Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Minnesota No 143.8 (142.4, 145.1) N/A 9,192 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.3)
United States 6 No 154.4 (154.1, 154.6) N/A 464,265 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Chisago County No 161.2 (147.5, 176.0) 16 (4, 67) 106 stable stable trend 6.2 (-5.2, 19.1)
Chippewa County No 191.0 (162.4, 224.2) 1 (1, 58) 36 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Faribault County No 173.8 (148.7, 202.8) 4 (1, 75) 40 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7)
Lincoln County No 171.3 (134.0, 217.7) 7 (1, 86) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.6)
Wadena County No 184.0 (157.9, 213.7) 3 (1, 58) 40 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Cottonwood County No 152.2 (127.7, 181.4) 38 (2, 86) 30 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3)
Lyon County No 146.0 (127.0, 167.2) 50 (5, 87) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Stevens County No 142.4 (112.0, 179.3) 64 (2, 87) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Brown County No 164.4 (145.9, 185.0) 13 (1, 73) 66 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Martin County No 164.7 (144.8, 187.2) 12 (1, 77) 57 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Nobles County No 168.6 (145.0, 195.9) 10 (1, 79) 41 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Watonwan County No 170.3 (138.5, 208.6) 8 (1, 84) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Clay County No 145.9 (132.8, 160.0) 52 (13, 83) 96 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Douglas County No 156.3 (142.1, 171.7) 27 (5, 75) 97 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Isanti County No 156.3 (140.8, 173.2) 26 (4, 78) 77 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Mille Lacs County No 186.3 (165.8, 208.9) 2 (1, 35) 63 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Red Lake County No 143.9 (104.1, 197.2) 60 (1, 87) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Rock County No 160.3 (131.5, 194.6) 17 (1, 86) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Sibley County No 165.2 (140.4, 193.8) 11 (1, 81) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Jackson County No 140.6 (114.5, 172.0) 68 (3, 87) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Pipestone County No 153.2 (125.3, 186.9) 36 (1, 87) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Traverse County No 153.7 (113.4, 210.7) 34 (1, 87) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
Wilkin County No 173.5 (136.3, 219.4) 5 (1, 87) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Clearwater County No 156.4 (125.6, 193.7) 25 (1, 87) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Dodge County No 139.0 (118.1, 162.8) 73 (7, 87) 32 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Fillmore County No 151.1 (131.9, 172.6) 40 (4, 85) 50 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
McLeod County No 137.6 (123.3, 153.4) 76 (18, 87) 70 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Yellow Medicine County No 157.6 (128.9, 191.8) 22 (1, 87) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Cass County No 154.6 (138.3, 172.8) 31 (4, 81) 76 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Freeborn County No 149.0 (133.2, 166.6) 47 (7, 83) 73 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Goodhue County No 158.0 (144.5, 172.6) 20 (4, 73) 108 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Grant County No 153.4 (116.4, 199.9) 35 (1, 87) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Kittson County No 150.1 (112.7, 199.5) 42 (1, 87) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Lake of the Woods County No 140.7 (100.2, 196.5) 67 (1, 87) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Le Sueur County No 161.3 (143.2, 181.4) 15 (2, 78) 60 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Norman County No 169.0 (134.2, 211.9) 9 (1, 87) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Renville County No 157.0 (134.0, 183.7) 23 (1, 85) 36 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Becker County No 145.4 (130.4, 162.1) 55 (9, 84) 72 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Meeker County No 157.7 (139.1, 178.5) 21 (2, 81) 55 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Morrison County No 155.3 (139.6, 172.6) 30 (4, 80) 76 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Murray County Yes 122.4 (98.2, 152.7) 86 (14, 87) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Pennington County No 143.7 (119.9, 171.3) 61 (4, 87) 28 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Redwood County No 140.8 (119.1, 165.9) 66 (5, 87) 33 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
