Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Ohio by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio Yes 54.6 (54.0, 55.2) N/A 7,223 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
United States Yes 47.3 (47.2, 47.4) N/A 168,038 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
Adams County Yes 94.1 (79.0, 111.4) 1 (1, 15) 31 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Vinton County Yes 89.4 (68.1, 115.7) 2 (1, 56) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Jackson County Yes 87.7 (74.1, 103.3) 3 (1, 23) 32 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Lawrence County Yes 82.2 (72.5, 92.9) 4 (1, 21) 57 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.5, 1.5)
Gallia County Yes 81.1 (67.2, 97.3) 5 (1, 44) 27 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Fayette County Yes 78.0 (64.2, 94.0) 6 (1, 49) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Pike County Yes 76.6 (63.5, 91.9) 7 (1, 53) 26 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Morgan County Yes 76.2 (58.3, 98.5) 8 (1, 75) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Brown County Yes 73.4 (63.1, 85.0) 9 (1, 45) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.1)
Crawford County Yes 72.7 (61.9, 85.0) 10 (2, 54) 36 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Scioto County Yes 72.3 (64.1, 81.3) 11 (2, 37) 62 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Preble County Yes 68.9 (58.2, 81.1) 12 (2, 66) 33 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Pickaway County Yes 66.4 (57.5, 76.3) 13 (4, 63) 43 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Guernsey County Yes 66.3 (55.7, 78.5) 14 (3, 71) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Clark County Yes 65.7 (59.7, 72.1) 15 (7, 50) 100 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Noble County Yes 65.6 (47.0, 90.0) 16 (1, 86) 12 rising rising trend 11.0 (0.6, 22.4)
Meigs County Yes 65.4 (51.7, 81.9) 17 (2, 81) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Hardin County Yes 64.4 (52.1, 78.9) 18 (3, 80) 21 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Clinton County Yes 64.3 (54.5, 75.7) 19 (4, 75) 33 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Morrow County Yes 64.3 (53.3, 77.1) 20 (4, 78) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Richland County Yes 64.2 (58.1, 70.8) 21 (8, 55) 89 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Perry County Yes 63.8 (53.3, 76.0) 22 (4, 76) 28 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Lucas County Yes 63.7 (60.4, 67.1) 23 (12, 43) 309 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Ashtabula County Yes 63.5 (56.8, 70.8) 24 (8, 59) 74 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Columbiana County Yes 63.4 (56.8, 70.5) 25 (7, 60) 80 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Jefferson County Yes 62.6 (54.5, 71.6) 26 (7, 73) 51 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Marion County Yes 62.3 (54.3, 71.3) 27 (7, 72) 47 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Hocking County Yes 62.2 (50.3, 76.5) 28 (4, 82) 21 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Ross County Yes 62.2 (54.9, 70.2) 29 (8, 68) 57 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Fulton County Yes 62.1 (52.0, 73.7) 30 (6, 79) 30 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Highland County Yes 62.0 (51.8, 73.8) 31 (5, 78) 29 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Coshocton County Yes 61.3 (50.4, 74.1) 32 (5, 80) 25 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Paulding County Yes 61.3 (46.6, 79.5) 33 (3, 86) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Van Wert County Yes 60.7 (48.8, 75.0) 34 (5, 83) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Ottawa County Yes 60.6 (50.4, 72.6) 35 (5, 80) 31 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Montgomery County Yes 60.4 (57.5, 63.5) 36 (19, 52) 353 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
Williams County Yes 60.1 (49.9, 72.0) 37 (6, 81) 27 stable stable trend -12.8 (-34.1, 15.5)
Carroll County Yes 60.0 (48.2, 74.3) 38 (4, 83) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Allen County Yes 60.0 (53.4, 67.2) 39 (10, 72) 67 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Trumbull County Yes 59.2 (54.6, 64.2) 40 (16, 64) 139 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Darke County Yes 59.2 (50.2, 69.4) 41 (8, 80) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Wyandot County Yes 58.0 (44.9, 74.2) 42 (5, 86) 15 falling falling trend -6.5 (-11.5, -1.3)
