Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma *** 178.0 (176.3, 179.8) N/A 8,266 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.0, -0.8)
United States *** 152.4 (152.3, 152.6) N/A 598,381 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Okfuskee County *** 245.5 (211.8, 283.5) 1 (1, 31) 39 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.0)
Kiowa County *** 230.6 (193.1, 273.8) 2 (1, 60) 29 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Ottawa County *** 218.6 (198.6, 240.2) 3 (1, 39) 92 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Nowata County *** 218.6 (186.0, 255.9) 4 (1, 61) 33 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Garvin County *** 218.3 (197.0, 241.5) 5 (1, 43) 79 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.8)
Hughes County *** 217.3 (187.8, 250.5) 6 (1, 58) 40 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Love County *** 208.7 (175.5, 246.9) 7 (1, 68) 29 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.8)
Seminole County *** 206.4 (184.5, 230.4) 8 (1, 56) 67 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Murray County *** 205.6 (177.4, 237.4) 9 (1, 66) 40 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Muskogee County *** 204.1 (190.6, 218.4) 10 (3, 43) 176 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Haskell County *** 203.9 (174.8, 236.9) 11 (1, 69) 37 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Caddo County *** 203.1 (182.7, 225.2) 12 (2, 57) 75 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
McCurtain County *** 202.8 (183.8, 223.5) 13 (2, 56) 87 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Le Flore County *** 202.4 (187.0, 218.8) 14 (2, 49) 133 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Pittsburg County *** 201.7 (185.9, 218.6) 15 (3, 52) 126 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Greer County *** 201.1 (159.0, 251.9) 16 (1, 75) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Mayes County *** 200.6 (183.8, 218.7) 17 (2, 53) 110 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Harmon County *** 200.0 (138.2, 282.1) 18 (1, 77) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.4)
Okmulgee County *** 199.6 (182.6, 218.0) 19 (3, 56) 106 stable stable trend -7.3 (-14.1, 0.1)
Creek County *** 199.5 (186.7, 212.9) 20 (5, 48) 189 falling falling trend -0.3 (-0.6, -0.1)
Pushmataha County *** 199.3 (171.3, 231.4) 21 (1, 70) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Jefferson County *** 199.0 (158.9, 247.3) 22 (1, 75) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Sequoyah County *** 198.6 (182.0, 216.4) 23 (3, 57) 110 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Cotton County *** 198.5 (156.3, 249.6) 24 (1, 75) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Choctaw County *** 197.3 (171.5, 226.5) 25 (2, 69) 44 stable stable trend -9.9 (-20.1, 1.7)
Kay County *** 195.7 (180.1, 212.5) 26 (5, 58) 122 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
Tillman County *** 195.0 (158.0, 238.9) 27 (1, 75) 20 stable stable trend 2.5 (-2.1, 7.4)
Carter County *** 194.6 (179.1, 211.1) 28 (5, 58) 120 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.2)
Beckham County *** 194.5 (170.4, 221.1) 29 (2, 68) 48 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Pottawatomie County *** 193.4 (180.4, 207.1) 30 (8, 57) 169 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Custer County *** 192.8 (171.2, 216.6) 31 (3, 66) 59 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Texas County *** 192.4 (164.5, 223.5) 32 (2, 72) 35 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.7, 6.8)
Adair County *** 192.4 (169.0, 218.2) 33 (3, 70) 51 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Pawnee County *** 190.0 (165.1, 218.0) 34 (2, 71) 44 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Blaine County *** 188.6 (156.7, 225.7) 35 (1, 75) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Atoka County *** 188.4 (161.8, 218.6) 36 (2, 72) 37 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Grant County *** 187.2 (139.3, 247.5) 37 (1, 77) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Major County *** 186.5 (150.8, 229.0) 38 (1, 76) 21 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.1, 2.3)
Lincoln County *** 186.4 (168.9, 205.4) 39 (7, 69) 87 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Coal County *** 185.8 (146.4, 234.1) 40 (1, 76) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Craig County *** 184.9 (159.2, 214.1) 41 (3, 73) 39 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Cherokee County *** 184.3 (168.7, 201.1) 42 (10, 67) 107 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Jackson County *** 184.0 (162.2, 208.0) 43 (4, 73) 53 stable stable trend -8.0 (-16.8, 1.7)
Pontotoc County *** 182.8 (165.8, 201.1) 44 (10, 68) 87 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Latimer County *** 182.6 (153.5, 216.3) 45 (3, 75) 30 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Washington County *** 182.2 (168.4, 197.0) 46 (14, 66) 137 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
McClain County *** 182.0 (164.6, 200.9) 47 (10, 70) 82 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Grady County *** 181.8 (167.5, 197.2) 48 (13, 67) 123 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Stephens County *** 181.6 (166.6, 197.8) 49 (11, 68) 114 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
McIntosh County *** 181.3 (161.3, 203.6) 50 (8, 72) 64 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Marshall County *** 178.9 (155.7, 205.0) 51 (6, 74) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Johnston County *** 178.0 (149.0, 211.5) 52 (3, 75) 28 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Comanche County *** 177.8 (167.1, 189.0) 53 (24, 66) 212 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Oklahoma County *** 176.7 (172.6, 180.9) 54 (37, 60) 1,465 falling falling trend -0.8 (-0.9, -0.7)
Noble County *** 173.9 (146.0, 206.2) 55 (5, 76) 28 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Ellis County *** 172.6 (127.5, 230.6) 56 (1, 77) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Garfield County *** 172.6 (159.4, 186.6) 57 (26, 72) 132 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.8, -0.1)
Rogers County *** 171.0 (160.1, 182.4) 58 (33, 70) 192 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Delaware County *** 170.7 (156.7, 185.7) 59 (26, 73) 122 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Tulsa County *** 168.2 (163.9, 172.6) 60 (48, 68) 1,196 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Bryan County *** 166.9 (152.5, 182.4) 61 (31, 74) 102 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Roger Mills County *** 165.3 (121.0, 223.3) 62 (2, 77) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Cimarron County *** 164.5 (107.0, 246.9) 63 (1, 77) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.8)
Osage County *** 164.0 (150.1, 179.0) 64 (34, 74) 110 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Payne County *** 163.1 (150.2, 176.8) 65 (38, 74) 123 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Washita County *** 162.1 (133.8, 195.2) 66 (10, 77) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Dewey County *** 161.1 (122.2, 210.1) 67 (2, 77) 12 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Logan County *** 160.0 (145.1, 176.0) 68 (38, 76) 89 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Canadian County *** 160.0 (150.6, 169.7) 69 (49, 74) 227 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Woods County *** 159.5 (127.9, 197.1) 70 (7, 77) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Cleveland County *** 156.9 (150.3, 163.7) 71 (57, 74) 444 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.4)
Kingfisher County *** 153.2 (129.2, 180.5) 72 (25, 77) 30 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Alfalfa County *** 143.8 (110.5, 185.7) 73 (14, 77) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Harper County *** 143.4 (100.0, 201.2) 74 (4, 77) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Wagoner County *** 143.0 (132.2, 154.5) 75 (64, 77) 137 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Woodward County *** 137.9 (117.8, 160.6) 76 (51, 77) 34 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Beaver County *** 116.2 (83.7, 158.6) 77 (51, 77) 9 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/26/2021 2:57 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top