Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6, 7 No 176.6 (174.7, 178.6) N/A 6,878 falling falling trend -0.8 (-0.9, -0.7)
United States 6 No 154.4 (154.1, 154.6) N/A 464,265 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Adair County 6, 7 No 166.3 (139.1, 198.5) 62 (11, 77) 28 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.3)
Alfalfa County 6, 7 No 149.9 (114.8, 194.8) 74 (11, 77) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.1)
Atoka County 6, 7 No 199.5 (169.7, 234.1) 21 (2, 71) 34 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Beaver County 6, 7 No 129.8 (92.5, 180.7) 76 (16, 77) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.6)
Beckham County 6, 7 No 201.5 (175.7, 230.4) 18 (2, 65) 46
*
*
Blaine County 6, 7 No 206.4 (169.2, 250.6) 13 (1, 73) 24
*
*
Bryan County 6, 7 No 170.2 (154.3, 187.4) 59 (23, 74) 89 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Caddo County 6, 7 No 204.6 (181.3, 230.7) 16 (2, 59) 58
*
*
Canadian County 6, 7 No 164.9 (155.0, 175.2) 65 (40, 74) 216
*
*
Carter County 6, 7 No 197.4 (180.4, 215.8) 23 (5, 56) 104
*
*
Cherokee County 6, 7 No 160.0 (142.9, 179.2) 70 (31, 76) 68 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Choctaw County 6, 7 No 179.0 (150.5, 212.6) 44 (4, 75) 30 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.4, 0.7)
Cimarron County 6, 7 Yes 105.7 (60.8, 186.0) 77 (18, 77) 4 stable stable trend -28.1 (-48.9, 1.0)
Cleveland County 6, 7 No 155.4 (148.5, 162.6) 73 (57, 75) 395 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Coal County 6, 7 No 198.4 (154.0, 254.9) 22 (1, 76) 15
*
*
Comanche County 6, 7 No 187.5 (174.7, 201.0) 37 (13, 59) 165 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Cotton County 6, 7 No 205.3 (160.2, 261.6) 14 (1, 76) 15
*
*
Craig County 6, 7 No 176.4 (148.5, 209.2) 47 (6, 76) 30
*
*
Creek County 6, 7 No 194.9 (181.5, 209.0) 26 (8, 52) 167
*
*
Custer County 6, 7 No 189.7 (166.0, 216.0) 34 (4, 71) 49
*
*
Delaware County 6, 7 No 166.0 (150.8, 182.7) 63 (29, 75) 102 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Dewey County 6, 7 No 167.3 (125.0, 221.9) 60 (2, 77) 11
*
*
Ellis County 6, 7 No 180.6 (131.8, 244.5) 42 (1, 77) 10
*
*
Garfield County 6, 7 No 171.6 (157.7, 186.6) 57 (24, 73) 120
*
*
Garvin County 6, 7 No 226.4 (202.8, 252.3) 6 (1, 34) 72
*
*
Grady County 6, 7 No 173.9 (159.3, 189.6) 52 (22, 72) 109
*
*
Grant County 6, 7 No 202.4 (152.1, 266.3) 17 (1, 76) 13 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.2)
Greer County 6, 7 No 209.5 (163.4, 266.8) 10 (1, 75) 15
*
*
Harmon County 6, 7 No 258.6 (168.7, 386.4) 1 (1, 76) 7
*
*
Harper County 6, 7 No 161.4 (111.7, 230.9) 68 (1, 77) 8
*
*
Haskell County 6, 7 No 196.3 (165.5, 232.2) 24 (2, 73) 31 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Hughes County 6, 7 No 195.0 (163.6, 231.8) 25 (1, 73) 29
*
*
Jackson County 6, 7 No 178.3 (153.9, 205.9) 45 (7, 75) 40
*
*
Jefferson County 6, 7 No 204.7 (159.5, 260.6) 15 (1, 75) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.6)
Johnston County 6, 7 No 172.9 (142.2, 209.6) 55 (6, 76) 23
*
*
Kay County 6, 7 No 191.7 (175.1, 209.7) 30 (7, 62) 107 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Kingfisher County 6, 7 No 164.8 (138.6, 195.2) 66 (14, 77) 29
*
*
Kiowa County 6, 7 No 231.7 (190.8, 280.1) 4 (1, 60) 25
*
*
Latimer County 6, 7 No 188.0 (155.1, 227.8) 36 (1, 75) 25
*
*
