Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas N/A No 143.5 (142.8, 144.1) N/A 42,090 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.4, -1.2)
United States N/A No 146.0 (145.8, 146.2) N/A 602,955 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
Zavala County Rural No 197.2 (159.9, 240.6) 22 (2, 202) 20 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Zapata County Rural No 129.2 (103.3, 159.6) 215 (60, 242) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.6)
Young County Rural No 204.6 (180.0, 232.0) 18 (3, 127) 53 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Yoakum County Rural No 171.6 (130.7, 221.1) 93 (3, 239) 12 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.3)
Wood County Rural No 184.0 (170.2, 198.8) 53 (18, 122) 152 stable stable trend 4.5 (-0.2, 11.7)
Wise County Urban No 181.3 (168.0, 195.4) 59 (21, 138) 146 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Winkler County Rural Yes 121.3 (89.2, 161.4) 226 (44, 243) 10 falling falling trend -4.9 (-20.6, -1.8)
Wilson County Urban No 152.9 (139.2, 167.7) 160 (72, 214) 96 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.2)
Williamson County Urban Yes 122.3 (118.3, 126.4) 224 (206, 233) 727 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
Willacy County Rural No 136.3 (115.2, 160.3) 203 (83, 239) 30 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Wilbarger County Rural No 171.8 (144.8, 202.8) 89 (12, 215) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.1)
Wichita County Urban No 185.3 (175.4, 195.6) 49 (18, 105) 275 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Wheeler County Rural No 182.8 (141.0, 234.8) 56 (3, 236) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Wharton County Rural No 154.7 (139.9, 170.7) 153 (61, 210) 84 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Webb County Urban No 135.3 (128.3, 142.6) 206 (165, 222) 289 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Washington County Rural No 139.5 (125.5, 154.7) 194 (108, 229) 80 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Ward County Rural No 137.6 (108.7, 171.9) 200 (36, 242) 16 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Waller County Urban No 154.2 (139.0, 170.7) 154 (50, 215) 79 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Walker County Rural No 134.1 (122.9, 146.1) 209 (140, 232) 109 falling falling trend -2.1 (-6.7, -1.3)
Victoria County Urban No 156.4 (145.9, 167.4) 148 (80, 191) 173 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Van Zandt County Rural No 168.0 (155.8, 181.1) 104 (39, 172) 147 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Val Verde County Rural No 142.8 (128.2, 158.5) 185 (101, 228) 71 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Uvalde County Rural No 175.3 (154.6, 198.2) 74 (14, 196) 53 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Upton County Rural Yes 119.2 (72.8, 184.6) 228 (12, 243) 4 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.1)
Upshur County Urban No 178.4 (162.7, 195.3) 64 (16, 155) 101 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Tyler County Rural No 164.3 (144.3, 186.8) 116 (21, 211) 52 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Trinity County Rural No 216.1 (189.7, 246.0) 13 (2, 91) 54 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Travis County Urban Yes 118.5 (115.5, 121.6) 230 (214, 237) 1,255 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -2.0)
Tom Green County Urban No 148.5 (139.5, 157.9) 169 (106, 208) 211 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Titus County Rural No 164.3 (145.3, 185.2) 117 (28, 208) 56 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Throckmorton County Rural No 124.9 (76.0, 208.3) 221 (6, 243) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.8)
Terry County Rural No 168.7 (138.7, 203.4) 99 (7, 227) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Taylor County Urban No 161.5 (152.6, 170.8) 129 (70, 174) 256 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Tarrant County Urban No 145.5 (143.0, 147.9) 180 (155, 192) 2,877 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
Swisher County Rural No 191.4 (152.5, 238.0) 33 (2, 219) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Sutton County Rural No 173.0 (123.9, 237.6) 83 (2, 241) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.5)
Stonewall County Rural No 219.1 (130.2, 355.2) 10 (1, 243) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.2)
