Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas No 154.9 (154.0, 155.7) N/A 26,329 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
United States 6 No 154.4 (154.1, 154.6) N/A 464,265 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Anderson County No 211.8 (194.0, 231.1) 14 (5, 76) 109 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Andrews County No 174.1 (138.1, 217.3) 93 (8, 219) 17 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Angelina County No 165.8 (153.3, 179.3) 125 (52, 183) 136 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -1.0)
Aransas County No 187.2 (165.8, 211.8) 49 (12, 173) 70 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Archer County No 142.8 (114.3, 177.5) 190 (34, 226) 18 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Armstrong County No 155.5 (99.4, 242.8) 164 (2, 228) 5
*
*
Atascosa County No 157.8 (136.6, 181.8) 157 (32, 217) 42 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Austin County No 144.5 (126.3, 165.3) 186 (70, 221) 50 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Bailey County No 172.7 (117.2, 251.3) 99 (2, 228) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Bandera County No 157.3 (138.1, 179.5) 159 (38, 210) 58 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Bastrop County No 172.3 (158.5, 187.2) 102 (35, 178) 127 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Baylor County No 244.4 (188.4, 316.9) 6 (1, 164) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Bee County No 176.5 (147.1, 210.9) 85 (9, 208) 26 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Bell County No 172.1 (163.9, 180.5) 103 (55, 150) 345 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Bexar County No 154.0 (150.0, 158.1) 166 (129, 180) 1,191 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
Blanco County No 168.3 (140.6, 201.7) 120 (13, 212) 30 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Bosque County No 195.0 (170.9, 222.5) 34 (7, 159) 56 stable stable trend 7.7 (-4.0, 20.8)
Bowie County No 176.3 (164.0, 189.3) 87 (32, 152) 160 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Brazoria County No 174.1 (166.3, 182.2) 94 (53, 138) 390 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
Brazos County Yes 122.6 (113.8, 131.9) 216 (189, 223) 149 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.5)
Brewster County Yes 121.3 (89.5, 164.9) 217 (50, 228) 12 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
Briscoe County No 162.4 (99.9, 276.2) 141 (1, 228) 4
*
*
Brown County No 171.4 (154.5, 189.9) 106 (30, 185) 82 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Burleson County No 149.9 (127.6, 176.1) 179 (49, 220) 34 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Burnet County No 155.7 (141.8, 170.9) 163 (74, 204) 105 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Caldwell County No 162.8 (141.9, 186.7) 140 (31, 209) 46 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Calhoun County No 189.0 (159.4, 223.9) 45 (6, 194) 34 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Callahan County No 173.9 (147.4, 204.5) 95 (13, 204) 33 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Cameron County No 123.9 (112.6, 136.5) 214 (177, 224) 119 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Camp County No 184.9 (152.0, 224.3) 60 (6, 205) 24 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Carson County No 138.9 (104.1, 183.6) 198 (27, 228) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.6)
Cass County No 170.0 (152.0, 189.9) 110 (30, 192) 69 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Castro County Yes 107.9 (67.1, 171.8) 223 (26, 228) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Chambers County No 176.3 (155.5, 199.3) 86 (19, 191) 55 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Cherokee County No 164.9 (149.2, 182.2) 129 (43, 192) 87 stable stable trend -0.7 (-11.2, 11.0)
Childress County No 197.8 (148.9, 259.4) 28 (1, 217) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.7)
Clay County No 174.3 (144.6, 209.5) 92 (9, 212) 27 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Cochran County No 157.8 (88.6, 279.6) 158 (1, 228) 3
*
*
Coke County No 213.2 (162.5, 283.2) 13 (1, 211) 12 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Coleman County No 210.0 (173.7, 253.9) 17 (2, 175) 27 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Collin County No 129.1 (125.1, 133.1) 210 (191, 218) 835 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
Collingsworth County Yes 116.9 (67.5, 198.2) 220 (12, 228) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Colorado County No 142.2 (120.1, 168.4) 192 (71, 223) 36 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Comal County No 150.8 (142.1, 159.9) 177 (118, 198) 243 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Comanche County No 141.3 (116.6, 171.2) 194 (41, 225) 28 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Concho County Yes 106.2 (60.7, 188.6) 224 (21, 228) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.5)
