Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas *** 124.1 (123.3, 125.0) N/A 18,776 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.5)
United States *** 131.1 (130.9, 131.3) N/A 283,394 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.6)
Baylor County *** 212.1 (142.6, 310.4) 1 (1, 207) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.2)
McCulloch County *** 200.4 (151.7, 261.9) 2 (1, 163) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.2)
Mitchell County *** 196.7 (142.2, 266.7) 3 (1, 189) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Polk County *** 194.3 (171.4, 219.5) 4 (1, 40) 60 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Knox County *** 192.7 (125.3, 288.6) 5 (1, 213) 6
*
*
Hamilton County *** 188.5 (142.7, 246.8) 6 (1, 178) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Upton County *** 179.0 (102.3, 290.8) 7 (1, 215) 3 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
Hutchinson County *** 173.7 (142.4, 210.1) 8 (1, 157) 23 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Liberty County *** 172.9 (156.0, 191.2) 9 (3, 76) 79 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Callahan County *** 172.9 (138.8, 214.1) 10 (1, 171) 19 stable stable trend -13.7 (-36.5, 17.2)
Delta County *** 172.6 (113.8, 253.0) 11 (1, 215) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.2)
Wheeler County *** 171.4 (117.4, 245.0) 12 (1, 214) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Trinity County *** 171.3 (140.0, 209.1) 13 (1, 167) 23 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Fannin County *** 170.4 (146.9, 196.9) 14 (2, 124) 40 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Floyd County *** 170.2 (117.2, 241.7) 15 (1, 214) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.0)
Kleberg County *** 169.9 (142.1, 201.8) 16 (2, 155) 27 rising rising trend 5.2 (2.6, 7.8)
Montague County *** 169.6 (140.7, 203.6) 17 (1, 156) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Jim Hogg County *** 168.9 (107.9, 253.1) 18 (1, 215) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.1)
Real County *** 168.3 (103.6, 268.1) 19 (1, 215) 5
*
*
Stephens County *** 167.7 (124.8, 222.3) 20 (1, 207) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Hill County *** 165.4 (143.6, 189.9) 21 (3, 124) 45 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Somervell County *** 164.4 (121.5, 219.0) 22 (1, 210) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Lynn County *** 164.2 (110.7, 236.6) 23 (1, 215) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Bee County *** 164.2 (136.2, 196.5) 24 (1, 165) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Falls County *** 162.3 (131.7, 198.4) 25 (1, 184) 20 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Matagorda County *** 161.9 (139.5, 187.0) 26 (3, 154) 40 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Clay County *** 160.8 (124.3, 206.9) 27 (1, 204) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.9)
Eastland County *** 160.7 (131.8, 195.0) 28 (2, 183) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Runnels County *** 159.2 (123.1, 204.8) 29 (1, 204) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.7)
Wichita County *** 159.0 (146.8, 172.1) 30 (11, 96) 133 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
DeWitt County *** 157.4 (129.3, 190.6) 31 (3, 185) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Nolan County *** 157.4 (123.9, 197.8) 32 (2, 205) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Sabine County *** 157.2 (120.0, 204.8) 33 (1, 204) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Coryell County *** 157.2 (138.6, 177.5) 34 (6, 144) 53 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Johnson County *** 156.6 (145.5, 168.3) 35 (14, 100) 153 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.2)
Coleman County *** 156.2 (117.9, 206.4) 36 (1, 210) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Grimes County *** 156.1 (130.1, 186.3) 37 (2, 178) 27 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Jones County *** 155.6 (121.7, 196.9) 38 (1, 206) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8)
Kimble County *** 155.2 (99.1, 237.6) 39 (1, 215) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.4)
Orange County *** 154.9 (140.4, 170.6) 40 (10, 121) 87 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Morris County *** 154.9 (121.0, 196.6) 41 (1, 202) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Bosque County *** 154.4 (125.7, 188.7) 42 (3, 193) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Ector County *** 153.0 (140.3, 166.6) 43 (13, 116) 109 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Shelby County *** 151.7 (126.1, 181.3) 44 (3, 185) 26 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Hockley County *** 151.4 (123.1, 184.4) 45 (3, 194) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 0.9)
