Death Rates Table
Death Rate Report for Texas by County
All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65
Sorted by CI*Rank
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate † deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | N/A | Yes | 44.8 (44.5, 45.2) | N/A | 12,984 |
falling 
|
-1.6 (-1.8, -1.2) |
| United States | N/A | Yes | 45.0 (44.9, 45.1) | N/A | 161,722 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-2.4, -1.9) |
| Anderson County | Rural | Yes | 105.4 (94.3, 117.6) | 1 (1, 11) | 67 |
stable 
|
-1.0 (-4.6, 3.9) |
| Jim Hogg County | Rural | Yes | 105.1 (64.2, 162.4) | 2 (1, 183) | 4 |
|
|
| Red River County | Rural | Yes | 92.2 (69.8, 120.6) | 3 (1, 97) | 13 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.3, 1.6) |
| Baylor County | Rural | Yes | 92.2 (51.7, 154.5) | 4 (1, 198) | 3 |
|
|
| Newton County | Rural | Yes | 90.3 (67.3, 119.3) | 5 (1, 123) | 12 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.3, 0.7) |
| Mason County | Rural | Yes | 87.8 (47.7, 150.3) | 6 (1, 200) | 3 |
|
|
| Lynn County | Urban | Yes | 86.1 (54.0, 131.0) | 7 (1, 196) | 5 |
|
|
| Duval County | Rural | Yes | 84.4 (59.0, 117.1) | 8 (1, 173) | 8 |
stable
|
0.9 (-0.8, 2.7) |
| Aransas County | Urban | Yes | 84.2 (68.0, 103.4) | 9 (1, 89) | 24 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.0, 1.0) |
| McCulloch County | Rural | Yes | 79.9 (53.8, 115.6) | 10 (1, 185) | 7 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.6, 1.8) |
| Hamilton County | Rural | Yes | 79.9 (52.7, 116.8) | 11 (1, 190) | 7 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.7, 2.0) |
| Kimble County | Rural | Yes | 79.8 (44.6, 134.5) | 12 (1, 200) | 4 |
|
|
| Haskell County | Rural | Yes | 79.1 (49.3, 122.5) | 13 (1, 198) | 5 |
|
|
| Robertson County | Urban | Yes | 78.5 (60.2, 101.0) | 14 (1, 126) | 14 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.7, 0.5) |
| Franklin County | Rural | Yes | 78.4 (55.5, 108.2) | 15 (1, 178) | 9 |
stable
|
5.5 (-0.1, 28.3) |
| Zavala County | Rural | Yes | 78.4 (53.2, 111.2) | 16 (1, 183) | 6 |
stable
|
0.7 (-1.0, 2.6) |
| Trinity County | Rural | Yes | 77.5 (58.5, 101.8) | 17 (1, 142) | 14 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.7, 1.5) |
| Kleberg County | Rural | Yes | 77.5 (62.1, 95.6) | 18 (2, 123) | 18 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.3, 2.1) |
| Jim Wells County | Rural | Yes | 76.9 (64.5, 91.0) | 19 (3, 86) | 29 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.0, 1.0) |
| Brooks County | Rural | Yes | 76.7 (48.2, 116.0) | 20 (1, 197) | 5 |
stable
|
0.2 (-2.4, 2.9) |
| Jasper County | Rural | Yes | 75.2 (62.3, 90.2) | 21 (3, 115) | 27 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.4, 5.1) |
| Hill County | Rural | Yes | 72.5 (60.7, 86.3) | 22 (4, 118) | 30 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-1.8, 0.1) |
| Dimmit County | Rural | Yes | 72.4 (47.9, 105.3) | 23 (1, 191) | 6 |
|
|
| Henderson County | Rural | Yes | 70.9 (63.1, 79.5) | 24 (10, 87) | 70 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.3, 0.0) |
| Delta County | Rural | Yes | 70.8 (43.0, 111.9) | 25 (1, 200) | 5 |
|
|
| Wilbarger County | Rural | Yes | 70.8 (51.7, 95.1) | 26 (1, 183) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-2.1, 0.3) |
| Wood County | Rural | Yes | 70.4 (59.6, 82.8) | 27 (6, 118) | 38 |
stable
|
1.3 (-0.4, 11.5) |
| Sabine County | Rural | Yes | 70.2 (48.7, 99.8) | 28 (1, 186) | 9 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.9, 0.6) |
| Polk County | Rural | Yes | 70.0 (60.5, 80.7) | 29 (8, 104) | 46 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.7, -0.1) |
| Madison County | Rural | Yes | 69.7 (49.8, 95.0) | 30 (2, 184) | 8 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.5, 0.7) |
| Frio County | Rural | Yes | 69.3 (51.2, 91.7) | 31 (2, 178) | 10 |
stable
|
0.3 (-1.3, 2.2) |
| Mills County | Rural | Yes | 69.3 (37.9, 119.4) | 32 (1, 200) | 3 |
|
|
| Nolan County | Rural | Yes | 69.1 (51.1, 91.6) | 33 (3, 179) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-2.0, 0.3) |
| Lamar County | Rural | Yes | 68.9 (58.8, 80.4) | 34 (6, 111) | 36 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.9, -0.4) |
