Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota N/A No 846.2 (837.6, 854.8) N/A 7,627 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
United States N/A No 844.0 (842.9, 845.1) N/A 441,232 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
Traverse County Rural No 1,256.7 (938.0, 1,648.3) 1 (1, 81) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.0)
Mahnomen County Rural No 1,220.6 (921.7, 1,586.4) 2 (1, 80) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Wadena County Rural No 1,145.6 (976.6, 1,335.5) 3 (1, 42) 33 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.0)
Mille Lacs County Urban No 1,124.2 (990.8, 1,270.5) 4 (1, 31) 52 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Norman County Rural No 1,109.5 (872.5, 1,391.1) 5 (1, 83) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
Wilkin County Rural No 1,084.7 (834.2, 1,386.4) 6 (1, 84) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.7)
Pipestone County Rural No 1,056.2 (857.0, 1,287.3) 7 (1, 78) 20 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Cottonwood County Rural No 1,033.5 (867.0, 1,222.6) 8 (1, 72) 29 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
Chisago County Urban No 1,027.9 (932.0, 1,131.0) 9 (2, 43) 86 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.6)
Pine County Rural No 1,022.0 (908.2, 1,145.9) 10 (1, 53) 60 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Faribault County Rural No 1,017.3 (866.9, 1,186.4) 11 (1, 75) 33 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.1)
Polk County Urban No 1,009.6 (894.7, 1,135.0) 12 (2, 57) 58 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Kittson County Rural No 984.9 (731.9, 1,296.6) 13 (1, 87) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.6)
Waseca County Rural No 984.7 (838.3, 1,149.3) 14 (1, 80) 33 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Chippewa County Rural No 984.0 (825.3, 1,164.4) 15 (1, 82) 28 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.5)
Goodhue County Rural No 980.8 (891.6, 1,076.5) 16 (4, 54) 90 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.2)
Le Sueur County Urban No 969.8 (849.7, 1,102.1) 17 (3, 74) 47 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Isanti County Urban No 968.1 (862.9, 1,082.6) 18 (4, 71) 63 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Carlton County Urban No 967.6 (860.3, 1,084.5) 19 (3, 65) 61 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Watonwan County Rural No 965.1 (790.6, 1,166.3) 20 (1, 85) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Benton County Urban No 953.4 (839.2, 1,078.7) 21 (3, 74) 53 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Kanabec County Rural No 948.0 (803.0, 1,111.5) 22 (2, 82) 31 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Lincoln County Rural No 947.2 (730.4, 1,208.4) 23 (1, 87) 14 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.7)
Brown County Rural No 944.2 (832.9, 1,066.4) 24 (4, 77) 54 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Rock County Urban No 934.1 (752.0, 1,147.2) 25 (2, 87) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Sherburne County Urban No 933.0 (850.4, 1,021.4) 26 (7, 68) 98 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Clearwater County Rural No 925.0 (730.9, 1,154.5) 27 (1, 87) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Lake of the Woods County Rural No 923.6 (645.3, 1,278.9) 28 (1, 87) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Cass County Rural No 923.6 (826.6, 1,028.7) 29 (6, 74) 68 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.1)
Pennington County Rural No 922.6 (762.7, 1,105.9) 30 (2, 86) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Itasca County Rural No 920.6 (839.1, 1,007.8) 31 (7, 71) 96 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Meeker County Rural No 919.6 (798.4, 1,053.9) 32 (4, 82) 42 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Big Stone County Rural No 918.9 (704.4, 1,178.5) 33 (1, 87) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Martin County Rural No 914.4 (795.2, 1,046.4) 34 (4, 83) 44 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Fillmore County Urban No 911.2 (789.5, 1,046.2) 35 (4, 83) 42 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Lake County Rural No 903.4 (754.4, 1,073.3) 36 (3, 85) 26 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Renville County Rural No 891.5 (747.5, 1,055.2) 37 (3, 86) 28 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Grant County Rural No 888.4 (683.0, 1,136.2) 38 (2, 87) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Crow Wing County Rural No 877.1 (811.0, 947.2) 39 (15, 76) 132 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Wright County Urban No 876.6 (814.7, 942.0) 40 (19, 75) 152 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Wabasha County Urban No 871.7 (755.9, 1,000.1) 41 (8, 85) 41 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Lyon County Rural No 867.5 (746.1, 1,003.1) 42 (7, 86) 38 falling falling trend -1.5 (-7.8, -0.3)