Kaufman County *** 151.2 (137.9, 165.5) 46 (12, 129) 98 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Donley County *** 151.2 (86.2, 251.9) 47 (1, 215) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.8)
Panola County *** 150.7 (125.8, 179.7) 48 (6, 183) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
San Patricio County *** 150.7 (133.7, 169.3) 49 (11, 154) 59 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Uvalde County *** 150.4 (125.1, 179.6) 50 (5, 191) 27 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Gray County *** 150.2 (122.2, 183.1) 51 (4, 203) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Bowie County *** 150.0 (136.4, 164.7) 52 (14, 138) 95 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Hale County *** 149.7 (125.5, 177.3) 53 (5, 185) 28 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.3)
Potter County *** 149.6 (136.3, 163.9) 54 (16, 142) 97 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Haskell County *** 149.6 (101.1, 218.1) 55 (1, 215) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Childress County *** 148.7 (96.9, 220.2) 56 (1, 215) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.9)
Lamar County *** 148.3 (130.8, 167.7) 57 (12, 158) 56 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Jackson County *** 147.8 (115.4, 187.2) 58 (3, 208) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.2)
Navarro County *** 147.5 (129.2, 167.9) 59 (11, 170) 49 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Lampasas County *** 147.5 (120.9, 178.8) 60 (5, 195) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Parker County *** 147.1 (135.4, 159.7) 61 (21, 137) 121 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Wise County *** 146.0 (129.3, 164.3) 62 (12, 168) 58 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Blanco County *** 145.5 (111.5, 188.8) 63 (3, 211) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.1)
Franklin County *** 145.3 (109.5, 190.8) 64 (3, 211) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Jasper County *** 145.2 (124.4, 168.8) 65 (11, 184) 38 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Grayson County *** 144.8 (133.9, 156.6) 66 (26, 140) 136 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Aransas County *** 144.0 (121.0, 171.1) 67 (8, 197) 33 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Wharton County *** 143.9 (124.5, 165.6) 68 (14, 185) 42 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Refugio County *** 143.7 (102.0, 199.5) 69 (1, 215) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
Gregg County *** 143.7 (131.9, 156.3) 70 (27, 147) 116 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Hunt County *** 143.3 (129.9, 157.8) 71 (23, 154) 87 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Galveston County *** 143.0 (135.5, 150.8) 72 (41, 125) 285 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Taylor County *** 143.0 (131.3, 155.4) 73 (26, 144) 119 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Dawson County *** 142.7 (106.9, 187.6) 74 (2, 212) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Colorado County *** 142.7 (117.6, 172.3) 75 (8, 203) 26 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Lee County *** 142.5 (114.0, 176.8) 76 (4, 210) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Ward County *** 142.0 (104.2, 189.6) 77 (2, 214) 10 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Dallam County *** 142.0 (90.1, 212.6) 78 (1, 215) 5 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.5)
Frio County *** 142.0 (109.4, 181.5) 79 (4, 211) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
Crosby County *** 141.8 (95.2, 206.1) 80 (1, 215) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Limestone County *** 141.7 (115.6, 172.3) 81 (6, 201) 23 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.9, -1.2)
Palo Pinto County *** 141.4 (119.1, 167.2) 82 (8, 197) 30 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.8)
Cass County *** 141.0 (120.5, 164.7) 83 (10, 195) 36 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Madison County *** 140.8 (104.6, 186.0) 84 (2, 213) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Freestone County *** 140.4 (112.8, 173.4) 85 (5, 206) 20 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Leon County *** 140.4 (112.6, 174.0) 86 (7, 211) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Houston County *** 140.3 (115.6, 169.6) 87 (8, 201) 26 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Hall County *** 140.0 (79.3, 237.3) 88 (1, 215) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 2.9)