| Cass County | Rural | Yes | 68.8 (56.2, 83.8) | 35 (5, 140) | 23 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.6, 0.2) |
| San Jacinto County | Urban | Yes | 68.7 (55.4, 84.5) | 36 (4, 140) | 22 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.7, 0.8) |
| Limestone County | Rural | Yes | 68.6 (53.6, 86.7) | 37 (4, 158) | 16 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.8, -0.2) |
| Martin County | Urban | Yes | 68.2 (39.9, 109.6) | 38 (1, 200) | 4 |
|
|
| Leon County | Rural | Yes | 67.6 (51.1, 88.6) | 39 (3, 173) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-1.8, 0.0) |
| Coleman County | Rural | Yes | 67.6 (45.5, 98.9) | 40 (1, 196) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-2.1, 1.8) |
| Morris County | Rural | Yes | 67.3 (48.1, 92.4) | 41 (2, 185) | 9 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.3, 0.3) |
| Llano County | Rural | Yes | 67.3 (51.8, 86.8) | 42 (4, 169) | 18 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.4, 0.8) |
| Liberty County | Urban | Yes | 66.6 (59.3, 74.6) | 43 (15, 100) | 63 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.5, -1.0) |
| Childress County | Rural | Yes | 66.5 (40.4, 103.8) | 44 (1, 200) | 4 |
stable
|
0.9 (-0.6, 2.5) |
| Hutchinson County | Rural | Yes | 66.3 (51.2, 84.7) | 45 (4, 171) | 15 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.3, 0.8) |
| Fannin County | Rural | Yes | 66.3 (55.4, 78.9) | 46 (9, 139) | 28 |
stable
|
2.3 (-0.6, 14.4) |
| Callahan County | Urban | Yes | 65.2 (48.5, 86.7) | 47 (3, 180) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.7, 0.4) |
| Terry County | Rural | Yes | 65.2 (45.2, 91.1) | 48 (2, 197) | 7 |
stable
|
20.8 (-0.3, 39.4) |
| Eastland County | Rural | Yes | 65.0 (48.5, 85.7) | 49 (5, 180) | 12 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-2.5, 0.1) |
| Castro County | Rural | Yes | 65.0 (38.9, 101.7) | 50 (1, 200) | 4 |
stable
|
3.2 (-0.7, 18.6) |
| Camp County | Rural | Yes | 64.8 (45.5, 89.8) | 51 (1, 194) | 8 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-2.5, 0.1) |
| Brown County | Rural | Yes | 64.7 (54.0, 77.2) | 52 (8, 150) | 28 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-1.9, 0.0) |
| Live Oak County | Rural | Yes | 64.4 (44.1, 91.3) | 53 (2, 197) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.8, 1.4) |
| Shelby County | Rural | Yes | 64.4 (50.9, 80.6) | 54 (6, 171) | 17 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.7, -1.2) |
| Burleson County | Urban | Yes | 64.3 (48.6, 83.8) | 55 (5, 179) | 13 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-3.1, 0.0) |
| Stephens County | Rural | Yes | 64.2 (42.7, 93.5) | 56 (2, 200) | 6 |
stable
|
-1.4 (-3.2, 0.3) |
| Palo Pinto County | Rural | Yes | 63.9 (51.4, 78.8) | 57 (8, 171) | 21 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.6, 7.1) |
| Bosque County | Urban | Yes | 63.5 (48.4, 82.4) | 58 (5, 177) | 14 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.8, 0.5) |
| Freestone County | Rural | Yes | 63.5 (48.5, 82.0) | 59 (5, 178) | 13 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.0, 0.1) |
| Colorado County | Rural | Yes | 63.4 (48.9, 81.2) | 60 (6, 180) | 15 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-2.0, -0.2) |
| La Salle County | Rural | Yes | 63.3 (37.4, 100.6) | 61 (1, 200) | 4 |
|
|
| Hunt County | Urban | Yes | 63.0 (56.3, 70.3) | 62 (19, 116) | 70 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.7, -0.4) |
| Swisher County | Rural | Yes | 62.9 (38.4, 97.8) | 63 (1, 200) | 4 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-2.2, 2.0) |
| Tyler County | Rural | Yes | 62.7 (48.0, 80.9) | 64 (6, 181) | 14 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.1, -0.4) |
| Milam County | Rural | Yes | 62.6 (49.6, 78.3) | 65 (7, 170) | 18 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.9, 0.8) |
| Bee County | Rural | Yes | 62.4 (50.1, 77.0) | 66 (10, 172) | 18 |
stable
|
3.0 (-0.9, 16.3) |
| Jones County | Urban | Yes | 62.2 (47.6, 80.3) | 67 (6, 180) | 13 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.2, 0.3) |
| Angelina County | Rural | Yes | 62.1 (54.7, 70.3) | 68 (17, 128) | 55 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.5, 7.0) |
