Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma N/A No 588.7 (582.9, 594.6) N/A 7,956 falling falling trend -0.8 (-0.9, -0.7)
United States N/A No 490.4 (489.9, 491.0) N/A 573,761 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
Harmon County Rural No 585.9 (391.3, 842.9) 50 (1, 76) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.4)
Ellis County Rural No 452.8 (318.4, 625.2) 75 (14, 76) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.7)
Harper County Rural No 592.8 (422.0, 810.9) 48 (1, 76) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 0.9)
Roger Mills County Rural No 534.5 (381.6, 729.4) 65 (2, 76) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.7)
Beaver County Rural No 428.5 (312.3, 574.4) 76 (31, 76) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.8)
Dewey County Rural No 547.3 (405.5, 723.6) 61 (3, 76) 10 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.1, -0.1)
Greer County Rural No 619.0 (475.1, 792.7) 41 (1, 76) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Alfalfa County Rural No 621.6 (484.6, 785.5) 40 (1, 76) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.3)
Grant County Rural No 770.6 (597.9, 977.7) 5 (1, 69) 15 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.8)
Cotton County Urban No 645.4 (507.0, 810.0) 33 (1, 75) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Major County Rural No 460.9 (362.8, 578.0) 74 (31, 76) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.9)
Woods County Rural No 529.6 (421.2, 657.8) 67 (12, 76) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Coal County Rural No 790.9 (635.0, 974.3) 4 (1, 64) 18 stable stable trend 14.3 (-0.2, 24.1)
Jefferson County Rural No 819.7 (657.8, 1,009.4) 2 (1, 56) 18 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.8)
Tillman County Rural No 621.9 (501.9, 762.5) 39 (2, 75) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.1)
Washita County Rural No 531.1 (436.9, 639.7) 66 (17, 76) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Johnston County Rural No 633.1 (526.5, 755.1) 35 (3, 73) 25 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Blaine County Rural No 714.2 (593.6, 852.2) 12 (1, 66) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Latimer County Rural No 608.0 (507.7, 722.7) 44 (5, 75) 26 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Kiowa County Rural No 753.9 (629.4, 895.9) 7 (1, 63) 27 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.1)
Love County Rural No 712.1 (597.2, 842.9) 13 (1, 65) 28 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.3)
Kingfisher County Rural No 526.3 (442.4, 621.5) 68 (27, 76) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Noble County Rural No 608.2 (512.8, 716.2) 43 (6, 74) 29 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Nowata County Rural No 750.8 (634.1, 883.0) 8 (1, 58) 30 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Texas County Rural No 557.9 (471.9, 654.9) 60 (14, 76) 31 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Haskell County Rural No 670.3 (572.3, 780.8) 24 (2, 67) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Craig County Rural No 566.1 (483.9, 658.4) 57 (15, 75) 34 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Hughes County Rural No 653.1 (557.9, 760.1) 31 (3, 70) 34 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.4)
Atoka County Rural No 627.2 (536.2, 729.3) 37 (4, 72) 35 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.3)
Pushmataha County Rural No 683.2 (585.5, 792.9) 19 (1, 64) 36 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Woodward County Rural No 494.1 (423.7, 573.0) 71 (39, 76) 36 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Murray County Rural No 616.4 (530.0, 713.1) 42 (6, 73) 37 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Okfuskee County Rural No 837.4 (720.0, 968.7) 1 (1, 35) 37 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.4, 6.8)
Choctaw County Rural No 648.1 (559.5, 746.9) 32 (3, 68) 39 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Pawnee County Urban No 628.3 (542.9, 723.3) 36 (6, 70) 40 falling falling trend -0.9 (-4.0, -0.1)
