Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Oklahoma 6, 7 N/A No 176.9 (175.0, 178.8) N/A 6,900 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
United States 6 N/A No 151.3 (151.1, 151.5) N/A 463,400 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Grant County 6, 7 Rural No 239.0 (182.4, 310.0) 6 (1, 71) 14 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.9, 2.8)
Jefferson County 6, 7 Rural No 276.2 (220.5, 343.8) 1 (1, 40) 18 stable stable trend 0.6 (-6.7, 7.4)
Alfalfa County 6, 7 Rural No 183.4 (141.9, 235.5) 46 (3, 76) 14 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.8, 2.3)
Atoka County 6, 7 Rural No 197.0 (166.7, 232.2) 26 (4, 72) 32 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.6)
Texas County 6, 7 Rural No 189.3 (157.3, 226.6) 34 (5, 74) 27 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.3, 1.6)
Marshall County 6, 7 Rural No 193.0 (166.2, 224.2) 30 (7, 71) 40 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.1)
Nowata County 6, 7 Rural No 238.8 (199.4, 285.4) 7 (1, 55) 27 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 1.6)
Sequoyah County 6, 7 Urban No 245.6 (224.3, 268.6) 4 (1, 19) 103 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 2.2)
Pittsburg County 6, 7 Rural No 208.3 (190.9, 227.2) 17 (7, 48) 113 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Pottawatomie County 6, 7 Rural No 194.6 (180.7, 209.3) 28 (14, 56) 152 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Kay County 6, 7 Rural No 197.7 (180.8, 216.0) 25 (10, 57) 108 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Le Flore County 6, 7 Rural No 219.1 (201.4, 238.2) 15 (4, 38) 119 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Ottawa County 6, 7 Rural No 218.6 (195.8, 243.6) 16 (3, 46) 72 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.3)
Haskell County 6, 7 Rural No 228.1 (193.0, 269.0) 12 (1, 57) 33 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.5)
McCurtain County 6, 7 Rural No 221.5 (198.1, 247.3) 14 (2, 46) 70 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Muskogee County 6, 7 Rural No 187.7 (172.5, 204.0) 39 (16, 63) 119 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Cherokee County 6, 7 Rural No 181.1 (162.5, 201.7) 50 (16, 71) 75 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Oklahoma County 6, 7 Urban No 173.4 (168.8, 178.2) 58 (42, 64) 1,099 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Osage County 6, 7 Urban No 179.8 (163.2, 198.0) 52 (19, 68) 93 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Cleveland County 6, 7 Urban No 153.8 (147.1, 160.7) 69 (59, 75) 416 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Comanche County 6, 7 Urban No 189.0 (176.3, 202.5) 35 (17, 60) 170 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Pushmataha County 6, 7 Rural No 207.9 (174.4, 247.5) 18 (2, 71) 30 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 0.8)
Delaware County 6, 7 Rural No 158.5 (143.5, 175.3) 67 (42, 76) 94 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Mayes County 6, 7 Rural No 183.9 (165.9, 203.6) 45 (16, 69) 82 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Adair County 6, 7 Rural No 199.2 (167.5, 236.5) 23 (4, 72) 30 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.4)
Beaver County 6, 7 Rural No 129.3 (93.5, 179.2) 76 (30, 76) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.4, 0.4)
Bryan County 6, 7 Rural No 181.8 (165.1, 199.9) 49 (18, 69) 93 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Tulsa County 6, 7 Urban No 157.4 (152.9, 162.0) 68 (58, 73) 962 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Choctaw County 6, 7 Rural No 180.1 (150.5, 215.2) 51 (8, 76) 29 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.5, 0.1)
