Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

Prostate, 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 21.8?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan Yes 18.7 (18.2, 19.2) N/A 944 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.2)
United States Yes 19.1 (19.0, 19.2) N/A 29,146 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Manistee County No 27.9 (18.3, 41.9) 1 (1, 55) 5 stable stable trend 8.6 (-0.2, 18.2)
Osceola County No 26.2 (15.0, 42.8) 2 (1, 59) 3 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.8, 1.1)
Delta County No 25.1 (17.3, 35.8) 3 (1, 54) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.5)
Van Buren County No 25.0 (18.5, 33.1) 4 (1, 49) 10 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.8)
Mecosta County No 24.6 (16.1, 36.0) 5 (1, 56) 6 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.2, -1.2)
Lenawee County No 24.4 (18.7, 31.4) 6 (1, 46) 13 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.2)
Allegan County No 23.8 (18.2, 30.6) 7 (1, 48) 13 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.0, -1.8)
Ionia County No 23.7 (15.8, 34.0) 8 (1, 56) 6 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.7, -2.2)
Calhoun County No 23.4 (18.6, 29.1) 9 (1, 45) 17 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.0)
Hillsdale County No 22.5 (14.9, 32.6) 10 (1, 58) 6 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.3, -1.3)
Branch County No 22.4 (14.5, 33.0) 11 (1, 58) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Sanilac County No 22.2 (15.0, 32.2) 12 (1, 58) 6 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.7, -1.8)
Ogemaw County No 22.1 (13.4, 36.0) 13 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Wayne County No 22.0 (20.5, 23.5) 14 (6, 27) 178 falling falling trend -3.5 (-3.9, -3.1)
Dickinson County Yes 21.7 (13.4, 34.3) 15 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Berrien County Yes 21.5 (17.5, 26.2) 16 (2, 49) 20 stable stable trend 11.3 (-4.3, 29.5)
Newaygo County Yes 20.7 (13.9, 29.8) 17 (1, 58) 6
*
*
Monroe County Yes 20.7 (16.2, 26.0) 18 (2, 53) 15 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.7)
Leelanau County Yes 20.6 (12.9, 33.6) 19 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Oceana County Yes 20.5 (11.8, 33.5) 20 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Jackson County Yes 19.7 (15.7, 24.6) 21 (4, 53) 17 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.5, -1.8)
Tuscola County Yes 19.6 (13.3, 28.1) 22 (1, 59) 6 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.8)
Lapeer County Yes 19.6 (13.7, 27.1) 23 (2, 58) 8 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.9, -2.4)
Menominee County Yes 19.2 (10.7, 32.8) 24 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Washtenaw County Yes 19.1 (16.0, 22.7) 25 (7, 52) 27 falling falling trend -4.0 (-4.9, -3.0)
Barry County Yes 19.1 (12.8, 27.4) 26 (2, 59) 6 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.0, -1.5)
St. Clair County Yes 19.0 (15.0, 23.7) 27 (5, 55) 16 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.7, -2.5)
St. Joseph County Yes 18.5 (12.4, 26.7) 28 (2, 59) 6 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.6, -1.7)
Huron County Yes 18.4 (11.7, 28.6) 29 (1, 59) 5 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.5, -1.6)
Ottawa County Yes 18.3 (15.1, 22.0) 30 (9, 54) 23 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -2.0)
Kalamazoo County Yes 18.2 (14.8, 22.1) 31 (8, 55) 21 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.4, -2.3)
Macomb County Yes 18.2 (16.4, 20.1) 32 (16, 49) 80 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.1, -2.9)
Antrim County Yes 18.2 (10.7, 30.5) 33 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Genesee County Yes 18.1 (15.6, 20.9) 34 (12, 52) 39 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.7, -2.9)
Clare County Yes 18.1 (10.8, 29.3) 35 (1, 59) 4 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.8, -0.3)
Cheboygan County Yes 18.0 (10.7, 29.7) 36 (1, 59) 4 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.6, -1.7)
Muskegon County Yes 17.9 (14.0, 22.5) 37 (7, 57) 15 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.4)
Kent County Yes 17.8 (15.6, 20.3) 38 (15, 52) 47 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.2, -2.8)
Cass County Yes 17.5 (11.3, 26.0) 39 (2, 59) 5 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.1, -2.8)
Ingham County Yes 17.1 (13.8, 21.0) 40 (11, 57) 19 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.7, -2.4)
Saginaw County Yes 17.0 (13.7, 20.9) 41 (12, 57) 19 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.4, -3.4)
Oakland County Yes 17.0 (15.6, 18.6) 42 (24, 52) 105 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.1, -3.2)
Wexford County Yes 17.0 (9.8, 27.7) 43 (1, 59) 3 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.2, -0.3)
Montcalm County Yes 17.0 (11.2, 24.7) 44 (3, 59) 6 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.6, -2.7)
Livingston County Yes 16.8 (13.0, 21.3) 45 (9, 57) 14 falling falling trend -5.0 (-6.5, -3.5)
Emmet County Yes 16.7 (9.8, 27.2) 46 (2, 59) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.2, 0.8)
Shiawassee County Yes 16.7 (11.3, 24.0) 47 (4, 59) 6 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.1, -1.5)
Houghton County Yes 16.4 (9.3, 26.9) 48 (2, 59) 3 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.2, -0.9)
Chippewa County Yes 16.2 (9.3, 26.3) 49 (2, 59) 3
*
*
Clinton County Yes 16.1 (10.8, 23.2) 50 (5, 59) 6 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.7, -2.0)
Roscommon County Yes 16.0 (9.3, 28.0) 51 (2, 59) 4
*
*
Iosco County Yes 15.3 (9.0, 26.0) 52 (3, 59) 4 falling falling trend -5.5 (-7.2, -3.9)
Alpena County Yes 15.0 (8.5, 25.4) 53 (3, 59) 3
*
*
Marquette County Yes 14.8 (9.9, 21.5) 54 (10, 59) 6 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.7, -1.6)
Bay County Yes 14.4 (10.4, 19.6) 55 (16, 59) 8 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.1, -2.5)
Gratiot County Yes 14.3 (8.2, 23.4) 56 (4, 59) 3 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.7, -2.3)
Eaton County Yes 13.8 (9.8, 19.0) 57 (16, 59) 8 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.8, -0.4)
Midland County Yes 11.7 (7.8, 17.0) 58 (26, 59) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -1.0)
Grand Traverse County Yes 11.6 (7.8, 16.7) 59 (29, 59) 6 falling falling trend -5.3 (-7.3, -3.3)
Alcona County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alger County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arenac County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benzie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlevoix County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gladwin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Isabella County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kalkaska County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otsego County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/12/2020 11:26 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top