Marshall County Rural No 654.6 (571.8, 746.3) 28 (4, 66) 46 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Adair County Rural No 682.0 (596.1, 776.9) 20 (2, 61) 47 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Beckham County Rural No 657.7 (574.6, 749.4) 27 (3, 65) 47 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Jackson County Rural No 593.2 (520.4, 673.4) 47 (13, 73) 49 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Custer County Rural No 564.4 (495.1, 640.8) 58 (21, 75) 49 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Seminole County Rural No 727.0 (650.2, 810.4) 10 (1, 45) 66 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.6)
McIntosh County Rural No 687.6 (614.6, 767.2) 17 (3, 53) 67 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Garvin County Rural No 750.1 (674.1, 832.5) 9 (1, 37) 73 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.1)
Caddo County Rural No 806.6 (725.8, 894.0) 3 (1, 25) 74 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.2)
Pontotoc County Rural No 567.4 (512.0, 627.1) 56 (27, 73) 78 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
McClain County Urban No 598.0 (540.1, 660.3) 46 (16, 68) 82 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.1)
McCurtain County Rural No 706.8 (639.8, 779.0) 14 (2, 46) 83 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Ottawa County Rural No 727.0 (658.7, 800.4) 11 (2, 39) 84 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Lincoln County Urban No 633.7 (574.6, 697.4) 34 (9, 63) 86 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Logan County Urban No 513.3 (466.1, 563.9) 69 (45, 76) 91 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Okmulgee County Urban No 675.8 (616.4, 739.5) 22 (4, 52) 97 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.3)
Mayes County Rural No 654.1 (596.8, 715.4) 30 (8, 56) 99 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Bryan County Rural No 576.1 (526.1, 629.5) 54 (27, 71) 99 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Osage County Urban No 546.6 (501.0, 595.3) 62 (37, 74) 109 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Delaware County Rural No 536.6 (491.8, 584.4) 64 (40, 74) 110 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Grady County Urban No 581.5 (533.9, 632.2) 52 (27, 69) 114 falling falling trend -1.2 (-5.5, -0.4)
Stephens County Rural No 622.5 (571.8, 676.6) 38 (13, 61) 115 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.3)
Cherokee County Rural No 670.6 (616.2, 728.5) 23 (7, 50) 115 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4)
Kay County Rural No 654.1 (601.2, 710.5) 29 (9, 55) 115 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.3)
Sequoyah County Urban No 763.5 (702.3, 828.6) 6 (1, 28) 117 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Carter County Rural No 681.1 (626.5, 739.2) 21 (5, 48) 118 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Garfield County Urban No 562.5 (518.8, 608.9) 59 (33, 72) 125 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Pittsburg County Rural No 688.6 (635.4, 745.2) 16 (4, 45) 126 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Le Flore County Rural No 704.3 (650.0, 761.9) 15 (3, 41) 128 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.3)
Payne County Rural No 584.8 (539.8, 632.5) 51 (27, 68) 129 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Washington County Rural No 591.2 (545.8, 639.4) 49 (24, 67) 129 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Wagoner County Urban No 487.8 (452.0, 525.7) 73 (59, 76) 143 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Muskogee County Rural No 665.9 (620.2, 714.1) 25 (9, 48) 161 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.7, 0.0)
Pottawatomie County Rural No 683.9 (638.6, 731.6) 18 (7, 42) 174 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.2)
Creek County Urban No 663.3 (620.7, 708.0) 26 (9, 47) 185 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.1)
Rogers County Urban No 575.8 (539.9, 613.4) 55 (34, 67) 196 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Comanche County Urban No 606.5 (569.9, 644.8) 45 (25, 61) 211 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.8)
Canadian County Urban No 503.4 (473.9, 534.3) 70 (57, 75) 225 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Cleveland County Urban No 493.1 (472.4, 514.5) 72 (62, 76) 439 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Tulsa County Urban No 536.8 (522.8, 551.2) 63 (54, 70) 1,141 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Oklahoma County Urban No 577.2 (563.4, 591.2) 53 (41, 62) 1,381 falling falling trend -0.8 (-0.9, -0.7)
Cimarron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top