Mortality > Table
Death Rates Table
Death Rate Report for Texas by County
All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022
Hispanic (any race), Both Sexes, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County |
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ |
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate † deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas | N/A | Yes | 115.6 (114.5, 116.7) | N/A | 8,904 | falling | -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2) |
United States 6 | N/A | Yes | 106.8 (106.4, 107.3) | N/A | 44,330 | falling | -1.1 (-1.2, -1.1) |
Henderson County | Rural | Yes | 57.7 (33.3, 91.6) | 147 (94, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Rusk County | Urban | Yes | 59.8 (33.0, 99.1) | 146 (76, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Smith County | Urban | Yes | 70.5 (53.6, 90.5) | 145 (102, 147) | 15 |
|
|
Brewster County | Rural | Yes | 75.1 (45.6, 117.6) | 144 (51, 147) | 4 | falling | -8.2 (-31.7, -3.5) |
Jefferson County | Urban | Yes | 76.9 (63.0, 92.6) | 143 (106, 146) | 25 | falling | -1.4 (-2.4, -0.2) |
Gregg County | Urban | Yes | 77.5 (53.3, 107.7) | 142 (66, 147) | 9 |
|
|
Cooke County | Rural | Yes | 77.5 (45.2, 122.9) | 141 (38, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Van Zandt County | Rural | Yes | 78.7 (43.2, 129.4) | 140 (30, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Burnet County | Rural | Yes | 79.0 (49.2, 118.4) | 139 (46, 147) | 6 |
|
|
Gillespie County | Rural | Yes | 79.7 (46.5, 126.0) | 138 (39, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Milam County | Rural | Yes | 79.9 (47.3, 125.1) | 137 (37, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Denton County | Urban | Yes | 80.5 (71.3, 90.3) | 136 (112, 144) | 72 | falling | -1.9 (-2.7, -0.3) |
Winkler County | Rural | Yes | 81.8 (45.9, 134.0) | 135 (28, 147) | 3 | stable | -2.0 (-4.1, 0.4) |
Erath County | Rural | Yes | 82.9 (46.0, 134.7) | 134 (22, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Collin County | Urban | Yes | 84.0 (74.2, 94.6) | 133 (105, 143) | 66 | falling | -2.0 (-2.9, -0.5) |
Williamson County | Urban | Yes | 84.5 (74.8, 95.0) | 132 (103, 143) | 67 | falling | -2.3 (-3.0, -1.2) |
Presidio County | Rural | Yes | 84.7 (56.8, 123.0) | 131 (46, 147) | 7 | falling | -2.6 (-4.4, -0.9) |
Kendall County | Urban | Yes | 86.5 (58.2, 122.7) | 130 (30, 147) | 6 | falling | -3.3 (-4.7, -1.3) |
Titus County | Rural | Yes | 86.6 (54.0, 129.9) | 129 (30, 147) | 6 |
|
|
Hunt County | Urban | Yes | 88.2 (59.0, 125.3) | 128 (41, 147) | 7 |
|
|
Chambers County | Urban | Yes | 88.7 (47.7, 146.7) | 127 (12, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Fort Bend County | Urban | Yes | 91.2 (83.4, 99.4) | 126 (99, 137) | 119 | falling | -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2) |
Rockwall County | Urban | Yes | 91.9 (62.8, 128.2) | 125 (33, 147) | 9 |
|
|
Cherokee County | Rural | Yes | 92.0 (56.8, 138.6) | 124 (19, 147) | 5 |
|
|
Waller County | Urban | Yes | 92.3 (63.3, 128.7) | 123 (36, 147) | 8 |
|
|
Wise County | Urban | Yes | 92.5 (59.6, 135.0) | 122 (28, 147) | 6 |
|
|
Nacogdoches County | Rural | Yes | 94.0 (57.6, 142.0) | 121 (17, 147) | 5 |
|
|
Wood County | Rural | Yes | 96.7 (55.4, 155.1) | 120 (12, 147) | 3 |
|
|
Bandera County | Urban | Yes | 96.8 (59.9, 148.1) | 119 (19, 147) | 5 |
|
|
Montgomery County | Urban | Yes | 97.7 (86.6, 109.6) | 118 (79, 135) | 73 | stable | 6.8 (-1.7, 16.1) |
Johnson County | Urban | Yes | 97.7 (78.0, 120.3) | 117 (53, 143) | 21 |
|
|
Travis County | Urban | Yes | 98.4 (92.1, 105.0) | 116 (89, 129) | 224 | falling | -2.2 (-2.5, -1.7) |
Angelina County | Rural | Yes | 98.7 (72.4, 130.7) | 115 (35, 146) | 11 | stable | -1.3 (-2.8, 0.9) |
Bastrop County | Urban | Yes | 99.5 (80.3, 121.5) | 114 (52, 143) | 23 | stable | -1.6 (-3.0, 0.7) |
Dallas County | Urban | Yes | 102.0 (97.7, 106.3) | 113 (89, 122) | 560 | falling | -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8) |
Fayette County | Rural | Yes | 102.4 (59.7, 162.1) | 112 (9, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Liberty County | Urban | Yes | 102.6 (72.7, 139.3) | 111 (25, 146) | 12 |
|
|
Andrews County | Rural | Yes | 102.8 (67.1, 148.8) | 110 (19, 147) | 6 |
|
|
Comal County | Urban | Yes | 103.4 (88.4, 120.1) | 109 (58, 137) | 37 | falling | -1.9 (-2.8, -0.8) |
Ellis County | Urban | Yes | 103.8 (84.8, 125.4) | 108 (47, 141) | 27 | stable | -0.9 (-2.1, 1.0) |
Harris County | Urban | Yes | 104.3 (101.4, 107.2) | 107 (89, 117) | 1,217 | falling | -1.3 (-1.7, -1.0) |
