Death Rates Table
County
|
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio | Yes | 54.6 (54.0, 55.2) | N/A | 7,223 |
falling 
|
-1.3 (-1.4, -1.2) |
| United States | Yes | 47.3 (47.2, 47.4) | N/A | 168,038 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-2.6, -2.0) |
| Cuyahoga County | Yes | 56.9 (55.1, 58.8) | 47 (32, 58) | 823 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-1.7, -1.4) |
| Franklin County | Yes | 49.8 (48.1, 51.6) | 73 (55, 78) | 646 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.1, -1.7) |
| Hamilton County | Yes | 52.5 (50.3, 54.8) | 63 (44, 73) | 465 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.2, -1.9) |
| Montgomery County | Yes | 60.4 (57.5, 63.5) | 36 (19, 52) | 353 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.5, -1.0) |
| Summit County | Yes | 52.6 (50.0, 55.4) | 62 (43, 75) | 332 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.5, -1.0) |
| Lucas County | Yes | 63.7 (60.4, 67.1) | 23 (12, 43) | 309 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.6, -1.0) |
| Stark County | Yes | 57.8 (54.5, 61.3) | 43 (24, 63) | 253 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.3, -0.6) |
| Butler County | Yes | 52.5 (49.3, 55.9) | 64 (40, 77) | 215 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.7, -1.0) |
| Lorain County | Yes | 50.4 (47.0, 53.9) | 71 (45, 81) | 184 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.0, -1.3) |
| Trumbull County | Yes | 59.2 (54.6, 64.2) | 40 (16, 64) | 139 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.3, -0.7) |
| Lake County | Yes | 47.4 (43.6, 51.4) | 79 (54, 84) | 136 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.9, -1.2) |
| Mahoning County | Yes | 46.5 (42.7, 50.5) | 80 (57, 84) | 131 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.1, -1.3) |
| Clermont County | Yes | 53.3 (49.1, 57.8) | 58 (32, 78) | 131 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.1, -1.4) |
| Licking County | Yes | 53.2 (48.7, 58.1) | 60 (32, 79) | 110 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.9, -1.0) |
| Warren County | Yes | 38.6 (35.2, 42.2) | 85 (79, 88) | 103 |
falling
|
-8.1 (-13.9, -2.0) |
| Portage County | Yes | 53.9 (49.0, 59.1) | 55 (28, 79) | 100 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.5, -0.7) |
| Clark County | Yes | 65.7 (59.7, 72.1) | 15 (7, 50) | 100 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.3, -0.4) |
| Richland County | Yes | 64.2 (58.1, 70.8) | 21 (8, 55) | 89 |
falling
|
-0.6 (-1.0, -0.1) |
| Medina County | Yes | 41.4 (37.4, 45.6) | 84 (72, 87) | 89 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.5, -1.6) |
| Fairfield County | Yes | 48.6 (44.0, 53.7) | 75 (44, 83) | 86 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.9, -1.1) |
| Greene County | Yes | 46.1 (41.6, 51.0) | 81 (54, 85) | 85 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.3, -1.6) |
| Columbiana County | Yes | 63.4 (56.8, 70.5) | 25 (7, 60) | 80 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.4, -0.5) |
| Delaware County | Yes | 33.5 (30.1, 37.1) | 88 (84, 88) | 75 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-2.9, -1.7) |
| Ashtabula County | Yes | 63.5 (56.8, 70.8) | 24 (8, 59) | 74 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.1, -0.2) |
| Wayne County | Yes | 55.5 (49.4, 62.2) | 52 (18, 79) | 68 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.7, -0.7) |
| Allen County | Yes | 60.0 (53.4, 67.2) | 39 (10, 72) | 67 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.5, -0.5) |
| Wood County | Yes | 47.5 (42.3, 53.3) | 78 (47, 86) | 64 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.0, -1.0) |
| Miami County | Yes | 50.1 (44.4, 56.4) | 72 (34, 84) | 62 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.6, -0.7) |
