Death Rates Table
Death Rate Report for Michigan by County
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 2018-2022
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages
Sorted by Name
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Met Healthy People Objective of ***? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate † deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan | N/A | *** | 5.8 (5.6, 6.0) | N/A | 756 |
falling 
|
-2.2 (-2.6, -1.9) |
| United States | N/A | *** | 5.0 (4.9, 5.0) | N/A | 20,108 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-2.2, -2.1) |
| Allegan County | Rural | *** | 5.3 (3.8, 7.3) | 39 (8, 48) | 8 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-3.8, -0.9) |
| Alpena County | Rural | *** | 7.4 (4.4, 12.2) | 8 (1, 48) | 4 |
|
|
| Barry County | Urban | *** | 6.8 (4.5, 9.9) | 19 (2, 48) | 6 |
stable 
|
-1.1 (-2.7, 0.7) |
| Bay County | Urban | *** | 5.2 (3.7, 7.3) | 42 (8, 48) | 8 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-3.3, 0.2) |
| Berrien County | Urban | *** | 5.6 (4.3, 7.3) | 35 (8, 48) | 13 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-3.2, -0.6) |
| Branch County | Rural | *** | 6.8 (4.1, 10.8) | 18 (1, 48) | 4 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-3.1, 1.4) |
| Calhoun County | Urban | *** | 7.5 (5.8, 9.6) | 7 (2, 42) | 13 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.9, -0.8) |
| Cass County | Urban | *** | 5.9 (3.7, 9.1) | 29 (3, 48) | 5 |
falling
|
-2.9 (-4.6, -1.3) |
| Charlevoix County | Rural | *** | 8.3 (4.8, 14.0) | 5 (1, 48) | 4 |
|
|
| Cheboygan County | Rural | *** | 9.8 (5.9, 15.9) | 2 (1, 47) | 4 |
|
|
| Chippewa County | Rural | *** | 9.5 (6.0, 14.5) | 4 (1, 46) | 5 |
|
|
| Clinton County | Urban | *** | 5.1 (3.4, 7.6) | 47 (7, 48) | 5 |
falling
|
-4.1 (-18.7, -2.1) |
| Eaton County | Urban | *** | 4.7 (3.3, 6.6) | 48 (12, 48) | 7 |
falling
|
-4.2 (-7.5, -2.6) |
| Emmet County | Rural | *** | 6.1 (3.6, 10.2) | 23 (2, 48) | 4 |
|
|
| Genesee County | Urban | *** | 5.9 (5.0, 6.9) | 28 (11, 45) | 32 |
falling
|
-2.5 (-11.8, -1.3) |
| Gladwin County | Rural | *** | 8.0 (4.2, 14.3) | 6 (1, 48) | 3 |
|
|
| Grand Traverse County | Urban | *** | 5.3 (3.7, 7.5) | 40 (7, 48) | 7 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-3.4, -0.2) |
| Gratiot County | Rural | *** | 7.3 (4.3, 11.6) | 11 (1, 48) | 4 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-4.8, -0.4) |
| Hillsdale County | Rural | *** | 9.9 (6.7, 14.3) | 1 (1, 38) | 6 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-3.7, 0.9) |
| Huron County | Rural | *** | 9.7 (6.2, 15.0) | 3 (1, 44) | 5 |
|
|
| Ingham County | Urban | *** | 5.7 (4.5, 7.1) | 32 (8, 48) | 16 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.4, -0.9) |
| Ionia County | Urban | *** | 5.7 (3.6, 8.8) | 31 (3, 48) | 5 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-3.5, 0.5) |
| Iosco County | Rural | *** | 6.9 (4.1, 12.0) | 15 (1, 48) | 4 |
|
|
| Isabella County | Rural | *** | 7.3 (4.5, 11.2) | 9 (1, 48) | 4 |
|
|
| Jackson County | Urban | *** | 6.0 (4.6, 7.6) | 26 (6, 48) | 13 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-2.1, -0.1) |
| Kalamazoo County | Urban | *** | 7.2 (5.9, 8.7) | 12 (3, 38) | 22 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.6, -0.4) |
| Kent County | Urban | *** | 6.0 (5.2, 6.9) | 24 (11, 43) | 41 |
falling
|
-2.8 (-7.7, -2.1) |
| Lapeer County | Urban | *** | 7.0 (5.0, 9.5) | 14 (2, 47) | 9 |
stable
|
-1.7 (-3.5, 0.3) |
| Lenawee County | Rural | *** | 7.3 (5.4, 9.7) | 10 (2, 46) | 10 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-3.5, -0.2) |
| Livingston County | Urban | *** | 6.5 (5.1, 8.1) | 21 (4, 46) | 16 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-2.5, 0.1) |
| Macomb County | Urban | *** | 5.9 (5.2, 6.5) | 30 (14, 42) | 67 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.3, -1.3) |
| Marquette County | Rural | *** | 7.0 (4.6, 10.3) | 13 (1, 48) | 6 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.6, 1.1) |
| Mecosta County | Rural | *** | 6.5 (3.7, 10.8) | 20 (1, 48) | 4 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-3.2, 0.8) |
| Midland County | Urban | *** | 6.3 (4.4, 8.8) | 22 (2, 48) | 8 |
