Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas *** 124.1 (123.3, 125.0) N/A 18,776 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.5)
United States *** 131.1 (130.9, 131.3) N/A 283,394 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.6)
Anderson County *** 130.7 (113.2, 150.4) 120 (25, 202) 42 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Andrews County *** 130.5 (97.8, 170.6) 123 (6, 214) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Angelina County *** 137.7 (124.1, 152.4) 101 (30, 175) 78 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Aransas County *** 144.0 (121.0, 171.1) 67 (8, 197) 33 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Archer County *** 122.6 (87.4, 169.6) 163 (6, 215) 8
*
*
Atascosa County *** 109.4 (93.0, 128.1) 195 (77, 214) 32 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Austin County *** 130.6 (109.0, 155.6) 122 (17, 207) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Bailey County *** 115.4 (71.1, 177.1) 182 (3, 215) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.4)
Bandera County *** 115.5 (94.5, 141.0) 181 (32, 214) 24 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
Bastrop County *** 138.5 (123.9, 154.3) 98 (26, 173) 70 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Baylor County *** 212.1 (142.6, 310.4) 1 (1, 207) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.2)
Bee County *** 164.2 (136.2, 196.5) 24 (1, 165) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Bell County *** 139.4 (131.3, 147.8) 94 (43, 139) 228 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Bexar County *** 123.5 (120.5, 126.6) 158 (118, 168) 1,278 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.0)
Blanco County *** 145.5 (111.5, 188.8) 63 (3, 211) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.1)
Bosque County *** 154.4 (125.7, 188.7) 42 (3, 193) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Bowie County *** 150.0 (136.4, 164.7) 52 (14, 138) 95 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Brazoria County *** 133.8 (126.2, 141.7) 110 (61, 156) 243 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Brazos County *** 107.1 (97.5, 117.3) 197 (141, 211) 94 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Brewster County *** 102.4 (71.2, 144.8) 208 (21, 215) 8 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3)
Brooks County *** 133.7 (90.0, 192.9) 111 (2, 215) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.7)
Brown County *** 125.8 (107.9, 146.2) 140 (33, 207) 37 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Burleson County *** 138.4 (111.8, 170.5) 99 (10, 211) 20 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Burnet County *** 125.2 (109.4, 143.1) 142 (45, 203) 49 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Caldwell County *** 124.8 (105.8, 146.4) 146 (34, 209) 32 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Calhoun County *** 129.3 (103.9, 159.5) 127 (11, 212) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Callahan County *** 172.9 (138.8, 214.1) 10 (1, 171) 19 stable stable trend -13.7 (-36.5, 17.2)
Cameron County *** 104.7 (98.9, 110.8) 201 (168, 209) 246 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Camp County *** 123.7 (92.1, 163.3) 154 (9, 215) 11 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Carson County *** 102.4 (63.7, 159.2) 207 (7, 215) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Cass County *** 141.0 (120.5, 164.7) 83 (10, 195) 36 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Castro County *** 106.9 (67.5, 161.8) 198 (6, 215) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Chambers County *** 123.6 (102.3, 147.8) 157 (28, 211) 25 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Cherokee County *** 127.9 (111.4, 146.4) 134 (40, 201) 45 rising rising trend 19.6 (6.4, 34.4)
Childress County *** 148.7 (96.9, 220.2) 56 (1, 215) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.9)
Clay County *** 160.8 (124.3, 206.9) 27 (1, 204) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.9)
Coke County *** 131.0 (81.1, 212.8) 118 (1, 215) 4
*
*
Coleman County *** 156.2 (117.9, 206.4) 36 (1, 210) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Collin County *** 105.7 (101.4, 110.0) 199 (170, 206) 492 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
