Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota N/A No 140.8 (139.4, 142.1) N/A 9,262 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
United States 6 N/A No 151.3 (151.1, 151.5) N/A 463,400 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Aitkin County Rural No 150.9 (130.4, 174.9) 40 (5, 85) 51 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Anoka County Urban No 143.3 (137.8, 149.0) 57 (34, 72) 540 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Becker County Rural No 141.3 (126.6, 157.5) 62 (16, 86) 72 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Beltrami County Rural No 141.4 (126.5, 157.8) 61 (16, 85) 70 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Benton County Urban No 154.1 (137.8, 171.9) 33 (6, 78) 68 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Big Stone County Rural No 175.4 (134.9, 226.5) 8 (1, 86) 16 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Blue Earth County Urban No 140.6 (128.3, 153.8) 65 (23, 84) 102 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Brown County Rural No 164.5 (146.2, 184.9) 17 (2, 69) 66 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Carlton County Urban No 153.8 (138.1, 171.1) 34 (6, 79) 73 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Carver County Urban No 125.5 (115.8, 135.7) 86 (57, 87) 131 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Cass County Rural No 146.1 (130.5, 163.6) 54 (11, 84) 74 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Chippewa County Rural No 174.2 (147.6, 205.2) 9 (1, 72) 35 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.6)
Chisago County Urban No 166.0 (152.2, 180.8) 14 (3, 55) 112 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Clay County Urban No 136.5 (124.1, 149.9) 69 (28, 86) 92 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Clearwater County Rural No 160.0 (127.8, 198.9) 24 (1, 86) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Cook County Rural Yes 102.0 (74.7, 141.0) 87 (29, 87) 11 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.2)
Cottonwood County Rural No 164.4 (138.3, 195.1) 18 (1, 83) 32 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Crow Wing County Rural No 147.9 (137.5, 159.0) 48 (18, 75) 163 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Dakota County Urban No 131.7 (126.9, 136.6) 74 (58, 84) 604 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.9, -1.5)
Dodge County Urban No 140.9 (119.9, 164.8) 64 (8, 87) 33 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.4, 0.0)
Douglas County Rural No 142.5 (129.6, 156.5) 59 (19, 84) 96 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Faribault County Rural No 174.2 (150.1, 201.9) 10 (1, 72) 41 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Fillmore County Urban No 153.0 (134.2, 174.2) 36 (5, 84) 52 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Freeborn County Rural No 146.5 (130.7, 164.1) 50 (11, 84) 72 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Goodhue County Rural No 159.4 (146.0, 173.9) 25 (6, 64) 111 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Grant County Rural No 165.6 (129.3, 210.6) 15 (1, 86) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Hennepin County Urban No 129.8 (126.9, 132.7) 79 (65, 84) 1,615 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.7)
Houston County Urban No 141.1 (121.8, 163.2) 63 (11, 86) 42 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Hubbard County Rural No 148.1 (130.0, 168.5) 47 (7, 85) 54 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Isanti County Urban No 156.5 (141.2, 173.2) 30 (6, 74) 79 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Itasca County Rural No 158.0 (144.8, 172.3) 27 (7, 68) 118 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Jackson County Rural No 125.8 (101.0, 155.9) 84 (13, 87) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Kanabec County Rural No 158.3 (136.3, 183.4) 26 (2, 83) 39 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Kandiyohi County Rural No 138.4 (124.6, 153.5) 68 (23, 86) 82 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Kittson County Rural No 183.0 (139.1, 239.6) 5 (1, 85) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.7)
Koochiching County Rural No 132.6 (111.8, 157.5) 73 (15, 87) 31 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Lac qui Parle County Rural No 125.5 (97.4, 161.5) 85 (10, 87) 16 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.8)
Lake County Rural No 160.9 (135.7, 190.7) 20 (1, 83) 33 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Lake of the Woods County Rural No 146.3 (103.7, 204.5) 52 (1, 87) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Le Sueur County Urban No 161.4 (143.4, 181.3) 19 (3, 73) 61 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Lincoln County Rural No 170.7 (133.8, 216.7) 11 (1, 86) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.8)
Lyon County Rural No 144.3 (125.6, 165.4) 55 (10, 86) 46 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Mahnomen County Rural No 160.3 (108.9, 232.4) 22 (1, 87) 8 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.6)