Kinney County *** 140.0 (84.4, 228.0) 89 (1, 215) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 2.5)
Mason County *** 140.0 (86.1, 222.2) 90 (1, 215) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Victoria County *** 139.8 (126.2, 154.5) 91 (27, 168) 82 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
San Augustine County *** 139.6 (101.4, 190.4) 92 (1, 214) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Upshur County *** 139.4 (120.4, 160.9) 93 (18, 191) 41 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Bell County *** 139.4 (131.3, 147.8) 94 (43, 139) 228 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Harrison County *** 139.2 (124.0, 155.9) 95 (24, 182) 63 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Robertson County *** 138.9 (109.5, 174.4) 96 (5, 209) 17 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Deaf Smith County *** 138.7 (107.2, 176.6) 97 (5, 211) 14 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.6)
Bastrop County *** 138.5 (123.9, 154.3) 98 (26, 173) 70 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Burleson County *** 138.4 (111.8, 170.5) 99 (10, 211) 20 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Young County *** 138.4 (111.6, 170.6) 100 (8, 207) 20 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.7, -1.2)
Angelina County *** 137.7 (124.1, 152.4) 101 (30, 175) 78 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Llano County *** 136.6 (114.1, 164.1) 102 (11, 204) 35 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Henderson County *** 136.5 (123.7, 150.5) 103 (32, 175) 91 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Moore County *** 136.5 (105.6, 173.6) 104 (4, 213) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Hopkins County *** 136.5 (116.7, 158.9) 105 (14, 197) 36 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Jefferson County *** 134.6 (126.5, 143.2) 106 (59, 159) 214 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
Martin County *** 134.5 (81.5, 210.0) 107 (1, 215) 4
*
*
Midland County *** 134.2 (122.9, 146.2) 108 (42, 171) 110 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Cooke County *** 133.8 (114.9, 155.2) 109 (24, 201) 38 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Brazoria County *** 133.8 (126.2, 141.7) 110 (61, 156) 243 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Brooks County *** 133.7 (90.0, 192.9) 111 (2, 215) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.7)
Red River County *** 133.2 (104.6, 169.5) 112 (6, 212) 16 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Ellis County *** 132.6 (122.2, 143.6) 113 (50, 176) 126 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Wilbarger County *** 131.9 (100.3, 171.3) 114 (8, 214) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Fisher County *** 131.3 (80.5, 210.1) 115 (1, 215) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Kerr County *** 131.1 (117.0, 147.0) 116 (40, 191) 71 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Van Zandt County *** 131.0 (115.8, 147.9) 117 (29, 196) 57 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Coke County *** 131.0 (81.1, 212.8) 118 (1, 215) 4
*
*
Rusk County *** 130.9 (113.9, 149.9) 119 (27, 197) 45 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Anderson County *** 130.7 (113.2, 150.4) 120 (25, 202) 42 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Hansford County *** 130.6 (82.1, 199.5) 121 (1, 215) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Austin County *** 130.6 (109.0, 155.6) 122 (17, 207) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Andrews County *** 130.5 (97.8, 170.6) 123 (6, 214) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Guadalupe County *** 129.9 (119.6, 141.0) 124 (57, 178) 119 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Nacogdoches County *** 129.7 (113.7, 147.3) 125 (34, 196) 51 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Dallas County *** 129.5 (126.6, 132.3) 126 (99, 147) 1,643 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
Calhoun County *** 129.3 (103.9, 159.5) 127 (11, 212) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