| Scioto County | Yes | 72.3 (64.1, 81.3) | 11 (2, 37) | 62 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.2, -0.2) |
| Tuscarawas County | Yes | 56.5 (49.8, 63.8) | 48 (14, 78) | 59 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.5, -0.2) |
| Ross County | Yes | 62.2 (54.9, 70.2) | 29 (8, 68) | 57 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.7, -0.5) |
| Lawrence County | Yes | 82.2 (72.5, 92.9) | 4 (1, 21) | 57 |
stable 
|
-2.0 (-5.5, 1.5) |
| Muskingum County | Yes | 57.2 (50.4, 64.7) | 46 (13, 78) | 56 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.1, -0.8) |
| Jefferson County | Yes | 62.6 (54.5, 71.6) | 26 (7, 73) | 51 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.0, -1.0) |
| Erie County | Yes | 53.6 (46.5, 61.7) | 56 (18, 84) | 48 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.7, -0.7) |
| Marion County | Yes | 62.3 (54.3, 71.3) | 27 (7, 72) | 47 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.1, -0.8) |
| Hancock County | Yes | 52.4 (45.5, 60.1) | 65 (23, 83) | 45 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.6, -0.5) |
| Geauga County | Yes | 38.4 (33.0, 44.4) | 86 (75, 88) | 44 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.6, -1.4) |
| Belmont County | Yes | 50.5 (43.6, 58.4) | 69 (27, 85) | 44 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.7, -1.3) |
| Pickaway County | Yes | 66.4 (57.5, 76.3) | 13 (4, 63) | 43 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.9, -0.6) |
| Brown County | Yes | 73.4 (63.1, 85.0) | 9 (1, 45) | 40 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.4, 0.1) |
| Washington County | Yes | 55.6 (47.6, 64.7) | 51 (14, 82) | 40 |
falling
|
-2.9 (-4.4, -1.3) |
| Sandusky County | Yes | 55.9 (47.8, 65.1) | 50 (13, 82) | 39 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.3, -0.1) |
| Knox County | Yes | 50.5 (43.1, 59.0) | 70 (24, 85) | 36 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.3, -1.0) |
| Crawford County | Yes | 72.7 (61.9, 85.0) | 10 (2, 54) | 36 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.5, -0.1) |
| Seneca County | Yes | 55.0 (46.6, 64.6) | 53 (12, 83) | 35 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.8, -0.3) |
| Darke County | Yes | 59.2 (50.2, 69.4) | 41 (8, 80) | 35 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.5, 0.2) |
| Huron County | Yes | 53.3 (45.2, 62.4) | 59 (16, 84) | 34 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.6, -0.3) |
| Logan County | Yes | 57.3 (48.6, 67.4) | 44 (9, 82) | 34 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.4, -0.3) |
| Preble County | Yes | 68.9 (58.2, 81.1) | 12 (2, 66) | 33 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.4, 0.2) |
| Athens County | Yes | 53.2 (45.1, 62.5) | 61 (16, 84) | 33 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.2, -0.8) |
| Clinton County | Yes | 64.3 (54.5, 75.7) | 19 (4, 75) | 33 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.7, 0.2) |
| Shelby County | Yes | 55.9 (47.1, 65.9) | 49 (12, 83) | 32 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-1.8, 0.0) |
| Ashland County | Yes | 53.3 (44.9, 63.1) | 57 (15, 84) | 32 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.8, -0.2) |
| Jackson County | Yes | 87.7 (74.1, 103.3) | 3 (1, 23) | 32 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.4, 0.1) |
| Guernsey County | Yes | 66.3 (55.7, 78.5) | 14 (3, 71) | 31 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.7, 0.0) |
| Ottawa County | Yes | 60.6 (50.4, 72.6) | 35 (5, 80) | 31 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-1.8, 0.0) |
| Adams County | Yes | 94.1 (79.0, 111.4) | 1 (1, 15) | 31 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.4, 0.6) |
