Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Texas N/A No 155.1 (154.3, 156.0) N/A 26,691 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
United States 6 N/A No 151.3 (151.1, 151.5) N/A 463,400 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Cameron County Urban No 147.9 (134.8, 162.4) 186 (113, 213) 133 stable stable trend 10.1 (-0.9, 16.9)
Ector County Urban No 219.3 (202.8, 236.9) 17 (7, 68) 138 stable stable trend 7.5 (-0.2, 11.8)
Pecos County Rural No 229.7 (173.7, 300.5) 13 (1, 206) 12 rising rising trend 6.1 (1.4, 20.1)
Nueces County Urban No 172.5 (163.3, 182.2) 117 (67, 160) 281 rising rising trend 5.9 (0.7, 9.4)
Randall County Urban No 149.5 (140.4, 159.1) 182 (125, 204) 210 rising rising trend 5.1 (2.0, 8.5)
Wood County Rural No 189.9 (174.9, 206.2) 61 (24, 140) 143 stable stable trend 4.8 (-0.1, 12.5)
Real County Rural No 266.4 (192.7, 372.1) 5 (1, 177) 11 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.2, 19.2)
Hansford County Rural No 178.9 (129.2, 247.2) 94 (5, 224) 9 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.4, 19.4)
Smith County Urban No 158.5 (150.9, 166.4) 158 (107, 192) 355 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.9, 9.9)
Cherokee County Rural No 180.0 (163.2, 198.3) 84 (30, 173) 92 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.3, 10.1)
Lubbock County Urban No 159.6 (151.8, 167.6) 155 (101, 187) 334 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.9, 5.6)
Reagan County Rural No 276.0 (152.1, 476.0) 3 (1, 226) 3 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.8, 3.9)
Yoakum County Rural No 179.2 (123.0, 257.7) 92 (3, 225) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 2.6)
Crockett County Rural No 397.7 (258.4, 601.3) 1 (1, 185) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.3)
Coleman County Rural No 238.1 (199.2, 285.1) 9 (2, 108) 29 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.2)
Deaf Smith County Rural No 144.1 (108.8, 191.4) 193 (26, 225) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7)
Martin County Urban No 260.6 (184.5, 359.0) 6 (1, 202) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.1)
Trinity County Rural No 234.4 (204.0, 269.3) 12 (2, 79) 50 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.3)
Zapata County Rural No 131.0 (74.2, 315.7) 210 (1, 226) 3 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 2.5)
Hamilton County Rural No 214.2 (176.4, 259.4) 22 (3, 180) 28 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.0)
Polk County Rural No 270.6 (247.9, 294.8) 4 (1, 16) 135 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.9)
San Saba County Rural No 162.3 (125.0, 213.0) 149 (14, 223) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.4)
Crosby County Urban No 174.9 (119.0, 257.5) 105 (3, 226) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.2)
Fisher County Rural No 216.0 (152.2, 302.8) 20 (1, 221) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.5)
Kleberg County Rural No 236.5 (189.3, 292.6) 10 (1, 161) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.3)
Wheeler County Rural No 197.8 (148.3, 262.0) 40 (3, 219) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.1)
Nolan County Rural No 234.6 (198.1, 277.1) 11 (2, 117) 32 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Haskell County Rural No 185.5 (140.5, 245.0) 69 (4, 219) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.2)
Matagorda County Rural No 212.7 (188.3, 240.1) 25 (7, 116) 61 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Motley County Rural No 177.1 (91.7, 342.0) 97 (1, 226) 3 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.5, 2.1)
Baylor County Rural No 256.2 (193.6, 336.8) 7 (1, 159) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.1)
Blanco County Rural No 168.1 (141.8, 200.1) 130 (25, 213) 31 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 1.0)
Delta County Rural No 220.5 (171.6, 281.2) 16 (2, 197) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Hall County Rural Yes 121.3 (76.5, 205.4) 219 (15, 226) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.5)
Lamb County Rural No 151.4 (118.1, 194.1) 178 (23, 224) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Milam County Rural No 180.7 (158.4, 206.2) 82 (19, 194) 52 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Terry County Rural No 183.1 (140.1, 237.1) 77 (6, 220) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Wise County Urban No 192.4 (177.8, 208.0) 57 (21, 131) 137 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4)
Hill County Rural No 213.7 (194.2, 235.1) 23 (8, 91) 97 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
Jones County Urban No 183.9 (155.6, 216.7) 75 (13, 197) 32 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Knox County Rural No 174.5 (116.5, 259.5) 108 (3, 226) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 0.9)
Limestone County Rural No 179.5 (154.0, 208.9) 90 (18, 202) 43 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 4.7)