Colorado County *** 142.7 (117.6, 172.3) 75 (8, 203) 26 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Comal County *** 124.1 (114.2, 134.7) 150 (79, 190) 122 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Comanche County *** 99.7 (74.6, 132.2) 210 (63, 215) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Cooke County *** 133.8 (114.9, 155.2) 109 (24, 201) 38 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Coryell County *** 157.2 (138.6, 177.5) 34 (6, 144) 53 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Crosby County *** 141.8 (95.2, 206.1) 80 (1, 215) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Dallam County *** 142.0 (90.1, 212.6) 78 (1, 215) 5 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.5)
Dallas County *** 129.5 (126.6, 132.3) 126 (99, 147) 1,643 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
Dawson County *** 142.7 (106.9, 187.6) 74 (2, 212) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
DeWitt County *** 157.4 (129.3, 190.6) 31 (3, 185) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Deaf Smith County *** 138.7 (107.2, 176.6) 97 (5, 211) 14 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.6)
Delta County *** 172.6 (113.8, 253.0) 11 (1, 215) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.2)
Denton County *** 111.8 (106.8, 116.9) 192 (152, 200) 416 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
Dimmit County *** 93.5 (62.3, 135.5) 214 (38, 215) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
Donley County *** 151.2 (86.2, 251.9) 47 (1, 215) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.8)
Duval County *** 117.0 (84.7, 158.9) 176 (11, 215) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Eastland County *** 160.7 (131.8, 195.0) 28 (2, 183) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Ector County *** 153.0 (140.3, 166.6) 43 (13, 116) 109 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
El Paso County *** 113.5 (109.1, 118.0) 187 (150, 196) 514 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Ellis County *** 132.6 (122.2, 143.6) 113 (50, 176) 126 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Erath County *** 120.1 (100.7, 142.2) 170 (36, 212) 29 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Falls County *** 162.3 (131.7, 198.4) 25 (1, 184) 20 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Fannin County *** 170.4 (146.9, 196.9) 14 (2, 124) 40 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Fayette County *** 102.9 (84.7, 124.9) 205 (104, 215) 25 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Fisher County *** 131.3 (80.5, 210.1) 115 (1, 215) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Floyd County *** 170.2 (117.2, 241.7) 15 (1, 214) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.0)
Fort Bend County *** 103.1 (98.2, 108.1) 204 (175, 210) 369 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Franklin County *** 145.3 (109.5, 190.8) 64 (3, 211) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Freestone County *** 140.4 (112.8, 173.4) 85 (5, 206) 20 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Frio County *** 142.0 (109.4, 181.5) 79 (4, 211) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
Gaines County *** 123.6 (91.6, 162.8) 155 (8, 215) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Galveston County *** 143.0 (135.5, 150.8) 72 (41, 125) 285 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Garza County *** 118.7 (70.0, 191.8) 173 (1, 215) 4
*
*
Gillespie County *** 103.1 (85.2, 124.5) 203 (89, 215) 30 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Goliad County *** 122.9 (85.2, 174.3) 161 (3, 215) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Gonzales County *** 125.1 (99.5, 155.8) 144 (18, 214) 17 stable stable trend -6.8 (-13.3, 0.2)
Gray County *** 150.2 (122.2, 183.1) 51 (4, 203) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Grayson County *** 144.8 (133.9, 156.6) 66 (26, 140) 136 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Gregg County *** 143.7 (131.9, 156.3) 70 (27, 147) 116 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Grimes County *** 156.1 (130.1, 186.3) 37 (2, 178) 27 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Guadalupe County *** 129.9 (119.6, 141.0) 124 (57, 178) 119 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Hale County *** 149.7 (125.5, 177.3) 53 (5, 185) 28 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.3)
Hall County *** 140.0 (79.3, 237.3) 88 (1, 215) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 2.9)
Hamilton County *** 188.5 (142.7, 246.8) 6 (1, 178) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Hansford County *** 130.6 (82.1, 199.5) 121 (1, 215) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Hardin County *** 126.4 (110.6, 143.9) 136 (41, 201) 48 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Harris County *** 122.1 (120.0, 124.2) 164 (128, 169) 2,642 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.6)