Cooke County No 171.9 (155.4, 190.0) 104 (29, 182) 86 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Coryell County No 204.7 (186.4, 224.5) 20 (9, 103) 93 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.3)
Crane County No 282.3 (185.8, 416.7) 2 (1, 212) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.6)
Crockett County No 290.7 (178.7, 458.2) 1 (1, 219) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.7)
Crosby County No 177.4 (125.5, 252.1) 80 (2, 226) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Dallam County No 164.3 (113.5, 231.0) 132 (3, 227) 7 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Dallas County No 152.3 (149.0, 155.6) 169 (138, 183) 1,769 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
Dawson County No 160.8 (121.2, 211.5) 150 (7, 226) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
DeWitt County No 193.3 (167.0, 223.7) 38 (6, 174) 42 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Deaf Smith County No 153.0 (116.9, 200.0) 167 (10, 225) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.7)
Delta County No 231.9 (182.0, 293.4) 7 (1, 182) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Denton County No 131.6 (127.1, 136.1) 207 (187, 216) 717 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -1.9)
Dickens County No 190.8 (119.5, 304.6) 43 (1, 227) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Donley County No 194.6 (135.5, 274.7) 35 (1, 224) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Eastland County No 173.4 (149.5, 200.6) 97 (17, 204) 44 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Ector County No 199.0 (183.9, 215.0) 25 (11, 99) 137 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Edwards County No 195.8 (109.4, 369.8) 31 (1, 228) 4
*
*
El Paso County No 160.9 (151.4, 170.9) 148 (82, 182) 225 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Ellis County No 166.1 (156.4, 176.3) 124 (64, 170) 230 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Erath County No 150.0 (132.9, 168.9) 178 (67, 213) 60 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Falls County No 185.3 (155.3, 220.6) 58 (7, 198) 30 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Fannin County No 175.4 (158.1, 194.5) 91 (22, 182) 79 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Fayette County No 126.0 (109.8, 144.8) 213 (145, 226) 51 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Fisher County No 161.9 (115.4, 228.1) 144 (4, 227) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Floyd County No 143.8 (98.1, 214.5) 187 (7, 228) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Fort Bend County No 131.5 (125.6, 137.6) 209 (180, 216) 402 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Franklin County No 181.2 (148.0, 220.6) 68 (7, 214) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Freestone County No 181.1 (155.9, 210.0) 69 (11, 194) 41 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Frio County No 169.6 (117.3, 240.4) 113 (2, 227) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Gaines County No 172.4 (136.3, 214.6) 100 (6, 222) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Galveston County No 175.8 (168.5, 183.3) 89 (50, 131) 463 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Garza County No 134.3 (90.4, 198.4) 204 (13, 228) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Gillespie County No 139.3 (123.2, 157.9) 197 (112, 222) 70 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Goliad County No 179.3 (135.0, 236.2) 73 (2, 222) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Gonzales County No 169.9 (141.3, 204.1) 111 (13, 215) 28 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Gray County No 162.9 (139.7, 189.5) 139 (21, 211) 38 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Grayson County No 180.5 (170.9, 190.5) 71 (33, 127) 284 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Gregg County No 173.3 (162.1, 185.1) 98 (44, 157) 192 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Grimes County No 161.4 (140.6, 185.1) 146 (30, 208) 47 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Guadalupe County No 158.2 (147.9, 169.1) 155 (87, 192) 182 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Hale County No 155.4 (131.8, 183.1) 165 (37, 219) 32 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Hall County Yes 109.8 (67.2, 189.2) 222 (20, 228) 4 falling falling trend -11.1 (-16.5, -5.3)
Hamilton County No 225.5 (186.2, 272.0) 9 (1, 145) 29 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 0.9)
Hansford County No 177.1 (125.1, 247.7) 83 (1, 225) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.3)
Hardeman County No 163.8 (114.7, 232.5) 134 (5, 227) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.8)
Hardin County No 165.4 (151.5, 180.3) 127 (51, 189) 109 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.6)