Stephens County Rural No 177.3 (145.8, 214.3) 67 (6, 220) 23 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Starr County Rural No 127.2 (114.5, 140.9) 216 (158, 238) 74 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Somervell County Rural No 149.1 (120.8, 183.0) 167 (20, 239) 20 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.8)
Smith County Urban No 150.0 (143.7, 156.6) 164 (120, 194) 441 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.6, 7.5)
Sherman County Rural Yes 106.6 (62.8, 170.9) 241 (22, 243) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.7)
Shelby County Rural No 195.4 (174.0, 219.0) 26 (6, 137) 62 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Shackelford County Rural No 127.2 (84.8, 186.5) 217 (10, 243) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.3)
Scurry County Rural No 163.1 (138.3, 191.1) 122 (20, 222) 31 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.6)
Schleicher County Rural Yes 114.8 (71.4, 179.7) 235 (19, 243) 4 falling falling trend -5.6 (-26.7, -0.7)
San Saba County Rural No 157.8 (124.0, 200.0) 143 (9, 238) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
San Patricio County Urban No 175.0 (161.9, 189.0) 77 (26, 151) 135 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
San Jacinto County Urban No 176.0 (157.9, 195.9) 73 (16, 177) 77 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
San Augustine County Rural No 177.3 (148.2, 212.2) 68 (7, 216) 28 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Sabine County Rural No 171.8 (144.9, 203.6) 91 (11, 222) 35 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Rusk County Urban No 171.8 (157.8, 186.7) 90 (27, 166) 116 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Runnels County Rural No 195.2 (164.2, 231.2) 27 (3, 185) 29 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Rockwall County Urban No 134.8 (124.9, 145.4) 208 (152, 228) 143 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Robertson County Urban No 184.7 (160.4, 212.0) 51 (8, 183) 45 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Refugio County Rural No 171.7 (138.4, 212.2) 92 (7, 225) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-9.6, 0.6)
Reeves County Rural No 163.8 (134.0, 198.3) 119 (10, 232) 21 stable stable trend 12.5 (-0.3, 23.3)
Red River County Rural No 198.7 (170.7, 230.7) 20 (4, 155) 40 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Real County Rural No 238.7 (181.7, 313.9) 5 (1, 197) 14 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.6, 17.8)
Reagan County Rural No 223.8 (144.7, 327.3) 8 (1, 240) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.6)
Randall County Urban No 147.3 (138.9, 156.1) 176 (119, 208) 235 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.4)
Rains County Rural No 160.4 (136.7, 187.9) 135 (20, 223) 35 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Presidio County Rural Yes 86.5 (60.5, 121.0) 243 (186, 243) 9 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.5)
Potter County Urban No 167.6 (157.5, 178.3) 106 (49, 162) 210 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Polk County Rural No 257.2 (237.1, 278.6) 2 (1, 12) 151 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Pecos County Rural No 147.3 (121.2, 177.3) 175 (29, 238) 23 stable stable trend 5.9 (-0.2, 17.8)
Parmer County Rural No 131.8 (102.6, 166.9) 212 (41, 243) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.6)
Parker County Urban No 162.3 (153.8, 171.1) 124 (69, 168) 288 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Panola County Rural No 182.9 (162.2, 205.7) 55 (10, 164) 60 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Palo Pinto County Rural No 187.7 (168.9, 208.3) 42 (9, 150) 77 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Orange County Urban No 174.5 (163.1, 186.5) 80 (32, 150) 181 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -1.0)
Oldham County Urban No 234.5 (143.4, 363.2) 6 (1, 241) 4
*
*
Ochiltree County Rural Yes 108.9 (81.0, 143.3) 238 (108, 243) 11 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.8)
Nueces County Urban No 138.5 (133.4, 143.8) 196 (165, 213) 560 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Nolan County Rural No 206.6 (178.7, 237.9) 15 (3, 140) 41 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Newton County Rural No 195.9 (167.3, 228.6) 25 (4, 178) 38 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Navarro County Rural No 164.6 (150.7, 179.4) 115 (37, 196) 109 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Nacogdoches County Rural No 172.0 (158.5, 186.3) 88 (30, 171) 126 stable stable trend 4.3 (-1.0, 9.6)
Motley County Rural No 146.7 (78.4, 268.6) 178 (1, 243) 3 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.0)