Harrison County *** 139.2 (124.0, 155.9) 95 (24, 182) 63 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Hartley County *** 125.7 (73.3, 203.2) 141 (1, 215) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.9)
Haskell County *** 149.6 (101.1, 218.1) 55 (1, 215) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Hays County *** 119.4 (109.6, 129.9) 171 (96, 198) 114 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Henderson County *** 136.5 (123.7, 150.5) 103 (32, 175) 91 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Hidalgo County *** 97.1 (92.8, 101.5) 212 (190, 213) 392 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Hill County *** 165.4 (143.6, 189.9) 21 (3, 124) 45 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Hockley County *** 151.4 (123.1, 184.4) 45 (3, 194) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 0.9)
Hood County *** 124.4 (110.4, 140.0) 149 (48, 200) 65 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.2)
Hopkins County *** 136.5 (116.7, 158.9) 105 (14, 197) 36 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Houston County *** 140.3 (115.6, 169.6) 87 (8, 201) 26 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Howard County *** 125.9 (103.9, 151.3) 139 (26, 212) 24 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Hunt County *** 143.3 (129.9, 157.8) 71 (23, 154) 87 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Hutchinson County *** 173.7 (142.4, 210.1) 8 (1, 157) 23 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Jack County *** 123.9 (85.7, 175.6) 151 (4, 215) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Jackson County *** 147.8 (115.4, 187.2) 58 (3, 208) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.2)
Jasper County *** 145.2 (124.4, 168.8) 65 (11, 184) 38 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Jefferson County *** 134.6 (126.5, 143.2) 106 (59, 159) 214 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
Jim Hogg County *** 168.9 (107.9, 253.1) 18 (1, 215) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.1)
Jim Wells County *** 121.8 (103.0, 143.2) 166 (37, 210) 31 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Johnson County *** 156.6 (145.5, 168.3) 35 (14, 100) 153 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.2)
Jones County *** 155.6 (121.7, 196.9) 38 (1, 206) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8)
Karnes County *** 119.1 (88.1, 158.4) 172 (10, 215) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Kaufman County *** 151.2 (137.9, 165.5) 46 (12, 129) 98 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Kendall County *** 102.7 (87.3, 120.3) 206 (110, 215) 34 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Kerr County *** 131.1 (117.0, 147.0) 116 (40, 191) 71 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Kimble County *** 155.2 (99.1, 237.6) 39 (1, 215) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.4)
Kinney County *** 140.0 (84.4, 228.0) 89 (1, 215) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 2.5)
Kleberg County *** 169.9 (142.1, 201.8) 16 (2, 155) 27 rising rising trend 5.2 (2.6, 7.8)
Knox County *** 192.7 (125.3, 288.6) 5 (1, 213) 6
*
*
La Salle County *** 104.3 (63.2, 163.6) 202 (6, 215) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.4, 1.7)
Lamar County *** 148.3 (130.8, 167.7) 57 (12, 158) 56 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Lamb County *** 121.8 (90.8, 160.9) 165 (8, 215) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Lampasas County *** 147.5 (120.9, 178.8) 60 (5, 195) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Lavaca County *** 123.9 (100.2, 152.4) 152 (20, 212) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Lee County *** 142.5 (114.0, 176.8) 76 (4, 210) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Leon County *** 140.4 (112.6, 174.0) 86 (7, 211) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Liberty County *** 172.9 (156.0, 191.2) 9 (3, 76) 79 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Limestone County *** 141.7 (115.6, 172.3) 81 (6, 201) 23 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.9, -1.2)
Live Oak County *** 117.3 (86.4, 157.5) 174 (12, 215) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Llano County *** 136.6 (114.1, 164.1) 102 (11, 204) 35 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Lubbock County *** 123.6 (116.0, 131.6) 156 (96, 185) 203 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Lynn County *** 164.2 (110.7, 236.6) 23 (1, 215) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Madison County *** 140.8 (104.6, 186.0) 84 (2, 213) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Marion County *** 116.1 (83.7, 159.4) 180 (9, 215) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Martin County *** 134.5 (81.5, 210.0) 107 (1, 215) 4