| Fulton County | Yes | 62.1 (52.0, 73.7) | 30 (6, 79) | 30 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.1, 0.5) |
| Highland County | Yes | 62.0 (51.8, 73.8) | 31 (5, 78) | 29 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.6, -0.2) |
| Perry County | Yes | 63.8 (53.3, 76.0) | 22 (4, 76) | 28 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.6, -0.6) |
| Gallia County | Yes | 81.1 (67.2, 97.3) | 5 (1, 44) | 27 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-0.9, 0.4) |
| Morrow County | Yes | 64.3 (53.3, 77.1) | 20 (4, 78) | 27 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.5, 0.3) |
| Williams County | Yes | 60.1 (49.9, 72.0) | 37 (6, 81) | 27 |
stable
|
-12.8 (-34.1, 15.5) |
| Union County | Yes | 41.4 (34.6, 49.3) | 83 (56, 88) | 27 |
falling
|
-2.7 (-3.5, -1.9) |
| Champaign County | Yes | 57.2 (47.4, 68.7) | 45 (8, 83) | 26 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.9, -0.2) |
| Pike County | Yes | 76.6 (63.5, 91.9) | 7 (1, 53) | 26 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.3, 0.5) |
| Auglaize County | Yes | 50.9 (42.0, 61.3) | 68 (16, 87) | 26 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.2, -0.5) |
| Coshocton County | Yes | 61.3 (50.4, 74.1) | 32 (5, 80) | 25 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.3, 0.0) |
| Madison County | Yes | 48.4 (40.1, 58.1) | 76 (27, 87) | 25 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.4, -0.9) |
| Fayette County | Yes | 78.0 (64.2, 94.0) | 6 (1, 49) | 25 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.8, 0.1) |
| Mercer County | Yes | 49.4 (40.1, 60.4) | 74 (18, 87) | 23 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.6, 0.3) |
| Defiance County | Yes | 51.2 (41.7, 62.5) | 67 (16, 87) | 23 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.6, 0.3) |
| Hardin County | Yes | 64.4 (52.1, 78.9) | 18 (3, 80) | 21 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.0, 0.0) |
| Hocking County | Yes | 62.2 (50.3, 76.5) | 28 (4, 82) | 21 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.5, -0.5) |
| Carroll County | Yes | 60.0 (48.2, 74.3) | 38 (4, 83) | 21 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.2, 1.0) |
| Van Wert County | Yes | 60.7 (48.8, 75.0) | 34 (5, 83) | 20 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.1, 0.4) |
| Meigs County | Yes | 65.4 (51.7, 81.9) | 17 (2, 81) | 18 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.7, 0.0) |
| Holmes County | Yes | 41.6 (32.9, 51.8) | 82 (41, 88) | 17 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.6, -0.9) |
| Putnam County | Yes | 38.1 (29.8, 48.2) | 87 (58, 88) | 16 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-3.4, -1.1) |
| Henry County | Yes | 47.9 (37.4, 60.8) | 77 (15, 88) | 16 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.9, -0.8) |
| Wyandot County | Yes | 58.0 (44.9, 74.2) | 42 (5, 86) | 15 |
falling
|
-6.5 (-11.5, -1.3) |
| Morgan County | Yes | 76.2 (58.3, 98.5) | 8 (1, 75) | 14 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.9, 1.0) |
| Vinton County | Yes | 89.4 (68.1, 115.7) | 2 (1, 56) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.8, 0.9) |
| Paulding County | Yes | 61.3 (46.6, 79.5) | 33 (3, 86) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-2.2, 0.4) |
| Noble County | Yes | 65.6 (47.0, 90.0) | 16 (1, 86) | 12 |
rising 
|
11.0 (0.6, 22.4) |
| Harrison County | Yes | 52.2 (37.9, 71.0) | 66 (7, 88) | 10 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.9, -0.9) |
| Monroe County | Yes | 54.4 (39.1, 74.6) | 54 (4, 88) | 9 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.4, 0.7) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/25/2023 2:04 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/25/2023 2:04 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.