Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Liver & Bile Duct, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee N/A *** 6.9 (6.7, 7.2) N/A 632 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.6, 2.0)
United States N/A *** 6.6 (6.6, 6.6) N/A 28,305 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Williamson County Urban *** 3.6 (2.7, 4.9) 52 (44, 52) 10
*
*
Fayette County Urban *** 4.8 (2.7, 8.1) 51 (13, 52) 3
*
*
Loudon County Urban *** 5.3 (3.3, 8.4) 50 (9, 52) 5
*
*
Anderson County Urban *** 5.4 (3.7, 7.8) 49 (13, 52) 7
*
*
Maury County Urban *** 5.5 (3.8, 7.7) 48 (13, 52) 7
*
*
Wilson County Urban *** 5.7 (4.3, 7.5) 47 (14, 52) 11
*
*
Coffee County Rural *** 5.8 (3.7, 8.8) 46 (7, 52) 5
*
*
Sumner County Urban *** 5.8 (4.5, 7.4) 45 (16, 51) 15 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.6, 4.5)
Blount County Urban *** 5.8 (4.4, 7.6) 44 (14, 51) 13 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.3, 3.9)
Robertson County Urban *** 5.8 (3.8, 8.6) 43 (8, 52) 6
*
*
Bedford County Rural *** 5.8 (3.5, 9.3) 42 (5, 52) 4
*
*
Monroe County Rural *** 5.9 (3.6, 9.3) 41 (6, 52) 4
*
*
Montgomery County Urban *** 6.1 (4.5, 7.9) 40 (11, 52) 11 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.5, 3.5)
Knox County Urban *** 6.2 (5.3, 7.2) 39 (20, 49) 39 rising rising trend 2.2 (1.3, 3.4)
Cumberland County Rural *** 6.3 (4.1, 9.4) 38 (4, 52) 7
*
*
Bradley County Urban *** 6.3 (4.6, 8.5) 37 (9, 52) 9
*
*
Putnam County Rural *** 6.5 (4.4, 9.3) 36 (5, 52) 6
*
*
Warren County Rural *** 6.5 (3.9, 10.5) 35 (2, 52) 4
*
*
Hamilton County Urban *** 6.5 (5.5, 7.6) 34 (13, 48) 33 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.7, 3.9)
McMinn County Rural *** 6.6 (4.3, 9.9) 33 (4, 52) 5
*
*
Madison County Urban *** 6.7 (4.9, 9.1) 32 (6, 51) 9 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.8, 5.1)
Dyer County Rural *** 6.7 (4.0, 10.9) 31 (2, 52) 4
*
*
Dickson County Urban *** 6.7 (4.2, 10.2) 30 (3, 52) 5
*
*
Roane County Urban *** 7.0 (4.8, 10.2) 29 (4, 52) 7
*
*
Tipton County Urban *** 7.1 (4.6, 10.5) 28 (3, 52) 5
*
*
Rhea County Rural *** 7.1 (4.2, 11.7) 27 (2, 52) 4
*
*
Greene County Rural *** 7.2 (5.1, 10.0) 26 (4, 51) 8
*
*
Claiborne County Rural *** 7.2 (4.0, 12.2) 25 (1, 52) 3
*
*
Rutherford County Urban *** 7.3 (6.0, 8.8) 24 (8, 45) 24
*
*
Gibson County Urban *** 7.3 (4.6, 11.1) 23 (2, 52) 5
*
*
Shelby County Urban *** 7.4 (6.7, 8.2) 22 (11, 37) 79 rising rising trend 1.7 (1.0, 2.6)
Davidson County Urban *** 7.4 (6.6, 8.4) 21 (10, 39) 58 stable stable trend -2.2 (-7.6, 0.6)
Hamblen County Urban *** 7.5 (5.2, 10.7) 20 (2, 51) 7
*
*
Franklin County Rural *** 7.6 (4.9, 11.5) 19 (2, 52) 5
*
*
Sevier County Rural *** 7.6 (5.7, 10.0) 18 (4, 49) 11
*
*
Jefferson County Urban *** 7.9 (5.4, 11.3) 17 (2, 51) 7
*
*
Washington County Urban *** 8.0 (6.2, 10.1) 16 (3, 45) 15 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.9, 4.9)
Campbell County Urban *** 8.4 (5.4, 12.8) 15 (1, 51) 5
*
*
Hawkins County Urban *** 8.5 (6.0, 11.8) 14 (1, 48) 8
*
*
Carter County Urban *** 8.5 (6.2, 11.8) 13 (1, 47) 9
*
*
Sullivan County Urban *** 8.8 (7.3, 10.7) 12 (3, 35) 24 rising rising trend 3.8 (2.5, 5.9)
Lauderdale County Rural *** 9.2 (5.2, 15.4) 11 (1, 52) 3
*
*
McNairy County Rural *** 9.4 (5.8, 14.9) 10 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Marion County Urban *** 9.5 (5.7, 15.2) 9 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Carroll County Rural *** 9.5 (5.9, 15.0) 8 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Henry County Rural *** 9.7 (6.3, 14.6) 7 (1, 51) 5
*
*
Johnson County Rural *** 9.9 (5.7, 17.3) 6 (1, 51) 3
*
*
Cheatham County Urban *** 10.0 (6.5, 14.8) 5 (1, 48) 6
*
*
Cocke County Rural *** 10.1 (6.6, 15.1) 4 (1, 48) 5
*
*
Henderson County Rural *** 10.5 (6.4, 16.4) 3 (1, 50) 4
*
*
Hardeman County Rural *** 10.5 (6.2, 16.9) 2 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Overton County Rural *** 12.3 (7.3, 19.7) 1 (1, 50) 4
*
*
Benton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bledsoe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cannon County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chester County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fentress County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Giles County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grainger County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haywood County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickman County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Obion County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sequatchie County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Unicoi County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Weakley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/06/2024 10:42 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top