Morris County Rural No 192.8 (164.7, 225.0) 31 (4, 186) 36 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Moore County Rural No 132.3 (110.2, 157.4) 211 (87, 240) 26 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Montgomery County Urban No 139.5 (135.4, 143.8) 193 (167, 211) 907 falling falling trend -1.9 (-5.2, -1.1)
Montague County Rural No 168.5 (148.7, 190.6) 103 (19, 204) 55 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Mitchell County Rural No 186.8 (150.0, 230.1) 45 (2, 220) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Mills County Rural No 189.7 (147.7, 243.1) 38 (1, 230) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Milam County Rural No 168.6 (149.9, 189.2) 101 (21, 196) 63 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Midland County Urban No 142.6 (133.7, 151.8) 186 (134, 217) 206 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Menard County Rural No 138.6 (87.4, 218.5) 195 (4, 243) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.2)
Medina County Urban No 144.2 (131.1, 158.2) 184 (94, 221) 93 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
McLennan County Urban No 155.1 (148.7, 161.7) 152 (98, 183) 456 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.5)
McCulloch County Rural No 218.2 (181.5, 261.4) 12 (1, 158) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Maverick County Urban No 137.7 (123.7, 152.9) 199 (116, 230) 72 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.3)
Matagorda County Rural No 187.0 (169.4, 206.0) 44 (10, 136) 87 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Mason County Rural No 198.1 (150.0, 259.9) 21 (1, 223) 14 stable stable trend 14.4 (-0.7, 30.8)
Martin County Urban No 222.0 (165.5, 291.2) 9 (1, 221) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7)
Marion County Rural No 148.2 (123.7, 177.7) 170 (29, 235) 28 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Madison County Rural No 193.5 (163.3, 227.8) 29 (4, 184) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.1)
Lynn County Urban No 189.9 (146.0, 243.6) 37 (1, 229) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Lubbock County Urban No 161.0 (154.6, 167.6) 130 (84, 165) 488 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.8, 5.1)
Llano County Rural No 152.8 (135.2, 172.7) 161 (54, 220) 76 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Live Oak County Rural No 151.4 (124.8, 182.5) 162 (24, 236) 25 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Lipscomb County Rural No 162.0 (111.0, 231.0) 127 (2, 243) 7 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.2, -0.2)
Limestone County Rural No 168.5 (148.3, 191.0) 102 (23, 202) 54 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Liberty County Urban No 192.8 (179.9, 206.4) 30 (12, 95) 177 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Leon County Rural No 183.9 (160.8, 210.0) 54 (10, 173) 50 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Lee County Rural No 159.7 (137.7, 184.6) 138 (20, 220) 40 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Lavaca County Rural No 166.3 (146.7, 188.2) 111 (24, 207) 57 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Lampasas County Urban No 185.5 (164.3, 209.0) 48 (9, 159) 58 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Lamb County Rural No 153.7 (128.2, 183.1) 155 (27, 234) 26 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Lamar County Rural No 190.8 (176.2, 206.4) 36 (12, 107) 133 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
La Salle County Rural No 166.1 (126.3, 214.9) 112 (4, 237) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4)
Knox County Rural No 208.2 (153.4, 278.5) 14 (1, 227) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.3)
Kleberg County Rural No 176.9 (155.9, 199.9) 70 (13, 181) 53 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Kinney County Rural No 162.0 (114.9, 225.4) 126 (3, 243) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.9)
Kimble County Rural No 176.7 (133.7, 232.0) 71 (2, 234) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Kerr County Rural No 149.3 (138.1, 161.3) 166 (84, 212) 153 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Kendall County Urban No 125.5 (113.4, 138.7) 219 (166, 238) 83 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Kaufman County Urban No 173.3 (163.1, 184.0) 81 (37, 144) 232 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Karnes County Rural No 178.9 (150.3, 211.5) 63 (7, 213) 29 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Jones County Urban No 160.8 (138.3, 186.1) 134 (22, 223) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Johnson County Urban No 166.0 (157.8, 174.4) 113 (58, 155) 325 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Jim Wells County Rural No 184.7 (167.2, 203.5) 52 (13, 150) 85 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.6, 11.0)
