State Cancer Profiles > Death Rates Table

Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Area:

Area Type:

Cancer:

Race/ Ethnicity:

Sex:

Age:

Year:

Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Liver & Bile Duct, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County	2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ	Met Healthy People Objective of ***?	Age-Adjusted Death Rate † deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)	CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)	Average Annual Count	Recent Trend	Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
North Carolina	N/A	*******	6.8 (6.6, 7.0)	N/A	932	stable	0.0 (-1.3, 0.8)
United States	N/A	*******	6.6 (6.6, 6.6)	N/A	28,305	falling	-0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Yancey County	Rural	*******	11.2 (6.6, 18.6)	3 (1, 69)	4	*	*
Yadkin County	Urban	*******	8.6 (5.5, 13.0)	18 (1, 72)	5	*	*
Wilson County	Rural	*******	7.6 (5.4, 10.4)	33 (3, 70)	8	*	*
Wilkes County	Rural	*******	8.1 (5.8, 11.2)	24 (2, 69)	9	*	*
Wayne County	Urban	*******	8.0 (6.1, 10.5)	26 (3, 65)	12	*	*
Watauga County	Rural	*******	6.3 (3.9, 10.0)	53 (4, 72)	4	*	*
Warren County	Rural	*******	9.0 (5.0, 16.0)	14 (1, 72)	3	*	*
Wake County	Urban	*******	5.5 (4.9, 6.2)	62 (43, 70)	64	stable	-8.9 (-15.6, 1.7)
Vance County	Rural	*******	8.5 (5.6, 12.6)	19 (1, 71)	6	*	*
Union County	Urban	*******	6.5 (5.1, 8.1)	50 (16, 70)	17	rising	2.1 (1.0, 4.1)
Transylvania County	Rural	*******	8.8 (5.3, 14.1)	17 (1, 72)	5	*	*
Surry County	Rural	*******	6.9 (4.8, 9.8)	43 (4, 72)	7	*	*
Stokes County	Urban	*******	6.3 (4.0, 9.9)	54 (5, 72)	5	*	*
Stanly County	Rural	*******	9.6 (6.9, 13.1)	9 (1, 62)	9	rising	3.5 (2.0, 6.0)
Scotland County	Rural	*******	9.8 (6.3, 14.8)	6 (1, 70)	5	*	*
Sampson County	Rural	*******	6.0 (3.9, 9.1)	57 (8, 72)	5	*	*
Rutherford County	Rural	*******	10.1 (7.5, 13.5)	4 (1, 53)	11	rising	4.2 (2.7, 6.7)
Rowan County	Urban	*******	6.7 (5.2, 8.6)	45 (11, 70)	13	rising	2.9 (1.4, 5.3)
Rockingham County	Urban	*******	5.2 (3.6, 7.4)	66 (24, 72)	8	*	*
Robeson County	Rural	*******	9.6 (7.5, 12.2)	8 (1, 54)	14	rising	4.6 (3.4, 6.9)
Richmond County	Rural	*******	9.1 (5.9, 13.6)	13 (1, 71)	5	rising	3.0 (1.4, 5.5)
Randolph County	Urban	*******	8.4 (6.7, 10.5)	20 (3, 58)	17	rising	4.2 (3.4, 5.4)
Pitt County	Urban	*******	5.9 (4.5, 7.7)	58 (19, 72)	12	rising	2.5 (1.2, 4.8)
Person County	Urban	*******	7.4 (4.4, 11.7)	36 (1, 72)	4	*	*
Pender County	Urban	*******	5.3 (3.3, 8.3)	65 (14, 72)	4	*	*
Orange County	Urban	*******	4.9 (3.5, 6.7)	70 (31, 72)	8	*	*
Onslow County	Urban	*******	8.1 (6.2, 10.4)	25 (3, 65)	13	*	*
New Hanover County	Urban	*******	5.7 (4.6, 7.1)	60 (30, 72)	19	rising	1.7 (0.3, 4.0)
Nash County	Urban	*******	7.7 (5.7, 10.2)	31 (4, 69)	11	rising	3.5 (2.0, 6.0)
Moore County	Urban	*******	6.1 (4.5, 8.1)	56 (15, 72)	11	*	*
Montgomery County	Rural	*******	8.4 (4.7, 14.2)	21 (1, 72)	3	*	*
Mecklenburg County	Urban	*******	7.5 (6.7, 8.3)	35 (16, 51)	81	rising	2.6 (2.1, 3.4)
McDowell County	Rural	*******	11.3 (7.9, 15.9)	2 (1, 53)	8	*	*
Macon County	Rural	*******	5.1 (3.0, 8.6)	67 (12, 72)	4	*	*
Lincoln County	Urban	*******	7.1 (5.2, 9.6)	42 (6, 71)	10	*	*
Lenoir County	Rural	*******	5.9 (3.7, 9.0)	59 (9, 72)	5	stable	1.3 (-0.4, 3.8)
Lee County	Rural	*******	6.7 (4.4, 9.7)	46 (5, 72)	6	*	*
Johnston County	Urban	*******	5.0 (3.8, 6.5)	68 (35, 72)	12	stable	0.0 (-1.5, 2.2)
Jackson County	Rural	*******	7.2 (4.4, 11.5)	38 (2, 72)	4	*	*
Iredell County	Urban	*******	4.8 (3.7, 6.3)	71 (37, 72)	12	rising	1.6 (0.1, 4.2)
Henderson County	Urban	*******	5.5 (4.1, 7.3)	63 (27, 72)	12	*	*
Haywood County	Rural	*******	7.1 (5.0, 10.0)	41 (4, 71)	8	*	*
Harnett County	Rural	*******	8.3 (6.3, 10.7)	22 (2, 65)	12	rising	2.0 (0.8, 3.7)
Halifax County	Rural	*******	7.5 (4.9, 11.2)	34 (2, 72)	6	*	*
Guilford County	Urban	*******	6.2 (5.4, 7.1)	55 (29, 68)	41	rising	2.8 (2.0, 3.8)
Greene County	Rural	*******	15.0 (8.9, 24.0)	1 (1, 60)	4	*	*