Harris County No 149.3 (146.7, 151.8) 182 (151, 189) 2,798 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
Harrison County No 149.4 (136.0, 163.9) 181 (91, 209) 95 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.3)
Hartley County Yes 118.0 (80.5, 169.6) 219 (33, 228) 7 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Haskell County No 195.5 (151.4, 253.1) 32 (2, 212) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Hays County No 143.8 (134.5, 153.5) 188 (133, 208) 193 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Hemphill County No 170.0 (112.3, 250.3) 109 (2, 227) 6
*
*
Henderson County No 181.8 (170.3, 194.1) 66 (29, 135) 207 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Hidalgo County Yes 120.0 (109.8, 131.1) 218 (192, 225) 156 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Hill County No 191.3 (172.5, 211.8) 41 (11, 145) 87 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Hockley County No 170.8 (142.7, 203.6) 107 (14, 215) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Hood County No 150.9 (139.6, 163.2) 174 (99, 205) 148 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.4)
Hopkins County No 168.4 (151.0, 187.6) 118 (31, 193) 72 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Houston County No 164.0 (141.7, 189.7) 133 (28, 208) 45 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Howard County No 163.3 (141.3, 188.1) 138 (26, 211) 42 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Hunt County No 178.1 (166.4, 190.5) 78 (33, 147) 182 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Hutchinson County No 196.7 (170.5, 226.3) 29 (6, 170) 44 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Jack County No 149.6 (118.0, 188.3) 180 (23, 225) 16 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Jackson County No 176.0 (146.2, 211.1) 88 (11, 209) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Jasper County No 173.8 (155.7, 193.7) 96 (22, 187) 73 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Jeff Davis County Yes 84.4 (46.1, 272.7) 228 (1, 228) 3
*
*
Jefferson County No 156.5 (147.7, 165.8) 161 (97, 191) 258 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Jim Wells County No 162.1 (129.2, 202.0) 142 (13, 221) 19 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Johnson County No 179.0 (169.7, 188.7) 75 (36, 131) 290 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
Jones County No 180.8 (153.0, 212.9) 70 (10, 205) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Karnes County No 136.6 (105.2, 176.9) 201 (34, 227) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Kaufman County No 186.9 (174.8, 199.7) 53 (23, 122) 184 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Kendall County No 126.5 (112.8, 141.6) 212 (164, 224) 69 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Kerr County No 158.0 (144.9, 172.3) 156 (63, 199) 137 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Kimble County No 204.1 (152.0, 274.0) 22 (1, 218) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Kinney County Yes 100.0 (60.4, 193.5) 226 (27, 228) 4 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.8)
Kleberg County No 248.3 (200.5, 304.9) 4 (1, 138) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Knox County No 186.2 (131.8, 263.5) 54 (1, 225) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Lamar County No 182.3 (166.7, 199.1) 64 (18, 153) 108 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Lamb County No 131.5 (99.5, 173.2) 208 (33, 228) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Lampasas County No 187.1 (163.6, 213.7) 50 (9, 180) 48 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Lavaca County No 162.0 (141.4, 185.7) 143 (30, 207) 48 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Lee County No 185.2 (157.4, 217.4) 59 (8, 194) 35 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Leon County No 188.5 (163.5, 217.2) 46 (9, 183) 47 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Liberty County No 209.5 (194.0, 225.9) 18 (7, 70) 144 stable stable trend -5.0 (-19.9, 12.7)
Limestone County No 175.7 (150.3, 204.8) 90 (15, 200) 41 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.7)
Lipscomb County Yes 105.7 (65.1, 172.0) 225 (49, 228) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.1)
Live Oak County No 155.9 (123.8, 195.8) 162 (14, 224) 19 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Llano County No 152.0 (133.4, 173.6) 170 (57, 212) 71 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Lubbock County No 150.9 (143.4, 158.7) 175 (120, 197) 319 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
Lynn County No 210.4 (153.8, 284.2) 16 (1, 219) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Madison County No 176.9 (144.7, 215.2) 84 (7, 213) 22 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Marion County No 141.8 (113.2, 177.6) 193 (38, 226) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Martin County No 225.2 (157.3, 313.4) 10 (1, 222) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.6)