Stark County Yes 57.8 (54.5, 61.3) 43 (24, 63) 253 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Logan County Yes 57.3 (48.6, 67.4) 44 (9, 82) 34 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Champaign County Yes 57.2 (47.4, 68.7) 45 (8, 83) 26 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Muskingum County Yes 57.2 (50.4, 64.7) 46 (13, 78) 56 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Cuyahoga County Yes 56.9 (55.1, 58.8) 47 (32, 58) 823 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.4)
Tuscarawas County Yes 56.5 (49.8, 63.8) 48 (14, 78) 59 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Shelby County Yes 55.9 (47.1, 65.9) 49 (12, 83) 32 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Sandusky County Yes 55.9 (47.8, 65.1) 50 (13, 82) 39 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Washington County Yes 55.6 (47.6, 64.7) 51 (14, 82) 40 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.3)
Wayne County Yes 55.5 (49.4, 62.2) 52 (18, 79) 68 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Seneca County Yes 55.0 (46.6, 64.6) 53 (12, 83) 35 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Monroe County Yes 54.4 (39.1, 74.6) 54 (4, 88) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Portage County Yes 53.9 (49.0, 59.1) 55 (28, 79) 100 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Erie County Yes 53.6 (46.5, 61.7) 56 (18, 84) 48 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Ashland County Yes 53.3 (44.9, 63.1) 57 (15, 84) 32 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Clermont County Yes 53.3 (49.1, 57.8) 58 (32, 78) 131 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Huron County Yes 53.3 (45.2, 62.4) 59 (16, 84) 34 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Licking County Yes 53.2 (48.7, 58.1) 60 (32, 79) 110 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
Athens County Yes 53.2 (45.1, 62.5) 61 (16, 84) 33 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Summit County Yes 52.6 (50.0, 55.4) 62 (43, 75) 332 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Hamilton County Yes 52.5 (50.3, 54.8) 63 (44, 73) 465 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.9)
Butler County Yes 52.5 (49.3, 55.9) 64 (40, 77) 215 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Hancock County Yes 52.4 (45.5, 60.1) 65 (23, 83) 45 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Harrison County Yes 52.2 (37.9, 71.0) 66 (7, 88) 10 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Defiance County Yes 51.2 (41.7, 62.5) 67 (16, 87) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Auglaize County Yes 50.9 (42.0, 61.3) 68 (16, 87) 26 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Belmont County Yes 50.5 (43.6, 58.4) 69 (27, 85) 44 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Knox County Yes 50.5 (43.1, 59.0) 70 (24, 85) 36 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.0)
Lorain County Yes 50.4 (47.0, 53.9) 71 (45, 81) 184 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Miami County Yes 50.1 (44.4, 56.4) 72 (34, 84) 62 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Franklin County Yes 49.8 (48.1, 51.6) 73 (55, 78) 646 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Mercer County Yes 49.4 (40.1, 60.4) 74 (18, 87) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Fairfield County Yes 48.6 (44.0, 53.7) 75 (44, 83) 86 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Madison County Yes 48.4 (40.1, 58.1) 76 (27, 87) 25 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Henry County Yes 47.9 (37.4, 60.8) 77 (15, 88) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.8)
Wood County Yes 47.5 (42.3, 53.3) 78 (47, 86) 64 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Lake County Yes 47.4 (43.6, 51.4) 79 (54, 84) 136 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
Mahoning County Yes 46.5 (42.7, 50.5) 80 (57, 84) 131 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Greene County Yes 46.1 (41.6, 51.0) 81 (54, 85) 85 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.3, -1.6)
Holmes County Yes 41.6 (32.9, 51.8) 82 (41, 88) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.9)
Union County Yes 41.4 (34.6, 49.3) 83 (56, 88) 27 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.5, -1.9)
Medina County Yes 41.4 (37.4, 45.6) 84 (72, 87) 89 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.6)
Warren County Yes 38.6 (35.2, 42.2) 85 (79, 88) 103 falling falling trend -8.1 (-13.9, -2.0)
Geauga County Yes 38.4 (33.0, 44.4) 86 (75, 88) 44 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Putnam County Yes 38.1 (29.8, 48.2) 87 (58, 88) 16 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.1)
Delaware County Yes 33.5 (30.1, 37.1) 88 (84, 88) 75 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.9, -1.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/05/2023 3:13 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top