Tarrant County | Urban | Yes | 105.3 (99.7, 111.0) | 106 (82, 119) | 334 | falling | -1.3 (-1.6, -0.7) |
Brazos County | Urban | Yes | 105.4 (86.1, 127.2) | 105 (48, 139) | 26 | stable | -1.3 (-2.5, 0.5) |
Bell County | Urban | Yes | 108.0 (94.5, 122.7) | 104 (60, 129) | 53 | falling | -1.3 (-2.1, -0.1) |
McLennan County | Urban | Yes | 108.5 (94.1, 124.2) | 103 (56, 129) | 46 | falling | -1.6 (-2.3, -0.6) |
Gaines County | Rural | Yes | 108.5 (70.8, 157.5) | 102 (13, 147) | 6 | falling | -2.2 (-3.9, -0.1) |
Kerr County | Rural | Yes | 109.7 (83.5, 141.0) | 101 (30, 144) | 13 | stable | -1.3 (-2.3, 0.0) |
Galveston County | Urban | Yes | 110.0 (98.0, 123.0) | 100 (58, 124) | 68 | falling | -2.5 (-6.4, -1.7) |
Moore County | Rural | Yes | 110.3 (77.7, 150.9) | 99 (17, 145) | 9 |
|
|
Hockley County | Urban | Yes | 110.6 (79.2, 149.7) | 98 (19, 145) | 9 | stable | -1.8 (-3.4, 0.3) |
Austin County | Urban | Yes | 111.0 (69.8, 164.8) | 97 (9, 147) | 5 |
|
|
Guadalupe County | Urban | Yes | 111.0 (98.0, 125.2) | 96 (53, 124) | 56 | falling | -1.9 (-2.5, -1.2) |
Brown County | Rural | Yes | 112.0 (75.9, 158.1) | 95 (14, 145) | 7 |
|
|
Wharton County | Rural | Yes | 112.2 (87.7, 141.1) | 94 (29, 142) | 15 | falling | -1.7 (-2.7, -0.6) |
Pecos County | Rural | Yes | 113.0 (85.1, 147.1) | 93 (23, 144) | 11 | stable | 8.6 (-0.8, 24.1) |
Washington County | Rural | Yes | 113.4 (64.9, 180.6) | 92 (6, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Nueces County | Urban | Yes | 113.4 (107.1, 120.0) | 91 (69, 110) | 249 | falling | -3.4 (-7.0, -1.9) |
Brazoria County | Urban | Yes | 113.7 (101.9, 126.5) | 90 (55, 122) | 79 | falling | -1.0 (-1.6, -0.2) |
Parmer County | Rural | Yes | 114.7 (72.1, 171.3) | 89 (10, 147) | 5 |
|
|
Jones County | Urban | Yes | 115.7 (71.7, 175.4) | 88 (7, 147) | 5 |
|
|
Lavaca County | Rural | Yes | 116.1 (68.2, 183.2) | 87 (6, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Hidalgo County | Urban | Yes | 116.4 (112.6, 120.3) | 86 (69, 100) | 721 | falling | -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4) |
Kaufman County | Urban | Yes | 117.4 (86.0, 154.8) | 85 (14, 142) | 14 | stable | -1.2 (-2.9, 1.7) |
Grayson County | Urban | Yes | 117.8 (82.2, 161.5) | 84 (13, 145) | 9 |
|
|
Grimes County | Rural | Yes | 118.6 (74.6, 176.7) | 83 (7, 147) | 5 |
|
|
Parker County | Urban | Yes | 119.0 (86.4, 158.4) | 82 (13, 143) | 11 |
|
|
Scurry County | Rural | Yes | 120.0 (77.8, 175.2) | 81 (8, 147) | 6 |
|
|
Cameron County | Urban | Yes | 121.0 (115.7, 126.4) | 80 (58, 95) | 409 | falling | -0.8 (-1.0, -0.5) |
Refugio County | Rural | Yes | 121.0 (78.1, 180.3) | 79 (7, 147) | 5 |
|
|
Castro County | Rural | Yes | 121.4 (77.5, 180.3) | 78 (5, 146) | 5 |
|
|
Bailey County | Rural | Yes | 121.5 (71.5, 191.1) | 77 (4, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Walker County | Rural | Yes | 122.2 (80.3, 175.5) | 76 (8, 146) | 7 |
|
|
Navarro County | Rural | Yes | 122.6 (86.5, 167.0) | 75 (10, 143) | 9 |
|
|
Medina County | Urban | Yes | 122.7 (103.8, 143.9) | 74 (32, 125) | 32 | falling | -1.2 (-2.0, -0.2) |
El Paso County | Urban | No | 125.2 (121.4, 129.0) | 73 (56, 86) | 845 | falling | -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9) |
Live Oak County | Rural | No | 125.4 (84.0, 180.0) | 72 (6, 146) | 6 | stable | -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2) |
Hays County | Urban | No | 125.6 (111.1, 141.4) | 71 (35, 109) | 64 | falling | -1.5 (-2.4, -0.3) |
Zapata County | Rural | No | 126.8 (98.6, 160.4) | 70 (17, 134) | 14 | stable | 17.5 (-0.5, 32.6) |
Coryell County | Urban | No | 127.2 (90.8, 171.7) | 69 (9, 143) | 9 |
|
|
Bexar County | Urban | No | 128.0 (124.7, 131.3) | 68 (51, 82) | 1,245 | falling | -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0) |
Howard County | Rural | No | 128.4 (97.7, 165.0) | 67 (13, 137) | 13 | stable | -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5) |
Palo Pinto County | Rural | No | 128.6 (77.7, 197.7) | 66 (4, 147) | 5 |
|
|
Tom Green County | Urban | No | 128.6 (112.6, 146.2) | 65 (29, 107) | 49 | falling | -1.1 (-1.6, -0.3) |
Goliad County | Urban | No | 128.9 (78.8, 201.3) | 64 (5, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Matagorda County | Rural | No | 129.2 (100.5, 163.0) | 63 (13, 134) | 15 | stable | -1.7 (-3.1, 0.1) |
DeWitt County | Rural | No | 130.8 (93.7, 177.4) | 62 (8, 140) | 8 | stable | -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2) |
Caldwell County | Urban | No | 131.3 (109.0, 156.6) | 61 (18, 122) | 26 | stable | -1.2 (-2.2, 0.1) |
Potter County | Urban | No | 131.8 (111.9, 153.9) | 60 (23, 115) | 36 | stable | -0.7 (-1.6, 0.5) |