Mason County No 148.1 (105.3, 209.4) 184 (8, 227) 11 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.7)
Matagorda County No 211.3 (187.1, 238.4) 15 (3, 111) 62 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
McCulloch County No 201.0 (160.8, 250.9) 24 (2, 206) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
McLennan County No 158.9 (151.0, 167.1) 153 (92, 183) 327 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Medina County No 151.0 (133.5, 170.6) 173 (69, 214) 58 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Menard County No 185.6 (113.6, 310.6) 56 (1, 228) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.3)
Midland County No 147.1 (136.1, 158.7) 185 (114, 207) 144 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Milam County No 165.7 (144.8, 189.6) 126 (28, 206) 49 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Mills County No 177.3 (133.2, 235.9) 81 (2, 221) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Mitchell County No 227.7 (176.0, 291.8) 8 (1, 182) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Montague County No 183.6 (161.7, 208.3) 63 (13, 176) 55 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Montgomery County No 152.8 (147.9, 157.9) 168 (129, 187) 769 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
Moore County No 164.5 (131.3, 204.8) 131 (13, 221) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Morris County No 198.6 (165.7, 237.5) 26 (3, 184) 29 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Motley County No 254.4 (140.6, 439.9) 3 (1, 228) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.1)
Nacogdoches County No 164.9 (149.6, 181.5) 130 (44, 195) 92 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Navarro County No 187.1 (169.3, 206.5) 51 (15, 149) 89 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Newton County No 169.0 (139.8, 203.4) 115 (12, 216) 27 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.7, -0.9)
Nolan County No 223.6 (187.6, 265.6) 11 (1, 135) 31 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
Nueces County No 163.5 (154.7, 172.7) 135 (74, 174) 277 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
Ochiltree County No 139.8 (102.0, 189.4) 196 (18, 228) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Oldham County No 208.4 (123.6, 332.5) 19 (1, 228) 4
*
*
Orange County No 193.1 (180.3, 206.7) 39 (14, 105) 174 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Palo Pinto County No 177.9 (158.4, 199.6) 79 (19, 184) 66 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Panola County No 184.5 (161.6, 210.2) 61 (11, 185) 49 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Parker County No 168.9 (159.5, 178.7) 116 (57, 165) 254 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Parmer County No 132.4 (95.7, 183.9) 206 (24, 228) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Pecos County No 191.9 (143.8, 253.4) 40 (2, 220) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Polk County No 246.7 (226.4, 268.4) 5 (1, 27) 132 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.5)
Potter County No 187.3 (173.9, 201.5) 48 (21, 126) 153 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Rains County No 158.8 (132.7, 189.7) 154 (23, 219) 30 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Randall County No 141.0 (132.1, 150.5) 195 (141, 211) 194 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Real County No 189.3 (129.9, 275.9) 44 (1, 225) 9 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Red River County No 163.5 (136.0, 196.3) 136 (16, 219) 28 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Reeves County No 160.2 (104.0, 238.3) 151 (3, 228) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Refugio County No 181.9 (136.9, 243.9) 65 (3, 223) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Robertson County No 187.8 (158.0, 222.5) 47 (7, 191) 33 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Rockwall County No 142.5 (131.0, 154.8) 191 (123, 214) 118 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Runnels County No 181.6 (148.6, 221.9) 67 (7, 213) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Rusk County No 163.3 (147.9, 180.2) 137 (46, 196) 86 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Sabine County No 172.3 (144.9, 205.3) 101 (13, 211) 34 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
San Augustine County No 166.3 (133.9, 207.3) 123 (8, 221) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
San Jacinto County No 161.2 (142.1, 182.5) 147 (33, 206) 59 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.2, 4.6)
San Patricio County No 185.4 (166.0, 206.7) 57 (14, 159) 72 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
