County *** 4.7 (4.3, 5.2) 24 (16, 34) 102 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Bay County *** 4.7 (3.3, 6.6) 25 (6, 43) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.2)
Lenawee County *** 4.7 (3.1, 6.9) 26 (4, 43) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 3.2)
Tuscola County *** 4.7 (2.7, 7.6) 27 (3, 43) 4
*
*
Marquette County *** 4.5 (2.8, 7.0) 28 (5, 43) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.0)
Van Buren County *** 4.5 (2.8, 6.9) 29 (5, 43) 5
*
*
Macomb County *** 4.4 (3.9, 5.0) 30 (17, 39) 52 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.0)
Allegan County *** 4.3 (2.9, 6.1) 31 (7, 43) 6
*
*
Barry County *** 4.3 (2.5, 7.0) 32 (5, 43) 4
*
*
Saginaw County *** 4.2 (3.2, 5.5) 33 (12, 43) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Muskegon County *** 4.2 (3.1, 5.7) 34 (11, 43) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.0)
Berrien County *** 4.2 (3.1, 5.6) 35 (11, 43) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.4)
Genesee County *** 4.2 (3.4, 5.0) 36 (17, 43) 23 stable stable trend -17.0 (-35.4, 6.5)
Oakland County *** 4.1 (3.6, 4.5) 37 (22, 41) 66 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Kalamazoo County *** 4.0 (3.1, 5.2) 38 (15, 43) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.6)
Kent County *** 4.0 (3.4, 4.8) 39 (20, 42) 28 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2)
St. Joseph County *** 4.0 (2.2, 6.6) 40 (6, 43) 3
*
*
Washtenaw County *** 3.6 (2.8, 4.6) 41 (21, 43) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Ottawa County *** 3.5 (2.6, 4.5) 42 (22, 43) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Grand Traverse County *** 3.0 (1.8, 4.7) 43 (19, 43) 4
*
*
Alcona County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alger County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alpena County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Antrim County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arenac County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benzie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlevoix County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheboygan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clare County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickinson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Emmet County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gladwin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gratiot County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huron County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kalkaska County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leelanau County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Manistee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oceana County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ogemaw County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otsego County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wexford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/27/2022 7:33 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of estimates:
Alcona, Alger, Alpena, Antrim, Arenac, Baraga, Benzie, Charlevoix, Cheboygan, Chippewa, Clare, Clinton, Crawford, Dickinson, Emmet, Gladwin, Gogebic, Gratiot, Huron, Iron, Kalkaska, Keweenaw, Lake, Leelanau, Luce, Mackinac, Manistee, Mason, Menominee, Missaukee, Montmorency, Oceana, Ogemaw, Ontonagon, Osceola, Oscoda, Otsego, Presque Isle, Schoolcraft, Wexford

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top