*
*
Mason County *** 140.0 (86.1, 222.2) 90 (1, 215) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Matagorda County *** 161.9 (139.5, 187.0) 26 (3, 154) 40 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Maverick County *** 124.8 (107.1, 144.6) 147 (39, 206) 36 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
McCulloch County *** 200.4 (151.7, 261.9) 2 (1, 163) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.2)
McLennan County *** 128.8 (120.7, 137.3) 128 (72, 172) 198 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Medina County *** 111.4 (95.3, 129.7) 193 (86, 214) 36 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Midland County *** 134.2 (122.9, 146.2) 108 (42, 171) 110 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Milam County *** 128.2 (106.7, 153.5) 131 (20, 209) 26 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Mills County *** 120.2 (76.7, 186.6) 169 (2, 215) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.1)
Mitchell County *** 196.7 (142.2, 266.7) 3 (1, 189) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Montague County *** 169.6 (140.7, 203.6) 17 (1, 156) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Montgomery County *** 123.2 (117.7, 128.9) 159 (107, 177) 386 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.7)
Moore County *** 136.5 (105.6, 173.6) 104 (4, 213) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Morris County *** 154.9 (121.0, 196.6) 41 (1, 202) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Nacogdoches County *** 129.7 (113.7, 147.3) 125 (34, 196) 51 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Navarro County *** 147.5 (129.2, 167.9) 59 (11, 170) 49 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Newton County *** 112.5 (82.8, 150.4) 189 (18, 215) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.5)
Nolan County *** 157.4 (123.9, 197.8) 32 (2, 205) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Nueces County *** 113.6 (107.2, 120.2) 185 (135, 199) 248 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
Ochiltree County *** 112.0 (72.7, 164.7) 191 (8, 215) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Orange County *** 154.9 (140.4, 170.6) 40 (10, 121) 87 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Palo Pinto County *** 141.4 (119.1, 167.2) 82 (8, 197) 30 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.8)
Panola County *** 150.7 (125.8, 179.7) 48 (6, 183) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Parker County *** 147.1 (135.4, 159.7) 61 (21, 137) 121 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Parmer County *** 128.0 (88.3, 180.0) 133 (3, 215) 7
*
*
Pecos County *** 90.8 (63.4, 126.5) 215 (66, 215) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.2)
Polk County *** 194.3 (171.4, 219.5) 4 (1, 40) 60 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Potter County *** 149.6 (136.3, 163.9) 54 (16, 142) 97 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Rains County *** 123.8 (94.1, 162.2) 153 (10, 215) 13 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.3, -1.4)
Randall County *** 120.2 (109.8, 131.4) 168 (87, 200) 101 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Real County *** 168.3 (103.6, 268.1) 19 (1, 215) 5
*
*
Red River County *** 133.2 (104.6, 169.5) 112 (6, 212) 16 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Reeves County *** 100.6 (69.6, 141.0) 209 (35, 215) 7 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Refugio County *** 143.7 (102.0, 199.5) 69 (1, 215) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
Robertson County *** 138.9 (109.5, 174.4) 96 (5, 209) 17 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Rockwall County *** 128.3 (114.6, 143.1) 130 (48, 193) 66 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Runnels County *** 159.2 (123.1, 204.8) 29 (1, 204) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.7)
Rusk County *** 130.9 (113.9, 149.9) 119 (27, 197) 45 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Sabine County *** 157.2 (120.0, 204.8) 33 (1, 204) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
San Augustine County *** 139.6 (101.4, 190.4) 92 (1, 214) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
San Jacinto County *** 127.1 (105.4, 152.4) 135 (21, 209) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
San Patricio County *** 150.7 (133.7, 169.3) 49 (11, 154) 59 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