| Upshur County | Urban | Yes | 61.8 (51.8, 73.5) | 69 (13, 146) | 30 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.6, -0.6) |
| San Augustine County | Rural | Yes | 61.3 (41.8, 89.5) | 70 (3, 198) | 7 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-2.8, 0.2) |
| Matagorda County | Rural | Yes | 61.1 (50.3, 73.8) | 71 (14, 161) | 25 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-1.8, 0.0) |
| Taylor County | Urban | Yes | 61.1 (55.0, 67.8) | 72 (25, 121) | 78 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.5, -0.5) |
| Bowie County | Urban | Yes | 60.9 (54.0, 68.6) | 73 (22, 129) | 60 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.8, -0.7) |
| Cherokee County | Rural | Yes | 60.7 (51.4, 71.3) | 74 (17, 157) | 32 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.5, -0.9) |
| Floyd County | Rural | Yes | 60.2 (33.5, 100.8) | 75 (1, 200) | 3 |
|
|
| San Patricio County | Urban | Yes | 60.0 (51.8, 69.0) | 76 (23, 142) | 41 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.1, 0.0) |
| Orange County | Urban | Yes | 59.9 (52.9, 67.7) | 77 (26, 136) | 57 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.9, -0.8) |
| Ector County | Urban | Yes | 59.5 (53.9, 65.6) | 78 (35, 127) | 83 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.9, -0.5) |
| Wichita County | Urban | Yes | 59.5 (53.4, 66.1) | 79 (29, 128) | 77 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.9, -0.8) |
| Panola County | Rural | Yes | 59.3 (46.3, 75.3) | 80 (10, 182) | 16 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.4, 0.2) |
| Grayson County | Urban | Yes | 59.1 (53.5, 65.1) | 81 (35, 126) | 92 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.9, -0.8) |
| Potter County | Urban | Yes | 59.0 (52.7, 65.9) | 82 (34, 134) | 67 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.3, -1.4) |
| Gregg County | Urban | Yes | 58.5 (52.4, 65.1) | 83 (36, 137) | 73 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.1, -1.3) |
| Navarro County | Rural | Yes | 58.4 (49.3, 68.7) | 84 (23, 166) | 32 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.6, -0.8) |
| Karnes County | Rural | Yes | 57.9 (41.5, 79.0) | 85 (6, 197) | 8 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-2.0, 0.9) |
| Mitchell County | Rural | Yes | 57.5 (36.2, 87.2) | 86 (3, 200) | 5 |
|
|
| Rains County | Rural | Yes | 57.3 (41.5, 78.4) | 87 (9, 197) | 10 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.2, 0.4) |
| Van Zandt County | Rural | Yes | 57.2 (48.9, 66.6) | 88 (23, 154) | 39 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.1, -0.7) |
| Calhoun County | Rural | Yes | 56.9 (43.1, 74.1) | 89 (13, 189) | 13 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.5, -0.1) |
| Victoria County | Urban | Yes | 56.8 (49.7, 64.5) | 90 (36, 152) | 51 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.5, -0.3) |
| Young County | Rural | Yes | 56.7 (41.6, 75.8) | 91 (7, 195) | 11 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.1, 0.1) |
| Atascosa County | Urban | Yes | 56.6 (47.5, 67.0) | 92 (23, 174) | 29 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.5, 0.4) |
| Nacogdoches County | Rural | Yes | 56.5 (47.9, 66.2) | 93 (28, 166) | 34 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.3, -0.7) |
| Rusk County | Urban | Yes | 56.4 (47.8, 66.2) | 94 (24, 168) | 33 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.5, -1.0) |
| Hardin County | Urban | Yes | 55.9 (47.6, 65.3) | 95 (30, 166) | 35 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.2, -0.8) |
| Uvalde County | Rural | Yes | 55.7 (42.4, 71.9) | 96 (11, 189) | 12 |
stable
|
4.8 (-1.2, 24.2) |
| Harrison County | Urban | Yes | 55.6 (48.2, 63.9) | 97 (32, 163) | 44 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.3, -1.0) |
| Hockley County | Urban | Yes | 55.1 (41.3, 72.2) | 98 (12, 194) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.8, 1.1) |
| Lampasas County | Urban | Yes | 55.1 (42.3, 70.9) | 99 (14, 189) | 14 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-3.4, -1.2) |
| Jefferson County | Urban | Yes | 55.0 (51.0, 59.3) | 100 (58, 136) | 150 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.9, -1.1) |