Marshall County Rural No 150.1 (122.7, 183.1) 44 (2, 87) 23 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Martin County Rural No 156.1 (136.5, 178.1) 31 (4, 82) 54 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
McLeod County Rural No 132.7 (118.9, 148.0) 72 (30, 87) 71 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Meeker County Rural No 150.6 (132.4, 171.1) 41 (7, 84) 52 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Mille Lacs County Urban No 187.4 (166.8, 210.1) 3 (1, 33) 63 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Morrison County Rural No 156.9 (141.2, 174.0) 29 (6, 74) 79 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Mower County Rural No 139.4 (125.0, 155.3) 66 (18, 85) 74 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Murray County Rural No 128.1 (103.3, 159.0) 82 (11, 87) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Nicollet County Urban No 131.4 (116.1, 148.3) 75 (27, 87) 57 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Nobles County Rural No 151.8 (129.0, 178.3) 37 (3, 85) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Norman County Rural No 179.7 (143.6, 224.1) 7 (1, 82) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Olmsted County Urban No 126.5 (119.2, 134.2) 83 (60, 87) 234 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Otter Tail County Rural No 143.2 (132.4, 154.9) 58 (21, 81) 147 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Pennington County Rural No 165.3 (139.4, 195.1) 16 (1, 81) 31 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Pine County Rural No 167.1 (150.0, 186.0) 13 (2, 60) 75 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Pipestone County Rural No 184.5 (153.5, 221.3) 4 (1, 66) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Polk County Urban No 168.4 (151.0, 187.6) 12 (2, 63) 73 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Pope County Rural No 148.6 (122.9, 178.9) 45 (3, 87) 27 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Ramsey County Urban No 139.2 (134.6, 144.0) 67 (42, 75) 734 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
Red Lake County Rural No 157.9 (114.5, 215.4) 28 (1, 87) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 0.9)
Redwood County Rural No 135.6 (114.6, 160.1) 70 (12, 87) 32 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Renville County Rural No 153.2 (130.4, 179.7) 35 (3, 85) 35 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Rice County Rural No 146.4 (134.2, 159.5) 51 (15, 79) 112 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.9)
Rock County Urban No 156.0 (128.4, 188.9) 32 (2, 86) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Roseau County Rural No 131.3 (110.2, 155.9) 77 (14, 87) 28 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Scott County Urban No 128.5 (119.7, 137.8) 81 (54, 87) 165 falling falling trend -2.4 (-6.3, -1.7)
Sherburne County Urban No 151.5 (139.9, 163.8) 38 (12, 74) 135 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.5)
Sibley County Rural No 151.0 (127.0, 178.8) 39 (4, 86) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
St. Louis County Urban No 148.5 (142.1, 155.2) 46 (24, 65) 431 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.9, -1.4)
Stearns County Urban No 146.1 (138.1, 154.5) 53 (23, 72) 262 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.5)
Steele County Rural No 141.4 (126.7, 157.6) 60 (17, 85) 71 stable stable trend 6.0 (-1.1, 10.7)
Stevens County Rural No 129.9 (100.8, 165.7) 78 (7, 87) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Swift County Rural No 131.4 (105.9, 162.4) 76 (9, 87) 21 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.1)
Todd County Rural No 128.7 (112.5, 147.0) 80 (29, 87) 51 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Traverse County Rural No 200.1 (152.0, 264.7) 1 (1, 82) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.4)
Wabasha County Urban No 144.0 (126.1, 164.2) 56 (11, 86) 50 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Wadena County Rural No 187.6 (161.9, 217.0) 2 (1, 49) 40 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Waseca County Rural No 160.0 (138.2, 184.8) 23 (2, 82) 41 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Washington County Urban No 135.2 (129.2, 141.4) 71 (48, 82) 400 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Watonwan County Rural No 181.0 (149.1, 219.1) 6 (1, 79) 27 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
Wilkin County Rural No 160.3 (125.1, 203.9) 21 (1, 87) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Winona County Rural No 150.3 (136.6, 165.2) 42 (9, 78) 95 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Wright County Urban No 147.5 (138.5, 156.9) 49 (21, 73) 208 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.5)
Yellow Medicine County Rural No 150.1 (121.0, 185.1) 43 (2, 87) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/22/2025 4:30 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top