McLennan County *** 128.8 (120.7, 137.3) 128 (72, 172) 198 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Titus County *** 128.3 (106.0, 154.0) 129 (19, 210) 24 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Rockwall County *** 128.3 (114.6, 143.1) 130 (48, 193) 66 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Milam County *** 128.2 (106.7, 153.5) 131 (20, 209) 26 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Tarrant County *** 128.1 (124.9, 131.2) 132 (102, 155) 1,329 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.3)
Parmer County *** 128.0 (88.3, 180.0) 133 (3, 215) 7
*
*
Cherokee County *** 127.9 (111.4, 146.4) 134 (40, 201) 45 rising rising trend 19.6 (6.4, 34.4)
San Jacinto County *** 127.1 (105.4, 152.4) 135 (21, 209) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Hardin County *** 126.4 (110.6, 143.9) 136 (41, 201) 48 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Swisher County *** 126.3 (84.3, 183.8) 137 (2, 215) 6 stable stable trend 31.5 (-4.2, 80.4)
Waller County *** 126.1 (106.8, 147.9) 138 (35, 208) 32 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Howard County *** 125.9 (103.9, 151.3) 139 (26, 212) 24 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Brown County *** 125.8 (107.9, 146.2) 140 (33, 207) 37 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Hartley County *** 125.7 (73.3, 203.2) 141 (1, 215) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.9)
Burnet County *** 125.2 (109.4, 143.1) 142 (45, 203) 49 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Wilson County *** 125.2 (107.7, 144.9) 143 (34, 206) 38 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Gonzales County *** 125.1 (99.5, 155.8) 144 (18, 214) 17 stable stable trend -6.8 (-13.3, 0.2)
Zavala County *** 125.0 (89.9, 169.8) 145 (5, 215) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Caldwell County *** 124.8 (105.8, 146.4) 146 (34, 209) 32 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Maverick County *** 124.8 (107.1, 144.6) 147 (39, 206) 36 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Wood County *** 124.4 (107.9, 143.3) 148 (39, 205) 50 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Hood County *** 124.4 (110.4, 140.0) 149 (48, 200) 65 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.2)
Comal County *** 124.1 (114.2, 134.7) 150 (79, 190) 122 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Jack County *** 123.9 (85.7, 175.6) 151 (4, 215) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Lavaca County *** 123.9 (100.2, 152.4) 152 (20, 212) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Rains County *** 123.8 (94.1, 162.2) 153 (10, 215) 13 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.3, -1.4)
Camp County *** 123.7 (92.1, 163.3) 154 (9, 215) 11 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Gaines County *** 123.6 (91.6, 162.8) 155 (8, 215) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Lubbock County *** 123.6 (116.0, 131.6) 156 (96, 185) 203 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Chambers County *** 123.6 (102.3, 147.8) 157 (28, 211) 25 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Bexar County *** 123.5 (120.5, 126.6) 158 (118, 168) 1,278 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.0)
Montgomery County *** 123.2 (117.7, 128.9) 159 (107, 177) 386 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.7)
Scurry County *** 123.1 (94.3, 158.7) 160 (8, 215) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Goliad County *** 122.9 (85.2, 174.3) 161 (3, 215) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Washington County *** 122.7 (104.6, 143.5) 162 (33, 210) 38 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Archer County *** 122.6 (87.4, 169.6) 163 (6, 215) 8
*
*
Harris County *** 122.1 (120.0, 124.2) 164 (128, 169) 2,642 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.6)
Lamb County *** 121.8 (90.8, 160.9) 165 (8, 215) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Jim Wells County *** 121.8 (103.0, 143.2) 166 (37, 210) 31 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Tom Green County *** 121.5 (110.4, 133.6) 167 (78, 200) 91 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Randall County *** 120.2 (109.8, 131.4) 168 (87, 200) 101 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Mills County *** 120.2 (76.7, 186.6) 169 (2, 215) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.1)
Erath County *** 120.1 (100.7, 142.2) 170 (36, 212) 29 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Hays County *** 119.4 (109.6, 129.9) 171 (96, 198) 114 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Karnes County *** 119.1 (88.1, 158.4) 172 (10, 215) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Garza County *** 118.7 (70.0, 191.8) 173 (1, 215) 4
*
*