| Runnels County | Rural | Yes | 55.0 (36.2, 81.0) | 101 (5, 200) | 6 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-3.0, 0.5) |
| Hopkins County | Rural | Yes | 54.7 (44.6, 66.5) | 102 (23, 182) | 22 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.7, -0.7) |
| Lubbock County | Urban | Yes | 54.5 (50.6, 58.7) | 103 (59, 137) | 150 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.4, -0.7) |
| Wise County | Urban | Yes | 54.4 (47.1, 62.6) | 104 (37, 166) | 44 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.1, -0.6) |
| Comanche County | Rural | Yes | 54.2 (37.1, 76.9) | 105 (6, 200) | 8 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-16.1, -0.4) |
| Wharton County | Rural | Yes | 54.0 (44.3, 65.2) | 106 (27, 180) | 24 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.4, -0.4) |
| Galveston County | Urban | Yes | 53.5 (50.2, 57.0) | 107 (72, 138) | 210 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.0, -1.4) |
| Lee County | Rural | Yes | 53.2 (39.2, 71.0) | 108 (17, 197) | 11 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-3.3, -0.8) |
| Moore County | Rural | Yes | 53.0 (39.0, 70.4) | 109 (12, 195) | 10 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-3.0, 0.0) |
| Grimes County | Rural | Yes | 53.0 (42.3, 65.9) | 110 (26, 190) | 19 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.0, -0.4) |
| Lavaca County | Rural | Yes | 52.9 (39.6, 69.7) | 111 (12, 193) | 12 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.3, 0.8) |
| Starr County | Rural | Yes | 52.9 (44.4, 62.5) | 112 (39, 178) | 28 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.4, 1.7) |
| McLennan County | Urban | Yes | 52.6 (48.5, 56.9) | 113 (68, 150) | 130 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.8, -1.1) |
| Houston County | Rural | Yes | 52.5 (40.8, 67.1) | 114 (21, 192) | 15 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-3.2, -1.6) |
| Yoakum County | Rural | Yes | 52.1 (30.9, 82.5) | 115 (4, 200) | 4 |
|
|
| Titus County | Rural | Yes | 51.9 (40.5, 65.5) | 116 (27, 193) | 15 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-3.4, -0.6) |
| Hood County | Rural | Yes | 51.8 (43.9, 60.7) | 117 (46, 179) | 37 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-3.2, -1.5) |
| Gray County | Rural | Yes | 51.6 (38.8, 67.5) | 118 (18, 196) | 11 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.4, -0.1) |
| Kaufman County | Urban | Yes | 51.4 (46.3, 56.9) | 119 (63, 162) | 77 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-2.8, -1.8) |
| Gonzales County | Rural | Yes | 51.4 (37.7, 68.5) | 120 (14, 198) | 10 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.7, -0.1) |
| Clay County | Urban | Yes | 51.1 (33.6, 75.9) | 121 (8, 200) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.7, 1.4) |
| Falls County | Urban | Yes | 50.9 (37.0, 68.7) | 122 (15, 198) | 10 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.9, -0.7) |
| Caldwell County | Urban | Yes | 50.8 (42.1, 60.9) | 123 (45, 183) | 25 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.9, -0.8) |
| DeWitt County | Rural | Yes | 50.4 (37.9, 66.3) | 124 (19, 198) | 12 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-3.0, -0.3) |
| Coryell County | Urban | Yes | 49.9 (42.7, 58.0) | 125 (51, 183) | 35 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.3, -0.7) |
| Nueces County | Urban | Yes | 49.9 (46.6, 53.4) | 126 (89, 157) | 178 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.7, -0.2) |
| Hale County | Rural | Yes | 49.9 (39.2, 62.6) | 127 (26, 193) | 16 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.2, 1.0) |
| Chambers County | Urban | Yes | 49.8 (41.0, 59.9) | 128 (45, 186) | 23 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-3.1, -1.3) |
| Montague County | Rural | Yes | 49.6 (37.2, 65.4) | 129 (17, 198) | 12 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.9, -0.5) |
| Cooke County | Rural | Yes | 49.5 (40.3, 60.4) | 130 (41, 188) | 23 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.9, -1.0) |
| Dallam County | Rural | Yes | 49.1 (27.9, 80.1) | 131 (5, 200) | 3 |
|
|
| Burnet County | Rural | Yes | 49.0 (40.9, 58.5) | 132 (53, 188) | 30 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.5, -0.8) |