Jim Hogg County Rural No 195.9 (146.6, 257.2) 24 (1, 234) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Jefferson County Urban No 153.6 (147.3, 160.2) 156 (110, 184) 460 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Jeff Davis County Rural Yes 110.2 (70.8, 215.5) 237 (4, 243) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.6)
Jasper County Rural No 191.7 (173.8, 211.1) 32 (8, 120) 91 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Jackson County Rural No 161.6 (138.0, 188.4) 128 (20, 221) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Jack County Rural No 174.6 (141.2, 214.1) 78 (5, 227) 19 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Irion County Urban No 156.7 (91.9, 257.6) 147 (1, 243) 4
*
*
Hutchinson County Rural No 156.8 (135.7, 180.6) 146 (28, 221) 42 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Hunt County Urban No 172.0 (161.6, 182.9) 87 (38, 153) 212 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Hudspeth County Urban No 258.3 (175.6, 365.3) 1 (1, 224) 6
*
*
Howard County Rural No 159.8 (141.6, 179.8) 137 (36, 210) 58 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Houston County Rural No 153.3 (135.6, 173.1) 159 (51, 224) 56 falling falling trend -2.1 (-6.4, -1.3)
Hopkins County Rural No 166.3 (150.5, 183.5) 110 (27, 189) 84 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Hood County Rural No 149.0 (138.3, 160.5) 168 (99, 210) 160 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.3)
Hockley County Urban No 166.4 (144.0, 191.4) 109 (19, 211) 41 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Hill County Rural No 205.2 (187.9, 223.7) 16 (5, 80) 111 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Hidalgo County Urban Yes 114.8 (111.4, 118.2) 236 (219, 239) 884 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Henderson County Rural No 185.1 (174.4, 196.4) 50 (20, 108) 240 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Hemphill County Rural Yes 115.4 (71.0, 177.9) 234 (9, 243) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.0)
Hays County Urban No 137.6 (130.2, 145.2) 201 (156, 219) 286 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Haskell County Rural No 182.7 (143.0, 231.9) 57 (2, 229) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.9)
Hartley County Rural Yes 119.3 (85.1, 163.5) 227 (60, 243) 8 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Harrison County Urban No 149.8 (138.4, 161.9) 165 (88, 211) 135 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -1.4)
Harris County Urban No 136.3 (134.7, 138.0) 204 (185, 211) 5,677 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.8)
Hardin County Urban No 160.3 (147.2, 174.2) 136 (58, 196) 116 falling falling trend -2.0 (-5.5, -1.5)
Hardeman County Rural No 135.5 (95.5, 189.6) 205 (10, 243) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.5)
Hansford County Rural No 172.1 (128.4, 226.5) 86 (4, 240) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Hamilton County Rural No 204.8 (170.2, 245.5) 17 (1, 165) 29 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Hall County Rural Yes 122.6 (83.7, 179.1) 223 (20, 243) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.8)
Hale County Rural No 150.3 (132.5, 169.8) 163 (60, 224) 53 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Guadalupe County Urban No 141.6 (134.0, 149.5) 189 (142, 216) 270 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.0)
Grimes County Rural No 156.1 (138.9, 175.0) 149 (44, 217) 63 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Gregg County Urban No 170.1 (160.7, 180.0) 95 (48, 156) 251 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Grayson County Urban No 176.1 (167.3, 185.2) 72 (37, 125) 319 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Gray County Rural No 158.1 (137.2, 181.5) 142 (30, 222) 42 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Gonzales County Rural No 166.6 (144.3, 191.5) 107 (18, 213) 42 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Goliad County Urban No 136.7 (107.6, 172.9) 202 (31, 242) 17 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.2)
Gillespie County Rural No 123.4 (109.6, 138.8) 222 (164, 239) 69 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Garza County Urban No 163.2 (118.8, 219.0) 121 (3, 242) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Galveston County Urban No 161.0 (155.3, 166.8) 131 (86, 161) 644 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.5, -1.5)
