Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

Pancreas, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan N/A *** 12.4 (12.1, 12.7) N/A 1,675 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.5, 0.7)
United States N/A *** 11.2 (11.1, 11.2) N/A 46,760 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.2, 0.3)
Clinton County Urban *** 9.3 (6.9, 12.4) 68 (20, 68) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 2.1)
Van Buren County Rural *** 9.3 (6.8, 12.5) 67 (19, 68) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.8)
Grand Traverse County Urban *** 9.4 (7.3, 12.1) 66 (25, 68) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.7)
Benzie County Urban *** 9.8 (5.8, 16.8) 65 (4, 68) 4
*
*
Branch County Rural *** 9.9 (6.7, 14.3) 64 (8, 68) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.7)
Ionia County Urban *** 10.0 (7.1, 13.9) 63 (8, 68) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.8)
Mason County Rural *** 10.4 (6.9, 15.7) 62 (5, 68) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 1.2)
Shiawassee County Rural *** 10.4 (7.7, 14.0) 61 (7, 68) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 2.1)
Osceola County Rural *** 10.8 (6.5, 17.4) 60 (2, 68) 4
*
*
Marquette County Rural *** 10.8 (8.0, 14.5) 59 (7, 68) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.3)
Berrien County Urban *** 11.2 (9.3, 13.4) 58 (14, 67) 26 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.4)
Dickinson County Rural *** 11.2 (7.0, 17.5) 57 (2, 68) 5
*
*
Leelanau County Urban *** 11.3 (7.0, 18.3) 56 (1, 68) 5
*
*
Mecosta County Rural *** 11.4 (7.7, 16.4) 55 (3, 68) 6
*
*
Montcalm County Urban *** 11.4 (8.4, 15.2) 54 (4, 68) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 2.4)
Ottawa County Urban *** 11.4 (9.9, 13.2) 53 (15, 65) 39 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 2.0)
St. Joseph County Rural *** 11.4 (8.3, 15.4) 52 (3, 68) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.5)
Oakland County Urban *** 11.5 (10.8, 12.3) 51 (27, 59) 196 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.8)
Kent County Urban *** 11.6 (10.5, 12.8) 50 (20, 61) 84 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 1.1)
Iosco County Rural *** 11.6 (8.0, 17.3) 49 (2, 68) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.8)
Gladwin County Rural *** 11.6 (7.1, 18.4) 48 (1, 68) 5
*
*
Menominee County Rural *** 11.6 (7.2, 18.4) 47 (1, 68) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.8)
Monroe County Urban *** 11.6 (9.7, 13.9) 46 (10, 65) 25 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 2.1)
Otsego County Rural *** 11.8 (7.5, 18.2) 45 (1, 68) 5
*
*
Barry County Urban *** 11.8 (8.7, 15.8) 44 (3, 68) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.9)
Allegan County Rural *** 11.8 (9.5, 14.6) 43 (7, 66) 19 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.7)
Huron County Rural *** 11.9 (8.0, 17.5) 42 (2, 68) 7
*
*
Emmet County Rural *** 12.0 (8.0, 17.5) 41 (2, 68) 7 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.2, 2.8)
Cheboygan County Rural *** 12.0 (8.0, 18.3) 40 (1, 68) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.5)
Bay County Urban *** 12.1 (9.8, 14.8) 39 (6, 66) 20 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.8)
Kalamazoo County Urban *** 12.2 (10.4, 14.1) 38 (9, 63) 36 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Gratiot County Rural *** 12.2 (8.4, 17.3) 37 (2, 68) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.2, 3.1)
Washtenaw County Urban *** 12.2 (10.7, 13.8) 36 (11, 60) 51 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.2)
Houghton County Rural *** 12.3 (8.1, 18.1) 35 (1, 68) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.8)
Roscommon County Rural *** 12.3 (8.4, 18.6) 34 (1, 68) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 3.1)
Saginaw County Urban *** 12.4 (10.5, 14.5) 33 (8, 62) 33 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Arenac County Rural *** 12.4 (6.6, 22.1) 32 (1, 68) 3
*
*
St. Clair County Urban *** 12.4 (10.5, 14.7) 31 (7, 63) 30 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.8)
Ingham County Urban *** 12.4 (10.7, 14.4) 30 (8, 61) 38 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.6, 2.3)
Sanilac County Rural *** 12.6 (8.9, 17.5) 29 (1, 68) 8 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.1, 3.4)
Livingston County Urban *** 12.6 (10.7, 14.7) 28 (7, 61) 35 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 2.4)
Jackson County Urban *** 12.6 (10.5, 15.0) 27 (5, 62) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-9.0, 1.6)
Newaygo County Rural *** 12.6 (9.0, 17.3) 26 (1, 68) 9 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.5)
Lapeer County Urban *** 12.7 (10.0, 15.9) 25 (3, 66) 16 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 2.1)
Wayne County Urban *** 12.8 (12.1, 13.5) 24 (15, 45) 281 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.1, 0.5)
Eaton County Urban *** 12.8 (10.4, 15.8) 23 (4, 64) 20 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.8)
Lenawee County Rural *** 13.1 (10.4, 16.2) 22 (3, 64) 18 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.3, 3.6)
Muskegon County Urban *** 13.1 (11.1, 15.5) 21 (5, 59) 30 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 1.8)
Alpena County Rural *** 13.3 (9.3, 19.0) 20 (1, 68) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 3.0)
Genesee County Urban *** 13.6 (12.2, 15.1) 19 (5, 46) 75 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.2, 1.4)
Hillsdale County Rural *** 13.6 (9.9, 18.5) 18 (1, 67) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.6, 1.1)
Charlevoix County Rural *** 13.7 (9.5, 20.0) 17 (1, 68) 7
*
*
Calhoun County Urban *** 13.8 (11.4, 16.5) 16 (3, 59) 25 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.8, 13.9)
Tuscola County Rural *** 13.8 (10.4, 18.2) 15 (1, 65) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 3.3)
Delta County Rural *** 13.9 (10.1, 19.0) 14 (1, 66) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.8)
Chippewa County Rural *** 13.9 (9.8, 19.5) 13 (1, 68) 7 rising rising trend 23.0 (0.2, 44.6)
Alcona County Rural *** 13.9 (8.3, 26.3) 12 (1, 68) 4
*
*
Macomb County Urban *** 14.0 (13.1, 15.1) 11 (6, 33) 167 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.4, 1.4)
Oceana County Rural *** 14.3 (9.6, 20.9) 10 (1, 68) 6
*
*
Cass County Urban *** 14.3 (10.6, 19.1) 9 (1, 65) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 2.4)
Wexford County Rural *** 14.5 (9.9, 20.7) 8 (1, 67) 7
*
*
Isabella County Rural *** 15.0 (11.0, 20.0) 7 (1, 65) 10 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.5, 3.8)
Manistee County Rural *** 15.3 (10.7, 22.0) 6 (1, 66) 8
*
*
Montmorency County Rural *** 15.9 (8.8, 30.0) 5 (1, 68) 3
*
*
Antrim County Rural *** 16.5 (11.6, 23.6) 4 (1, 64) 8
*
*
Midland County Urban *** 16.7 (13.5, 20.5) 3 (1, 42) 20 stable stable trend -4.0 (-18.7, 14.2)
Ogemaw County Rural *** 17.8 (12.4, 25.6) 2 (1, 61) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.5, 3.8)
Clare County Rural *** 17.8 (13.0, 24.1) 1 (1, 56) 10 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.3, 3.6)
Alger County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kalkaska County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/03/2024 7:10 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top