| Bell County | Urban | Yes | 49.0 (45.6, 52.6) | 133 (94, 163) | 161 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.1, -1.4) |
| Smith County | Urban | Yes | 48.8 (44.7, 53.2) | 134 (88, 166) | 114 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-2.6, -1.6) |
| Howard County | Rural | Yes | 48.8 (39.1, 60.3) | 135 (39, 194) | 18 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.7, -1.0) |
| Fayette County | Rural | Yes | 48.5 (36.7, 63.2) | 136 (23, 198) | 14 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-3.1, -0.8) |
| Bandera County | Urban | Yes | 48.4 (37.2, 62.9) | 137 (29, 197) | 16 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-3.0, 0.1) |
| Bastrop County | Urban | Yes | 48.2 (42.2, 54.7) | 138 (75, 181) | 52 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-2.9, -1.3) |
| Val Verde County | Rural | Yes | 48.1 (38.9, 58.7) | 139 (44, 190) | 19 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.4, -0.2) |
| Jackson County | Rural | Yes | 48.0 (33.7, 67.0) | 140 (20, 200) | 8 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.3, 0.2) |
| Kerr County | Rural | Yes | 47.9 (39.6, 57.7) | 141 (54, 187) | 28 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.5, -0.8) |
| Waller County | Urban | Yes | 47.9 (39.6, 57.4) | 142 (51, 190) | 25 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.7, -1.0) |
| Austin County | Urban | Yes | 47.8 (37.6, 60.3) | 143 (37, 198) | 17 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-3.1, -0.8) |
| Tom Green County | Urban | Yes | 47.8 (42.1, 54.2) | 144 (80, 180) | 54 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.8, -0.7) |
| Ellis County | Urban | Yes | 47.2 (43.0, 51.8) | 145 (96, 177) | 96 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-2.6, -1.6) |
| Dawson County | Rural | Yes | 46.7 (30.6, 68.4) | 146 (14, 200) | 6 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-2.0, 1.3) |
| Johnson County | Urban | Yes | 46.5 (42.2, 51.2) | 147 (97, 179) | 90 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.2, -1.2) |
| Willacy County | Rural | Yes | 46.4 (32.9, 63.5) | 148 (23, 200) | 8 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.6, 1.5) |
| Webb County | Urban | Yes | 46.4 (42.4, 50.6) | 149 (104, 178) | 103 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.2, 0.2) |
| Brazoria County | Urban | Yes | 46.1 (43.1, 49.3) | 150 (112, 173) | 178 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.2, -1.5) |
| Wilson County | Urban | Yes | 45.5 (37.9, 54.4) | 151 (66, 194) | 27 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.4, -0.6) |
| Bexar County | Urban | Yes | 45.4 (44.0, 46.8) | 152 (129, 165) | 857 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-1.6, 1.0) |
| Pecos County | Rural | Yes | 45.2 (30.9, 64.0) | 153 (22, 200) | 7 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-3.0, 0.2) |
| Cameron County | Urban | Yes | 45.2 (42.1, 48.4) | 154 (119, 176) | 164 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.1, -0.2) |
| San Saba County | Rural | Yes | 44.7 (25.4, 76.3) | 155 (9, 200) | 3 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-2.6, 2.2) |
| Dallas County | Urban | Yes | 44.3 (43.2, 45.5) | 156 (137, 170) | 1,124 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-2.3, -2.0) |
| Winkler County | Rural | Yes | 44.0 (26.5, 69.7) | 157 (10, 200) | 4 |
falling
|
-3.9 (-19.2, -2.2) |
| Marion County | Rural | Yes | 44.0 (28.5, 67.1) | 158 (19, 200) | 6 |
falling
|
-18.8 (-36.7, -3.2) |
| Guadalupe County | Urban | Yes | 43.8 (39.5, 48.5) | 159 (115, 184) | 79 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-7.5, -0.2) |
| Midland County | Urban | Yes | 43.7 (39.0, 48.7) | 160 (112, 186) | 67 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.2, -1.1) |
| Parker County | Urban | Yes | 43.6 (39.1, 48.5) | 161 (112, 185) | 74 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.5, -1.5) |
| Washington County | Rural | Yes | 43.4 (34.0, 54.9) | 162 (59, 199) | 17 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-3.2, -1.2) |
| Erath County | Rural | Yes | 43.4 (34.0, 54.5) | 163 (65, 199) | 16 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.2, -0.3) |