Gaines County Rural No 147.7 (120.9, 178.3) 172 (23, 237) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Frio County Rural No 162.7 (136.7, 192.2) 123 (17, 228) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Freestone County Rural No 185.9 (163.6, 210.7) 46 (8, 166) 53 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Franklin County Rural No 175.1 (145.6, 209.5) 76 (8, 217) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Fort Bend County Urban Yes 116.5 (112.9, 120.2) 233 (215, 238) 872 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.1, 0.3)
Floyd County Rural No 163.6 (123.9, 213.1) 120 (5, 239) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 0.8)
Fisher County Rural No 203.5 (150.7, 271.0) 19 (1, 231) 12 rising rising trend 22.1 (0.5, 39.3)
Fayette County Rural No 133.7 (117.9, 151.3) 210 (119, 236) 59 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Fannin County Rural No 188.5 (171.5, 207.0) 41 (10, 137) 93 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Falls County Urban No 165.3 (142.6, 190.8) 114 (18, 215) 40 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.7)
Erath County Rural No 147.7 (132.0, 164.8) 173 (76, 222) 67 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Ellis County Urban No 160.8 (152.7, 169.2) 133 (72, 172) 311 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
El Paso County Urban No 129.8 (126.4, 133.4) 214 (196, 223) 1,102 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Edwards County Rural No 188.9 (116.7, 299.5) 40 (1, 243) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.1)
Ector County Urban No 185.8 (175.1, 197.0) 47 (21, 109) 236 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.8, 6.7)
Eastland County Rural No 187.3 (164.1, 213.2) 43 (8, 173) 52 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Duval County Rural No 178.3 (145.7, 216.4) 65 (5, 222) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Donley County Rural No 148.2 (104.1, 208.4) 171 (6, 243) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Dimmit County Rural No 175.3 (140.7, 216.3) 75 (6, 231) 18 rising rising trend 13.6 (0.2, 24.9)
Dickens County Rural No 181.3 (114.6, 280.0) 60 (1, 242) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.7)
Denton County Urban Yes 118.3 (114.8, 121.8) 231 (213, 236) 941 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -2.0)
Delta County Rural No 196.5 (154.3, 248.3) 23 (1, 217) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Deaf Smith County Rural No 147.5 (123.1, 175.2) 174 (33, 235) 27 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.8)
DeWitt County Rural No 174.6 (153.6, 198.0) 79 (15, 188) 52 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Dawson County Rural No 167.7 (137.9, 202.0) 105 (8, 229) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Dallas County Urban No 144.5 (142.3, 146.7) 182 (160, 194) 3,373 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.5)
Dallam County Rural No 138.1 (100.1, 185.5) 197 (13, 243) 9 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.5)
Culberson County Rural Yes 107.2 (62.7, 176.5) 240 (24, 243) 4 stable stable trend 24.5 (-3.0, 50.4)
Crosby County Urban No 141.7 (104.7, 188.7) 188 (13, 243) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Crockett County Rural No 248.1 (181.9, 332.2) 3 (1, 196) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.2)
Crane County Rural No 173.1 (122.5, 237.5) 82 (1, 240) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Cottle County Rural No 131.7 (73.2, 231.7) 213 (2, 243) 3 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.3)
Coryell County Urban No 177.2 (163.3, 192.0) 69 (22, 156) 123 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Cooke County Rural No 166.4 (151.4, 182.5) 108 (35, 193) 96 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Concho County Rural Yes 108.1 (72.2, 159.7) 239 (60, 243) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Comanche County Rural No 140.7 (118.0, 167.1) 190 (48, 239) 31 falling falling trend -3.8 (-11.8, -1.7)
Comal County Urban No 142.0 (134.8, 149.5) 187 (142, 214) 310 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Colorado County Rural No 168.6 (148.4, 191.1) 100 (18, 204) 54 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Collingsworth County Rural No 157.8 (101.7, 235.6) 144 (1, 243) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.5)