St. Louis County Urban No 867.3 (825.8, 910.3) 43 (25, 69) 338 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.7, -1.5)
Douglas County Rural No 862.5 (779.1, 952.5) 44 (15, 82) 79 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Stearns County Urban No 861.7 (809.5, 916.3) 45 (23, 73) 207 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Becker County Rural No 860.4 (765.4, 963.9) 46 (12, 83) 61 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Winona County Rural No 856.2 (770.1, 949.4) 47 (15, 83) 74 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Anoka County Urban No 855.9 (819.1, 893.9) 48 (29, 68) 420 falling falling trend -1.4 (-3.3, -1.0)
Clay County Urban No 854.0 (768.7, 946.2) 49 (14, 83) 76 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Nobles County Rural No 853.4 (723.6, 999.6) 50 (6, 86) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Dodge County Urban No 849.7 (706.2, 1,013.5) 51 (6, 87) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Marshall County Rural No 845.6 (674.4, 1,047.2) 52 (3, 87) 17 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Blue Earth County Urban No 845.1 (764.0, 932.4) 53 (18, 83) 82 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Sibley County Rural No 845.0 (698.4, 1,013.2) 54 (5, 87) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Ramsey County Urban No 844.8 (815.9, 874.4) 55 (33, 69) 669 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.3)
Rice County Rural No 843.3 (765.6, 926.8) 56 (18, 83) 88 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.8, 0.9)
Aitkin County Rural No 842.0 (733.3, 962.3) 57 (11, 86) 43 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Koochiching County Rural No 839.8 (699.8, 999.4) 58 (7, 87) 26 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Red Lake County Rural No 836.3 (584.0, 1,161.3) 59 (1, 87) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Pope County Rural No 832.0 (682.5, 1,004.4) 60 (5, 87) 22 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Roseau County Rural No 820.5 (674.6, 988.6) 61 (8, 87) 23 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Washington County Urban No 815.0 (775.1, 856.4) 62 (38, 80) 319 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -0.9)
Freeborn County Rural No 813.1 (721.2, 913.5) 63 (19, 86) 58 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Hennepin County Urban No 811.7 (792.8, 830.9) 64 (49, 75) 1,448 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
Beltrami County Rural No 811.7 (721.2, 910.4) 65 (20, 86) 60 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Otter Tail County Rural No 810.1 (744.8, 879.5) 66 (28, 84) 116 falling falling trend -1.2 (-5.6, -0.7)
Mower County Rural No 807.0 (715.7, 906.7) 67 (20, 86) 59 falling falling trend -1.1 (-5.3, -0.6)
Yellow Medicine County Rural No 805.0 (635.2, 1,006.2) 68 (5, 87) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Morrison County Rural No 801.9 (708.2, 904.4) 69 (21, 87) 54 falling falling trend -2.1 (-7.8, -1.0)
Houston County Urban No 797.3 (675.9, 934.1) 70 (13, 87) 32 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Hubbard County Rural No 797.1 (690.2, 915.7) 71 (17, 87) 41 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Murray County Rural No 796.9 (633.3, 989.6) 72 (6, 87) 17 falling falling trend -1.5 (-9.5, -0.6)
Steele County Rural No 793.5 (700.7, 895.2) 73 (22, 87) 54 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Dakota County Urban No 789.6 (758.1, 822.0) 74 (49, 82) 486 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Scott County Urban No 787.9 (727.2, 852.3) 75 (36, 85) 128 falling falling trend -2.1 (-7.7, -1.2)
Nicollet County Urban No 787.8 (688.1, 898.0) 76 (24, 87) 46 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
McLeod County Rural No 784.4 (694.9, 882.2) 77 (26, 87) 57 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Kandiyohi County Rural No 780.6 (696.4, 872.2) 78 (28, 87) 64 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Carver County Urban No 767.3 (700.1, 839.2) 79 (37, 87) 99 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Redwood County Rural No 759.2 (631.2, 905.6) 80 (17, 87) 25 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Lac qui Parle County Rural No 757.2 (585.1, 963.4) 81 (9, 87) 14 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Olmsted County Urban No 756.6 (709.4, 806.2) 82 (52, 86) 196 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Todd County Rural No 751.9 (652.7, 861.8) 83 (27, 87) 42 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Swift County Rural No 726.0 (576.6, 902.2) 84 (16, 87) 17 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Stevens County Rural No 705.3 (535.4, 912.0) 85 (13, 87) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.9)
Jackson County Rural No 699.7 (555.4, 870.4) 86 (22, 87) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Cook County Rural No 654.7 (481.7, 869.5) 87 (20, 87) 10 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.6, 0.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top