Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

Colon & Rectum, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 74.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan N/A Yes 13.4 (13.1, 13.7) N/A 1,738 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 1.4)
United States N/A Yes 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) N/A 52,325 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Oscoda County Rural Yes 19.2 (10.8, 34.5) 8 (1, 71) 3
*
*
Presque Isle County Rural Yes 13.5 (6.8, 25.4) 39 (1, 71) 3
*
*
Antrim County Rural Yes 7.6 (4.3, 13.2) 71 (31, 71) 3 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.5, -2.2)
Arenac County Rural Yes 13.1 (7.2, 22.8) 44 (2, 71) 3 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -1.1)
Benzie County Urban Yes 11.2 (6.2, 19.5) 61 (3, 71) 3
*
*
Leelanau County Urban Yes 8.4 (4.5, 15.3) 70 (16, 71) 4 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.4, -1.3)
Alcona County Rural Yes 23.1 (11.9, 41.9) 1 (1, 71) 4
*
*
Charlevoix County Rural Yes 8.9 (5.4, 14.6) 69 (18, 71) 4 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.4, -0.8)
Kalkaska County Urban Yes 19.3 (11.6, 30.4) 6 (1, 70) 4
*
*
Mackinac County Rural Yes 20.9 (12.5, 34.7) 4 (1, 69) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 0.4)
Otsego County Rural Yes 11.5 (7.2, 18.0) 59 (7, 71) 4 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.6, -1.4)
Dickinson County Rural Yes 11.0 (6.9, 17.2) 62 (8, 71) 5 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.2, -0.5)
Ogemaw County Rural Yes 15.0 (9.7, 22.9) 23 (1, 71) 5 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.9, -2.1)
Wexford County Rural Yes 10.7 (7.0, 16.0) 64 (12, 71) 5 stable stable trend 21.6 (-2.3, 41.1)
Cheboygan County Rural Yes 12.8 (8.2, 19.8) 47 (4, 71) 6 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.5, -0.3)
Menominee County Rural Yes 14.2 (9.4, 21.4) 29 (2, 71) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.5)
Alpena County Rural Yes 12.2 (8.1, 18.2) 52 (7, 71) 6 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.4)
Houghton County Rural Yes 13.6 (9.0, 19.9) 38 (3, 71) 6 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.5)
Mason County Rural Yes 13.0 (8.5, 19.4) 45 (4, 71) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.9)
Osceola County Rural Yes 19.2 (13.0, 27.7) 7 (1, 66) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Emmet County Rural Yes 12.3 (8.4, 17.7) 51 (7, 71) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.0)
Mecosta County Rural Yes 13.7 (9.4, 19.5) 34 (3, 71) 7 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -1.1)
Roscommon County Rural Yes 13.6 (9.4, 20.4) 37 (4, 71) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.5)
Oceana County Rural Yes 19.0 (13.1, 26.8) 10 (1, 66) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 1.0)
Manistee County Rural Yes 18.4 (12.6, 26.3) 12 (1, 67) 8 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.3)
Barry County Urban Yes 10.4 (7.4, 14.4) 65 (18, 71) 8 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.5, -1.3)
Iosco County Rural Yes 19.1 (13.0, 27.6) 9 (1, 63) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.5)
Delta County Rural Yes 14.4 (10.1, 20.1) 27 (2, 70) 9 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.6)
Chippewa County Rural Yes 18.6 (13.4, 25.3) 11 (1, 61) 9
*
*
Gladwin County Rural Yes 21.2 (14.8, 29.8) 2 (1, 56) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.4)
Hillsdale County Rural Yes 13.7 (9.9, 18.6) 36 (5, 70) 9 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.3, -1.3)
Marquette County Rural Yes 10.1 (7.3, 13.7) 66 (23, 71) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.0)
Branch County Rural Yes 15.8 (11.5, 21.3) 19 (2, 68) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Clare County Rural Yes 17.9 (13.1, 24.3) 16 (1, 63) 10 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Ionia County Urban Yes 14.3 (10.5, 19.1) 28 (5, 69) 10 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Huron County Rural Yes 18.2 (13.4, 24.5) 14 (1, 58) 10 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Newaygo County Rural Yes 15.1 (11.2, 20.1) 22 (2, 68) 10 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.0)