Le Flore County 6, 7 No 209.0 (192.0, 227.3) 11 (3, 42) 118 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.1)
Lincoln County 6, 7 No 186.0 (167.9, 205.7) 39 (9, 69) 82
*
*
Logan County 6, 7 No 160.6 (145.2, 177.5) 69 (35, 76) 83
*
*
Love County 6, 7 No 233.1 (194.2, 278.7) 3 (1, 56) 27
*
*
Major County 6, 7 No 173.2 (136.8, 217.4) 54 (4, 77) 18
*
*
Marshall County 6, 7 No 179.8 (154.0, 210.0) 43 (7, 75) 39 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Mayes County 6, 7 No 174.1 (156.9, 192.9) 51 (18, 73) 81 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
McClain County 6, 7 No 188.8 (170.3, 208.8) 35 (8, 67) 79
*
*
McCurtain County 6, 7 No 194.2 (173.2, 217.4) 27 (5, 65) 67 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
McIntosh County 6, 7 No 178.2 (156.1, 203.6) 46 (10, 74) 53
*
*
Murray County 6, 7 No 208.1 (176.9, 244.1) 12 (1, 68) 35
*
*
Muskogee County 6, 7 No 192.6 (177.4, 209.0) 29 (8, 60) 125 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Noble County 6, 7 No 171.9 (142.8, 206.3) 56 (9, 76) 26
*
*
Nowata County 6, 7 No 212.0 (176.5, 254.1) 8 (1, 68) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.3)
Okfuskee County 6, 7 No 241.2 (202.0, 286.8) 2 (1, 49) 28
*
*
Oklahoma County 6, 7 No 175.0 (170.4, 179.8) 49 (37, 61) 1,111 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.6)
Okmulgee County 6, 7 No 187.0 (168.1, 207.8) 38 (8, 70) 76
*
*
Osage County 6, 7 No 173.6 (157.2, 191.4) 53 (19, 73) 90 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Ottawa County 6, 7 No 210.6 (188.9, 234.5) 9 (1, 50) 74 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Pawnee County 6, 7 No 182.6 (156.4, 212.6) 41 (6, 75) 37
*
*
Payne County 6, 7 No 166.8 (153.2, 181.3) 61 (31, 74) 117
*
*
Pittsburg County 6, 7 No 200.6 (183.4, 219.3) 19 (4, 56) 108 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Pontotoc County 6, 7 No 159.4 (142.1, 178.6) 71 (31, 76) 64
*
*
Pottawatomie County 6, 7 No 190.3 (176.6, 204.9) 32 (10, 58) 148 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Pushmataha County 6, 7 No 194.1 (163.0, 231.0) 28 (2, 73) 30 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.1)
Roger Mills County 6, 7 No 165.4 (118.9, 228.2) 64 (1, 77) 9
*
*
Rogers County 6, 7 No 175.2 (163.6, 187.5) 48 (24, 70) 177
*
*
Seminole County 6, 7 No 199.7 (175.9, 226.4) 20 (2, 65) 53
*
*
Sequoyah County 6, 7 No 226.4 (206.4, 248.2) 5 (1, 29) 99 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Stephens County 6, 7 No 184.7 (168.7, 202.1) 40 (12, 67) 106
*
*
Texas County 6, 7 No 212.2 (178.1, 251.9) 7 (1, 67) 29 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.9, 6.1)
Tillman County 6, 7 No 190.5 (148.6, 243.5) 31 (1, 76) 15
*
*
Tulsa County 6, 7 No 164.4 (159.7, 169.2) 67 (50, 71) 975 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Wagoner County 6, 7 No 140.2 (129.0, 152.3) 75 (64, 77) 120
*
*
Washington County 6, 7 No 190.1 (174.7, 206.7) 33 (8, 62) 125
*
*
Washita County 6, 7 No 174.2 (143.4, 210.4) 50 (5, 76) 25
*
*
Woods County 6, 7 No 170.4 (136.6, 211.0) 58 (5, 77) 19
*
*
Woodward County 6, 7 No 158.0 (135.5, 183.7) 72 (25, 77) 36
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/16/2024 6:57 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

7 Data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) for this state and the user is cautioned against drawing conclusions from such data. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top