Live Oak County *** 117.3 (86.4, 157.5) 174 (12, 215) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Val Verde County *** 117.2 (99.8, 136.9) 175 (53, 211) 33 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Duval County *** 117.0 (84.7, 158.9) 176 (11, 215) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Sutton County *** 116.9 (64.2, 199.8) 177 (1, 215) 3 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.1, 0.0)
Smith County *** 116.9 (109.1, 125.0) 178 (118, 200) 178 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
Willacy County *** 116.4 (90.1, 148.4) 179 (21, 215) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Marion County *** 116.1 (83.7, 159.4) 180 (9, 215) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Bandera County *** 115.5 (94.5, 141.0) 181 (32, 214) 24 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
Bailey County *** 115.4 (71.1, 177.1) 182 (3, 215) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.4)
Walker County *** 114.4 (98.5, 132.4) 183 (66, 212) 39 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.0)
Tyler County *** 114.2 (91.9, 141.6) 184 (40, 214) 20 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Nueces County *** 113.6 (107.2, 120.2) 185 (135, 199) 248 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
Winkler County *** 113.5 (71.5, 171.5) 186 (4, 215) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
El Paso County *** 113.5 (109.1, 118.0) 187 (150, 196) 514 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Williamson County *** 113.3 (107.6, 119.1) 188 (141, 198) 314 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Newton County *** 112.5 (82.8, 150.4) 189 (18, 215) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.5)
Yoakum County *** 112.1 (70.5, 168.9) 190 (6, 215) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.2)
Ochiltree County *** 112.0 (72.7, 164.7) 191 (8, 215) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Denton County *** 111.8 (106.8, 116.9) 192 (152, 200) 416 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
Medina County *** 111.4 (95.3, 129.7) 193 (86, 214) 36 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Terry County *** 109.9 (77.8, 151.5) 194 (13, 215) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Atascosa County *** 109.4 (93.0, 128.1) 195 (77, 214) 32 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Webb County *** 107.5 (99.2, 116.3) 196 (143, 209) 126 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.3, -0.7)
Brazos County *** 107.1 (97.5, 117.3) 197 (141, 211) 94 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Castro County *** 106.9 (67.5, 161.8) 198 (6, 215) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Collin County *** 105.7 (101.4, 110.0) 199 (170, 206) 492 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
Travis County *** 105.2 (101.2, 109.4) 200 (173, 208) 550 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Cameron County *** 104.7 (98.9, 110.8) 201 (168, 209) 246 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
La Salle County *** 104.3 (63.2, 163.6) 202 (6, 215) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.4, 1.7)
Gillespie County *** 103.1 (85.2, 124.5) 203 (89, 215) 30 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Fort Bend County *** 103.1 (98.2, 108.1) 204 (175, 210) 369 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Fayette County *** 102.9 (84.7, 124.9) 205 (104, 215) 25 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Kendall County *** 102.7 (87.3, 120.3) 206 (110, 215) 34 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Carson County *** 102.4 (63.7, 159.2) 207 (7, 215) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Brewster County *** 102.4 (71.2, 144.8) 208 (21, 215) 8 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3)
Reeves County *** 100.6 (69.6, 141.0) 209 (35, 215) 7 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Comanche County *** 99.7 (74.6, 132.2) 210 (63, 215) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Starr County *** 98.0 (83.0, 114.9) 211 (135, 215) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.7)
Hidalgo County *** 97.1 (92.8, 101.5) 212 (190, 213) 392 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
San Saba County *** 95.0 (58.7, 151.0) 213 (15, 215) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.3)
Dimmit County *** 93.5 (62.3, 135.5) 214 (38, 215) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
Pecos County *** 90.8 (63.4, 126.5) 215 (66, 215) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.2)
Armstrong County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/29/2021 6:06 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top