San Saba County *** 95.0 (58.7, 151.0) 213 (15, 215) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.3)
Scurry County *** 123.1 (94.3, 158.7) 160 (8, 215) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Shelby County *** 151.7 (126.1, 181.3) 44 (3, 185) 26 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Smith County *** 116.9 (109.1, 125.0) 178 (118, 200) 178 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
Somervell County *** 164.4 (121.5, 219.0) 22 (1, 210) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Starr County *** 98.0 (83.0, 114.9) 211 (135, 215) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.7)
Stephens County *** 167.7 (124.8, 222.3) 20 (1, 207) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Sutton County *** 116.9 (64.2, 199.8) 177 (1, 215) 3 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.1, 0.0)
Swisher County *** 126.3 (84.3, 183.8) 137 (2, 215) 6 stable stable trend 31.5 (-4.2, 80.4)
Tarrant County *** 128.1 (124.9, 131.2) 132 (102, 155) 1,329 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.3)
Taylor County *** 143.0 (131.3, 155.4) 73 (26, 144) 119 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Terry County *** 109.9 (77.8, 151.5) 194 (13, 215) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Titus County *** 128.3 (106.0, 154.0) 129 (19, 210) 24 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Tom Green County *** 121.5 (110.4, 133.6) 167 (78, 200) 91 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Travis County *** 105.2 (101.2, 109.4) 200 (173, 208) 550 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Trinity County *** 171.3 (140.0, 209.1) 13 (1, 167) 23 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Tyler County *** 114.2 (91.9, 141.6) 184 (40, 214) 20 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Upshur County *** 139.4 (120.4, 160.9) 93 (18, 191) 41 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Upton County *** 179.0 (102.3, 290.8) 7 (1, 215) 3 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
Uvalde County *** 150.4 (125.1, 179.6) 50 (5, 191) 27 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Val Verde County *** 117.2 (99.8, 136.9) 175 (53, 211) 33 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Van Zandt County *** 131.0 (115.8, 147.9) 117 (29, 196) 57 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Victoria County *** 139.8 (126.2, 154.5) 91 (27, 168) 82 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Walker County *** 114.4 (98.5, 132.4) 183 (66, 212) 39 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.0)
Waller County *** 126.1 (106.8, 147.9) 138 (35, 208) 32 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Ward County *** 142.0 (104.2, 189.6) 77 (2, 214) 10 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Washington County *** 122.7 (104.6, 143.5) 162 (33, 210) 38 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Webb County *** 107.5 (99.2, 116.3) 196 (143, 209) 126 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.3, -0.7)
Wharton County *** 143.9 (124.5, 165.6) 68 (14, 185) 42 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Wheeler County *** 171.4 (117.4, 245.0) 12 (1, 214) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Wichita County *** 159.0 (146.8, 172.1) 30 (11, 96) 133 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Wilbarger County *** 131.9 (100.3, 171.3) 114 (8, 214) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Willacy County *** 116.4 (90.1, 148.4) 179 (21, 215) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Williamson County *** 113.3 (107.6, 119.1) 188 (141, 198) 314 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Wilson County *** 125.2 (107.7, 144.9) 143 (34, 206) 38 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Winkler County *** 113.5 (71.5, 171.5) 186 (4, 215) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
Wise County *** 146.0 (129.3, 164.3) 62 (12, 168) 58 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Wood County *** 124.4 (107.9, 143.3) 148 (39, 205) 50 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Yoakum County *** 112.1 (70.5, 168.9) 190 (6, 215) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.2)
Young County *** 138.4 (111.6, 170.6) 100 (8, 207) 20 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.7, -1.2)
Zavala County *** 125.0 (89.9, 169.8) 145 (5, 215) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Armstrong County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/28/2022 3:10 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top