Mills County Rural No 199.4 (151.5, 262.7) 38 (3, 218) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Refugio County Rural No 210.1 (159.8, 278.8) 28 (2, 212) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Swisher County Rural No 182.2 (134.9, 245.3) 80 (5, 224) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Wilbarger County Rural No 187.2 (153.5, 227.7) 65 (7, 204) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Young County Rural No 218.3 (190.9, 249.3) 19 (6, 120) 50 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
Bosque County Urban No 206.6 (181.8, 234.8) 33 (7, 130) 59 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.1)
Calhoun County Rural No 187.9 (157.6, 224.0) 64 (9, 199) 32 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.5)
Crane County Rural No 244.4 (154.2, 375.4) 8 (1, 224) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.2)
DeWitt County Rural No 176.7 (151.8, 205.9) 100 (21, 199) 38 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Donley County Rural No 155.6 (106.9, 224.9) 165 (4, 226) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.1)
Franklin County Rural No 182.7 (149.4, 222.3) 78 (10, 211) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Freestone County Rural No 185.4 (159.7, 214.7) 70 (14, 193) 41 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Hale County Rural No 155.5 (130.6, 184.8) 166 (44, 220) 30 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Red River County Rural No 198.5 (167.0, 235.5) 39 (6, 191) 32 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Callahan County Urban No 161.1 (135.9, 190.4) 153 (29, 217) 31 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Clay County Urban No 164.1 (135.7, 197.9) 144 (25, 218) 26 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Floyd County Rural No 172.8 (117.7, 255.1) 115 (3, 226) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.0)
Gaines County Rural No 167.6 (131.7, 209.6) 131 (14, 222) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Hardeman County Rural No 154.2 (106.4, 223.4) 174 (7, 226) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 0.9)
Hockley County Urban No 189.3 (159.2, 224.5) 62 (9, 197) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.4)
Hutchinson County Rural No 174.6 (149.9, 202.8) 107 (19, 206) 39 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Lavaca County Rural No 169.7 (148.1, 194.4) 126 (32, 203) 49 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Lynn County Urban No 169.1 (117.0, 239.4) 127 (4, 225) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.1)
Madison County Rural No 213.1 (175.3, 257.6) 24 (3, 183) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Maverick County Urban No 204.8 (119.0, 329.1) 34 (1, 226) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.0)
Mitchell County Rural No 227.3 (175.8, 291.2) 14 (1, 195) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.7)
Parmer County Rural No 142.6 (104.1, 196.1) 196 (23, 226) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 0.9)
Runnels County Rural No 212.4 (174.5, 258.3) 26 (3, 182) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.7)
San Augustine County Rural No 179.9 (146.7, 221.8) 86 (10, 216) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
San Jacinto County Urban No 186.4 (165.4, 209.8) 67 (19, 175) 67 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Stonewall County Rural No 218.9 (117.0, 390.6) 18 (1, 226) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.4)
Throckmorton County Rural No 132.6 (79.6, 228.7) 208 (9, 226) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.6)
Childress County Rural No 201.1 (151.5, 264.0) 36 (2, 218) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.5)
Gray County Rural No 177.8 (152.9, 206.2) 96 (18, 201) 39 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Morris County Rural No 206.8 (172.7, 247.1) 32 (5, 177) 29 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Newton County Rural No 188.4 (156.7, 225.6) 63 (10, 201) 29 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Shelby County Rural No 208.2 (182.5, 237.2) 30 (7, 140) 50 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Atascosa County Urban No 180.0 (156.7, 206.3) 85 (19, 196) 45 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Coryell County Urban No 194.6 (177.7, 212.7) 49 (16, 128) 100 falling falling trend -0.6 (-4.1, -0.2)
Fannin County Rural No 197.2 (178.7, 217.5) 42 (14, 134) 87 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Gonzales County Rural No 184.9 (154.4, 221.4) 71 (8, 201) 29 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Grayson County Urban No 184.0 (174.4, 194.0) 74 (44, 133) 293 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Hunt County Urban No 179.8 (168.1, 192.1) 88 (45, 148) 187 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
McCulloch County Rural No 215.9 (173.0, 269.1) 21 (2, 191) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Nacogdoches County Rural No 177.1 (161.1, 194.3) 98 (33, 176) 98 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Panola County Rural No 184.0 (160.8, 210.2) 73 (18, 185) 48 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Wichita County Urban No 197.0 (185.4, 209.1) 43 (23, 98) 232 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.3)
Wilson County Urban No 163.1 (145.8, 182.1) 148 (51, 204) 68 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.2)