| Medina County | Urban | Yes | 43.4 (35.7, 52.3) | 164 (82, 198) | 24 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.0, -0.5) |
| Tarrant County | Urban | Yes | 43.2 (42.0, 44.5) | 165 (140, 175) | 926 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.1, -1.7) |
| Ward County | Rural | Yes | 42.9 (26.4, 65.9) | 166 (16, 200) | 4 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-3.5, 0.7) |
| Harris County | Urban | Yes | 42.7 (41.9, 43.6) | 167 (148, 176) | 1,951 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-2.3, -2.1) |
| Reeves County | Rural | Yes | 42.5 (27.7, 62.4) | 168 (31, 200) | 5 |
stable
|
-1.4 (-3.1, 0.3) |
| El Paso County | Urban | Yes | 42.4 (40.3, 44.5) | 169 (139, 181) | 335 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.9, 0.6) |
| Maverick County | Urban | Yes | 41.9 (34.1, 50.9) | 170 (82, 199) | 20 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.5, 0.6) |
| Randall County | Urban | Yes | 41.6 (36.9, 46.9) | 171 (119, 190) | 59 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.0, -0.7) |
| Hidalgo County | Urban | Yes | 41.4 (39.3, 43.6) | 172 (146, 183) | 289 |
stable
|
3.8 (-1.1, 7.0) |
| Deaf Smith County | Rural | Yes | 41.3 (28.2, 58.4) | 173 (48, 200) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-2.3, 0.5) |
| Montgomery County | Urban | Yes | 41.2 (39.0, 43.4) | 174 (145, 184) | 275 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-2.8, -2.0) |
| Jack County | Rural | Yes | 41.1 (24.8, 65.3) | 175 (20, 200) | 4 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-4.0, -0.4) |
| Goliad County | Urban | Yes | 40.9 (22.5, 70.3) | 176 (14, 200) | 3 |
falling
|
-24.2 (-50.5, -1.3) |
| Parmer County | Rural | Yes | 40.9 (23.8, 65.4) | 177 (19, 200) | 4 |
|
|
| Gaines County | Rural | Yes | 40.6 (28.2, 56.4) | 178 (51, 200) | 7 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-3.6, -0.5) |
| Refugio County | Rural | Yes | 40.3 (23.3, 67.5) | 179 (20, 200) | 4 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-2.5, 2.5) |
| Comal County | Urban | Yes | 40.2 (36.1, 44.6) | 180 (135, 191) | 79 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.2, -1.1) |
| Zapata County | Rural | Yes | 39.9 (24.9, 60.4) | 181 (25, 200) | 4 |
|
|
| Walker County | Rural | Yes | 38.9 (32.9, 45.8) | 182 (124, 199) | 31 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.7, -1.0) |
| Lamb County | Rural | Yes | 38.7 (25.2, 57.4) | 183 (35, 200) | 6 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.8, -0.1) |
| Scurry County | Rural | Yes | 38.3 (26.1, 54.5) | 184 (46, 200) | 7 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.8, -0.3) |
| Somervell County | Rural | Yes | 37.9 (23.1, 60.1) | 185 (33, 200) | 4 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-3.2, -0.2) |
| Archer County | Urban | Yes | 37.7 (23.5, 59.5) | 186 (25, 200) | 5 |
falling
|
-2.9 (-4.6, -1.2) |
| Blanco County | Rural | Yes | 37.4 (24.6, 56.7) | 187 (47, 200) | 6 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-3.0, 1.3) |
| Andrews County | Rural | Yes | 36.8 (25.0, 52.3) | 188 (56, 200) | 6 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-3.6, -0.9) |
| Kendall County | Urban | Yes | 36.1 (28.8, 45.0) | 189 (110, 200) | 19 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-3.1, -1.2) |
| Brewster County | Rural | Yes | 35.7 (20.6, 58.8) | 190 (33, 200) | 4 |
falling
|
-2.7 (-4.4, -1.0) |
| Hays County | Urban | Yes | 35.7 (32.2, 39.4) | 191 (164, 198) | 80 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.5, -1.1) |
| Brazos County | Urban | Yes | 34.9 (31.1, 39.2) | 192 (167, 199) | 62 |
falling
|
-2.5 (-3.1, -1.8) |
| Rockwall County | Urban | Yes | 34.7 (30.0, 40.0) | 193 (156, 200) | 40 |
falling
|
-2.7 (-3.5, -1.8) |
| Gillespie County | Rural | Yes | 33.8 (24.1, 46.6) | 194 (99, 200) | 10 |
falling
|
-2.6 (-4.0, -1.1) |
| Williamson County | Urban | Yes | 33.8 (31.7, 35.9) | 195 (176, 198) | 205 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-2.4, 1.5) |
| Fort Bend County | Urban | Yes | 33.1 (31.4, 34.9) | 196 (180, 199) | 286 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.4, -1.6) |