Beckham County 6, 7 Rural No 201.7 (175.9, 230.6) 20 (5, 64) 46
*
*
Blaine County 6, 7 Rural No 232.8 (190.4, 283.1) 10 (1, 60) 24
*
*
Caddo County 6, 7 Rural No 227.1 (200.9, 256.3) 13 (1, 42) 56
*
*
Canadian County 6, 7 Urban No 152.8 (143.7, 162.4) 71 (57, 76) 215
*
*
Carter County 6, 7 Rural No 200.6 (183.3, 219.4) 21 (10, 55) 103
*
*
Coal County 6, 7 Rural No 253.9 (201.9, 318.7) 2 (1, 56) 17
*
*
Cotton County 6, 7 Urban No 197.9 (152.4, 255.3) 24 (1, 76) 14
*
*
Craig County 6, 7 Rural No 172.7 (144.9, 205.5) 59 (14, 76) 29
*
*
Creek County 6, 7 Urban No 195.9 (182.6, 210.0) 27 (13, 54) 169
*
*
Custer County 6, 7 Rural No 171.4 (148.8, 196.8) 60 (19, 75) 44
*
*
Dewey County 6, 7 Rural No 175.4 (129.3, 235.3) 54 (3, 76) 10
*
*
Ellis County 6, 7 Rural No 151.6 (105.8, 213.6) 72 (7, 76) 8
*
*
Garfield County 6, 7 Urban No 175.1 (161.0, 190.3) 55 (25, 70) 122
*
*
Garvin County 6, 7 Rural No 235.0 (210.1, 262.3) 9 (1, 30) 69
*
*
Grady County 6, 7 Urban No 174.8 (160.1, 190.6) 56 (25, 70) 109
*
*
Greer County 6, 7 Rural No 191.0 (145.5, 248.5) 32 (2, 76) 12
*
*
Harmon County 6, 7 Rural No 231.2 (144.5, 360.1) 11 (1, 76) 5
*
*
Harper County 6, 7 Rural No 176.0 (124.9, 249.0) 53 (1, 76) 8
*
*
Hughes County 6, 7 Rural No 193.6 (162.1, 230.5) 29 (4, 74) 28
*
*
Jackson County 6, 7 Rural No 188.3 (163.0, 216.8) 36 (9, 72) 42
*
*
Johnston County 6, 7 Rural No 183.1 (148.8, 224.1) 47 (6, 76) 21
*
*
Kingfisher County 6, 7 Rural No 164.3 (137.4, 195.6) 63 (16, 76) 28
*
*
Kiowa County 6, 7 Rural No 241.6 (198.6, 292.5) 5 (1, 55) 25
*
*
Latimer County 6, 7 Rural No 188.1 (154.1, 229.6) 37 (4, 75) 23
*
*
Lincoln County 6, 7 Urban No 188.0 (169.9, 207.8) 38 (13, 67) 82
*
*
Logan County 6, 7 Urban No 159.9 (145.0, 176.2) 65 (41, 76) 88
*
*
Love County 6, 7 Rural No 237.0 (197.1, 283.8) 8 (1, 52) 27
*
*
Major County 6, 7 Rural No 147.1 (114.8, 187.1) 74 (20, 76) 16
*
*
McClain County 6, 7 Urban No 183.1 (165.1, 202.6) 48 (15, 69) 80
*
*
McIntosh County 6, 7 Rural No 199.5 (175.7, 226.7) 22 (6, 65) 57
*
*
Murray County 6, 7 Rural No 187.2 (158.8, 220.3) 41 (8, 74) 33
*
*
Noble County 6, 7 Rural No 174.8 (145.8, 208.9) 57 (11, 76) 27
*
*
Okfuskee County 6, 7 Rural No 249.2 (208.2, 297.2) 3 (1, 47) 28
*
*
Okmulgee County 6, 7 Urban No 190.1 (170.7, 211.4) 33 (11, 66) 74
*
*
Pawnee County 6, 7 Urban No 187.6 (160.3, 218.9) 40 (8, 74) 36
*
*
Payne County 6, 7 Rural No 183.9 (169.6, 199.2) 44 (19, 65) 129
*
*
Pontotoc County 6, 7 Rural No 159.3 (141.8, 178.6) 66 (37, 76) 64
*
*
Roger Mills County 6, 7 Rural No 147.6 (100.3, 213.7) 73 (6, 76) 7
*
*
Rogers County 6, 7 Urban No 168.1 (157.0, 179.9) 62 (36, 72) 176
*
*
Seminole County 6, 7 Rural No 205.5 (180.7, 233.3) 19 (4, 60) 52
*
*
Stephens County 6, 7 Rural No 191.7 (175.3, 209.5) 31 (13, 61) 110
*
*
Tillman County 6, 7 Rural No 186.5 (145.0, 239.5) 42 (2, 76) 15
*
*
Wagoner County 6, 7 Urban No 146.6 (135.3, 158.8) 75 (59, 76) 129
*
*
Washington County 6, 7 Rural No 184.7 (169.6, 201.1) 43 (16, 64) 121
*
*
Washita County 6, 7 Rural No 170.4 (139.7, 206.6) 61 (12, 76) 23
*
*
Woods County 6, 7 Rural No 162.3 (128.9, 202.8) 64 (12, 76) 17
*
*
Woodward County 6, 7 Rural No 153.7 (131.7, 178.6) 70 (30, 76) 36
*
*
Cimarron County 6, 7 Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2024 12:09 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

7 Data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) for this state and the user is cautioned against drawing conclusions from such data. This was based on the NCHS Policy.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top