Andrews County Rural No 195.0 (155.2, 242.5) 48 (5, 212) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Brown County Rural No 179.0 (161.5, 198.2) 93 (29, 177) 85 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Camp County Rural No 202.7 (166.0, 246.5) 35 (5, 197) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Cass County Rural No 193.1 (173.2, 215.2) 54 (17, 149) 73 falling falling trend -0.7 (-2.3, -0.1)
Collingsworth County Rural No 165.6 (99.1, 268.8) 140 (2, 226) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.5)
Concho County Rural No 144.0 (88.2, 236.9) 194 (5, 226) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Cooke County Rural No 173.5 (157.3, 191.3) 113 (38, 185) 90 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Eastland County Rural No 196.1 (170.5, 225.2) 45 (9, 174) 48 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Karnes County Rural No 165.8 (129.9, 211.5) 138 (12, 223) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Kimble County Rural No 194.1 (142.3, 264.3) 50 (2, 220) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Lee County Rural No 168.4 (142.2, 199.1) 128 (24, 215) 32 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Leon County Rural No 195.8 (169.2, 226.5) 47 (9, 174) 44 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Lipscomb County Rural No 160.2 (102.7, 248.0) 154 (3, 226) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.0)
Moore County Rural No 153.1 (121.1, 192.5) 176 (26, 224) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Navarro County Rural No 173.6 (156.9, 191.9) 112 (38, 186) 86 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Stephens County Rural No 191.8 (155.7, 235.5) 58 (7, 207) 22 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Bowie County Urban No 182.2 (169.7, 195.5) 79 (37, 149) 165 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Colorado County Rural No 165.8 (141.3, 194.6) 139 (32, 207) 40 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Henderson County Rural No 194.1 (182.2, 206.7) 51 (24, 112) 221 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Howard County Rural No 176.5 (152.6, 203.4) 101 (20, 201) 41 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Jack County Rural No 187.1 (150.6, 231.2) 66 (6, 212) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Jasper County Rural No 197.5 (177.4, 219.5) 41 (14, 142) 78 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Jim Wells County Rural No 208.9 (169.8, 255.4) 29 (3, 190) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Johnson County Urban No 176.0 (166.9, 185.6) 102 (58, 147) 292 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Lamar County Rural No 193.4 (177.4, 210.7) 53 (18, 129) 115 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Lampasas County Urban No 200.1 (175.8, 227.6) 37 (9, 149) 52 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Live Oak County Rural No 170.0 (133.3, 215.7) 124 (9, 222) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Marion County Rural No 145.4 (117.3, 180.6) 191 (40, 224) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Palo Pinto County Rural No 197.0 (176.1, 220.0) 44 (13, 141) 71 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Reeves County Rural No 147.4 (90.5, 229.2) 188 (5, 226) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.5)
Rusk County Urban No 173.8 (157.6, 191.4) 111 (41, 187) 89 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Taylor County Urban No 167.5 (157.0, 178.5) 134 (74, 177) 205 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Aransas County Urban No 191.1 (167.4, 218.2) 59 (13, 176) 65 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Bandera County Urban No 165.0 (145.1, 187.9) 142 (38, 204) 58 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Dickens County Rural No 190.2 (112.8, 320.0) 60 (1, 226) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 0.6)
El Paso County Urban No 156.7 (147.4, 166.4) 160 (111, 194) 222 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 2.6)
Erath County Rural No 155.7 (138.5, 174.7) 163 (66, 212) 63 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Falls County Urban No 180.3 (151.2, 215.0) 83 (13, 205) 29 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Jackson County Rural No 149.8 (123.9, 180.9) 181 (46, 223) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Medina County Urban No 161.1 (142.8, 181.6) 152 (50, 206) 61 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Midland County Urban No 142.2 (131.2, 154.0) 197 (137, 216) 133 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Robertson County Urban No 182.0 (152.5, 216.6) 81 (13, 204) 31 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
San Patricio County Urban No 193.6 (174.2, 214.8) 52 (14, 150) 77 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Scurry County Rural No 174.1 (144.3, 209.5) 109 (15, 215) 25 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.3)