Gratiot County Rural Yes 21.1 (15.9, 27.7) 3 (1, 47) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.7)
St. Joseph County Rural Yes 14.0 (10.5, 18.4) 32 (5, 69) 11 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.4)
Sanilac County Rural Yes 18.0 (13.5, 23.8) 15 (1, 60) 12 stable stable trend 6.1 (-1.2, 26.2)
Shiawassee County Rural Yes 12.6 (9.5, 16.5) 49 (11, 70) 12 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.6, -1.8)
Tuscola County Rural Yes 16.2 (12.3, 21.1) 18 (1, 64) 12 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.6)
Clinton County Urban Yes 12.2 (9.3, 15.7) 53 (13, 70) 13 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.1)
Montcalm County Urban Yes 14.9 (11.3, 19.2) 26 (3, 67) 13 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.2, 11.9)
Isabella County Rural Yes 20.2 (15.4, 26.1) 5 (1, 45) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.6)
Cass County Urban Yes 18.2 (14.1, 23.4) 13 (1, 54) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Grand Traverse County Urban Yes 10.8 (8.4, 13.7) 63 (26, 71) 14 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.1)
Midland County Urban Yes 12.0 (9.3, 15.3) 54 (16, 71) 14 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.4)
Van Buren County Rural Yes 14.2 (11.0, 18.1) 31 (7, 67) 14 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -1.0)
Eaton County Urban Yes 9.9 (7.7, 12.5) 68 (34, 71) 15 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.9, -2.2)
Lapeer County Urban Yes 13.2 (10.3, 16.6) 43 (10, 69) 16 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.0)
Allegan County Rural Yes 13.7 (11.1, 16.8) 35 (11, 67) 20 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.6)
Lenawee County Rural Yes 14.9 (12.0, 18.3) 25 (6, 64) 20 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Bay County Urban Yes 14.2 (11.6, 17.2) 30 (10, 63) 22 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Muskegon County Urban Yes 11.5 (9.5, 13.7) 60 (25, 70) 26 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.2)
Calhoun County Urban Yes 15.3 (12.7, 18.3) 21 (6, 59) 26 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.1)
Monroe County Urban Yes 12.8 (10.7, 15.2) 48 (16, 66) 27 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.7)
Jackson County Urban Yes 13.5 (11.3, 15.9) 40 (13, 65) 30 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.1, -1.9)
Livingston County Urban Yes 12.5 (10.6, 14.7) 50 (19, 67) 31 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.7)
Ingham County Urban Yes 11.6 (9.9, 13.6) 58 (28, 69) 33 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.8)
Ottawa County Urban Yes 10.0 (8.5, 11.7) 67 (44, 71) 34 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.8, -2.3)
St. Clair County Urban Yes 15.7 (13.4, 18.4) 20 (6, 51) 34 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
Saginaw County Urban Yes 13.4 (11.4, 15.6) 42 (15, 63) 36 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.6)
Kalamazoo County Urban Yes 12.8 (11.0, 14.9) 46 (19, 66) 38 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Berrien County Urban Yes 16.7 (14.3, 19.4) 17 (4, 43) 38 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.2, 14.8)
Washtenaw County Urban Yes 11.8 (10.3, 13.4) 56 (29, 68) 46 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.1, -1.9)
Genesee County Urban Yes 13.9 (12.4, 15.4) 33 (17, 55) 74 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.5)
Kent County Urban Yes 11.8 (10.6, 13.0) 57 (34, 65) 83 stable stable trend 2.7 (-2.7, 9.6)
Macomb County Urban Yes 13.5 (12.5, 14.5) 41 (23, 53) 155 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.7)
Oakland County Urban Yes 11.8 (11.1, 12.6) 55 (40, 64) 198 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
Wayne County Urban Yes 14.9 (14.2, 15.7) 24 (16, 39) 315 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -2.0)
Alger County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/05/2024 5:31 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top