Collin County Urban Yes 116.7 (113.6, 119.9) 232 (216, 238) 1,114 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Coleman County Rural No 225.7 (190.8, 266.7) 7 (1, 117) 32 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Coke County Rural No 189.6 (143.1, 250.8) 39 (1, 231) 12 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Cochran County Urban No 193.7 (132.0, 276.3) 28 (1, 239) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.0)
Clay County Urban No 153.3 (127.1, 184.3) 158 (23, 236) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Childress County Rural No 172.9 (134.1, 220.0) 84 (6, 238) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.2)
Cherokee County Rural No 169.0 (155.0, 183.9) 97 (32, 179) 112 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.4, 8.4)
Chambers County Urban No 162.2 (145.0, 180.9) 125 (35, 203) 69 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Castro County Rural No 138.0 (103.8, 180.0) 198 (20, 242) 12 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.8)
Cass County Rural No 191.0 (173.0, 210.7) 35 (9, 133) 88 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Carson County Urban No 146.9 (111.7, 191.3) 177 (15, 242) 12 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Camp County Rural No 182.3 (153.2, 215.7) 58 (6, 211) 30 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Cameron County Urban No 125.4 (120.7, 130.2) 220 (201, 229) 546 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.8, 5.2)
Callahan County Urban No 160.9 (136.9, 188.4) 132 (15, 221) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Calhoun County Rural No 169.3 (147.8, 193.3) 96 (15, 208) 47 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Caldwell County Urban No 158.6 (143.5, 174.8) 140 (55, 209) 84 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Burnet County Rural No 146.2 (134.2, 159.2) 179 (101, 216) 119 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Burleson County Urban No 177.7 (155.1, 203.1) 66 (12, 194) 49 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Brown County Rural No 168.8 (153.6, 185.3) 98 (29, 184) 95 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Brooks County Rural No 172.7 (134.6, 218.6) 85 (4, 235) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Briscoe County Rural No 140.4 (82.1, 235.3) 192 (1, 243) 4
*
*
Brewster County Rural Yes 102.5 (80.4, 130.0) 242 (170, 243) 16 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.7)
Brazos County Urban No 126.9 (119.3, 134.7) 218 (183, 232) 219 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Brazoria County Urban No 155.3 (149.5, 161.3) 151 (106, 178) 558 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Bowie County Urban No 180.3 (169.5, 191.7) 61 (23, 124) 214 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Bosque County Urban No 191.2 (169.6, 215.4) 34 (7, 148) 62 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Blanco County Rural No 171.5 (146.2, 201.0) 94 (13, 216) 36 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 1.0)
Bexar County Urban No 140.6 (138.2, 143.1) 191 (171, 205) 2,721 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
Bell County Urban No 158.3 (152.2, 164.6) 141 (94, 170) 523 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Bee County Rural No 163.9 (144.1, 185.6) 118 (26, 211) 51 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 6.6)
Baylor County Rural No 244.5 (187.9, 315.4) 4 (1, 158) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.0)
Bastrop County Urban No 145.1 (135.1, 155.7) 181 (116, 217) 166 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Bandera County Urban No 153.3 (136.0, 173.0) 157 (46, 220) 63 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Bailey County Rural Yes 118.6 (86.5, 159.0) 229 (59, 243) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.3)
Austin County Urban No 144.3 (128.4, 161.8) 183 (80, 229) 64 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Atascosa County Urban No 155.8 (141.3, 171.5) 150 (57, 208) 86 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Armstrong County Urban No 135.2 (80.5, 219.5) 207 (3, 243) 4
*
*
Archer County Urban Yes 121.5 (96.5, 152.2) 225 (99, 243) 17 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Aransas County Urban No 179.5 (160.4, 200.6) 62 (15, 169) 78 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Angelina County Rural No 156.9 (146.3, 168.2) 145 (72, 195) 166 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Andrews County Rural No 159.7 (131.5, 191.9) 139 (15, 231) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Anderson County Rural No 218.8 (203.3, 235.3) 11 (3, 37) 151 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -1.2)
Borden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/10/2024 12:28 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top