Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan *** 5.9 (5.7, 6.1) N/A 754 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -1.9)
United States *** 5.1 (5.1, 5.2) N/A 20,291 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.3, -2.1)
Cheboygan County *** 10.2 (6.6, 15.9) 1 (1, 45) 5
*
*
Huron County *** 9.8 (6.2, 15.1) 2 (1, 47) 5
*
*
Alpena County *** 9.7 (5.7, 15.9) 3 (1, 49) 4
*
*
Hillsdale County *** 8.9 (5.9, 13.0) 4 (1, 48) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.3)
Ionia County *** 8.3 (5.5, 11.9) 5 (1, 48) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Chippewa County *** 8.2 (4.9, 13.0) 6 (1, 50) 4
*
*
Calhoun County *** 7.8 (6.0, 10.0) 7 (1, 42) 13 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Mason County *** 7.7 (4.6, 12.6) 8 (1, 50) 4
*
*
Kalamazoo County *** 7.2 (5.9, 8.7) 9 (3, 42) 21 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Gladwin County *** 7.2 (4.0, 12.7) 10 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Mecosta County *** 7.1 (4.4, 11.2) 11 (1, 50) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.5)
Emmet County *** 7.1 (4.3, 11.5) 12 (1, 50) 4
*
*
Clare County *** 7.0 (4.1, 11.7) 13 (1, 50) 4
*
*
Muskegon County *** 7.0 (5.5, 8.9) 14 (3, 46) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Tuscola County *** 7.0 (4.6, 10.4) 15 (1, 50) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.5)
Charlevoix County *** 6.7 (3.8, 11.8) 16 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Branch County *** 6.7 (4.0, 10.7) 17 (1, 50) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.6)
Jackson County *** 6.7 (5.2, 8.5) 18 (3, 47) 15 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.1)
Gratiot County *** 6.6 (3.9, 10.7) 19 (1, 50) 4 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.9, -0.7)
St. Clair County *** 6.6 (5.2, 8.4) 20 (4, 48) 15 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -1.0)
Clinton County *** 6.4 (4.3, 9.2) 21 (2, 50) 6 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.2, -0.3)
Livingston County *** 6.4 (5.0, 8.1) 22 (5, 48) 15 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Lenawee County *** 6.3 (4.5, 8.6) 23 (4, 50) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.0)
Ottawa County *** 6.3 (5.1, 7.6) 24 (7, 48) 20 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.9)
Shiawassee County *** 6.2 (4.1, 9.1) 25 (2, 50) 6
*
*
Eaton County *** 6.2 (4.5, 8.3) 26 (4, 50) 9 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.0, -2.0)
Allegan County *** 6.2 (4.5, 8.4) 27 (4, 50) 9 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.7)
Monroe County *** 6.2 (4.7, 8.0) 28 (5, 49) 13 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.8)
Lapeer County *** 6.1 (4.2, 8.6) 29 (3, 50) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.5)
Montcalm County *** 6.1 (3.9, 9.2) 30 (2, 50) 5 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.7, -1.9)
Macomb County *** 6.1 (5.4, 6.8) 31 (12, 44) 69 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Genesee County *** 6.0 (5.1, 7.1) 32 (10, 47) 32 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Barry County *** 6.0 (3.9, 9.1) 33 (3, 50) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4)
Bay County *** 5.8 (4.2, 7.9) 34 (5, 50) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Midland County *** 5.7 (3.9, 8.2) 35 (4, 50) 7 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.2, -2.0)
Kent County *** 5.7 (4.9, 6.6) 36 (15, 48) 38 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.9, -2.3)
Saginaw County *** 5.7 (4.4, 7.2) 37 (9, 50) 15 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.6)
Ingham County *** 5.7 (4.5, 7.1) 38 (9, 50) 17 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Newaygo County *** 5.7 (3.4, 9.1) 39 (2, 50) 4 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.2)
Cass County *** 5.6 (3.4, 9.0) 40 (3, 50) 4 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.5, -1.1)
Wayne County *** 5.5 (5.1, 6.0) 41 (23, 47) 113 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Oakland County *** 5.5 (5.0, 6.0) 42 (22, 48) 88 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.7)
Grand Traverse County *** 5.5 (3.8, 7.7) 43 (6, 50) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.2)
Marquette County *** 5.5 (3.4, 8.5) 44 (4, 50) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Sanilac County *** 5.3 (3.1, 8.8) 45 (4, 50) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.3)
St. Joseph County *** 5.3 (3.2, 8.3) 46 (4, 50) 4 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.1, -0.4)
Washtenaw County *** 5.1 (4.2, 6.3) 47 (17, 50) 20 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Isabella County *** 5.0 (2.9, 8.1) 48 (5, 50) 4
*
*
Van Buren County *** 4.9 (3.1, 7.5) 49 (7, 50) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Berrien County *** 4.8 (3.6, 6.3) 50 (16, 50) 11 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.0)
Alcona County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alger County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Antrim County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arenac County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benzie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickinson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houghton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iosco County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kalkaska County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leelanau County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Manistee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oceana County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ogemaw County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otsego County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roscommon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wexford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 5:33 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top