Granville County	Rural	*******	8.9 (6.4, 12.3)	16 (1, 66)	8	*	*
Gaston County	Urban	*******	9.5 (8.0, 11.3)	10 (2, 36)	29	rising	3.6 (2.6, 5.3)
Franklin County	Urban	*******	5.5 (3.5, 8.2)	64 (15, 72)	5	*	*
Forsyth County	Urban	*******	7.1 (6.1, 8.3)	40 (15, 62)	35	rising	3.1 (2.2, 4.4)
Edgecombe County	Urban	*******	9.2 (6.3, 13.1)	11 (1, 67)	7	*	*
Durham County	Urban	*******	5.6 (4.5, 6.9)	61 (31, 72)	19	stable	-3.4 (-11.0, 0.0)
Davidson County	Urban	*******	7.6 (6.2, 9.4)	32 (8, 62)	19	rising	3.5 (2.4, 5.2)
Dare County	Rural	*******	8.2 (5.3, 12.6)	23 (1, 72)	6	*	*
Cumberland County	Urban	*******	6.6 (5.4, 7.9)	49 (18, 68)	23	rising	2.3 (1.3, 4.1)
Craven County	Rural	*******	9.1 (6.9, 11.9)	12 (1, 58)	13	*	*
Columbus County	Rural	*******	8.0 (5.3, 11.7)	29 (2, 72)	6	*	*
Cleveland County	Rural	*******	7.8 (5.8, 10.2)	30 (4, 69)	11	*	*
Cherokee County	Rural	*******	6.6 (3.2, 12.5)	47 (1, 72)	3	*	*
Chatham County	Urban	*******	4.7 (3.3, 6.8)	72 (31, 72)	7	*	*
Catawba County	Urban	*******	6.4 (5.0, 8.1)	51 (16, 71)	15	rising	2.7 (1.2, 5.0)
Carteret County	Rural	*******	8.0 (5.8, 11.0)	28 (2, 68)	10	*	*
Caldwell County	Urban	*******	7.3 (5.3, 9.9)	37 (5, 71)	9	*	*
Cabarrus County	Urban	*******	7.1 (5.7, 8.8)	39 (11, 67)	17	rising	2.8 (1.6, 4.9)
Burke County	Urban	*******	4.9 (3.4, 7.1)	69 (27, 72)	7	*	*
Buncombe County	Urban	*******	6.6 (5.5, 7.8)	48 (18, 68)	27	rising	2.4 (1.5, 3.6)
Brunswick County	Urban	*******	6.3 (5.0, 8.0)	52 (20, 71)	19	stable	0.5 (-0.9, 3.1)
Bladen County	Rural	*******	9.9 (6.4, 15.2)	5 (1, 70)	5	*	*
Beaufort County	Rural	*******	9.7 (6.8, 13.6)	7 (1, 63)	8	*	*
Ashe County	Rural	*******	8.0 (4.9, 13.3)	27 (1, 72)	4	*	*
Alexander County	Urban	*******	6.8 (4.1, 10.9)	44 (2, 72)	4	*	*
Alamance County	Urban	*******	8.9 (7.3, 10.9)	15 (2, 49)	21	rising	3.8 (2.7, 5.9)
Alleghany County	Rural	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Anson County	Urban	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Avery County	Rural	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Bertie County	Rural	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Camden County	Urban	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Caswell County	Rural	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Chowan County	Rural	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Clay County	Rural	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Currituck County	Urban	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Davie County	Urban	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Duplin County	Rural	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Gates County	Urban	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Graham County	Rural	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Hertford County	Rural	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Hoke County	Urban	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Hyde County	Rural	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Jones County	Rural	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Madison County	Urban	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Martin County	Rural	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Mitchell County	Rural	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Northampton County	Rural	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Pamlico County	Rural	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Pasquotank County	Rural	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Perquimans County	Rural	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Polk County	Rural	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Swain County	Rural	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Tyrrell County	Rural	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*
Washington County	Rural	*******	*	*	3 or fewer	*	*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/04/2024 11:43 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top