| Ochiltree County | Rural | Yes | 32.8 (18.4, 54.3) | 197 (41, 200) | 3 |
falling
|
-3.0 (-4.9, -1.3) |
| Travis County | Urban | Yes | 32.3 (30.9, 33.8) | 198 (183, 199) | 405 |
falling
|
-2.7 (-2.9, -2.5) |
| Denton County | Urban | Yes | 32.3 (30.7, 33.9) | 199 (182, 199) | 308 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-2.7, -2.1) |
| Collin County | Urban | Yes | 29.3 (27.9, 30.8) | 200 (189, 200) | 327 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-2.6, -2.0) |
| Armstrong County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Bailey County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Borden County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Briscoe County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Carson County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Cochran County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Coke County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Collingsworth County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Concho County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Cottle County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Crane County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Crockett County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Crosby County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Culberson County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Dickens County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Donley County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Edwards County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Fisher County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Foard County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Garza County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Glasscock County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hall County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hansford County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hardeman County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hartley County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hemphill County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hudspeth County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Irion County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jeff Davis County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Kenedy County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Kent County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| King County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Kinney County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Knox County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Lipscomb County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Loving County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| McMullen County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Menard County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Motley County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Oldham County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Presidio County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Reagan County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Real County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Roberts County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Schleicher County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Shackelford County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sherman County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sterling County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stonewall County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sutton County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Terrell County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Throckmorton County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Upton County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Wheeler County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:00 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:00 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.