Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma *** 600.1 (594.1, 606.2) N/A 7,757 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.7)
United States *** 522.2 (521.6, 522.8) N/A 565,890 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.6)
Beaver County *** 344.9 (243.0, 475.3) 77 (62, 77) 8 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.0)
Alfalfa County *** 482.5 (367.8, 622.1) 76 (14, 77) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Harper County *** 484.1 (340.1, 668.6) 75 (4, 77) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Wagoner County *** 485.4 (447.4, 525.8) 74 (62, 77) 127 falling falling trend -8.3 (-15.7, -0.1)
Woodward County *** 495.3 (423.1, 576.2) 73 (39, 77) 34 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Payne County *** 499.5 (457.5, 544.2) 72 (56, 76) 107 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Roger Mills County *** 504.2 (357.2, 691.9) 71 (3, 77) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.3)
Osage County *** 515.3 (470.5, 563.4) 70 (48, 76) 100 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Cleveland County *** 521.5 (498.4, 545.4) 69 (57, 75) 399 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Woods County *** 531.4 (424.4, 657.5) 68 (10, 77) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Cimarron County *** 531.6 (354.0, 769.4) 67 (1, 77) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.9)
Canadian County *** 532.1 (499.0, 566.9) 66 (52, 75) 201 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Grant County *** 534.1 (398.7, 700.9) 65 (3, 77) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Logan County *** 557.4 (504.2, 614.5) 64 (27, 75) 84 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Bryan County *** 558.5 (508.8, 611.9) 63 (30, 74) 94 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Garfield County *** 565.0 (520.6, 612.1) 62 (30, 73) 123 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Noble County *** 565.8 (472.6, 672.1) 61 (7, 76) 26 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Tulsa County *** 573.4 (558.2, 588.8) 60 (44, 66) 1,124 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Craig County *** 582.8 (499.3, 676.3) 59 (7, 76) 35 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Delaware County *** 583.6 (536.7, 633.4) 58 (23, 71) 119 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Washita County *** 585.4 (488.2, 696.4) 57 (5, 76) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.0)
Rogers County *** 587.3 (549.2, 627.3) 56 (26, 68) 181 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Kingfisher County *** 587.9 (499.5, 687.4) 55 (5, 76) 32 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.8)
Johnston County *** 591.3 (492.4, 704.3) 54 (4, 76) 26 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Lincoln County *** 593.5 (535.9, 655.6) 53 (14, 72) 79 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Washington County *** 597.5 (551.7, 646.0) 52 (19, 68) 129 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Oklahoma County *** 599.8 (585.4, 614.4) 51 (35, 59) 1,368 falling falling trend -0.8 (-0.8, -0.7)
Grady County *** 601.1 (551.5, 654.0) 50 (16, 68) 111 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Comanche County *** 601.8 (564.5, 640.8) 49 (21, 66) 199 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Harmon County *** 601.8 (416.8, 842.1) 48 (1, 77) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.1)
Dewey County *** 605.4 (462.8, 778.7) 47 (1, 77) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Blaine County *** 607.0 (502.1, 727.6) 46 (1, 75) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Cherokee County *** 607.7 (554.8, 664.3) 45 (13, 68) 99 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Stephens County *** 612.1 (561.4, 666.2) 44 (13, 67) 109 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Texas County *** 614.4 (522.5, 717.7) 43 (3, 74) 33 stable stable trend 4.3 (-0.7, 9.5)
McIntosh County *** 619.8 (551.7, 694.1) 42 (6, 70) 62 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Latimer County *** 620.7 (523.0, 731.6) 41 (2, 75) 29 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Murray County *** 620.7 (530.7, 721.6) 40 (3, 73) 35 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Pawnee County *** 622.4 (538.0, 716.3) 39 (3, 73) 40 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
Pontotoc County *** 623.8 (565.1, 686.9) 38 (8, 66) 84 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Marshall County *** 626.0 (546.4, 714.0) 37 (4, 72) 45 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Caddo County *** 633.4 (566.2, 706.3) 36 (5, 67) 65 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.7)
Coal County *** 635.1 (498.8, 797.4) 35 (1, 76) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Carter County *** 635.1 (582.8, 690.9) 34 (8, 64) 111 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Major County *** 635.8 (517.6, 772.8) 33 (1, 75) 21 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.4, 2.4)
Pottawatomie County *** 636.4 (592.1, 683.1) 32 (9, 60) 156 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
Ellis County *** 639.2 (481.3, 832.4) 31 (1, 76) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.1)
Tillman County *** 640.4 (518.4, 782.4) 30 (1, 76) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Kay County *** 645.6 (593.6, 701.0) 29 (7, 60) 116 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
McClain County *** 646.0 (583.0, 713.9) 28 (5, 65) 80 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Haskell County *** 646.9 (552.7, 752.8) 27 (2, 72) 34 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Creek County *** 653.8 (610.6, 699.4) 26 (7, 54) 173 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.1)
Cotton County *** 656.1 (519.4, 818.1) 25 (1, 75) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Pushmataha County *** 661.6 (565.6, 769.3) 24 (1, 71) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Mayes County *** 666.0 (609.0, 726.8) 23 (3, 58) 103 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Beckham County *** 668.4 (583.6, 762.0) 22 (1, 67) 46 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Jackson County *** 670.4 (591.9, 756.4) 21 (2, 65) 54 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 0.8)
Sequoyah County *** 671.3 (614.7, 731.7) 20 (3, 58) 106 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Muskogee County *** 676.2 (630.6, 724.4) 19 (4, 47) 166 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.7, 0.0)
Custer County *** 677.7 (601.2, 761.1) 18 (1, 61) 58 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.0)
Adair County *** 682.5 (599.8, 773.3) 17 (1, 63) 51 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Pittsburg County *** 683.7 (630.4, 740.3) 16 (2, 47) 123 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Okmulgee County *** 687.1 (628.6, 749.5) 15 (2, 49) 103 stable stable trend -7.3 (-16.5, 2.9)
Le Flore County *** 688.8 (635.8, 745.1) 14 (2, 46) 128 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.2)
Seminole County *** 694.8 (621.3, 774.7) 13 (1, 55) 66 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.5)
McCurtain County *** 699.6 (634.7, 769.3) 12 (1, 52) 87 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Choctaw County *** 705.6 (614.6, 806.3) 11 (1, 63) 44 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 0.9)
Jefferson County *** 711.8 (571.4, 876.0) 10 (1, 73) 18 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.5)
Atoka County *** 714.6 (617.5, 822.6) 9 (1, 61) 40 rising rising trend 6.4 (2.2, 10.9)
Garvin County *** 715.6 (644.1, 792.9) 8 (1, 49) 74 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.1)
Nowata County *** 721.8 (611.2, 846.6) 7 (1, 64) 31 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Ottawa County *** 729.6 (662.9, 801.3) 6 (1, 41) 89 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Hughes County *** 740.2 (638.5, 853.4) 5 (1, 57) 39 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Kiowa County *** 742.5 (623.2, 878.1) 4 (1, 62) 28 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.2)
Greer County *** 744.1 (591.6, 924.0) 3 (1, 71) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Love County *** 747.6 (628.5, 882.8) 2 (1, 60) 29 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4)
Okfuskee County *** 813.6 (698.8, 941.8) 1 (1, 38) 36 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/18/2021 5:46 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top