Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for New York by County

Pancreas, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New York N/A *** 10.6 (10.5, 10.8) N/A 2,805 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.9, -0.2)
United States N/A *** 11.2 (11.1, 11.2) N/A 46,760 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.2, 0.3)
Albany County Urban *** 11.6 (10.2, 13.2) 28 (5, 54) 49 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.3)
Allegany County Rural *** 10.5 (7.3, 14.9) 47 (1, 60) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.9)
Bronx County Urban *** 9.2 (8.5, 9.9) 59 (42, 60) 144 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Broome County Urban *** 11.5 (9.9, 13.5) 30 (4, 57) 35 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.1)
Cattaraugus County Rural *** 10.2 (7.7, 13.5) 48 (4, 60) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Cayuga County Rural *** 10.0 (7.6, 13.2) 51 (5, 60) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.4)
Chautauqua County Rural *** 11.9 (9.7, 14.5) 21 (2, 58) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Chemung County Urban *** 12.8 (10.1, 16.1) 9 (1, 57) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-10.0, 0.8)
Chenango County Rural *** 12.7 (9.2, 17.2) 12 (1, 60) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 2.2)
Clinton County Rural *** 12.5 (9.7, 15.9) 14 (1, 59) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 2.0)
Columbia County Rural *** 11.9 (9.0, 15.6) 22 (1, 60) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8)
Cortland County Rural *** 12.7 (9.0, 17.7) 10 (1, 60) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.8)
Delaware County Rural *** 12.2 (8.8, 16.9) 17 (1, 60) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.4)
Dutchess County Urban *** 11.1 (9.7, 12.7) 38 (8, 57) 47 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.6)
Erie County Urban *** 12.0 (11.2, 12.9) 18 (8, 41) 159 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.6)
Essex County Rural *** 9.7 (6.6, 14.1) 56 (3, 60) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.7)
Franklin County Rural *** 11.0 (7.7, 15.5) 39 (1, 60) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.6)
Fulton County Rural *** 12.3 (9.1, 16.5) 16 (1, 60) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.5)
Genesee County Rural *** 13.4 (10.2, 17.6) 5 (1, 58) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Greene County Rural *** 15.2 (11.4, 20.0) 1 (1, 51) 12 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.1, 2.6)
Herkimer County Urban *** 9.6 (7.0, 13.1) 57 (5, 60) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Jefferson County Urban *** 11.7 (9.1, 14.7) 27 (2, 60) 15 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 2.0)
Kings County Urban *** 9.7 (9.2, 10.2) 55 (40, 57) 293 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.0, -1.1)
Lewis County Rural *** 11.7 (7.3, 18.1) 25 (1, 60) 5
*
*
Livingston County Urban *** 10.5 (7.7, 14.3) 46 (2, 60) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 1.0)
Madison County Urban *** 10.9 (8.1, 14.4) 41 (1, 60) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.4)
Monroe County Urban *** 11.9 (11.0, 12.9) 20 (7, 45) 124 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.5)
Montgomery County Rural *** 14.3 (10.6, 19.1) 2 (1, 58) 10 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.1, 17.5)
Nassau County Urban *** 11.3 (10.6, 12.0) 34 (15, 47) 223 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.4, 0.1)
New York County Urban *** 9.3 (8.7, 9.9) 58 (43, 60) 204 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.6, -0.9)
Niagara County Urban *** 12.0 (10.3, 13.9) 19 (3, 53) 38 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.8)
Oneida County Urban *** 12.5 (10.9, 14.4) 13 (2, 49) 42 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.1)
Onondaga County Urban *** 11.2 (10.0, 12.4) 36 (10, 53) 72 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Ontario County Urban *** 10.9 (8.8, 13.4) 43 (4, 60) 19 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.9)
Orange County Urban *** 10.9 (9.6, 12.4) 40 (10, 57) 50 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Orleans County Urban *** 13.2 (9.2, 18.5) 6 (1, 60) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.8)
Oswego County Urban *** 10.9 (8.7, 13.5) 42 (3, 60) 18 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Otsego County Rural *** 13.1 (9.9, 17.3) 7 (1, 59) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 2.3)
Putnam County Urban *** 12.4 (9.9, 15.4) 15 (1, 58) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.4)
Queens County Urban *** 8.7 (8.2, 9.2) 60 (50, 60) 268 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.6, -0.9)
Rensselaer County Urban *** 11.4 (9.4, 13.8) 32 (3, 59) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Richmond County Urban *** 11.3 (10.1, 12.6) 33 (9, 52) 71 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.1)
Rockland County Urban *** 11.2 (9.7, 12.7) 37 (7, 56) 46 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.5)
Saratoga County Urban *** 10.2 (8.7, 11.9) 49 (12, 60) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.2)
Schenectady County Urban *** 12.8 (10.7, 15.2) 8 (1, 53) 27 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.9)
Schoharie County Urban *** 11.2 (7.4, 16.7) 35 (1, 60) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.3)
Seneca County Rural *** 9.7 (6.1, 15.0) 54 (1, 60) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.9)
St. Lawrence County Rural *** 11.8 (9.4, 14.6) 23 (2, 59) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.2)
Steuben County Rural *** 10.1 (7.9, 12.9) 50 (6, 60) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.8)
Suffolk County Urban *** 11.5 (10.8, 12.2) 31 (14, 45) 237 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Sullivan County Rural *** 12.7 (9.9, 16.2) 11 (1, 58) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Tioga County Urban *** 9.9 (7.0, 13.9) 52 (3, 60) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.1)
Tompkins County Urban *** 11.7 (9.0, 15.0) 24 (1, 60) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.5)
Ulster County Urban *** 10.8 (9.2, 12.8) 44 (7, 59) 31 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Warren County Urban *** 11.7 (9.0, 15.1) 26 (1, 60) 13 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.3)
Washington County Urban *** 13.8 (10.6, 17.9) 3 (1, 56) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 2.8)
Wayne County Urban *** 11.6 (9.0, 14.7) 29 (1, 60) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 1.0)
Westchester County Urban *** 10.6 (9.9, 11.5) 45 (21, 53) 147 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Wyoming County Rural *** 13.6 (9.6, 18.9) 4 (1, 60) 8
*
*
Yates County Rural *** 9.8 (5.9, 15.8) 53 (1, 60) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.4)
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:02 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top