Wilbarger County | Rural | No | 133.1 (73.6, 216.7) | 59 (2, 147) | 3 |
|
|
Wilson County | Urban | No | 133.1 (110.3, 159.2) | 58 (19, 118) | 26 | falling | -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7) |
Starr County | Rural | No | 133.6 (120.1, 148.2) | 57 (30, 93) | 72 | stable | 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7) |
Midland County | Urban | No | 134.9 (117.7, 153.6) | 56 (22, 102) | 53 | stable | -0.5 (-1.4, 0.8) |
Maverick County | Urban | No | 135.8 (121.5, 151.2) | 55 (26, 93) | 67 | stable | -0.2 (-0.6, 0.4) |
Taylor County | Urban | No | 136.7 (115.6, 160.3) | 54 (18, 108) | 32 | falling | -1.4 (-2.3, -0.3) |
Gonzales County | Rural | No | 137.5 (101.1, 181.8) | 53 (8, 134) | 10 | stable | -1.5 (-2.8, 0.0) |
Atascosa County | Urban | No | 137.5 (118.7, 158.3) | 52 (20, 101) | 40 | falling | -1.3 (-2.2, -0.1) |
Mitchell County | Rural | No | 137.9 (81.3, 217.3) | 51 (2, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Floyd County | Rural | No | 138.9 (81.5, 219.4) | 50 (3, 147) | 4 |
|
|
Webb County | Urban | No | 139.2 (131.8, 146.9) | 49 (33, 72) | 274 | stable | -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2) |
Yoakum County | Rural | No | 139.9 (85.3, 213.8) | 48 (3, 146) | 5 |
|
|
Hale County | Rural | No | 141.4 (114.3, 172.6) | 47 (11, 114) | 20 | stable | 0.0 (-1.1, 1.4) |
Lampasas County | Urban | No | 141.9 (89.0, 212.8) | 46 (4, 145) | 5 |
|
|
Val Verde County | Rural | No | 142.0 (125.6, 159.9) | 45 (20, 89) | 55 | stable | 0.7 (-0.5, 2.8) |
Willacy County | Rural | No | 142.3 (118.4, 169.5) | 44 (12, 108) | 25 | stable | -0.7 (-1.8, 0.6) |
Ward County | Rural | No | 142.4 (97.6, 199.5) | 43 (4, 143) | 7 | stable | -0.3 (-2.1, 2.0) |
Colorado County | Rural | No | 146.8 (99.7, 207.1) | 42 (3, 139) | 7 |
|
|
Lubbock County | Urban | No | 147.2 (134.3, 160.9) | 41 (21, 71) | 105 | falling | -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3) |
Wichita County | Urban | No | 147.4 (119.2, 179.7) | 40 (9, 107) | 21 | stable | -1.3 (-2.4, 0.3) |
Jackson County | Rural | No | 149.3 (98.4, 215.8) | 39 (3, 143) | 6 | stable | 0.3 (-1.2, 2.2) |
Hill County | Rural | No | 150.1 (101.3, 212.0) | 38 (3, 138) | 7 |
|
|
Randall County | Urban | No | 150.4 (116.7, 189.3) | 37 (5, 118) | 19 |
|
|
Deaf Smith County | Rural | No | 152.3 (116.1, 195.3) | 36 (5, 121) | 13 | stable | -0.8 (-2.1, 0.8) |
Ector County | Urban | No | 154.1 (138.8, 170.6) | 35 (13, 67) | 85 | stable | -0.8 (-1.4, 0.2) |
San Patricio County | Urban | No | 154.4 (136.4, 173.9) | 34 (11, 74) | 55 | falling | -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5) |
Terry County | Rural | No | 154.8 (108.0, 213.7) | 33 (3, 138) | 8 | stable | -1.4 (-3.2, 0.9) |
Burleson County | Urban | No | 155.0 (94.2, 237.5) | 32 (2, 145) | 4 |
|
|
Aransas County | Urban | No | 155.5 (115.1, 205.3) | 31 (4, 123) | 10 | stable | -0.9 (-2.3, 1.3) |
Lamb County | Rural | No | 155.6 (114.0, 206.8) | 30 (3, 131) | 10 | stable | -0.8 (-2.3, 1.2) |
Kleberg County | Rural | No | 157.5 (133.6, 184.4) | 29 (8, 85) | 31 | stable | -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4) |
Victoria County | Urban | No | 159.0 (140.9, 178.6) | 28 (9, 68) | 58 | stable | -0.3 (-1.2, 0.9) |
Polk County | Rural | No | 162.0 (99.0, 244.8) | 27 (2, 144) | 5 |
|
|
Nolan County | Rural | No | 162.7 (115.7, 221.8) | 26 (3, 129) | 8 | stable | -0.8 (-2.5, 1.5) |
Calhoun County | Rural | No | 162.9 (125.5, 207.5) | 25 (4, 114) | 14 | falling | -1.8 (-3.0, -0.4) |
Frio County | Rural | No | 163.0 (132.7, 198.1) | 24 (5, 91) | 20 | stable | 0.3 (-0.7, 1.6) |
Uvalde County | Rural | No | 166.4 (139.7, 196.8) | 23 (5, 77) | 28 | stable | -0.7 (-1.6, 0.4) |
Sutton County | Rural | No | 167.2 (103.6, 257.7) | 22 (1, 144) | 4 |
|
|
Robertson County | Urban | No | 168.6 (107.6, 250.5) | 21 (2, 142) | 5 |
|
|
Bee County | Rural | No | 169.3 (141.1, 201.3) | 20 (4, 79) | 26 | stable | 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9) |
Crockett County | Rural | No | 169.8 (102.7, 265.6) | 19 (2, 145) | 4 |
|
|
Runnels County | Rural | No | 171.6 (110.6, 252.9) | 18 (2, 143) | 5 | stable | -0.5 (-2.6, 2.1) |
Reeves County | Rural | No | 172.0 (136.6, 213.6) | 17 (4, 89) | 16 | rising | 16.3 (0.1, 28.6) |
Dimmit County | Rural | No | 172.4 (135.2, 216.9) | 16 (3, 99) | 15 | rising | 15.4 (0.5, 25.9) |
Brooks County | Rural | No | 173.3 (132.7, 222.8) | 15 (3, 106) | 13 | stable | -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9) |
Dawson County | Rural | No | 177.5 (131.3, 233.9) | 14 (2, 111) | 10 | stable | 0.4 (-0.9, 2.1) |
Karnes County | Rural | No | 177.6 (133.9, 230.3) | 13 (2, 100) | 12 | stable | -0.3 (-1.8, 1.3) |