San Saba County No 136.5 (102.1, 184.1) 202 (28, 227) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Scurry County No 179.1 (149.1, 214.4) 74 (8, 204) 26 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Shackelford County Yes 114.8 (75.4, 172.7) 221 (35, 228) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -1.0)
Shelby County No 186.0 (162.4, 212.7) 55 (9, 179) 48 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Sherman County No 190.9 (121.8, 293.8) 42 (1, 228) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 2.9)
Smith County No 150.9 (143.4, 158.6) 176 (119, 195) 331 rising rising trend 6.1 (2.9, 9.4)
Somervell County No 177.2 (142.4, 219.2) 82 (6, 214) 20 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Stephens County No 198.5 (163.1, 241.0) 27 (2, 192) 24 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Stonewall County No 201.1 (111.1, 351.1) 23 (1, 228) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.6)
Sutton County No 138.1 (83.0, 233.8) 199 (4, 228) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.9, 0.0)
Swisher County No 168.9 (126.2, 225.8) 117 (6, 224) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Tarrant County No 157.3 (154.2, 160.5) 160 (121, 169) 2,015 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
Taylor County No 170.3 (159.7, 181.5) 108 (47, 165) 206 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Terry County No 148.9 (110.4, 198.2) 183 (13, 226) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Throckmorton County No 134.0 (79.9, 231.7) 205 (5, 228) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.6)
Titus County No 178.8 (154.7, 206.1) 76 (11, 196) 45 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Tom Green County No 161.4 (150.1, 173.5) 145 (70, 185) 159 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Travis County No 123.3 (119.4, 127.4) 215 (198, 221) 806 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Trinity County No 219.8 (191.8, 251.9) 12 (2, 104) 51 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Tyler County No 151.1 (131.7, 173.2) 171 (53, 218) 47 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Upshur County No 179.9 (162.9, 198.3) 72 (21, 167) 88 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Upton County No 169.7 (98.6, 277.6) 112 (1, 228) 4
*
*
Uvalde County No 204.1 (168.5, 246.8) 21 (3, 184) 28 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Val Verde County No 169.2 (135.3, 210.2) 114 (8, 220) 19 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Van Zandt County No 178.3 (164.6, 192.9) 77 (29, 156) 135 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Victoria County No 159.2 (145.4, 174.2) 152 (67, 198) 107 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Walker County No 143.7 (129.7, 158.9) 189 (109, 217) 80 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Waller County No 168.3 (148.2, 190.5) 119 (29, 197) 54 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Ward County No 171.5 (127.8, 226.3) 105 (5, 224) 11 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Washington County No 135.5 (120.0, 153.0) 203 (120, 223) 64 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Webb County Yes 95.2 (73.0, 122.8) 227 (193, 228) 14 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.3, -2.1)
Wharton County No 165.1 (145.4, 187.2) 128 (27, 201) 56 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Wheeler County No 187.0 (140.2, 247.8) 52 (2, 219) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Wichita County No 193.9 (182.7, 205.7) 37 (16, 97) 237 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.7, 0.5)
Wilbarger County No 167.0 (135.3, 205.3) 121 (10, 218) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Willacy County No 184.0 (109.1, 294.3) 62 (1, 228) 5
*
*
Williamson County No 137.0 (131.9, 142.2) 200 (175, 209) 567 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Wilson County No 151.0 (134.5, 169.2) 172 (69, 211) 64 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Winkler County No 160.9 (108.3, 232.9) 149 (3, 228) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.1)
Wise County No 194.0 (179.3, 209.7) 36 (13, 113) 137 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.3)
Wood County No 166.5 (152.3, 182.0) 122 (43, 186) 123 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Yoakum County No 195.3 (139.6, 270.0) 33 (1, 224) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.9)
Young County No 196.6 (171.3, 225.4) 30 (6, 168) 47 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Zapata County No 128.9 (71.5, 309.3) 211 (1, 228) 3 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.4)
Borden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duval County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Maverick County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Starr County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/16/2024 7:08 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top