falling
|
-3.2 (-5.2, -2.0) |
| Monroe County | Urban | *** | 5.3 (4.1, 7.0) | 37 (10, 48) | 12 |
falling
|
-20.8 (-37.0, -1.3) |
| Montcalm County | Urban | *** | 5.3 (3.3, 8.1) | 41 (5, 48) | 4 |
falling
|
-3.9 (-6.4, -2.4) |
| Muskegon County | Urban | *** | 6.9 (5.3, 8.7) | 17 (3, 44) | 15 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-2.6, 0.0) |
| Oakland County | Urban | *** | 5.2 (4.8, 5.8) | 43 (24, 46) | 87 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-2.7, -1.7) |
| Ottawa County | Urban | *** | 5.7 (4.6, 7.0) | 33 (10, 48) | 20 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-3.3, -0.9) |
| Saginaw County | Urban | *** | 6.0 (4.8, 7.5) | 25 (7, 47) | 17 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.7, -0.3) |
| Sanilac County | Rural | *** | 5.7 (3.4, 9.3) | 34 (3, 48) | 4 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-3.2, 0.0) |
| Shiawassee County | Rural | *** | 6.9 (4.7, 10.0) | 16 (2, 48) | 6 |
|
|
| St. Clair County | Urban | *** | 5.9 (4.6, 7.6) | 27 (6, 48) | 14 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-3.7, -1.1) |
| St. Joseph County | Rural | *** | 5.3 (3.3, 8.3) | 38 (4, 48) | 4 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-4.2, -0.4) |
| Tuscola County | Rural | *** | 5.4 (3.4, 8.4) | 36 (4, 48) | 5 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-3.7, -0.6) |
| Van Buren County | Rural | *** | 5.2 (3.4, 7.8) | 44 (6, 48) | 5 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-3.1, 0.1) |
| Washtenaw County | Urban | *** | 5.1 (4.2, 6.3) | 46 (15, 48) | 20 |
stable
|
-2.2 (-9.6, 0.0) |
| Wayne County | Urban | *** | 5.2 (4.8, 5.7) | 45 (25, 46) | 108 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-4.3, -1.6) |
| Alcona County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Alger County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Antrim County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Arenac County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Baraga County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Benzie County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Clare County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Crawford County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Delta County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Dickinson County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Gogebic County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Houghton County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Iron County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Kalkaska County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Keweenaw County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Lake County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Leelanau County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Luce County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mackinac County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Manistee County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mason County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Menominee County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Missaukee County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Montmorency County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Newaygo County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Oceana County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ogemaw County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ontonagon County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Osceola County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Oscoda County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Otsego County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Presque Isle County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Roscommon County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Schoolcraft County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Wexford County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 3:59 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 3:59 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.