Duval County | Rural | No | 181.1 (145.9, 222.5) | 12 (3, 81) | 19 | stable | 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1) |
Jim Wells County | Rural | No | 181.9 (161.9, 203.6) | 11 (4, 40) | 62 | stable | 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7) |
La Salle County | Rural | No | 182.0 (131.6, 244.8) | 10 (2, 107) | 9 | stable | -0.1 (-1.9, 2.1) |
Zavala County | Rural | No | 188.0 (150.0, 232.8) | 9 (2, 74) | 17 | stable | 0.2 (-1.0, 1.6) |
Swisher County | Rural | No | 205.3 (131.5, 303.5) | 8 (1, 127) | 5 |
|
|
Blanco County | Rural | No | 216.1 (122.1, 348.4) | 7 (1, 141) | 4 |
|
|
McCulloch County | Rural | No | 222.6 (149.0, 320.4) | 6 (1, 107) | 6 |
|
|
Jim Hogg County | Rural | No | 225.9 (168.5, 297.0) | 5 (1, 68) | 11 | stable | 0.3 (-1.1, 1.8) |
Lynn County | Urban | No | 227.7 (149.4, 332.0) | 4 (1, 106) | 6 |
|
|
Hudspeth County | Urban | No | 237.8 (144.3, 365.9) | 3 (1, 125) | 4 |
|
|
Anderson County | Rural | No | 304.3 (232.6, 389.2) | 2 (1, 15) | 16 |
|
|
Mason County | Rural | No | 342.0 (196.7, 552.4) | 1 (1, 121) | 4 |
|
|
Archer County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Armstrong County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Baylor County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Borden County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Bosque County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Bowie County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Briscoe County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Callahan County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Camp County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Carson County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Cass County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Childress County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Clay County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Cochran County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Coke County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Coleman County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Collingsworth County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Comanche County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Concho County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Cottle County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Crane County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Crosby County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Culberson County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Dallam County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Delta County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Dickens County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Donley County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Eastland County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Edwards County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Falls County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Fannin County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Fisher County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Foard County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Franklin County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Freestone County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Garza County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Glasscock County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Gray County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hall County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hamilton County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hansford County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hardeman County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hardin County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Harrison County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hartley County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Haskell County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hemphill County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hood County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hopkins County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Houston County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hutchinson County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Irion County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Jack County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Jasper County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Davis County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Kenedy County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Kent County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Kimble County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
