Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Breast, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota *** 17.7 (17.1, 18.4) N/A 642 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.5, -2.1)
United States *** 19.9 (19.8, 20.0) N/A 41,951 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
Anoka County *** 19.0 (16.3, 22.0) 19 (7, 34) 38 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.3)
Becker County *** 13.6 (7.4, 23.1) 40 (6, 45) 3 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.7, -2.0)
Beltrami County *** 18.7 (11.8, 28.4) 20 (2, 45) 5
*
*
Benton County *** 22.2 (14.3, 32.9) 8 (1, 44) 5 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.0, -0.4)
Blue Earth County *** 12.3 (7.9, 18.5) 44 (14, 45) 5 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.8, -1.1)
Brown County *** 14.3 (7.3, 26.0) 38 (3, 45) 3
*
*
Carlton County *** 14.5 (8.5, 23.8) 36 (5, 45) 4
*
*
Carver County *** 15.3 (11.0, 20.8) 34 (9, 45) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Cass County *** 20.6 (13.2, 31.7) 12 (1, 44) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.0)
Chisago County *** 17.5 (11.7, 25.3) 25 (4, 45) 6 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.3, -1.2)
Clay County *** 16.7 (11.2, 24.1) 28 (4, 45) 6 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Crow Wing County *** 13.3 (9.2, 19.0) 42 (13, 45) 7 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.2, -1.8)
Dakota County *** 16.4 (14.2, 18.8) 31 (14, 40) 42 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.5, -2.1)
Douglas County *** 11.5 (6.1, 20.1) 45 (9, 45) 3 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.5)
Freeborn County *** 20.2 (12.5, 31.5) 14 (1, 45) 5 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.4)
Goodhue County *** 17.6 (11.9, 25.6) 24 (4, 45) 7 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.3, -3.0)
Hennepin County *** 18.7 (17.3, 20.2) 21 (10, 30) 140 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -2.0)
Isanti County *** 24.7 (16.8, 35.3) 6 (1, 39) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.2)
Itasca County *** 19.7 (13.5, 28.2) 15 (2, 44) 7 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.3, -1.5)
Kandiyohi County *** 28.7 (20.0, 40.1) 3 (1, 29) 8 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.5)
Koochiching County *** 25.4 (14.7, 44.9) 5 (1, 44) 3
*
*
Lyon County *** 20.3 (11.7, 33.2) 13 (1, 45) 4 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.3)
Martin County *** 21.8 (12.1, 37.4) 9 (1, 45) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.1)
McLeod County *** 19.0 (11.6, 29.6) 18 (1, 45) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2)
Meeker County *** 16.5 (9.3, 28.4) 29 (2, 45) 3 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.6, -1.1)
Mille Lacs County *** 29.1 (18.7, 43.7) 2 (1, 37) 5
*
*
Morrison County *** 12.3 (6.7, 21.4) 43 (8, 45) 3 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.5, -1.0)
Mower County *** 14.9 (9.2, 23.2) 35 (6, 45) 5 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.4)
Nicollet County *** 15.7 (9.3, 25.5) 33 (4, 45) 4
*
*
Nobles County *** 23.3 (13.0, 39.0) 7 (1, 45) 3
*
*
Olmsted County *** 13.4 (10.4, 17.1) 41 (20, 45) 14 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.2, -2.5)
Otter Tail County *** 16.8 (11.8, 23.6) 27 (5, 45) 8 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.2)
Polk County *** 16.3 (9.3, 26.8) 32 (3, 45) 4
*
*
Ramsey County *** 17.9 (15.9, 20.1) 23 (10, 35) 62 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.9, -1.8)
Rice County *** 27.2 (20.1, 36.2) 4 (1, 29) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Scott County *** 18.4 (14.1, 23.6) 22 (5, 42) 13 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.5)
Sherburne County *** 19.2 (14.0, 25.8) 17 (3, 43) 9 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.4)
St. Louis County *** 14.0 (11.3, 17.3) 39 (20, 45) 21 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.7)
Stearns County *** 16.5 (12.9, 20.8) 30 (9, 43) 16 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -1.0)
Steele County *** 21.7 (14.0, 32.5) 10 (1, 44) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -0.8)
Todd County *** 14.5 (8.3, 25.1) 37 (5, 45) 3 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.4, -0.8)
Wadena County *** 30.7 (16.3, 53.7) 1 (1, 45) 3
*
*
Washington County *** 19.4 (16.3, 22.8) 16 (6, 35) 30 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Winona County *** 20.7 (13.4, 30.5) 11 (1, 44) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.7)
Wright County *** 17.4 (13.4, 22.3) 26 (6, 43) 13 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.6)
Aitkin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Big Stone County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottonwood County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dodge County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Faribault County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fillmore County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hubbard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kanabec County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Le Sueur County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pennington County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pipestone County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Redwood County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Renville County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roseau County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sibley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swift County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabasha County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Waseca County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watonwan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yellow Medicine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/02/2022 12:16 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of estimates:
Aitkin, Big Stone, Chippewa, Clearwater, Cook, Cottonwood, Dodge, Faribault, Fillmore, Grant, Houston, Hubbard, Jackson, Kanabec, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur, Lincoln, Mahnomen, Marshall, Murray, Norman, Pennington, Pine, Pipestone, Pope, Red Lake, Redwood, Renville, Rock, Roseau, Sibley, Stevens, Swift, Traverse, Wabasha, Waseca, Watonwan, Wilkin, Yellow Medicine

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top