Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Breast, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank ascending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Minnesota N/A No 17.2 (16.6, 17.9) N/A 649 stable stable trend -1.6 (-2.2, 0.9)
United States N/A No 19.3 (19.2, 19.4) N/A 42,308 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
Douglas County Rural Yes 9.2 (5.2, 16.0) 42 (24, 42) 3 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.7, -0.6)
Crow Wing County Rural Yes 12.2 (8.4, 17.6) 41 (15, 42) 7 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.6, -2.3)
Cass County Rural Yes 12.3 (7.2, 21.1) 40 (9, 42) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.4)
Mower County Rural Yes 12.4 (7.4, 20.0) 39 (11, 42) 4 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.7, -1.7)
Carver County Urban Yes 12.5 (8.7, 17.4) 38 (16, 42) 7 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -0.9)
Becker County Rural Yes 12.8 (7.5, 21.2) 37 (8, 42) 4 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.6, -1.9)
Scott County Urban Yes 14.6 (10.9, 19.0) 36 (11, 42) 11 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -1.7)
Clay County Urban No 15.3 (10.1, 22.5) 35 (5, 42) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.7)
Dakota County Urban No 15.5 (13.4, 17.8) 34 (15, 39) 43 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.3, -1.8)
Otter Tail County Rural No 15.6 (10.9, 22.0) 33 (6, 42) 8 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
Olmsted County Urban No 15.9 (12.6, 19.9) 32 (9, 40) 17 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.8, -2.1)
Blue Earth County Urban No 16.3 (11.1, 23.3) 31 (4, 42) 7 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.7, -1.0)
Goodhue County Rural No 16.5 (11.0, 24.2) 30 (3, 42) 6 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.2, -3.0)
Brown County Rural No 16.6 (9.2, 28.6) 29 (2, 42) 4
*
*
Pine County Rural No 16.7 (10.3, 27.0) 28 (3, 42) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.9)
Stearns County Urban No 16.7 (13.1, 21.1) 27 (8, 40) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.8)
Anoka County Urban No 16.8 (14.4, 19.5) 26 (11, 37) 36 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.3)
Freeborn County Rural No 16.9 (9.9, 27.5) 25 (2, 42) 4 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.7, -0.1)
St. Louis County Urban No 17.1 (14.1, 20.5) 24 (8, 38) 27 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.1)
Itasca County Rural No 17.3 (11.5, 25.7) 23 (3, 42) 7 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.5, -1.7)
Hennepin County Urban No 18.1 (16.7, 19.5) 22 (11, 30) 142 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.9)
Ramsey County Urban No 18.2 (16.2, 20.4) 21 (9, 32) 64 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.6)
Washington County Urban No 18.2 (15.4, 21.5) 20 (7, 35) 31 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Wright County Urban No 18.3 (14.2, 23.3) 19 (4, 38) 14 stable stable trend -1.6 (-2.9, 0.0)
Winona County Rural No 19.2 (12.8, 28.1) 18 (2, 41) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.1)
Nicollet County Urban No 19.5 (11.9, 30.5) 17 (1, 42) 5
*
*
Sherburne County Urban No 19.6 (14.4, 26.1) 16 (2, 39) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.2, 0.2)
Beltrami County Rural No 19.9 (12.4, 30.2) 15 (1, 42) 5
*
*
Mille Lacs County Urban No 19.9 (11.6, 32.5) 14 (1, 42) 4
*
*
Polk County Urban No 20.1 (12.2, 31.7) 13 (1, 42) 4
*
*
McLeod County Rural No 20.1 (12.8, 30.4) 12 (1, 41) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.1)
Meeker County Rural No 21.2 (12.7, 34.2) 11 (1, 42) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.4)
Morrison County Rural No 22.1 (14.0, 33.6) 10 (1, 40) 5 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.5, 0.3)
Isanti County Urban No 22.3 (15.3, 31.8) 9 (1, 38) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.4)
Le Sueur County Urban No 22.4 (13.5, 35.3) 8 (1, 42) 4 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.8, -0.4)
Kandiyohi County Rural No 22.6 (15.2, 32.7) 7 (1, 39) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.6)
Fillmore County Urban No 22.9 (12.9, 38.4) 6 (1, 42) 4
*
*
Chisago County Urban No 23.2 (16.5, 32.0) 5 (1, 36) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.1)
Faribault County Rural No 23.7 (13.5, 41.4) 4 (1, 42) 3
*
*
Rice County Rural No 23.9 (17.1, 32.6) 3 (1, 36) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Steele County Rural No 26.0 (17.3, 37.8) 2 (1, 36) 6 stable stable trend 6.9 (-1.4, 30.1)
Pipestone County Rural No 39.1 (21.9, 67.5) 1 (1, 35) 3
*
*
Aitkin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Big Stone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carlton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottonwood County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dodge County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hubbard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kanabec County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Koochiching County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lyon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nobles County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pennington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Redwood County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Renville County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roseau County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sibley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swift County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Todd County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabasha County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wadena County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Waseca County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watonwan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yellow Medicine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/13/2025 2:56 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top