King County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Kinney County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Knox County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Lamar County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Lee County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Leon County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Limestone County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Lipscomb County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Llano County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Loving County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Madison County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Marion County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Martin County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
McMullen County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Menard County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Mills County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Montague County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Morris County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Motley County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Newton County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Ochiltree County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Oldham County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Orange County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Panola County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Rains County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Reagan County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Real County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Red River County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Roberts County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Sabine County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
San Augustine County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
San Jacinto County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
San Saba County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Schleicher County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Shackelford County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Shelby County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Sherman County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Somervell County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Stephens County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Sterling County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Stonewall County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Terrell County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Throckmorton County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Trinity County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Tyler County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Upshur County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Upton County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Wheeler County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Young County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/02/2024 10:22 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
NHIA (NAACCR Hispanic Identification Algorithm) was used for Hispanic Ethnicity (see Technical Notes section of the USCS).
Statistics for minorities may be affected by inconsistent race identification between the cancer case reports (sources for numerator of rate) and data from the Census Bureau (source for denominator of rate); and from undercounts of some population groups in the census.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/02/2024 10:22 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
NHIA (NAACCR Hispanic Identification Algorithm) was used for Hispanic Ethnicity (see Technical Notes section of the USCS).
Statistics for minorities may be affected by inconsistent race identification between the cancer case reports (sources for numerator of rate) and data from the Census Bureau (source for denominator of rate); and from undercounts of some population groups in the census.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.