St. Louis County No 158.4 (151.6, 165.4) 19 (9, 49) 447 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Stearns County No 145.2 (137.2, 153.5) 57 (24, 77) 260 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
Wright County No 149.3 (140.0, 159.0) 46 (16, 74) 198 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Beltrami County No 140.8 (126.0, 157.1) 65 (13, 86) 70 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Carlton County No 144.4 (129.1, 161.3) 59 (10, 85) 67 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Crow Wing County No 153.8 (142.8, 165.4) 33 (8, 71) 159 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Kandiyohi County No 145.6 (131.1, 161.6) 54 (10, 85) 83 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Mower County No 149.0 (134.2, 165.2) 48 (8, 83) 82 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Otter Tail County No 138.7 (128.0, 150.2) 74 (28, 85) 140 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Pine County No 153.8 (137.6, 171.8) 32 (5, 81) 69 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Pope County No 130.5 (106.3, 159.4) 82 (9, 87) 24 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Wabasha County No 145.3 (127.5, 165.4) 56 (6, 86) 50 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Winona County No 153.0 (139.1, 168.0) 37 (7, 79) 96 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Anoka County No 150.1 (144.3, 156.0) 43 (22, 65) 539 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Blue Earth County No 142.7 (130.2, 156.2) 62 (15, 84) 101 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Hubbard County No 150.6 (132.2, 171.4) 41 (4, 84) 55 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Itasca County No 161.5 (148.0, 176.1) 14 (3, 66) 117 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Koochiching County No 149.3 (126.4, 176.4) 45 (2, 87) 34 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Nicollet County No 135.2 (119.3, 152.7) 79 (19, 87) 55 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Polk County No 172.5 (154.8, 191.9) 6 (1, 55) 74 stable stable trend -1.2 (-12.7, 11.8)
Sherburne County No 148.3 (136.7, 160.6) 49 (12, 80) 129 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Waseca County No 144.7 (123.8, 168.6) 58 (5, 87) 36 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Aitkin County No 160.0 (139.5, 183.8) 18 (1, 82) 55 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Houston County No 129.1 (110.5, 150.5) 83 (18, 87) 38 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Swift County No 155.4 (126.5, 190.1) 29 (1, 87) 23 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Benton County No 151.8 (135.6, 169.4) 39 (4, 82) 68 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Dakota County No 137.4 (132.4, 142.6) 77 (50, 81) 594 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Kanabec County No 155.6 (133.2, 181.2) 28 (2, 85) 37 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Marshall County No 140.1 (113.7, 171.9) 71 (4, 87) 22 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Rice County No 145.8 (133.6, 158.9) 53 (14, 83) 111 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Roseau County No 132.8 (111.1, 158.0) 81 (10, 87) 28 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Steele County No 136.2 (121.6, 152.4) 78 (18, 87) 66 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Washington County No 140.5 (134.2, 147.1) 69 (37, 79) 388 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Carver County No 123.6 (113.6, 134.2) 85 (62, 87) 121 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Cook County No 140.4 (105.4, 187.4) 70 (1, 87) 13 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.3)
Mahnomen County No 157.0 (107.9, 226.0) 24 (1, 87) 8 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Scott County No 138.4 (128.8, 148.4) 75 (31, 84) 165 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Big Stone County No 149.5 (115.8, 193.2) 44 (1, 87) 15 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.8)
Lac qui Parle County No 139.2 (107.7, 179.1) 72 (2, 87) 17 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Lake County No 146.0 (122.0, 174.6) 51 (2, 87) 30 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Olmsted County No 128.0 (120.5, 135.9) 84 (60, 87) 225 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Ramsey County No 142.7 (138.0, 147.5) 63 (38, 74) 742 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.6)
Hennepin County No 133.5 (130.5, 136.5) 80 (62, 82) 1,618 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.8)
Todd County Yes 121.8 (106.0, 139.7) 87 (43, 87) 47 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.0, -1.8)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/20/2024 5:36 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top