Upshur County Urban No 183.9 (166.7, 202.5) 76 (24, 159) 90 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Van Zandt County Rural No 174.9 (161.8, 189.1) 104 (47, 177) 140 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Austin County Urban No 149.1 (130.4, 170.5) 183 (72, 219) 52 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Brewster County Rural No 128.9 (94.8, 175.3) 213 (42, 226) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Castro County Rural No 165.5 (106.8, 249.7) 141 (3, 226) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.3)
Comal County Urban No 151.7 (143.4, 160.5) 177 (127, 199) 266 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.5)
Comanche County Rural No 154.9 (128.1, 187.2) 170 (35, 221) 29 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Dawson County Rural No 148.7 (109.9, 199.4) 184 (16, 225) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.2)
Guadalupe County Urban No 155.4 (145.5, 165.9) 168 (109, 197) 190 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Hopkins County Rural No 172.2 (154.7, 191.5) 118 (38, 191) 74 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Kerr County Rural No 158.2 (145.0, 172.6) 159 (83, 200) 137 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.5)
Kinney County Rural No 162.0 (102.7, 287.3) 150 (2, 226) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
Llano County Rural No 161.6 (142.0, 184.3) 151 (50, 210) 74 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Montague County Rural No 175.4 (154.3, 199.1) 103 (26, 197) 54 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Orange County Urban No 184.3 (171.6, 197.7) 72 (31, 150) 165 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Parker County Urban No 167.6 (158.6, 177.0) 132 (80, 177) 273 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Rains County Rural No 166.0 (140.6, 195.9) 136 (27, 214) 33 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Sabine County Rural No 172.7 (144.4, 206.7) 116 (17, 215) 32 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Titus County Rural No 179.6 (154.8, 208.0) 89 (20, 198) 42 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Tom Green County Urban No 155.5 (144.2, 167.5) 167 (108, 201) 152 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Tyler County Rural No 168.2 (146.6, 192.7) 129 (34, 209) 48 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Uvalde County Rural No 196.0 (161.5, 237.9) 46 (5, 199) 26 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Waller County Urban No 166.0 (146.2, 187.9) 137 (35, 206) 54 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Burleson County Urban No 177.0 (151.6, 206.5) 99 (17, 203) 39 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Carson County Urban No 156.0 (117.4, 205.0) 161 (17, 225) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Ellis County Urban No 167.3 (157.8, 177.3) 135 (74, 174) 243 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Garza County Urban No 170.9 (118.0, 246.4) 121 (5, 226) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Gregg County Urban No 171.9 (160.8, 183.6) 120 (59, 171) 191 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.9)
Grimes County Rural No 153.8 (134.0, 176.3) 175 (59, 217) 47 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Hidalgo County Urban Yes 120.1 (109.9, 131.2) 220 (194, 224) 154 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Houston County Rural No 163.8 (142.1, 189.0) 145 (38, 211) 45 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Kaufman County Urban No 185.7 (173.8, 198.3) 68 (32, 132) 191 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Potter County Urban No 179.8 (166.7, 193.8) 87 (40, 152) 150 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Wharton County Rural No 163.5 (143.7, 185.7) 147 (49, 205) 55 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Angelina County Rural No 164.5 (151.8, 178.1) 143 (65, 192) 132 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Archer County Urban No 125.9 (99.6, 158.4) 217 (98, 226) 16 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Bastrop County Urban No 159.4 (146.8, 173.1) 157 (86, 199) 130 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Bee County Rural No 172.0 (141.7, 207.9) 119 (16, 216) 23 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Bell County Urban No 170.1 (162.2, 178.3) 123 (75, 159) 358 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Brazoria County Urban No 174.8 (167.0, 183.0) 106 (66, 144) 390 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Coke County Rural No 192.6 (140.3, 265.7) 55 (3, 222) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Fayette County Rural No 137.0 (119.0, 157.9) 204 (111, 223) 52 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Frio County Rural No 179.3 (122.6, 256.7) 91 (2, 225) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.0)
Galveston County Urban No 167.5 (160.5, 174.7) 133 (87, 162) 459 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
Hays County Urban No 143.6 (134.7, 152.9) 195 (144, 210) 210 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Jefferson County Urban No 154.9 (146.2, 164.1) 171 (111, 197) 254 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
Liberty County Urban No 207.4 (192.2, 223.7) 31 (12, 92) 145 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Mason County Rural No 178.3 (126.7, 250.7) 95 (3, 224) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Tarrant County Urban No 154.7 (151.6, 157.9) 173 (141, 182) 2,000 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
Victoria County Urban No 150.3 (136.9, 164.9) 180 (106, 211) 101 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Bailey County Rural Yes 102.3 (66.4, 160.3) 225 (96, 226) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.1)
Bexar County Urban No 155.2 (151.2, 159.3) 169 (136, 183) 1,192 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Caldwell County Urban No 170.1 (149.3, 193.7) 122 (28, 201) 52 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Chambers County Urban No 173.8 (153.8, 195.7) 110 (30, 194) 58 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Dallam County Rural No 172.9 (118.9, 243.6) 114 (4, 225) 7 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.7, -0.1)
Dallas County Urban No 150.8 (147.5, 154.1) 179 (153, 191) 1,691 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
Gillespie County Rural No 129.3 (113.5, 147.6) 212 (149, 223) 65 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Sutton County Rural No 192.5 (108.7, 330.0) 56 (1, 226) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 0.8)
Ward County Rural No 148.2 (107.2, 201.3) 185 (13, 226) 9 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.3)
Washington County Rural No 133.3 (118.2, 150.4) 207 (149, 223) 64 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Anderson County Rural No 211.8 (194.0, 231.0) 27 (8, 86) 110 falling falling trend -1.4 (-6.1, -0.8)
Burnet County Rural No 154.9 (141.5, 169.6) 172 (85, 204) 112 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Rockwall County Urban No 138.9 (127.9, 150.7) 202 (144, 218) 122 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.8)
Fort Bend County Urban No 130.9 (125.1, 136.8) 211 (186, 219) 411 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Williamson County Urban No 132.3 (127.5, 137.2) 209 (187, 216) 601 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Collin County Urban No 128.1 (124.2, 132.0) 214 (196, 219) 880 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Harris County Urban No 146.6 (144.1, 149.1) 189 (165, 197) 2,756 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.4)
Kendall County Urban No 135.1 (121.1, 150.6) 206 (137, 222) 75 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
McLennan County Urban No 159.5 (151.7, 167.6) 156 (106, 187) 338 falling falling trend -1.6 (-4.9, -1.1)
Montgomery County Urban No 147.7 (143.0, 152.6) 187 (155, 200) 780 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Ochiltree County Rural Yes 114.3 (81.1, 159.5) 223 (96, 226) 8 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Somervell County Rural No 155.7 (125.4, 192.7) 164 (24, 223) 19 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Walker County Rural No 140.9 (127.5, 155.5) 200 (136, 218) 84 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Brazos County Urban No 126.7 (117.9, 136.0) 215 (187, 223) 159 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Hartley County Rural Yes 110.9 (75.3, 160.8) 224 (83, 226) 7 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Hood County Rural No 155.8 (144.3, 168.3) 162 (96, 199) 156 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Menard County Rural No 135.3 (85.2, 241.4) 205 (9, 226) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.2)
Travis County Urban No 123.5 (119.7, 127.4) 218 (200, 222) 847 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.9, -1.6)
Hardin County Urban No 163.7 (149.9, 178.5) 146 (66, 195) 108 falling falling trend -1.9 (-5.0, -1.4)
Val Verde County Rural No 146.1 (114.3, 185.5) 190 (33, 225) 15 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.9)
Denton County Urban No 126.3 (122.2, 130.5) 216 (196, 220) 749 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.9)
Harrison County Urban No 145.2 (132.2, 159.3) 192 (124, 215) 96 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.5)
Shackelford County Rural No 137.2 (90.4, 204.3) 203 (11, 226) 6 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.8)
Webb County Urban Yes 86.1 (65.6, 112.1) 226 (204, 226) 13 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.4, -2.1)
Winkler County Rural No 169.8 (116.4, 243.4) 125 (3, 226) 7 falling falling trend -3.2 (-17.2, -0.7)
Goliad County Urban No 142.2 (105.4, 191.6) 198 (26, 226) 12 falling falling trend -19.7 (-32.4, -12.7)
Armstrong County Urban No 141.7 (82.8, 235.3) 199 (6, 226) 4
*
*
Cochran County Urban No 225.4 (124.5, 391.5) 15 (1, 226) 4
*
*
Hemphill County Rural No 139.8 (80.8, 228.4) 201 (4, 226) 4
*
*
Jeff Davis County Rural Yes 118.5 (65.9, 339.9) 221 (1, 226) 4
*
*
Oldham County Urban No 295.6 (180.1, 460.0) 2 (1, 224) 4
*
*
Willacy County Rural Yes 116.3 (65.1, 204.2) 222 (11, 226) 4
*
*
Borden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duval County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Starr County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/13/2024 8:05 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top